Pawlenty Pummels Obama

If cliches are the enemy of good writing, they can also be the core of successful speeches. Putative presidential contender Tim Pawlenty killed the crowd at CPAC this afternoon, and perhaps no line drew more applause than this string of platitudes. “We’ve had enough of the hype and speeches filled with rhetoric that soars — but takes us in the wrong direction,” Pawlenty said. “This is about rolling up our sleeves, plowing forward, standing tall, and getting the job done.” Explosive applause. Cue another “T-Paw” chant.

The shot at Obama’s oratory was one of innumerable broadsides Pawlenty aimed at the President. He hit Obama for spending too much, for backing down from bullies (the Obama-as-apologist canard was a decisive winner today), for “Obamacare,” for expanding government, for appeasing Iran and Russia. (Pawlenty made mention, interestingly, of the Muslim Brotherhood, though he didn’t mention Egypt specifically.) You can sum up the substance in a couple of binaries without losing much in translation. Obama is Carter, not Reagan. Government bad, private sector good. The U.S. should be strong, not weak. We spend too much and don’t create enough jobs. A typical sentence: “We need more common sense, and less Obama nonsense.”

The knock against Tim Pawlenty, which Adam reviewed in a good post a few days back, is that he’s too milquetoast for a fired-up base. Adam’s theory was that Pawlenty could be the “vessel for anti-Romney Republicans,” the guy who could lag back as the backlash built and then bolt for the rail when the base begins openly clamoring for a social-conservative substitute.

Pawlenty showed no interest in that strategy today. Poised and energetic, he drew out the audience, particularly during sustained attacks on Obama’s foreign policy. Like Romney, he peppered his address with laugh lines. (A sampling: “President Obama has done the impossible. He’s proven that someone can deserve a Nobel Prize less than Al Gore!” And: “The federal government spends our money the way Keith Olbermann talks: too much, without a point, and it leaves the whole country confused.”) Unlike Romney, who ducked a health care issue to steer clear of his own vulnerabilities, he savaged the individual mandate, calling it “completely backward thinking.” He argued that the U.S. should “move toward God, not away from Him,” which will surely appeal to social conservatives. He stumped for a balanced-budget amendment and an overhaul of the federal tax code. He brought Tea Partyers to their feet by agitating against a debt-limit hike.

Other than that, the speech — remarks as prepared for delivery are after the jump — was remarkably airy, even for a setting that’s more pep rally than policy forum. At some point, Pawlenty will need to sharpen his own points, rather than just sharply rebuke Obama. But today his stinging criticisms were enough to win over a friendly crowd.

REMARKS AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY


Thank you and thanks to Sean Duffy.

Are you fired up and ready to take back our country? That’s great, we really need you. You know why?

President Obama has done the impossible. He’s proven that someone can deserve a Nobel Prize less than Al Gore!

Now, I’m not one who questions the existence of the President’s birth certificate.  But when you listen to his policies, don’t you at least wonder what planet he’s from? On what planet do they create jobs by taxing the daylight out of people trying to grow jobs? On what planet do they try to reduce the deficit by spending even more? On what planet do they make health care better by putting bureaucrats in charge?

I do tip the cap to President Obama in at least one area: he’s pretty good at duping the mainstream media. In fact, some of them have been reporting that he’s behaving like Ronald Reagan. Can you believe that?

Ronald Reagan knew how to stare down our enemies. He understood the price of freedom. He understood that putting our people back to work means the U.S. must be open for business not open to more taxation, more regulation, and more big government strangulation.

Ladies and gentleman: Barack Obama is not behaving like Ronald Reagan! He’s behaving like Jimmy Carter!

The individual mandate in Obamacare is a page right out of the Jimmy Carter playbook. The left simply doesn’t understand.  The individual mandate reflects completely backwards thinking.  They, the bureaucrats, don’t tell us what to do. We, the people, tell the government what to do!

We’re blessed to live in the freest and most prosperous nation in the history of the world. Our freedom is the very air we breathe. Make no mistake: The policies of the left encroach every day on the very freedom that has made this country great. We will never, ever, ever stop fighting for our freedom.

If we bend, if we compromise, on this bedrock issue we are in danger of losing our edge.  But there’s a real concern that we’re losing our edge already. Did you know that a recent survey asked Americans which country they thought would be the dominant country in the world in just twenty years? Guess what the answer was? China!

You know what I say to that:  No way!  No how!  Not the America we know.  Not the America we love!

America’s rightful place is not lagging behind China.  America’s place is leading the world!

My friends, we need to restore American confidence, American optimism, and America’s hope for the future. We need to restore the American Dream by restoring American common sense.

As Washington proves time and time again, not everyone’s born or elected with common sense. We need leaders who remember where they came from, and what made this nation the greatest country the world has ever known.

For me, that real world experience started in my hometown of South St. Paul, Minnesota – a place filled with good-hearted people, strong families and the rock-solid values of the heartland.

