What Haley Barbour Didn’t Tell Fox News: He Lobbied For Mexico On “Amnesty”

Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour made the case Sunday on Fox News that his career as a high-powered federal lobbyist for domestic corporations and foreign governments would be an asset if he ran for President in 2012.

I can tell you what we did when I was there. We represented Switzerland. We represented Macedonia because the Clinton administration asked us to because of what was going on in the Balkans. But I am perfectly glad to look at the clients that I worked with when I was there. But let me just make this very plain. I’m a lobbyist, a politician, and a lawyer. You know, that the trifecta. And I am willing to have my record in front of everybody.

Barbour may be eager to showcase his record, but one of Barbour’s foreign lobbying clients could cause him some troubles in the 2012 Republican primary, if he decides to run. According to a Justice Department filing by Barbour’s former lobbying firm, The Embassy of Mexico decided to retain Barbour’s services on August 15, 2001, to work on, among other things, legislation that would provide a path to citizenship for foreigners living illegally in the United States—what opponents of immigration reform call “amnesty.”

“Haley Barbour and I will lead the BG&R team,” wrote Lanny Griffith, Barbour’s former business partner, in the filing. According to subsequent filings, Barbour’s work included “building support in the legislative branch for passage of a bill related to Section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.” As part of that work, Barbour’s firm arranged meetings and briefings with “Senators, members of Congress and their staffs, as well as Executive Branch Officials in the White House, National Security Council, State Department, and Immigration & Naturalization Service.” Barbour’s firm charged Mexico $35,000 a month, plus expenses.

At the time, Mexico was seeking an extension of a provision that allowed undocumented immigrants living in the United States to receive legal visas or green cards without returning to their country of origin, provided they pay an additional fine. In practice, the provision generally helped out undocumented family members of legal immigrants or undocumented immigrants who were eligible for visas based upon certain job skills. Without the provision in place, undocumented immigrants who received legal papers had to return to their country of origin, for three or 10 years, before returning to the U.S. The Congressional Research Service estimated that an extension would benefit about 300,000 undocumented immigrants.

At the time of Barbour’s lobbying, the 245(i) effort was referred to as “mini-amnesty” in conservative circles.“This amnesty loophole allowed aliens who broke our laws to pay a $1,000 fine and go to the head of the line in front of prospective immigrants who complied with our laws,” opined Phyllis Schlafly, founder of the Eagle Forum, in a 2002 column.
Among the other supporters of extending 245(i) was President George W. Bush, who had called for an extension of the provision before meeting with then-Mexican President Vincent Fox in 2002. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives voted out the extension, but in the post-September 11 atmosphere, the extension failed to win approval in the Senate. The late Sen. Robert Bryd, D-WV, led the charge to sink the measure. “Reviving the 245(i) provision reopens another crack in the system through which a potential terrorist can crawl,” Bryd said, in a speech on the Senate floor on March 18, 2002. “It is lunacy—sheer lunacy—that the president would request, and the House would pass, such an amnesty at this time.”

The 245(i) provision expired in April of 2002. Since then, Barbour has maintained his support for providing a path to citizenship for those immigrants who are now living in the U.S. illegally. Last year, in an interview with the Hoover Institution, Barbour laid out a view of immigration that sounds entirely consistent with the work he did in 2001 and 2002 for Mexico.

I don’t know where we would have been in Mississippi after Katrina if it hadn’t been with the Spanish speakers that came in to help rebuild. And there’s no doubt in my mind some of them were here illegally. Some of them were, some of them weren’t. But they came in, they looked for the work. If they hadn’t been there — if they hadn’t come and stayed for a few months or a couple years — we would be way, way, way behind where we are now. . . . A lot of it is just common sense. And common sense tell us we’re not going to take 10 or 12 or 14 million people and put them in jail and deport them. We’re not gonna do it, and we need to quit — some people need to quit acting like we are and let’s talk about real solutions.

Whether such arguments play well among the Republican primary electorate is another matter altogether.

Here’s the video of Barbour’s comments last year:

Correction: The original post said the documents were filed with the State Department. Foreign Agent Registrations are, in fact, filed with the Justice Department. The post has been corrected.

Update: For a screen shot of one of the relevant filings, see here.

