David Wu Apologizes for the Part of the Story No One Cared About

Perhaps confused by the Christopher Lee photo episode a few weeks ago, Rep. David Wu apologized yesterday on “Good Morning America” for emailing staff Halloween pictures of him dressed as a tiger last fall. Unless it’s a very different tiger suit than the kind I’m imagining (or unless he was dressed not as a tiger, but as Tiger), it doesn’t seem like that was the thing he needed to address on national television.

Because setting aside the Halloween pictures, there’s still the matter of:

Next to all that, apologizing for the Halloween photos is like your teenage son throwing an out-of-control bash that culminates in a Snickers-and-deep-fryer incident that burns down the house, and then apologizing for not watering the plants while you were gone.

UPDATE: And now an Oregon newspaper is calling for Wu to resign.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • apr2563

    Sounds like he has some real mental difficulties he is trying to deal with. What makes this post newsworthy?
    Where was the “news”? Obviously this has all been reported before.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Religion is AS’s specialty and yet she can’t keep herself away from the most sordid stories.
    .
    AS loved her some John Edwards.
    .
    Having read about Wu before, and assuming it is accurate, it seems he needs professional help. And perhaps a new job.

  • stewartiii

    NewsBusters| Name That Party: Erratic Rep. David Wu’s Party Registration Unnoted by TIME’s Sullivan
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2011/02/23/name-party-erratic-rep-david-wus-party-registration-unnoted-times-sull

  • CP in FL

    Yes, he is a member of the Democratic Party. We have our nut jobs on our side of the aisle as well. The difference is, when we find out these people are nut jobs, we generally agree that they need to go. Republican’s usually defend their nut jobs under any circumstances.

    I don’t really see any conspiracy by Amy or Time not to include Wu’s party affiliation. Amy was probably just too tired from her bible studies and such.

blog comments powered by Disqus