Back in the 60s, when I grew up there, it was home to some of the world’s largest stockyards and meat-packing plants. Many families in my hometown relied on those big plants for their paychecks, for their family’s well-being and for their future. But those plants shut down, and so did a big part of the spirit and the soul of my hometown.

My mom died when I was 16 and not much longer after that, my dad, who worked for a trucking company, lost his job for awhile. The foundations of my hometown and my family were shaken hard.

At a young age, I saw up close the face of loss, the face of hardship, the face of losing a job and I saw in the mirror the face of a very uncertain future. I know many Americans are feeling that way today. I know that feeling – I’ve lived it.

But in those moments, we learn some things. We see some things. We remember what’s important. One of the most important things that we should always remember is the motto of our country “In God we trust.” And we should stand on that foundation as our founders intended.

A few weeks into the Constitutional Convention in 1787, Benjamin Franklin addressed George Washington and the other convention members, speaking to the bedrock importance of seeking God’s guidance as they pursued the sacred task of creating our country.

He said, “I have lived a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth: that God governs in the affairs of men.  And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?” Ladies and Gentlemen, we, as a nation, must move towards God, not away from Him.

The solutions to our problems aren’t easy, but they’re not a mystery either. We simply need to remind each other what made this country great and restore America’s greatness by restoring American common sense. We need more common sense and less Obama non-sense.

And let’s start with this: We can’t spend more than we take in.

You can’t do it as an individual. You can’t do it as a family. You can’t do it as a business. And we can’t let our government do it anymore.

The big spenders in Washington D.C. have us on a course of trillion dollar deficits for as far as the eye can see.

The federal government spends our money the way Keith Olbermann talks: too much without a point and it leaves the whole country confused.

It’s not a matter of right versus left. It’s a matter of 6th grade mathematics. It isn’t going to work. It’s irresponsible, it’s unsustainable and it’s reckless. Just because we followed Greece into democracy, does not mean we need to follow them into bankruptcy!

And, of course, the government spenders come with excuses. They say, “Oh, Governor, how do you do that? It’s too hard. The politics are difficult and the interest groups are really tough.”

I know something about the spenders and I know something about difficult. I’m from the state of McCarthy, Mondale, Humphrey, Wellstone and now United States Senator Al Franken.

But we cut government in Minnesota.  If we can do it there, we can do it anywhere.

The naysayers say “we can’t cut spending; we can’t prioritize; we have to raise taxes.”

I drew a line in the sand and said, “Absolutely not. We’re going to live within our means just like families, just like businesses, just like everybody else.”

It wasn’t easy.  I set a record for vetoes in my State. Vetoed billions of dollars of tax and spending increases. Had the first government shutdown in Minnesota’s history. Took one of the longest transit strikes in the country’s history to get public employee benefits under control. And, in the last budget period, I cut spending in real terms for the first time in the history of my state.

The federal government should do the same.

Here are a few things I think you’ll agree with me: We should NOT raise the debt ceiling! We should pass a constitutional amendment to balance the budget! And here’s one I know you’ll agree with: We must repeal Obamacare!

And while we’re at it, one more thing: Let’s throw the ridiculous federal tax code overboard!

Let’s start by requiring, under penalty of perjury, every member of Congress to do their own tax returns without the help of a tax preparer, accountant or lawyer. Let them experience firsthand the moronic, burdensome and intimidating beast that our tax system has become.

Here’s another commonsense principle from the heartland that President Obama clearly still needs to learn.  And it’s this: People spend money differently – when it’s their own money.

Now, maybe you’ve got time in your busy life to read white papers, go to seminars, stay up all night and watch cable TV or read journals about public policy. I hope you do — they’re really valuable.

But if you don’t, here’s all you really need to know about government reform. On a given weekend, go to two weddings. Go to one where there’s an open bar where the drinks are supposedly free. Then, go to another wedding with a cash bar where people pay for their own drinks. You’ll see very, very different behaviors.

Now, I said this on Wall Street not long ago and somebody said, “Well, who the heck has a cash bar anymore?” That question right there from a Wall Streeter tells you about all you need to know, doesn’t it?

If you have a system where people get to consume stuff, without any of their own skin in the game or responsibility, and the bill magically goes somewhere else — that’s a system that is doomed to fail.

Unfortunately, that describes most of our government.  So whether it’s education, health care, housing, or just about anything else, we need to put people in charge, give them the power to make their own decisions, not government.

And the best thing we can do to empower people is to make sure they have a good job. That means always remembering this next commonsense principle: The private sector, not government, is the answer to job creation. We shouldn’t be looking to Washington D.C. for how to create jobs.

We should be asking the people who actually provide the jobs!! When you do, they give you some pretty clear answers. They say: “Reduce my costs and get government off my back”.

It isn’t that hard.

By the way, in Minnesota our unemployment rate, as I left the governorship, was significantly below the national average. And since the crash, we’ve been helping lead the nation towards recovery.

Ladies and gentlemen, America needs job growth, not government growth!

Now, you may have learned this next principle on a playground, in sports, at work, or maybe even in a back alley. But no matter where you learned it, it’s always true.

