Boehner & McConnell’s Secret Plan to Avert a Shutdown

House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell have been working behind the scenes to draft a two-week stopgap measure to avert a government shutdown that would include $4 billion in immediate cuts, according to House and Senate GOP aides.

The House would move first – the Rules Committee could meet as early as Monday. Boehner is hoping to pass the bill by Wednesday. Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have been in discussions but if a deal is not reached ahead of time Senate Republicans would offer Boehner’s proposal as a substitute to Reid’s bill. The cuts will include reductions that President Obama has suggested and other non-controversial items in the hopes of luring support from moderate Senate Democrats who are facing tough reelections. No details were immediately available on what cuts Boehner and McConnell are looking at. “Senator Reid’s position that they will force a government shutdown rather than cut one penny in spending is indefensible – and it will be very hard for them to oppose a reasonable short-term funding measure that will cut spending,” says a House GOP aide. If nothing is done by March 4 the government will shutdown.

Reid’s office said Wednesday he still plans to move forward with a 30-day spending freeze at current levels. The House on Saturday passed a bill funding the government through the end of the fiscal year. But that bill slashes funding by $100 billion — cuts that are not likely to survive the Democratically-controlled Senate. The Senate has proposed cutting $41 billion from Obama’s 2011 request, but that translates into funding the government at roughly the same level it’s at right now. “While Republicans are making a genuine effort to cut spending and debt, Washington Democrats can’t seem to find a single dime of federal spending to cut, insisting on the status quo, even for a short-term spending bill,” McConnell said Wednesday in a statement to TIME. “But keeping bloated spending levels in place is simply unacceptable. So it is our hope that Democrats will join us in a bill that actually reduces Washington spending.” Both sides agree that more time is needed to negotiate a compromise and Boehner has said he will not allow even a temporary extension without some cuts.

The competing bills amount to a game of chicken between the Republican-controlled House and the Democrat-controlled Senate. Both sides claim they are trying to avoid a shutdown, but if one happens both are laying the ground work to blame the other. While both Parties say they want cuts, Republicans want immediate results while Democrats have been taking more of a “scapel” rather than a “meat axe” approach, as Reid put it yesterday on a call with reporters.

The calendar is working against Reid. If he introduces legislation on Monday when the Senate comes back into session the earliest he can get the measure onto the Senate calendar is Wednesday, given the Senate rules. With the likelihood that at least one senator will object to Reid’s bill, it would take until at least Saturday to pass Reid’s measure and government funding expires that Friday.

Republicans are banking on support from Senate Democrats who have publically indicated a willingness to cut above and beyond current spending levels. “My Party, honestly, is in denial about how severe the problem is,” Senator Claire McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat who is up for reelection this cycle said last month. “They think we can just nibble around the edges.” McCaskill has co-authored legislation with Republican Jeff Sessions to cut deeper than what Obama proposed in January. She is one of nine Democratic senators who have said the cuts on the table in the Senate do not go far enough. Democrats hold 23 of the 33 Senate seats up in 2012, some of them in Red states like Montana, Nebraska and West Virginia where cutting the size of government is popular. But it reamins unclear how many Senate Democrats will cross Reid and support McConnell and Boehner, if it comes down to a partisan fight.

Updated at 6:02 p.m.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: shutdown, Barack Obama, Budgets, Congress, Democratic Party, Exclusives, Harry Reid, John Boehner, Republican Party, Senate, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Morning Must Reads: Boom

    Santorum Responds To Foster Friess' Controversial CommentHuffPost Politics

    A Spokesperson for Marriage

    National Review editor Rich Lowry, writing in the new issue of TIME on the social implications of the decline of marriage, has a suggestion: No one wants to be preachy about marriage when everyone knows its inevitable frustrations. (“Marriage is a wonderful institution,” H.L. Mencken said, “but who would want to live in an institution?”) [...]

  • freeinpa

    It’s all over the internet, how secret can it be?

  • afguy

    Is this what they mean by “floating a trial balloon”?

  • m0mentom0ri

    When Freepy and I agree, bad things are afoot.

  • shepherdwong

    Both sides claim they are trying to avoid a shutdown, but if one happens both are laying the ground work to blame the other.
    .
    But “Boehner & McConnell’s Secret Plan” suggests they know that Republicans will, rightly, be blamed. That means that McCaskill and the rest of Blue Dog are too stupid to know they have the political and moral high ground or, as usual, this is just Kabuki to conceal their own desire to do the plutocrats’ bidding.

  • deconstructiva

    Jay, any chance of YOU or a teammate calling up Boehner or McConnell ala Walker / Buffalo Beast to get secret plan details out of ‘em (like BB got Walker’s secret D-vious plan to lure D’s back to WI)? Maybe you can say you work for Koch Industries or impersonate a FOX pundit / reporter. Or which guy on swamp team can best impersonate the Koch bros.? Scherer?
    .
    Of course, I wonder if the “secret plan” is meant to avert a shutdown or cause one once both plans hit committees / the floor. IF the High Sheriffs won’t let you do the Buffalo Beast-esque call, I hope you’ll interview ‘em both and make them lie to your face in public go on the record with their next moves. Thoughts, Jay? Thanks.

