President Obama’s Bahrain Burden Grows

On Tuesday, President Obama took a victory lap on his handling of the crises in Egypt. “Without revisiting all the events over the last three weeks, I think history will end up recording that at every juncture in the situation in Egypt that we were on the right side of history,” Obama said in a press conference. “At each juncture I think we calibrated it just about right.  And I would suggest that part of the test is that what we ended up seeing was a peaceful transition, relatively little violence, and relatively little, if any, anti-American sentiment, or anti-Israel sentiment, or anti-Western sentiment.  And I think that testifies the fact that in a complicated situation, we got it about right.”

History may be less kind when it comes to Bahrain. As reports of violence increase, President Obama has yet to make a public comment. And the reports are clear: As Reuters now reports, “Bahraini troops shot at protesters near Pearl Square on Friday and wounded many, a former Shi’ite lawmaker said, a day after police forcibly cleared a protest camp from the traffic circle in Manama.” [TIME's Aryn Baker has a great eyewitness account here.] As in Egypt, those troops are largely supported by U.S. aide. The U.S. military has a major naval base and an air base in Bahrain, a country that has been a major recipient of military aide in recent years. As the Congressional Research Service reports (see full pdf here):

To assist Bahrain’s ability to cooperate with the United States on regional security issues, Congress and successive Administrations, citing Bahrain’s limited income, have supported military assistance to Bahrain’s small force. The main recipient of such assistance is the relatively small Bahrain Defense Force (BDF), which has about 13,000 personnel (plus about 1,200 National Guard).

The regime in Bahrain is clearly hoping that it will be able to get away with the crackdown. “Our leadership is committed to dialog,” the Bahrain regime’s special envoy to the U.S. Abdul Latif Bin Rashid Al Zayani told CNN midday Friday. But in the next breath he justified the beatings and shootings of his own citizens. “We had to take action, and action was taken by the law,” he said. “The King is really committed to democracy.”

History will not judge those words well. Al Zayani was defending beatings and shootings of peaceful protesters, and the murder of a doctor trying to help. He is excusing the violent crackdown on protesters from the Shia religious majority, who have had their political rights regularly repressed for years. As the New York Times’ Nicholas Kristof, who has been reporting on the carnage, put it, “When a king opens fire on his people, he no longer deserves to be ruler.”

President Obama will no doubt condemn the violence, as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has already done. But if events continue on this course, that will not be enough to keep Obama and the United States on the right side of history.

UPDATE by Adam Sorensen at 1:32 p.m. ET:

Painting in broad strokes, President Obama condemned violent crackdowns against protesters in the Arab world on Friday. In a statement issued to reporters by White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, Obama declined to single out one nation in urging restraint and called for security forces to respect the protesters’ right to assemble. “I am deeply concerned by reports of violence in Bahrain, Libya and Yemen,” he said. “The United States condemns the use of violence by governments against peaceful protesters in those countries and wherever else it may occur.” Carney said President Obama is receiving regular updates and continues to follow the situation closely.

Related Topics: bahrain, obama, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • rdw56

    His victory lap about Egypt is only in the fertile minds of his supporters at Time. History won’t be so kind. He was consistently slow to react and he most definitely was NOT always on the right side. Hillary openly supported Mubarak stating he should remain in power. It was GWB with the freedom agenda. Obama and the elites strongly opposed it.

  • benjoya

    It was GWB with the freedom agenda.

    ie, billions to mubarak. what’s your point?

  • michaelfury
  • rdw56

    Actually the billions to Egypt are the result of Carter’s Camp David accords. Bush actively supported freedom movements in his speeches and when possible with funding. Liberals thought him a rube as the did Reagan.

  • afguy

    Now, WHO was the Egyptian President who was at Camp David, rdw?
    .
    Someone named Anwar Sadat. A FAR different sort of leader than was Mubarak.
    .
    Nice piece of info you left out there, rdw. But it did allow you to take another swing at Carter which was, I’m sure, the whole point.
    .
    As for speeches about freedom, one could say that “talk is cheap”. That’s the problem – we’ve been “talking” about democracy for decades over there. Just talk, esp. if the results aren’t to our diplomatic liking.
    .
    Nice caveat on the funding too. “Possible” can have a very nebulous meaning. Try “convenient”.

  • shepherdwong

    UPDATE by shepherdwong at 2:18 ET: Michael Scherer is an @ss.

  • apr2563

    http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/
    .
    For some real news on Mid East.

  • morristhewise

    Arab workers will not get a raise in pay because of the resignation of their leaders. Employers need low labor costs to make their products competitive in the world markets. But the recent 150 million dollar donation by the US will temporarily satisfy some of Egyptian strikers.

  • rdw56

    Nasser, Sadat and Mubarak were all the same people. They were classic, run of the mill dictators.

blog comments powered by Disqus