Bullies respect strength, not weakness. So when the United States of America projects its national security interests here and around the world, we need to do it with strength! We need to make sure that there is no equivocation, no uncertainty, no daylight between us and our allies around the world.

The current administration doesn’t seem to understand this principle. We undermine Israel, the U.K., Poland, the Czech Republic, and Colombia, among other friends. Meanwhile, we appease Iran, Russia, and adversaries in the Middle East, including Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Mr. President, with bullies, might makes right. Strength — makes them submit. Get tough on our enemies — not on our friends.  And, Mr. President, stop apologizing for our country.

The bullies, terrorists and tyrants of the world have lots to apologize for. America does not.

My friends, none of this is going to be easy.  If prosperity were easy, everybody around the world would be prosperous. If freedom were easy, everybody around the world would be free. And, if security were easy, everybody around the world would be secure.

They’re not. It takes an extraordinary effort. It takes extraordinary commitment. It takes extraordinary strength to stand up to those who oppose these principles. But we can do it.

Valley Forge wasn’t easy. Settling the West wasn’t easy. Winning World War II wasn’t easy.

Going to the moon wasn’t easy. This ain’t about easy.

We’ve had enough of the hype and speeches filled with rhetoric that soars – but takes us in the wrong direction. This is about rolling up our sleeves, plowing forward, standing tall, and getting the job done.

This is the United States of America. We are the American people. We have seen difficulties before, and we always overcome. We can and we will do it again.

We will rise up, as our forefathers did, with the assurance of our time-tested conservative values, the wisdom of the American people, and the courage of our convictions.

Thank you. God bless you. And God Bless the United States of America!

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • hippooath

    “”We’ve had enough of the hype and speeches filled with rhetoric that soars — but takes us in the wrong direction,” Pawlenty said. “This is about rolling up our sleeves, plowing forward, standing tall, and getting the job done.” Explosive applause. Cue another “T-Paw” chant.”
    .
    Yeah
    .
    Do something

  • afguy

    As a comedian, his delivery needs work… LOTS of it.
    .
    As a politician…. well, he STILL needs work. LOTS of it.

  • afguy

    “We’ve had enough of the hype and speeches filled with rhetoric that soars — but takes us in the wrong direction,”
    .
    So… instead, we need hype and speeches filled with rhetoric that sucks… but STILL takes us in the wrong direction?
    .
    Where’s the improvement?

  • Paul-no not that one

    Timmy Cul-De-Sac(less) is quickly taking McCain’s spot as the Beltway’s fave.
    .
    He is a cypher, which of course makes him a perfect candidate for the media.
    .
    He’ll move few voters but will surprise a lot of people with the nastiness of his doomed campaign.

  • nflfoghorn

    “…[He's] the guy who could lag back as the backlash built and then bolt for the rail when the base begins openly clamoring for a social-conservative substitute”
    .
    Whomever’s riding him needs to crack the whip.

  • shepherdwong

    You can sum up the substance in a couple of binaries without losing much in translation. Obama is Carter, not Reagan. Government bad, private sector good. The U.S. should be strong, not weak. We spend too much and don’t create enough jobs.
    .
    Ha! That’s every Republican speech since Reagan and half of Rush Limbaugh’s act to boot. Makes you wonder why they bother with speechwriters at all and why anyone still listens to them.

  • http://milascurtains.wordpress.com milascurtains

    Hey , Tim, wasn’t it YOUR Stupid party, that dropped My Country Down?

    hatever You say – there is no sense until You would recognize – Yes, it was Your party and You are the Part of that Ugly uselss party of outdated Morons.

    Plus – You are so booooooooooooooooring

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    How many Swampers are in attendance at this bacchanalia of mendacity?

  • fhmadvocat

    Please! Obama would eat Pawlenty for lunch in a debate! Pawlenty offered nothing but the standard cliches about smaller government. This from a guy who has never spent a day working in Washington. I like how he touts that Minnesota has a lower unemployment rate than the rest of the country. Minnesota has always had a lower unemployment rate that the rest of the country. Minnesota has a very high level of educated citizens who are strangely socially conservative, economically liberal and the only state to go Republican for president once since 1956 (Nixon in 1972). Pawlenty talks about being tough on our “enemies”. How? It took us how long to subdue Iraq, a backwater country. How would he strike fear into our “enemies”? Thanks to Bush, who fought a war without paying for it, what makes Pawlenty seem to think he can do better? For all of his bragging, Pawlenty left office with less than a 50% approval rating in Minnesota. What makes him think he can win a presidential primary?
    From what I hear, Pawlenty is a blank slate, who plans to be all things to all people. Doesn’t that sound a lot like Barack Obama?

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    The media is terrible at informing people about the news.
    -
    CPAC is a fine event for what it is. But it is not news.

  • Ivy_B

    I’m looking forward to the wall to wall coverage of Netroots Nation. Of course it isn’t so close, so I guess we’ll only have two reporters there full time, but I’m sure it will be great.

  • Paul-no not that one

    All of them?

  • apr2563

    Wouldn’t that be refreshing. I believe Jay Carney went one year and had his feelings hurt.

