Congress Weighs Counter-Piracy

Members of the House’s Subcommittee on the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation, bless them, aren’t humorless. They gathered Tuesday to address the U.S. response to piracy, and as ranking Democrat Rep. Rick Larsen gave his opening statement, he quipped: “It’s clear that today’s pirate is no Jack Sparrow.”

He also, as others did, remembered the American victims and captives of pirates over the past few years — a thought that will quickly wipe the smile off one’s face. Hanging particularly thick over the hearing was the death of four leisure yachters on Feb. 22, who had taken the sea vessel Quest into pirate territory about 200 miles off the Oman coast.

A few basics were at the heart of the discussion (for those who need a primer): Today’s pirates largely come from Somalia, an East African country that borders the narrow Gulf of Aden, which in turn leads on to the Suez Canal, Europe and so on. And the main business of today’s pirates is kidnapping and ransoming — a field that has taken in between $75 and $85 million since Jan. 2010, according to the Department of Defense. For a country like Somalia, where the GDP per capita is $600, people will undergo plenty of risk for that kind of money.

During the hearing, a common concern amongst the five or so congressmen assembled was that pirates are linking up with terrorists groups. But just about every witness, including envoys from the Coast Guard, Dept. of Defense, State Dept. and Government Accountability Office, reiterated that there’s no intelligence to really back that up. Witnesses also pointed out that pirates and what Americans might traditionally think of as terrorist groups have a fundamental difference: The kidnap-and-ransom game appears to be the only one pirates are playing, which means simple money, rather than complex ideology, is at the heart of their motivation.

In terms of more substantiated worries, witness William Weschler, who works on global threats for the DoD, gave a good rundown of the current problems in curbing the increase in piracy:

–Somalia is poor and unstable — Rep. Andy Harris took the harder line of saying they have “no government” — and its stability is key.

–The geographic area that pirates appear to be roaming these days is vast, about the size of the contiguous U.S., and all the navies of all the world put together can’t effectively patrol that much high sea — according to the DoD — especially without better intelligence than they currently have. Meanwhile, the number of overall attacks is on the rise. According to Weschler’s testimony, Somali pirates are currently holding 28 vessels and 600 crew members from various countries hostage.

–The prosecution of pirates is difficult. Jurisdiction is tricky, and stakeholder countries are often unwilling or unable to put them through their court systems. Out of an estimated 800 who have been turned over for prosecution, no witness could say how many had actually been prosecuted when grilled by Larsen. The closest they got to an answer was “very few.” (The subcommittee chairman, Rep. Frank LoBiondo, called this the “catch and release” status quo, which seemed suitably nautical.)

The reason more than 30 countries now have counter-piracy operations and are plagued by these problems is two-fold. There is, of course, safety. But there’s also billions of dollars in the international economy — lost when pirates get in the way or spent in taking the enormous 4900-mile loop around the cape of Africa to avoid them. The congressmen and witnesses presented money as a vital part of the current solution too, in getting people not to pay the ransoms that continue to fund operations and in finding the “pirate kingpins” who fund the operations at the outset. The latter, all seemed to agree, would need to be done via dry land.

LoBiond0 lost his temper at one point, after a lot of talk about future talk (instead of action). “What will it take for us to finally say we’re not going to try to hold hands and serve more milk and cookies?!” he said. “There has to be a breaking point for the U.S. to say we’ve had enough and do something about this.” But none of the witnesses could provide estimates of how much the U.S. is currently spending on counter-piracy operations, and it seems the proponents of the program may struggle to get more, whatever the amount, given how far from home the problem seems and, literally, is.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • nflfoghorn

    When will leisure boaters learn to stay away from that part of Africa?

  • gysgt213

    “a field that has taken in between $75 and $85 million since Jan. 2010″.
    .
    Extend the Bush tax cuts?

