Obama To Chamber: Please Won’t You Be My Neighbor?

About 16 months ago, Barack Obama’s White House launched a frontal assault on its neighbor across Lafayette Square, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett laid out a strategy that bypassed the chamber by reaching out directly to corporate CEOs, who Jarrett called “the actual people who are on the front lines, running businesses, trying to create jobs.” It didn’t work out all that great, according to Obama and his aides.

So on Monday, by contrast, Obama traveled across the park to pay homage to the organization it once spurned. “I’m here today because I am convinced, as Tom [Donahue, the Chamber's president] mentioned in his introduction, that we can and we must work together,” Obama said, all but erasing the memory of Obama’s previous strategy of working around the Chamber.

With two of his biggest conflicts with the Chamber–health care reform, financial regulatory reform, and climate change legislation–fading into the rearview mirror, Obama presented himself as a friendly neighbor making a warm house call. “I strolled over from across the street,” he said at the top of his remarks. “And, look, maybe if we — if we had brought over a fruitcake when I first moved in, we would have gotten off to a better start. But I’m going to make up for it.”

The last part, about making up for it, was not in his prepared remarks. But the sentiment flowed through them. At times, Obama offered himself as a pitchman for American business. “I don’t charge a commission,” he joked. At times, he presented himself as a listener. “I want to know,” he said. He also pleaded for business to help him, and the country, bring down the unemployment rate by investing now some of their significant cash reserves. “We’re in this together,” he said. “So I just want to encourage you to get in the game.”

On substance, he made no mention of climate change and only a glancing mention of health care reform. But he did promote new trade deals with South Korea, Panama and Columbia. He spoke of new tax cuts to promote investments and scientific research and technology investments. He also proposed  revenue-neutral reforms to the corporate tax code, which would eliminate specialized tax breaks while lowering the overall tax rate. “We need something smarter, something simpler, something fairer,” he said. He also spoke of regulatory reforms, a hot topic for business leaders, without making any clear commitments about which regulations should be considered “outdated and unnecessary.”

But this speech was not about announcing a new initiative or set of reforms. It was about appearances. Obama was publicly withdrawing his former posture. He was endorsing the power an organization he once attempted to minimize. He was calling for cooperation after two years of rather brutal fights, which culminated with the Chamber spending more than $32 million on the midterms, almost all of it to defeat Democrats. The mood has shifted. It was a beautiful day in the neighborhood. But there are no assurances about how long the new spirit of cooperation will last.

Related Topics: u.s. chamber of commerce, Barack Obama, Health Care, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • ricardo4max

    why in the world would ANY intelligent businessman or woman invest a penny when the Marxist anti-American in the White House and his Democrat thug accomplices in Congress have painted a bullseye on their backs?

  • newfreedomblog

    Eating crow is what we call it where I am from. I still don’t trust the man any further than I could throw him. 2012 can’t come soon enough.

  • Matt

    Both of these characters look equally silly with today’s little love-fest. Obama looks bad because he is essentially groveling at the feet of a group of Republican partisans that spent millions to bring down the Democratic majority and, in essence, the Obama presidency.

    And why is the Chamber inviting and expecting cooperation from the president after that scorched-earth campaign of 2010? Funny that now they’re breaking from the Republicans they helped elect over infrastructure spending, etc. what, they didn’t believe these tea party folks would actually follow through on what they promised? Gut and cut…
    http://www.sunstateactivist.org

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Maybe he should tell them if they don’t start spending the hordes of cash they are sitting on, he will tax it and spend it for them? If they don’t like that they can get the hell out of the biggest market in the world.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Well there seems to be at least one president the Chamber supports.
    .
    President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
    .
    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/02/chamber-of-commerce-undercuts-iran-sanctions.php?ref=fpblg#
    .

  • freeinpa

    “Maybe he should tell them if they don’t start spending the hordes of cash they are sitting on, he will tax it and spend it for them? If they don’t like that they can get the hell out of the biggest market in the world”
    .
    The old faithful- TAX THEM.

    Most of the cash is held by overseas arms of domestic companies. The reason the cash remains on the balance sheet and not spent? The US will tax the cash if they repatriate it here. See how well that works!

  • freeinpa

    Obama is doing stand-up comedy with his speech to the Chamber of Commerce

    .
    We are going to re-build the economy by cutting regulation, lowering taxes, support basic R&D, training 100,000 new teachers and support cost efficient infrastructure. (all with a straight face)
    .
    After spending 2 years adding pages of regulation and giving agencies carte blanch to legislate with regulation, pushing for higher taxes, cutting research at NASA or vilifying drug companies , supporting teachers unions who make it impossible to fire bad teachers and re-instating the Davis-Bacon Act which burdens every public project with much higher costs.