  • Paul-no not that one

    I’ll try to pick up the slack.
    .
    At $295.00 you won’t be able to shut me up!

  • apr2563

    Alex, how many Swampland journalists are reporting on CPAC and their mostly fantasy candidates? The organization is made up of the most insane of the reationaries, has little influence on outcomes, and drifts from memory quickly?
    .
    Were you all hoping Limbaugh would do his jiggly dance again accompanied by hate speech?
    .
    http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/01/cnn-limbaughs-angry-sinister-speech-crossed-a-line/
    .
    I hope the Republican’s bring their angry, nasty selves to their convention and they will scare America like they did in 92.

  • Matt

    Nice rhetoric, but T-Paw has hardly delivered in his own political career. He’s had little experience running anything beyond his backwater state of Minnesota, and even there he ran up consistent budget deficits. Pawlenty thinks if he says enough hot button red meat words and jabs Obama enough, the tea party will think he’s one of them. Really pathetic…
    http://www.sunstateactivist.org

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Matt = Michael Fury if he was a peddler of stale CW.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    “This is about rolling up our sleeves, plowing forward, standing tall, and getting the job done.” Explosive applause. ”

    I’m not quite sure why one set of empty metaphors is better than another. Do any of them have any actual ideas or plans?

  • perrywhite1

    Wait, where is the knee-jerk false equivalence? What, you mean there ISN’T a Democratic equivalent of rich Neanderthals getting together and dreaming of the Gilded Age? You know, that glorious time when all the wealth was gathered at the top. robber barons ran the country, workers were paid a pittance and were beaten if they got mouthy.
    .
    We’re halfway there, so it’s too bad there ISN’T a left-wing group that gets equal time to make the case that trickle-down economics doesn’t work and is really, really bad for 90% of the country.

  • farstomp

    LOL… turn into CNN or MSNBC to see the case being made. In the meantime go ahead and invest in a nice bank savings account and get raked over the coals.

    Your money, not mine,

  • apr2563

    Paul, keep us posted.

  • allthingsinaname

    Pawlenty Pummels Obama
    .
    In who’s eyes?