  • http://www.124monkeys.com Sean DeCoursey forgot his password

    Random question I’ve been wondering about for awhile. We’ve got troops fighting two wars right now. What happens to them if/when the shutdown happens? I mean, what kind of services are they going to lose? Resupply? Pay? Coms with people stateside? Contractor support (which now covers everything from food to sanitation)?
    -
    Haven’t seen anything on this and I’ve still got several buddies who are currently forward. I know pay continued during the first shutdown, but we weren’t at war then. Any info anyone could provide would be appreciated. Thanks.

  • 53_3

    This is a rare occurrence.
    .
    I liken it to my agreement with paulejb that Palin should be the presidential candidate for the GOP in 2012.

  • 53_3

    I’m sure that nothing occuring now is having any affect on the Democrats either.
    .
    Of course not!
    .
    Wwhy should a few measly demonstrations make a bit of difference in the calculus, or the fact that polls are showing disapproval for the way the GOP is going about things n their tone deaf quest for cuts.
    .
    Come into the light…

  • nflfoghorn

    If the deficit was all-consuming they wouldn’t still be over there, would they? It’s like they’re saying “we all have to sacrifice! Except if you’re in uniform…we’ll print $ for you guys, you’re so special.”

  • afguy

    Yeah, but THAT was for totally different reasons.
    .
    HE wanted her to win… YOU just wanted to watch a cheap train-wreck.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    So what are they doing about unemployment?

  • fhmadvocat

    It would be nice if instead of playing chickhen, the House and the Senate would agree to keep the government running and then agree to seriously discuss cutting the deficit.

    This requires serious discussion on entitlement reform. When one looks at Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, we have a serious problem. These and the paying interest on the debt is what is really eating at our budget. Yet, no one is serious about entitlement reform lest they get slammed in November.

    Now would be the time for the President to lead. Instead he has kicked his own deficit commission to the curb. If he would seriously tackle entitlement reform work with the likes of Dick Durban and even Tom Claborn , he would guarantee his re-election in 2012. Instead he is nibbling on the edges, cutting relatively inexpensive programs that help the poor and actually make a difference in people’s lives.

    I used to think he could be a Liberal Ronald Reagan. Instead he will go down in history as a Liberal George H.W. Bush.

  • deconstructiva

    …do wish the reporters here would write about that.

  • pintortwo

    “We cannot talk about fiscal responsibility while spending trillions on occupying and bullying the rest of the world. We cannot talk about the budget deficit and spiraling domestic spending without looking at the costs of maintaining an American empire of more than 700 military bases in more than 120 foreign countries. We cannot pat ourselves on the back for cutting a few thousand dollars from a nature preserve or an inner-city swimming pool at home while turning a blind eye to a Pentagon budget that nearly equals those of the rest of the world combined.”
    -Ron Paul (link)
    .
    Why can’t anyone else say this when we discuss the budget?

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    No plans to impersonate anyone at this time. But good point about causing a shutdown… In politics there are always ulterior motives.
    JNS

  • fhmadvocat

    Because Ron Paul is possibly the only elected politician who can say this and not be accused of being a “Communist”, “Socialist”, or “Hates America” by the Right Wing.

  • shepherdwong

    The plight of the millions of unemployed Americans is so passé among the Villagers…and other psychopaths.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Jay. Agreed on hidden motives, need to watch for ‘em. The R’s open motives are already causing problems, let alone the hidden ones.

  • rwbbinla

    @ 7. fhmadvocat. Why do you think that social security should be included in the list of budgetary problems, when it is fully funded until 2037?

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Social Security is only an “entitlement” in that we all pay into it and are “entitled” to getting money back once we retire.

  • freeinpa

    “The plight of the millions of unemployed Americans is so passé”
    .
    to Obama who still hasn’t figured out that collecting an unemployment check is not the same as actually working. But then to a community organizer, spending taxpayer money is a job

  • freeinpa

    “Social Security is only an “entitlement” in that we all pay into it and are “entitled” to getting money back once we retired.
    .
    I noticed you didn’t say getting the money “you paid in”. That’s problem the left refuses to acknowledge. This was not set up as a retirement plan but a safety net. People are living longer and collecting multiples of what “they paid in”. Above that it becomes an entitlement!

  • freeinpa

    “the only elected politician who can say this and not be accused of being a “Communist”, “Socialist”,
    .
    Maybe soemone can explain to you the difference between a libertarian and a “communist or Socialist”.

  • hippooath

    “6.3″The plight of the millions of unemployed Americans is so passé”
    .
    to Obama who still hasn’t figured out that collecting an unemployment check is not the same as actually working. But then to a community organizer, spending taxpayer money is a job”
    .
    So what are the republicans doing?

blog comments powered by Disqus