    .
    Makes one wonder if Obama is clueless or he hopes that we are. Evidence points to the former rather than the later. But most of all he is in over his head

    (also posted on Morning Must Reads)

  • chupkar

    Whenever Freep and Newfie are this active, I know Obama is doing a good job.

  • freeinpa

    I guess we can add that to the list of things you don’t know but think you do as well.

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    “About 16 months ago, Barack Obama’s White House launched a frontal assault on its neighbor across Lafayette Square, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.”

    You mean by supporting the multi-billion dollar gifts to some of the Chamber’s largest and most influential members? Sign me up for some of that abuse?

    Can we just agree that Obama never declared war on business or attacked business in any way? Any rational look at recent history would have to conclude that he saved the Chamber’s collective butts.

  • notfooledbydistractions

    Big Business seems to have been doing just fine under the oppression of the Obama Administration. Record setting profits…oh the abuse!!

    Their self proclaimed “war on business” is just nonsense.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Here’s the work of a reporter on the matter: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2010/1007.verini.html

    With unemployment, statistical and personal, on the mind of every officeholder up for reelection this year, Republicans and Democrats claim to agree on one thing: small business will be the engine of job growth after the Great Recession. But while the Chamber has as legitimate a claim to representing this sector as any organization around—96 percent of its members have fewer than 100 employees—it is also beholden to a cadre of multinationals whose interests are often inimical to those of small business. In 2008, a third of its revenues came from just nineteen companies.

    “What we always said was the Chamber does best when there’s a Democrat in the White House, because you want businesses to be scared,” a former Chamber lobbyist said. “There’s no better time to raise money than when businesses are scared.”

    In other words, a large part of what the Chamber sells is political cover. For multibillion-dollar insurers, drug makers, and medical device manufacturers who are too smart and image conscious to make public attacks of their own, the Chamber of Commerce is a friend who will do the dirty work. “I want to give them all the deniability they need,” says Donohue. That deniability is evidently worth a lot. According to a January article in the National Journal, six insurers alone—Aetna, Cigna, Humana, Kaiser Foundation Health Plans, UnitedHealth Group, and Wellpoint—pumped up to $20 million into the Chamber last year.

    Lesher was, by all accounts, a good deal more ideological than Donohue, but also less of a political gamesman. It was this combination of traits that led Lesher to his bravest, but unluckiest, political decision: to cooperate with the Clinton White House on health care reform. Chamber members had been telling Lesher for years that their health care costs were out of control, and many supported a national policy of some kind.

    When [Donohue] returned in 1997, he immediately took steps to win the Chamber back into the GOP fold, supporting Republican initiatives and opposing Democratic ones.

    “Donohue brought in generalist lobbyists who knew about the politics but not the substance of the issues,” says Willard Workman, a Chamber vice president from 1988 to 2004. “They couldn’t go to the Hill and talk about an export-control regime, because they couldn’t spell ‘regime.’”

    When I asked Donohue why, for instance, the financial sector shouldn’t be more closely regulated in light of the recent meltdown, he shot back, “Would they have caught Madoff? Would they have caught some guy at Boeing or Caterpillar or anywhere else that was a crook? They wouldn’t have.”

    He mused on, “There is no place in our society where there is not warts. The media? Wow. The Chamber business? The lobbying business? The business business? The church? The Boy Scouts? We got jerks every place.”

    According to a former Chamber employee, Donohue, when he was working under Lesher in the 1970s and early ’80s, was repeatedly rebuked for making use of chauffeured cars, and in at least one instance hiring a private plane for a business trip. “He always needed perks,” Lesher told me.

    By 2001, the Chamber was low enough on cash that it took out a $30 million line of credit on its building on H Street, a lithic beaux arts building situated off Lafayette Park within shouting distance of—and not appreciably smaller than—the White House. (The Chamber claims the line of credit was taken out because the cash balances existing when Donohue came to the Chamber had been pledged to an IT vendor, and that the line is still used for capital improvements.) For extra income the Chamber now rents its roof to Fox News for the network’s White House remotes. In 2008, the last year for which records are available, the Chamber posted operating losses of over $2.5 million and a net asset loss of over $29 million, according to its IRS filings.