  • sasquatch08

    OK, well I’m going to totally ignore what this thread is about, because I could honestly not care less about Tim Pawlenty or what he has to say. Perhaps some of what I’m about to say would echo his speech, but I wouldn’t know because I have not and will not read it. This is just something I’ve been thinking about, but haven’t found a good place to post here on the Swamp. Warning: it’s a bit long.
    .
    The general problem with “big government” is that it’s all a set of bureaucracies run by bureaucrats, which somehow manage to screw up even the simple things. Bureaucracies are slow and cumbersome (ever been to the DMV?), and never ever are they efficient about anything. They’re staffed mainly by people who refuse to make a decision on anything for fear of raising the ire of another faceless higher-up and hence are slow and extremely difficult to deal with. However there are two things they are good at; forcing you to squeeze yourself into a prefab box, group or quota that they’ve made for you and wasting shockingly enormous amounts of money.
    .
    If your doubt this; just look at what happened to Kelly Williams-Bolar in Akron, Ohio. She was convicted of a felony, “defrauding” the school system and sentenced to 10 days in jail and now may never become a teacher because of the felony on her record. What did she do? She lives in crappy and dangerous neighborhood with failing schools, while her father lives in another area of Akron (which trust me is not a place anyone would really like to live) which has better schools. So she decided to list her father’s address on her kids school forms to get them into a better school, they spend A LOT of time at his house, so what’s the problem? Well the problem is that the School District decided that she had “robbed” that failing school of $30,000 (that they probably would have wasted anyway) by her actions and hired a Private Investigator to follow her around until they could nail her. That right there is exactly what bureaucracy is good at, screwing you for not following their stupid, arbitrary rules that make no sense in real life. This woman isn’t rich, she can’t afford to move to the nice neighborhood [one that’s not in Akron], so they nail her to the wall for trying to find a workaround that will get her kids a decent education. 10 days in jail might not be that bad, but potentially losing her ability to become a teacher and have a better life for her and her kids because of a felony conviction on a BS charge? That’s extreme, but that’s how government makes an “example” of someone. Why can’t we go back to simplicity, you know, like crucifying people along the Via Appia?
    .
    Further I find a lot of the control “big government” wants to exert, well, quite frankly insulting. I don’t care if it’s banning kids toys in Happy Meals, gun control, the ACA, the food police in NYC or anything else. It’s condescending and insulting. At its most basic level every single one of these policies says “You’re not smart enough to do X”, literally that’s what they say. The people in Washington or the State House are SO much smarter than everyone else that they have to micromanage your life for you. The Happy Meal thing in San Francisco says “You’re not smart enough to raise your kids, so we’ll do part of it for you”, gun control says “You’re not smart enough to safely handle a firearm, so we have to take that away from you”, NYC and a number of other cities say to their citizens “You’re not smart enough to eat right, so we’ll have to force you” while the ACA basically tells people “You’re not smart enough to buy insurance, if you are it’s not the ‘right’ insurance and you’re getting ripped off, so we’ll have to regulate what you can and can’t buy and force you to pay for stuff you don’t want or need”. The ACA says that I, as a male have to have insurance that covers maternity care even though it’s not possible for me to get pregnant, as well as substance abuse treatment when I don’t have a substance abuse problem. Yet I still have to pay for these valuable services which I will never use. Stupid and reprehensible. You can take care of yourself, and if you can’t well… too freaking bad. I don’t feel bad for the person who has a car accident while drag racing on a public street and then tries to blame someone else for it, like that pothole caused them to drive at 120mph in a 45 zone. Act like an adult with dignity and self-respect and do what needs to be done without crying about it or asking the government to make and force everyone else into a one-size-fits-all policy that doesn’t work for anyone. If you can’t do that, admit you’re not an adult and proceed to STFU.
    .
    On a side note, the income tax assumes “It’s not your money that you ‘earned’, it’s the government’s money and you can have whatever we deem you worthy of having”. Don’t give me that crap about how it’s a “fee” we pay for living here, for most of this country’s existence the government survived without an income tax, so that line of argument is pure bunk.
    .
    On top of the problems that all these needless layers of rules and people create, they’re also almost impossible to get rid of. We created the DHS after 9/11 to correct the errors that allowed the event to occur in the first place, but we didn’t fire anyone for doing a poor job. The Department of Agriculture gives subsidies to corn farmers (as well as soybean farmers and others making precursors for ethanol) for making ethanol, but that’s a stupid waste of money since there’s a law that says that gas must be a 10% ethanol mixture anyway. So we’re subsidizing a product that is required to be produced and sold. It doesn’t matter than ethanol is energy negative after the production process, nor does it matter it’s robbing us of massive quantities of food, we not only force petroleum companies to mix it with their gas we subsidize the farmers who make something people are legally required to buy if they choose to buy gas! Shenanigans! If you need a subsidy to make money, the product you’re offering is not wanted by the public and you should either change your business or go broke.
    .
    Now let’s look at the details of how effing retarded this is real quick, using my car (2003 Subaru WRX) as an example:
    .
    My car has a 16 gallon tank, and I fill it about every 10 days when not traveling. It has ABOUT a 340 mile range under normal conditions (mostly city driving in my case, it does much better for highway mileage). Now I fill it every ten days or so, 365 days in a year so 365/10=36.5 tanks of gas per year and 36.5×16=584 gallons of fuel per year, at 10% ethanol that’s 58.4 gallons of ethanol a year. Now the math works like this, 22 gallons of ethanol has about 1 years supply of calories for the average human being, stated differently: 22 gallons of ethanol uses enough corn, wheat, soybeans or other food to feed a person for one year. Therefore, 58.4/22=2.65, or 2.65 people don’t have a year’s supply of food because I burned it in my car. In effect, we may actually be KILLING people through starvation with ethanol mandates and subsidies, but we are absolutely driving up the cost of bread and other foodstuffs made from things that are precursors to ethanol.
    .
    I’m not going to go into a detailed explanation of how much more money the government outright wastes, you get the idea. It’s insane. Government doesn’t make anything work better, it doesn’t streamline anything, it makes things harder and more expensive. Government IS bureaucracy, and is huge. That right there is the source of our problems, because bureaucracy doesn’t do really do anything useful very well.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    A single school district does something you don’t like therefore the solution is to cut an arbitrary 100 Billion in Federal outlays, slash state budgets and add tens of thousands of people to the unemployment rolls.
    .
    Brilliant!

  • http://julemry.wordpress.com julemry

    little Timmy Pawlenty, trying so hard to sound tough. OMG, Repugs, please nominate this guy! My grandma could beat him and she’s been dead for 20 years!

    Seriously though, Pawlenty has no substance, no record of innovation or accomplishment on a national scale, and he’s just spewing cliches and hate to get attention. He’s the weenie kid jumping up and down saying, “Pick me!” when his baseball skills are non-existent. He ends up being the water boy.

    Minnesota is a great place to visit, especially Minneapolis, but I ask that they take Timmy home now please.

  • diecash1

    too bad there ISN’T a left-wing group that gets equal time to make the case that trickle-down economics doesn’t work and is really, really bad for 90% of the country.

    No group needed. It’s called empirical evidence. Too bad it falls on deaf ears in DC. Perhaps that’s why a group is needed — More volume.

  • lou58lou

    I have tried to listen to the State of the Union addresses from all the Presidents. But after the first 5 minutes it starts to sound like the teacher in Peanuts. Their mouths are moving, but nothing they say makes sense. I am probably picking up the insincerity behind the words. I pray someone will finally be elected that will not spout what they think we want to hear, but speaks the truth. “If elected I will spend lots of your money, and make your life hell”.

  • Paul-no not that one

    No. He was barely here the last year of his term, we sure don’t want him now.

  • lou58lou

    I read most of it; great post.

