Raymond Davis Case Tests U.S.-Pakistan Intelligence Ties

By TIME contributor Mark Benjamin

The first details of a possible deal to spring Raymond Davis from Pakistan surfaced late last week, providing a potential boost for the CIA in what has become a public relations disaster for the agency that at times has seemed like it just couldn’t get much worse. Davis is the agency operative accused of shooting to death two Pakistanis in broad daylight on a street in the center of Lahore last month.

If the deal comes together, the Pakistanis would hand over Davis to the United States. The U.S. government would, in turn, announce an investigation into the incident and financially compensate families of the victims, according to a report in Foreign Policy. (The widow of one of the deceased in the Davis saga would not receive compensation, since she reportedly committed suicide by swallowing rat poison after her husband’s death.)

This sort of transaction would avert a murder trial, an obvious catastrophe for the CIA, and would save the Pakistanis the humiliation of releasing Davis outright despite the deaths of Pakistanis on the streets of Lahore.

The details emerged following a meeting in Oman last week between top Pakistani military officers and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. David Petraeus, who is the top American commander in Afghanistan, and a laundry list of other American military officials.

Whether or not the deal to release Davis comes together, close observers of the relationship between the United States and Pakistan say the Davis incident has severely – and perhaps irrevocably – wounded rapport between the two countries.

“The damage is done no matter what the outcome is,” Moeed Yusuf, the South Asia Adviser at the United States Institute of Peace, told TIME from Djibouti. “I think this is much more serious than what people are making it out to be,” he added. “This will not rupture the relationship, but relations are going to be much more tense because there is no trust.”

The rift is particularly acute between the CIA and the agency’s Pakistani counterpart, the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The cost to American interests are potentially very high because the CIA heavily relies on the ISI in the U.S. anti-terrorism mission in the region. Pakistan also has the world’s fastest-growing nuclear arsenal.

The ISI is angry, and their operatives went so far as to leak to The Associated Press last Wednesday a statement that the agency’s actions had “put the partnership into question.”

“It’s hard to predict if the relationship will ever reach the level at which it was prior to the Davis episode,” the ISI railed.

At least on the record, the CIA has been much more urbane in its statements about the ISI. “The CIA works closely with our Pakistani counterparts on a wide range of security challenges, including our common fight against al-Qaeda and its terrorist allies,” the agency’s George Little wrote in a statement sent to TIME. “The agency’s ties to ISI have been strong over the years, and when there are issues to sort out, we work through them. That’s the sign of a healthy partnership.”

The considerably harsher tone from the ISI is understandable, since the American side of the Davis story has been spectacularly bungled from the start. Most accounts suggest that the shooting on the street was a horrendously botched affair from the outset. Information leaked from the Pakistanis alleges that Davis shot the two victims in the back, engaging them with a Glock pistol and shooting through his windshield. Both of Davis’ victims were reportedly armed. Davis then got out of his car, fired more shots, and apparently photographed the body of at least one of the men.

Davis then called the U.S. Consulate in Lahore for an extraction, but the unmarked Toyota Land Cruiser that sped to the scene to retrieve him raced the wrong way down a one-way street, striking and killing another Pakistani on a motorcycle. A Lahore Police Department crime report says that while the SUV retreated to the consulate, 100 bullets and a black mask fell out of the vehicle. The Americans in the SUV were quickly whisked out of the country before Pakistani officials could question them.

The whole story took on a cartoon-like quality when Obama administration officials publicly insisted that Davis was a diplomat days after reports showed that the 36-year-old retired Special Forces soldier was traveling in Lahore with a Glock, a miniature telescope, a long-range wireless set and a headlamp. Those officials gave up that charade last Tuesday and admitted Davis worked for the CIA. Pakistani officials suspect he is part of a large American clandestine network in their country.

The relationship between the ISI and the CIA was already tense. American officials suspect the ISI may have played a role in publicly revealing the identity of the agency’s top clandestine officer in the country in December, forcing his removal him from Pakistan. The Davis debacle has done further damage; the only question is how much. Yusuf, from the Institute of Peace, says a dysfunctional relationship just got much worse, noting that, “Neither side has learned how to handle public relations with the other.”

Related Topics: National Security
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • fhmadvocat

    While the deaths caused by Raymond Davis are regrettable, who are we kidding? How many deaths of Americans, our allies and innocent Afghanis has the ISI been responsible. They still support the Taliban and are the biggest obstacle to our war against Al-Qaida in Afghanistan. They seem more worried about Indianian influence with Karzi than in solving the Afghan problem. And consider that we are taking out the Pakistani Taliban (whom ISI considers a problem), you would expect more help.

    Ironically, the CIA can’t help themselves. If we want a diplomatic solution, we can agree to send the FBI to investigate and if the shooting was illegal, charge Davis with a crime and put him on trial under a U.S. court.

  • gysgt213

    If anyone wants to understand what Glenn is always going on about with todays media need not look in further then this post.
    .
    In case you didn’t know almost all major American news oulets knew this guy was with the CIA, but withheld that information from the public at the behest of the current administration. Now comes a story about a deal which if is not finalized should be in theory secret too. But some how now the administration makes sure this story about a proposed deal gets out.

  • afguy

    Here’s the problem:
    .
    Blackwater in Iraq. No punishment and they continue to operate there as security for our State Department.
    .
    Why would anyone in Pakistan expect the “investigation” to come to any other conclusion except “self-defense”?
    .
    Those weren’t Americans killed – they were “brown people” – they don’t really count.

  • swissArmyBrainBETA

    “…avoid humiliation of releasing Davis outright despite the deaths of Pakistanis”
    .
    ha. not a chance! throwing some $ around and promising an internal investigation?! haha please. there will have to be serious behind-the-scenenes coercion to get this guy out of there for trial. he’s not worth it. U.S. already tried to claim diplomatic immunity so no chance whatsoever ppl there are going to believe he will be brought to justice outside pakistan. there probably never was. greenwald’s title for his first (?) post on this was perfect: “this week in ‘winning hearts and minds…’”

  • afguy

    “…avoid humiliation of releasing Davis outright despite the deaths of Pakistanis”
    .
    Exactly WHAT were you smoking, Mark, when you dreamed THAT up as a serious solution?
    .
    Must have been some “righteous” sh!t…

  • libssd

    In case you didn’t know almost all major American news oulets knew this guy was with the CIA, but withheld that information from the public at the behest of the current administration.
    .
    Anybody with a clue about the CIA knows that they embed agents in embassies and consulates, and knew from the instant the instant this story hit the wires that Davis was probably a spook. This is hardly a “mainstream media” conspiracy.

  • http://tisias.wordpress.com tisias

    even stupider than the CIA agent who was improperly extracted in a high risk high priority country is the Administration officials who spew crap out before getting the go ahead from their superiors

  • pintortwo

    Can we all acknowledge that we are not building bases in Afghanistan in order to stabilize Pakistan. The WOT has created a lot of animosity toward the US in Pakistan. We build bases because we want to police the region.

  • afguy

    Shhhh!!!
    .
    That’s supposed to be a “secret”…

  • jlbrumb

    If the depiction of the shooting is valid, he is a dumb as a rock, let him hang.

    If you are going to play cowboys and “pakis”, you’d need better cowboys than this!

  • afguy

    You know, they might at that…
    .
    The PUBLIC announcement would be that “justice has been served”. Privately, the message to the other “spooks” would be “If you’re stupid enough to get caught by the locals, we’ll hang you out to dry… DON’T GET CAUGHT.”
    .
    Them learn any “morality” lesson in all of this?
    .
    Pfffft!!!

blog comments powered by Disqus