  • shepherdwong

    Here’s the work of a reporter on the matter:
    .
    No kidding. A devastating demonstration of how our politics is being run by political morons, psychopaths and incompetents. At the Chamber too.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    http://www.alternet.org/story/149806/vision%3A_everyday_brits_are_in_revolt_against_wealthy_tax_cheats_–_can_we_do_that_here
    .
    .
    One of the things the Chamber helps big corporations do is hide their tax liability.
    .
    .
    If the Brits can do this why couldn’t we?

  • paulejb

    Matt@3,

    “…he is essentially groveling”

    And here we all thought that the Barack Obama was the president of all the people of the United States. When did the rules change so that he is merely the mouthpiece of the Democrat party?

  • swissArmyBrainBETA

    the pettiness of the business community’s anger was evident earlier in the reaction to a little standard populist anti-corporate rhetoric. based on that experience, i think a little substance free flattery is a smart move. its hillarious to think that should matter, but whatever

  • paulejb

    Derek@4,

    And the King decreed that all his subjects must spend their own money by his command. Didn’t we already go through all this back in 1776?

  • paulejb

    notfooled…@9,

    “Their self proclaimed ‘war on business’ is just nonsense.”

    Indeed it is. It was also ill advised and ideologically driven. Hopefully the Obama gang will cut it out.

  • freeinpa

    “Can we just agree that Obama never declared war on business or attacked business in any way”
    .
    Really? Are you delusional or is it just another liberal lying to himself in order to keep the faith in a bankrupt philosophy

  • paulejb

    swissArmyBrain,

    No one likes to be demonized by demagogues. Can’t blame the Chamber for being ticked off.

  • freeinpa

    “to a little standard populist anti-corporate rhetoric.”
    .
    I guess they took umbrage to the volumes of regulatory rules and HC reform was that shoved down their throats and the throat of the American public. In the end Obama discovered that they could survive but he couldn’t since he knows nothing about the economy or how it runs. Unfortunately it is the American public that are paying the price for Obama’s arrogance and ignorance

  • paulejb

    Paul-no…@5,

    Even a cursory reading of the TPM article makes your interpretation of it fatuous.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    I just thought that since the right is going to accuse him of being a left-wing radical, no matter what he does or does not do, he might as well act like one.

  • chupkar

    Translation: “I know I am but what are you?” Are you really 10 years old inside?

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    @freeinpa: The Chamber was a major Wall Street bailout supporter. If they were intellectually honest they would put statues of Obama and Geithner in their lobby.

  • square1

    Why don’t you go look up what the term Marxist means and then come back and try to make a halfway intelligent comment?

  • Paul-no not that one

    You have grown tiresome at an impressive rate.

  • paulejb

    square1@1.1

    Karl or Groucho?

  • paulejb

    Derek@4.3

    Not unless he wants to join Jimmy Carter as another failed one term president. The voters did not vote for left wing radicalism in 2008.

  • paulejb

    Paul-no@5.2,

    I get that a lot when I am pointing out the obvious inconsistencies in a poster’s comments. It never fails to raise their ire.

  • freeinpa

    Gee you must have gotten that with your fortune cookie at lunch

  • freeinpa

    “If they were intellectually honest”
    .
    What a relief. That is one thing we never have to worry about the left being intellectually honest– they lie to us and themselves

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    You guys keep insisting he is a radical left-wing extremist so it looks like they did vote for left-wing extremism in 2010, because Obama was elected by the majority.

  • freeinpa

    “It was also ill advised and ideologically driven. Hopefully the Obama gang will cut it out.”
    .
    They will and it will be short-lived. When American business finally pulls this administration out of the economic hole they have put the country in with massive spending, gifts to their political allies and attempts to takeover industries and massive debts and deficits, they will revert to form. Then supported by a complicit press then re-write history to tell how government “investments” is what did it and the need to continue their welath re-distribution

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    The only more effective thing Obama could do is put on a pair of assless chaps and charge by the hour. I know his reelection coffers have to be filled somehow but what an absolute streetwalking POS. We … are … f@cked. And imagine, this was to be the correction of GOP excess.

  • freeinpa

    If Obama and the Team Donkey Congress are all centrists it is hard to fathom that the Centrist political organization would be closing its doors.
    .
    Could it be that the delusional left has lied (again) to us about all the centrist running around their party?

    Late Breaking News!