  • diecash1

    (ever been to the DMV?), and never ever are they efficient about anything. They’re staffed mainly by people who refuse to make a decision on anything for fear of raising the ire of another faceless higher-up and hence are slow and extremely difficult to deal with

    That’s one giant, broad-brush, knee-jerk overreaction you’ve got there. Never? Ever? Really? What bureaucrat raked you over the coals in your formative years? I’ve had many excellent experiences at the DMV in my state and many helpful interactions with State and Federal entities. Rarely have I had a problem and most of it has been reasonably efficient. Perhaps my anecdotal evidence is better than yours?
    ..
    That was quite a long anti-government rant. Since you hate government so very much, even irrationally I would say, what are you going to do about it? Might you move to a country without a government? I’m sure that will go swimmingly. Good luck going all Galt. Be sure to drop us a line though I don’t know how you’ll do it without a postal service or the internet. Wouldn’t want to use those government services!

  • diecash1

    Every time I see this guy, this is what I hear:
    ..

  • jtn1026

    Alex: Wouldn’t cliches be the enemy of GOOD writing??

    I don’t see anyone among the prospective Repub candidates that is even remotely electable. Shades of 1996 to this point.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    You would think that if your life was hell, you’d try to seek out the root causes instead of blaming some politician you only see on TeeVee…….

  • Alex Altman

    Whoops. Thanks for the catch JTN.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Give lou a break Dirks.
    .
    He both “tried to listen” to the State of The Union but could only get through 5 minutes and read “most” of a comment.
    .
    There may be some attention issues.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Have any of the masters of metaphor explained why the tax cuts for billionaires did not create any jobs yet?

  • apr2563

    50% and counting.

  • afguy

    They’re still uncertain… about what it is they’re supposed to do with ALL that extra money.

  • http://dalejrstwin.wordpress.com dalejrstwin

    I am from Minnesota, Jesse Ventura slashed too much revenue from the state so Pawlenty had to fix it. Since I have a relative that works for the state, that is the truth. You have to drop taxes for small businesses to create jobs, we do it here, but most of the taxes we have is for higher standard of living. You have to balance the budget, not waste money. Problem is most people see more revenue, fill that up with jobs and projects and then fail when your revenue stream drops and cannot figure out how to cut itself, but instead borrow a trillion dollars from China just to sustain itself. Most Minnesotas look at rest of the US and just shake our head at how stupid most people are in the US. Your first job is fire your congress men and woman who don’t do shit and make more rules. Look around your office at work, how many democrats actually are good people, help others and don’t complain about everything and want to be in control, they are people that are selfish, yet are big talkers and not doers? Aren’t they some of the laziest people who always want to do the same old thing over and over.. with no change as long as it doesn’t affect them.. they are hermits.

    Pawlenty means what he says, he wants the country to return to its roots. Congress is our problem and so is big Government and so is the bs’ers in control. Our Democrats of this country are so bad at their jobs, when is last time they did anything for someone other themselves? They don’t know the first thing about anything that make sense, they rather bitch and moan and create bs, then actually doing something constructive and contributing to the world. Pawlenty doesn’t need a nation scale, God put the man in charge in Minnesota and now he is going to run for President. Last I checked Minnesota does better than the national average in many areas. Even though Minnesota is DFL, when run by republicans, we actually get something done. Pawlenty will do it, he did it in Minnesota. Whether you think I’m right or not, but there are facts that back up what he says. And if we as country do not suppose Isreal, then we are doomed, because the Bible that Jesus wrote is true, and he said, that any country that is not the side of Isreal is against God. And if you don’t want to follow God or not is not up for debate, but if whole the country is this way and allows Congress and the President to not believe in God, do what God wants, then for sure God will decide the country will no longer be protected by God himself.

    God is still living, he is alive and will come back. I certainly don’t want a politician who doesn’t believe in God leading this country when that happens.

  • ricardo4max

    Sas Excellent post. All the anti-American knuckledraggers like PD eagerly display their ignorance with replies that totally miss the mark.
    For Marxists like dc you are the ones that should move to a country where central planning and huge overbearing govt controls everyone’s life and freedom is only a dream and stop trying to change America from its founding principles.
    Do you left wing kooks ever read your own posts to see how petty , juvenile and bitter you sound?

  • ricardo4max

    a) there were NO recent tax cuts. The most recent tax cuts occurred in 2003 and the results of them were realized a year or two later.
    b) The tax cuts from the Bush administration era in early 200′s were not just for billionaires.
    c) No one with any money is going to spend it until the Marxists are thrown out of govt and some of the burdensome regulations are rescinded.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    “No one with any money is going to spend it until the Marxists are thrown out of govt and some of the burdensome regulations are rescinded.”
    .
    I don’t recall any of the Republicans or Democrats who supported the billionaire tax cuts arguing that point. If that is the case, it wouldn’t make much sense to give them the tax cuts on the understanding they would spend the money.
    .
    Why is the media completely ignoring the failure of the tax cuts, at a time when everyone is worried about deficits?

  • diecash1

    Ricardo, do you know what a Marxist actually is? Yeah, I thought not. I realize you’re too utterly stupid to realize that I’m not a Marxist but you should really read your own posts; dumber and dumber by the word.
    ..
    You can count on the fact that despite the continued breeding of ignorant fools such as yourself, I’ll not be leaving America any time soon.