Related Topics: 2012, haley barbour, Immigration, mexico, republican primary, Republican Party
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • trifecta55

    The one thing this reminds me of is that Lanny Davis will literally doing anything for a buck.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Reading this makes me realize (yet again) just how depressing this election is going to be. We’re going to have an endless examination of how many republicans, while on the other side of the equation there’ll sit one unchallenged centrist, with a complete blackout of any perspectives left of center. Should make you and yours overjoyed, MS.
    .
    This is why I pray that Ron Paul runs–he may be the only candidate in ’12 who isn’t spouting lies or platitudes.

  • afguy

    Barbour talking out of both sides off his mouth??
    .
    Say it ain’t so…

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    That was a typo. It wasn’t Lanny Davis. It was Lanny Griffith, who was Barbour’s partner. I fixed above.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    What I find so interesting is the Catch-22 that immigration opponents have put in place to deflect charges of racism.
    .
    They aren’t against Hispanic immigrants they insist. They only object to those who enter the country illegally. They then proceed to do their damndest to assure that the laws in place make it exceedingly difficult to immigrate any other way.

  • http://morrisdev.wordpress.com Morris Development


    This is why I pray that Ron Paul runs–he may be the only candidate in ’12 who isn’t spouting lies or platitudes.”

    I LOVE Paul. Easily the most entertaining (and smartest) of all the right wing prospects.

    Then again…. he would be an awful president. Presidents need to make coalitions of many people on many sides. They do it by making, dare i say it, “compromises”. Paul’s entire philosophy – and that of his entire following – is to refuse to compromise.

    so, what we’d end up with is a guy who makes a half-assed attempt to bring this nation to a structure that only about 20% support and only about 1% understand. The rest of the country will oppose him at every step, or simply not take his calls and wait him out.

    the electoral debates, however, would be simply awesome.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Funny, as I’ve seen Paul work with, among others, Barney Frank and Alan Grayson, not to mention the libertarian leaning republicans who just voted with liberals not to extend some of the worst provisions of the Patriot Act.
    .
    Of course, he’s unelectable, as is Nader or Kucinich or anyone else bothered by the contents of Mark Thompson’s last post. That’s why we’re where we are. One of the main reasons they’re unelectable is that our media will not give them equal time and their platforms are, how to put it, far less palatable to the ruling class, busy wrecking the American dream one day at a time.
    .
    And when forced to consider the choice, a centrist vs. a libertarian, I can’t say my vote is particularly clear cut. Good thing for our faux democracy is that I’ll never have that choice, unless Paul runs as an indy.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    This is just another instance of somebody conveniently “forgetting” something they’d done and hoping everybody has forgotten about it as well.

  • apr2563

    Still true about Lanny Davis.

  • apr2563

    jcapan: I agree Ron Paul is genuine and principled in his beliefs. However, you can be genuine but still wrong. This is the man that opposes the Civil Rights Act and thinks it was wrong for us to have fought the Civil War, is an Ayn Rand advocate, supported Pat Buchanan in 92. He wants the US to withdraw from the UN, opposes birthright citizenship, wants to void Roe v Wade. Against environmental regulations and most all federal agencies that provide regulatory safe guards.
    .
    I certainly agree with his suspicions of the Federal Reserve and his opposition to our current wars. He is against national ID numbers. He wants to do away with the War Power Act. Opposes the Patriot Act. All things I support.
    .
    I would like to see him run for President again. I enjoy the spice he brings to the Republican debates. But, I would never want him as President.

  • apr2563

    Haley Barbour: Politician, Lobbyist, Lawyer
    .
    3 professions that do not inspire trust.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    I know all of this Apr. And like you, I largely just want a compelling figure running for the office, even if he hasn’t a snowball’s chance…
    .
    But I would say that his foreign policy, as well as his stances on war and civil liberties are of disproportionate interest to me, enough so that if presented with an Obama-Paul general…. Unlike many liberals, I think our policies impact far more people around the globe, in dramatic fashion, than the American population. And I’m equally concerned with the social justice of Egyptians and Americans. If there were a realistic chance that he could get into office and actually accomplish his foreign policy or end perpetual war, vis a vis Obama’s full hearted embrace…
    .
    But Paul is no more likely than Chomsky of getting a nomination, much less the crown, so this is all hypothetical, much to our nation’s regret, I might add.

  • Paul-no not that one

    I think the word “typo” just was defamed.

  • Matt

    So that’s why the buzz of Haley running in 2012 has cooled.. Hard to imagine working for the Mexican embassy on amnesty is going to generate excitement from conservatives… He surely can’t believe that giant flashing red light in his resume is going to go unnoticed…
    http://www.sunstateactivist.org

  • afguy

    Does he also sell used cars?
    .
    Just a thought…

blog comments powered by Disqus