Economic “Fallout”-Don’t Take Your KI Just Yet

Nukes scare people. The before and after satellite photos of Friday’s earthquake in Japan showed over the weekend that the resulting tsunami had sheared off and washed away whole sections of the country’s economy. But it was the threat of a nuclear meltdown that sent global markets plunging Tuesday. US investors drove the Dow down nearly 300 points before it crawled back to close down 137.

The areas of greatest concern were: diminished global growth and a threat to the recovery resulting from a sudden drop in Japanese demand; the impact on U.S treasury bonds, of which Japan is the third largest holder; a downturn in the nuclear industry in which the US is a big player; supply chain disruption for products like semiconductors affecting US manufacturers like Apple and Hewlett Packard; and the overall effect on US imports and exports.

It is difficult to disaggregate elements of the Japanese economy from the rest of the world. But by and large it looks as if the markets everywhere overreacted Tuesday, including in the US. There are potential real effects from the Japanese crisis but the biggest sources of damage to the US economy seem to be offset either by the peculiarities of the Japanese economy or by global capacity to adjust to disruptions.

On the macro level, Japan represents roughly 5% of the US export market. A large drop in that country’s consumption would have a limited effect on U.S. export levels. Japan has not been contributing much to global growth, so a drop there will not necessarily slow the rest of the world.

Most of Japan’s treasury holdings are in the private sector, with companies, banks and pension funds doing the most buying and selling of US Treasury bonds. Insurance companies are expected to have to cash in holdings, but pension funds seeking yields may make up the difference as they seek safe haven in the US.

It is unclear what effect the nuclear meltdown will have on US players in that field but it’s unlikely to be good. GE quickly put out a statement saying less than 1% of its earnings comes from nuclear. But clearly it and other players will suffer as new precautions and slower approval of new plants ensues. Demand for US natural gas, which has been beaten down in price amid a glut of new sources, is likely to rise.

Japan’s electrical grid may be affected and several factories that supply semiconductors and other high-tech products said they expected to offline or operating at diminished levels for weeks or months. However, the US may be able to pick up some of that demand for itself.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • http://tisias.wordpress.com tisias

    I would argue that the US would only be able to take this opportunity with the leadership in Congress and the White House being able to recognize and work together in grabbing a chance to improve American exports.

    But the way things seem right now, from the bickering in Congress and the current trend of globalization, it looks like most of those jobs will go to China.

  • afguy

    Problem is… how many of our exports rely on THEIR exports (e.g. semiconductors)?
    .
    From “Armageddon” – “American components…Russian components… ALL MADE IN TAIWAN!”

  • http://tisias.wordpress.com tisias

    haha you’ve been watching too much fx
    .
    I will play the devil’s advocate a bit, while china is mass producing many things americans used to make, the us and japan and some european countries are figuratively “at the top of the food chain” in the realm of producing certain goods. Like how ipads are all made of chinese components, but are assembled more in the US.

  • afguy

    But you see the point.
    .
    Indonesia (or Taiwan, or Singapore) makes the chips that the Japanese need to make the memory boards, that WE need to assemble the end item that we sell as “American-made”.
    .
    God, it makes my head hurt to even consider the mental gymnastics needed to makes some of the claims we do…

blog comments powered by Disqus