  • notfooledbydistractions

    Wow. If we were looking for a “stand up comic in chief” Pawlenty would still come in at the end of the pack.

    This clown has the charisma of a sweaty gym sock, and rivals Palin in the intellect department. Another republican loser, I guess that’s why they propped up Trump. Never underestimate the gullibility of conservative voters, and the cynicism and distain republican politicians have for them.

  • sasquatch08

    Not that anyone will see this at this point, but don’t worry I will repost it.
    .
    @ Paul Dirks
    .
    “A single school district does something you don’t like therefore the solution is to cut an arbitrary 100 Billion in Federal outlays, slash state budgets and add tens of thousands of people to the unemployment rolls.”
    .
    Since the Department of Education is unconstitutional, and since its inception our schools have declined, it should be abolished. Since education is NOT a right enumerated to the federal government in the Constitution, it falls to the states or the people. Your failure to admit to what reality actually is, is not a valid reason to continue foolish, self destructive policies that waste money. Further, I mentioned a single school district yes, but multiple government programs, your inability to address any of my other grievances proves your argument to be weak at best and a straw man at worst.
    .
    “…add tens of thousands to the unemployment rolls..”
    .
    You mean those teachers that suck and should be fired? They DESERVE to be unemployed. The only reason they are employed is because liberals and teachers unions support them no matter what. Without special interests backing them, they would have been fired and replaced years ago, as they should have been. Special interests are not just oil companies. How about the tens of thousands of p!ss poorly educated high school kids that are unemployed? Where are your tears for them? Charlatan. Sorry that’s what you are, either that or a charlatan AND a shill, you can pick.
    .
    @ricardo
    .
    “All the anti-American knuckledraggers like PD eagerly display their ignorance with replies that totally miss the mark.”
    .
    Lets try to keep it civil. Name calling almost never serves a purpose. Yes, I have done it on here when angry, but it’s not constructive criticism, let’s try to stick to facts and stay away from name calling.
    .
    @diecash
    .
    “Rarely have I had a problem and most of it has been reasonably efficient. “
    .
    5 weeks to get a new license (piece of plastic with your picture and info on it) is reasonable. Ha! Having to submit 4 pieces of paper that prove who you are to get a new state license, and then having them tell you one it’s not “quite right” and having to wait weeks before you can “legally drive” is OK with you. Clearly you’ve never left your home state.
    .
    “Since you hate government so very much, even irrationally I would say, what are you going to do about it? Might you move to a country without a government? I’m sure that will go swimmingly.”
    .
    I don’t hate government, and only a moron would say I do. I merely state the facts, governments are NOT efficient, which is a demonstrable fact. They make rules that are STUPID, because they are bureaucracies… My example on ethanol proves that, which I note you avoid talking about, your avoidance speaks volumes about your knowledge of government and the depth of your argument. Only on the Swamp would your comment be taken for “intelligent criticism”, when in reality it’s a pathetic child’s argument that screams “My idea is better nah nah nah!” Why don’t you try explaining your position rather than attacking the one I laid out without attacking anyone? Could it be that you don’t actually have one? I think it might be. Please explain to me in similar detail how government micromanagement of everything is a good idea, please reference the USSR, China and other countries that have tried it. Don’t forget to mention that MASS MURDER it required.
    .
    Better yet. JUSTIFY the mass murder that has been committed in the name of “social and economic justice”. Please explain to me how it is that it’s justified that the USSR murdered 30 million of its own people, China did it to 50 million and other lefties did it to countless more millions, and let’s not forget the other millions that starved under their policies (the Holodomor anyone?) Explain to me how it is that type of policies you support have resulted in the deaths or murders of 100+ million people and how that’s justified for “social justice” and get back to me.
    .
    Or just remove your head from your rectum, since there is no justification.

  • diecash1

    Please explain to me in similar detail how government micromanagement of everything is a good idea, please reference the USSR, China and other countries that have tried it. Don’t forget to mention that MASS MURDER it required.
    .
    Better yet. JUSTIFY the mass murder that has been committed in the name of “social and economic justice”. Please explain to me how it is that it’s justified that the USSR murdered 30 million of its own people, China did it to 50 million and other lefties did it to countless more millions, and let’s not forget the other millions that starved under their policies (the Holodomor anyone?) Explain to me how it is that type of policies you support have resulted in the deaths or murders of 100+ million people and how that’s justified for “social justice” and get back to me.

    Talk about a child-like argument. Where did I say anything about government having total control of a country and committing mass murder? Straw man much? Anyone that would call you a reasonable and intelligent conservative has obviously never actually spoken with one. You’re a child whose idea of “intelligent debate” consists of a near endless rant about the evils of the “gubmint” as witnessed through your own anecdotal experiences as if that makes it true for all. Ridiculous. I won’t waste my time defending what I didn’t bring up.
    ..