    The Democratic Leadership Council, the iconic centrist
    organization of the Clinton years, is out of money and could close its doors next week

  • 53_3

    It’s that penchant for “recreational hatred”…

  • freeinpa

    “You guys keep insisting he is a radical left-wing extremist so it looks like they did vote for left-wing extremism in 2010, because Obama was elected by the majority.”
    .
    He and the Demos elected ran as moderate and spewing conservative values and the complicit press took a guided tour never questioning Obama about his extreme left philosophy.

    .
    That majority opinion of Obama changed as they realized he was not a moderate but a lying left wing extremist. Funny thing about a liberal they can hide what they are and lie about what they want but eventually they have to show their hand. And when they do it never ends well fo rthem.

  • shepherdwong

    The only more effective thing Obama could do is put on a pair of assless chaps and charge by the hour.
    .
    Do you have a poll showing that independents would like to see that? How about a John Harris column?
    .
    (I’m pretty sure that President McCain would never have gotten out of bed).

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    What would some examples that he is a “lying left wing extremist?” Was it bumping up the troop level in Afghanistan, failing to nationalize a single bank he bailed out, letting the public option die without a whimper?

  • paulejb

    freeinpa@9.2,

    It does bring to mind the story of the scorpion and the frog, doesn’t it?

    It’s their nature.

  • square1

    Shorter Chamber of Commerce:

    President Obama is anti-business because he doesn’t swallow.

  • square1

    Freeper:
    .
    Do you take pride in being too stupid to know who controls the Democratic Party?
    .
    I mean, I don’t support either the corporate wing of the GOP or the tea party wing. But I know how much control each has and in what areas.
    .
    I find it hilarious that Republicans are incapable of making similar, objective analyses of opposing political factions.

  • rover27

    “You have grown tiresome at an impressive rate.”

    OMG, truer words were never spoken. This guy is one the biggest blowhards to ever post here.

    Hey. Paulieboy, go away. Far, far away.

  • 53_3

    It’s actually good square1:
    .
    The more they believe in their own TP, the more likely they will misjudge political situations.
    .
    The outcome of the election may just be a case in point…

  • 53_3

    It takes a Micheal Scherer to put Obama into this context. He must have watched Obama’s interview with O’Reilly.
    .
    A word to the wisest:
    .
    There are some Americans who are chuckling to themselves mightily over this one…

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    “President Obama is anti-business because he doesn’t swallow.”
    .
    And the GOP does, right? There’s a campaign poster gagging to be made:
    .
    Vote Obama b/c at least he doesn’t swallow

  • shepherdwong

    And the GOP does, right?
    .
    With both faces. Next question.

  • 3xfire3

    rovermutt,
    .
    “You have grown tiresome at an impressive rate.”

    “{OMG, truer words were never spoken. This guy is one the biggest blowhards to ever post here.

    Hey. Paulieboy, go away. Far, far away.”
    .
    Paulejb.
    .
    Your comments are always factual, intelligent and rational.
    .
    It’s quite comical watching the liberals try to degrade you and try to move you off this site. Most of them are such Ideologies that they really believe the garbage that’s in their closed illogical minds. Therefore whenever someone factually shows they are full of it, they start ranting and name calling.
    .
    Liberalism = Closed Illogical Mind

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Hmmm.
    Corporate profits are through the roof while employment remains stagnant. And we’re supposed to feel sorry for the poor Corporations for the way the exectutive branch is ramming regulations down their throats? Poor effing babies. I think they’ll get over it.
    ,
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/phd9/2254404824/

  • paulejb

    rover@5.4,

    Now rover, it’s not my fault that you boys can’t handle a little competition. Must have not been much adult supervision around here until I showed up.

  • freeinpa

    “Poor effing babies. I think they’ll get over it.”

    Question is will Obama and th erest of the whining liberals get over it

  • earsoftheworld

    I’d love to know the thinking here: oh they did their best to screw us over on health/financial reform and did all they could to discredit us, but they do have deep pockets, so let me go over there and kiss some ass.
    How pathetic. Guess it never hurts to suck up to the boss, even if he’s a scumbag who would as easily throw you under the bus as help you out.
    .
    Did I really vote for this guy? Oh well, live and learn.

  • http://stellawinslet.wordpress.com stellawinslet

    Even so Obama, appearing in Fox television, acknowledged that the outlawed Brotherhood was well organized and had strains of ideology that are anti-US. But he exuded confidence that a representative govt would emerge from the ongoing turmoil and Washington could work with it..
    http://fms.nu/eebAHz

blog comments powered by Disqus