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Fudamental difference.
    .
    Terrorists- wharped murderous ideologs.
    .
    Pirates- murderous theives.
    .
    Fudamental similarity. They’re both muslim.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Katy. Any word on how willing / not the R’s / TP’s in Congress are to fund anti-piracy operations, given their cut-everything moods? Except defense, of course. If they claim to represent biz interests – which they do, obviously (whether they represent anyone else’s interests is another matter, but I digress) – they’d want to protect private shipping …and their sponsors. Exxon and friends have a lot of tankers going thru there heading for the Suez Canal. I wonder how much the Koch’s Galactic Empire subsidiaries ship that way too (do you know, Katy?). Thanks for your reporting and your thoughts.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    digressing again, buttsniffer?

  • shepherdwong

    The prosecution of pirates is difficult.
    .
    Seems as though you’ve discussed every option except for option “c”: start blowing their mother ships out of the water (and, yes, I know that there’s the threat against hundreds of captives in the pirates’ hands). Is anyone discussing the possibility of calling their bluff with a couple of Tomahawks?

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Excellent idea but we’d better clear it with the UN first. Wouldn’t want to damage our image in that part of the world.

  • shepherdwong

    I’m afraid that ship has sailed, so to speak.
    .
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/UN/usvetoes.html

  • gysgt213

    Hee!

  • Paul-no not that one

    “During the hearing, a common concern amongst the five or so congressmen assembled was that pirates are linking up with terrorists groups. But just about every witness, including envoys from the Coast Guard, Dept. of Defense, State Dept. and Government Accountability Office, reiterated that there’s no intelligence to really back that up.”
    .
    Thank you for that. I have read that conflation more than once.
    .
    You can’t solve a problem until you really understand the problem.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    It sounds like some of our elected officials are inventing problems that are not there. A common habit of those in DC. When are those people going to stop with the constant attempts to invent threats and actually deal with reality?

  • hippooath

    Right, because I assume the Somailians are doing it because their religion makes them do it.
    .
    Brilliant.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Nice to see you’re finally getting it.

  • kbanginmotown

    Is any thread safe from drive-bys today? Sheesh.

  • abdullah69

    Like the abuses at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, the Persian Gulf and elsewhere occur because the perpetrators are Christian.

  • http://worldsecurityservices.wordpress.com worldsecurityservices

    Their was some funding, but the republicans (and some of the democrats) have pulled that funding away. Republicans to somewhat to give some concessions for getting a foot hold back into congress and the democrats cause they are scared of losing their jobs. None of them care aout their constituents, just what they each can get into their own pockets.
    (Erieangel) Invent? How right you are. Using the Terrorist tactic to get money, and as the reublican side has shown to get money for their buddies using the terrorist scenario. Has worked for 10 years.
    As far the many of the ship owners, they hire companies (shipping management companies) to run their ships, including the security. I spoke with one in-particular management company not long ago, and WOW…open face lie.
    I quote “Since September 11, 2001 we have taken security for our ships as tp priority. It costs us under $200,000 a year fo armed security for the vessels we manage. This company just had an oil tanker hi-jacked and I think someone forgot to tell this guy.
    The bottom line is it will take more like a min$1.25 million to protect a vessel full year, and using armed security, very few are cause they are scared of getting busted for arms smuggling.
    The security that is out their right now isn’t much better than the pirates. Example is of the Danish couple that was taken hostage with their children and crew members. Two danish yachts with a couple, children same age, and a small crew in the arabian sea at the same time were attacked by pirates. One yacht was purportedly saved by a private contractor with a falling apart WWII destroyer. The other family is now hostages in Somalia. So here is a group of mercks using the story of a family taken hostage and making up another family (everything same place same location same time frame just rename the yacht) to make a name for them selves and to try and get some quick action. In aspect they are no better than the POS pirates in the region.
    Sounds like a few members of congress and from a few parlaments around the globe.

  • http://worldsecurityservices.wordpress.com worldsecurityservices

    Oh, and my internet savvy isn’t the greatest, but the name of the boat that was used that the mercks were to have rescued, has been sitting in dry dock and for sale since Jan. Interesting in deed and the world media fell for it.
    I am sure got them some business somewhere.\
    I think they were taking lessons from the US Congress and the New group of morons that they call the Tea Party.
    By no means am I anti-government, but I am anti-moron and believe me we got alot of them in this country. Another reson we are so hated in this world and have to watch a damn backs when we visit another country (our lovely congress for the last 20 years).

blog comments powered by Disqus