    I don’t hate government, and only a moron would say I do. I merely state the facts

    By your long-winded and banal rant, it certainly seems that you do. Name calling already? Seems as if I struck a nerve.

    Lets try to keep it civil. Name calling almost never serves a purpose. Yes, I have done it on here when angry,

    Yeah, as evidenced above. Very civil.

    Clearly you’ve never left your home state.

    I’ve dealt with a few state governments and the federal government and, as I said, my transactions have been quite efficient. You obviously can’t see past your own bad experience(s) and it has blinded you.

    My example on ethanol proves that, which I note you avoid talking about, your avoidance speaks volumes about your knowledge of government and the depth of your argument

    I don’t have the time or the inclination to wade through the depths of all your endless rantings but I’ll say this: Ethanol was in response to the oil embargo in the early 1970s and the idea was then pushed heavily by corporate america because it’s good business for them. It may not make any sense for the country but it pays awfully well for the handful of corporations involved in it. If you think that that’s an indictment of government rather than corporate america, you’re mistaken. Much of our government is bought and paid for by their campaign donations and lobbyists and it has a very corrosive effect. That’s the root of the problem.

    Only on the Swamp would your comment be taken for “intelligent criticism”, when in reality it’s a pathetic child’s argument that screams “My idea is better nah nah nah!

    More impotent rage and name-calling. Classy. Let me know when you’ve grown up enough to have an adult conversation about the issues.

  • http://liberalspin.wordpress.com darkskinned

    “Pawlenty will need to sharpen his own points, rather than just sharply rebuke Obama.”

    Didn’t just bashing Bush get Obama elected, so Pawlenty should be fine with a similar approach.

  • sasquatch08

    “Talk about a child-like argument. Where did I say anything about government having total control…”
    .
    Well you are one of the people on here arguing for higher taxes on rich people to be “fair”, massive regulation of everything from energy to healthcare to cars to firearms to food, so I’d say you’re pretty well on your way to micromanaging the economy, which is what everyone derives their lives from, hence the government would basically have total control.
    .
    “…but it pays awfully well for the handful of corporations involved in it. If you think that that’s an indictment of government rather than corporate america, you’re mistaken.”
    .
    How exactly is the government forcing me to put 10% ethanol in my gas tank AND taking my money to subsidize it’s production NOT an indictment of government? It’s not the CEO’s collecting taxes and deciding how to spend them, it’s the government. CEO’s aren’t passing laws, the government is.
    .
    Are you suggesting that these big, evil, corporations actually threatened the entire 1970′s government with assassination if they didn’t get a subsidy? That this was a such credible threat that the current government is still quaking in its boots due to the thought of their horrible deaths at the hands of CEO’s? Please. Government had to AGREE to pass those laws and hand out those subsidies, and it tacitly agrees to them every year by not ending them.
    .
    Government is responsible for these problems, not business. Business’ may like the free money and they may cry if you take it away, but they are certainly not in any position to force the federal government to give it to them.
    .
    To borrow a liberal argument in favor the ACA, if you can’t turn a profit without a government subsidy, perhaps your business model isn’t the best? Government has a legitimate role, but picking winners and losers in the private sector, driving up the price of energy for political reasons, telling law abiding citizens they can’t have a gun and that their car must get a certain MPG, banning salt and trans fats, taking the toys of of Happy Meals and forcing people to buy insurance are not part of that role.
    .
    “It may not make any sense for the country”
    .
    Did I miss a memo or something? Isn’t that exactly what we elect these retards to do? The “right thing” for the country?
    .
    “Much of our government is bought and paid for by their campaign donations and lobbyists and it has a very corrosive effect. That’s the root of the problem.”
    .
    On that I agree, but do you also mean those public sector unions getting paid in tax dollars and then kicking them into campaign coffers? The lobbyists they buy with our money? Public sector unions have a share of blame in this too, and a rather large one at that.

  • diecash1

    Well you are one of the people on here arguing for higher taxes on rich people to be “fair”, massive regulation of everything from energy to healthcare to cars to firearms to food

    Oh really? Care to point to all the posts that I’ve written suggesting any of that? I await your “evidence.”
    ..
    This

    How exactly is the government forcing me to put 10% ethanol in my gas tank AND taking my money to subsidize it’s production NOT an indictment of government?

    and this

    Are you suggesting that these big, evil, corporations actually threatened the entire 1970′s government with assassination if they didn’t get a subsidy?

    are related. Perhaps you’re not old enough to recall, but there was a virtual panic among Americans after the oil embargo and they were receptive to any way to lessen that threat. Corporations pushed the idea on government and no, they didn’t threaten them with “assassination.” It was more of the same way things are done now — lobbying, slush funds, campaign contributions or lack thereof. That’s how it was done. Once it was put in place, it became that much harder to remove as corporations are not exactly willing to give up their government goodies. Government is culpable but it’s not as if they didn’t have serious help getting their. Until there is real campaign finance reform and a repeal of corporate personhood, it’s unlike to change.

    Isn’t that exactly what we elect these retards to do? The “right thing” for the country?

    See my point above. They are largely bought and paid for.

blog comments powered by Disqus