John Kerry as Diplomatic Utility Man

Crowley wrote back in December:

[The WikiLeaks cables] support the idea that Kerry has been an effective envoy for the Obama administration–a kind of utility player who can lay diplomatic groundwork for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or step into a crisis where other officials can’t–as when he assuaged an ornery Afghan president Hamid Karzai during last year’s elections at a moment when Karzai wasn’t willing to deal with Richard Holbrooke. Kerry has also waded into the politics of Middle East peace, international climate change, US aid to Pakistan, and preventing civil war in Sudan.

This has prompted a recent spike in the long-running chatter about Kerry’s prospects to succeed Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. It’s a job Kerry is known to have wanted, even lobbied for, when Obama first took office. People close to Kerry wave away such talk as a Beltway parlor game, and although Clinton has said she won’t serve more than one term, there’s no sign her departure is imminent (although she has often spoken of the exhausting nature of her job). At a minimum, though, Kerry is positioning himself nicely for the State job if and when it does open up.

Joan Vennochi, writing today in the Boston Globe, makes the case that turmoil in Egypt has put Kerry in a similarly critical role and that he remains interested in succeeding Clinton at State:

AS EGYPT battles over its future, Senator John Kerry is negotiating his own.

The Bay State’s senior senator is running an unofficial campaign to become the next secretary of state. For once, he looks artful, as well as ambitious.

His recent opinion piece in the New York Times said what President Obama couldn’t or wouldn’t: Mubarak must go.

Speculation about Kerry’s designs on Foggy Bottom aside, it’s clear how valuable a strong voice on Foreign Relations can be. In a situation as fluid and fraught as Egypt’s, where every administration statement must be couched in cautious diplo-speak, Kerry is someone who can (and did) take a firmer position early on without knocking the administration’s official stance off kilter.

Related Topics: John Kerry, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • afguy

    Sooo… where does he stand regarding being able to influence our “knee-jerk” habit of supporting one “quasi-democratic” leader after another in the ME?
    .
    Any chance of his being able to get some real democratic and moral principles injected into our foreign policy…
    .
    Or is he going to be the latest “messenger” for our “same as it’s always been” unquestioning support for Israel and any strong man leader who will go along with our policy in that regard, in return for oodles and gobs of military and personal financial aid?
    .
    Color me skeptical…

  • nflfoghorn

    Just ’cause it’s Friday: What if Monica was chosen to succeed HC?

  • lcky9

    Now your assuming a lot.. IF there is a change in PRESIDENTS all Kerry’s work is for NOTHING.. However.. all things considered those that do NOT support Israel do so at their own risk.. therefore anyone who is ANTI Israel should NOT be representing this country..More over most Americans DO support Israel.. but leave it to the ELITISTS to not worry about ANYTHING but their POWER grab..

  • afguy

    therefore anyone who is ANTI Israel should NOT be representing this country
    .
    Strange… I always thought Israel was its own country with a set of interests that MAY (or MAY NOT) coincide with our own.
    .
    Did they become another U.S. state (or territory) when I wasn’t looking?

  • nflfoghorn

    It’s unfortunate that both Israel and Palestine want to be the lead dog. Chutzpay makes it a good chance nothing’ll get done.

  • nflfoghorn

    chutzpah

  • afguy

    That would really “blow”, wouldn’t it? ;-)

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    It’s amazing how many people are willing to complete suspend the ability and desire for moral reasoning.
    .
    ny time you determine that someone or something can do no wrong, the amount of time before ‘doing something wrong’ becomes inevitably shrinks to zero.

  • hippooath

    Let me break out my decoder.
    .
    Presidents Nothing Not Anti Not Do Elitists Anything Power.
    .
    I’m sorry, the decoder is broken or your idjut speak can’t be deciphered.

  • hippooath

    Chutzpay is what we pay for their chutzpah.

  • nflfoghorn

    Leaving a huge stain on world diplomacy….
    …and a whole new meaning to Foggy Bottom. ;)

  • afguy

    Here’s a cheery thought…
    .
    Bill could be dispatched to get “on top” of any potential “hot spots”…

  • nflfoghorn

    :)

  • newfreedomblog

    John Kerry for President, 2012!!

  • nflfoghorn

    But on the positive side it would bring Arabs and Jews to the table. Smoking victory see-gars and all.

  • nflfoghorn

    1.1 = 2.4

  • afguy

    And let’s not forget her talent for “under the table” negotiations and “back-door” diplomacy…

  • afguy

    She could help to retire our “mounting” debt…

  • nflfoghorn

    Bring in Linda Tripp as a negotiator – she’s just…like…them.

  • afguy

    She could give “full-throated” support for our foreign policy in private consultations with world leaders.

  • nflfoghorn

    Yeah, right. You’re a firm supporter.
    A suppository, even.

  • afguy

    Bring in Linda Tripp as a negotiator – she’s just…like…them.
    .
    Nah. That would result in “wilting” influence.

  • nflfoghorn

    RE 2.3: Poker face!
    Poke…
    er…
    face!

  • afguy

    All these “in-u-end”-dos… we SHOULD be ashamed of ourselves.

  • nflfoghorn

    WE didn’t get our groove on that day ;)

  • allthingsinaname

    Tsk, Tsk, Children, Children!

  • afguy

    We definitely need someone who can endure sustained negotiating sessions, sometime pulling “all-nighters”, who works well “in the clutch”, and is flexible enough to adapt to changing positions and fluid situations…

  • afguy

    Sacredh,
    .
    These are for you. In memory of old times….

  • nflfoghorn

    I started it. Guilty as charged!

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Naw. We’ll keep Obama another term. Then maybe a Kerry/Clinton ticket?

  • nflfoghorn

    Still cost us $40M less than Ken Starr’s investigation. ;)

  • apr2563

    Where’s the fine hand of John Bolton in our diplomacy.
    Trouble in Rwanda=bomb Iran
    Hurricane in Australia=bomb Iran
    Global warming=bomb Iran
    Or, as Glen Beck opines, we didn’t bomb Babylon because it was part of the caliphate, sharia take over of the world. After all, Frank Gaffney says their are Muslim Brotherhood members who have infiltrated the administration.
    .
    These are the guys who should be in charge.

  • http://beaverpig.wordpress.com beaverpig

    The idea of John Kerry as Secretary of State sends shivers down my spine — I donated to Hillary’s campaign, largely due to her strength on foreign policy, and largely support her efforts as Secretary of State. I can’t imagine a worse replacement than John Kerry. Yes, he has a lot of foreign policy experience but, based upon my experience as an avid C-SPAN watcher for the past quarter century and other qualifications, I have trouble thinking of many foreign policy issues where Kerry had original thought or stood on the right side of an issue, ranging from the Soviet Union to the surge in Iraq. Also, he is bold when he should keep his mouth shut and equivocates when he should show some spine. Generally, he believes in and advocates for American weakness as the central pillar of his world view. Hillary Clinton does the opposite. I’m still not sure what President Obama thinks — he started his term as more of a Kerry-ite but has come around to reality a bit. I blame Obama’s initial weakness on his lack of experience in foreign affairs. Unfortunately for Kerry, his weakness is the result of his long experience. Remember, John Kerry, the 2004 Democratic presidential candidate, lost the election to G.W. Bush largely because of the public’s doubts about his national security credentials — Obama would do a lot of damage to his re-election chances if Americans knew Kerry was waiting in the wings to become SoS.

  • apr2563

    You do understand that Hillary is the person sending Kerry on these diplomatic forays.
    .
    I only wish we had had Kerry in charge of foreign policy rather than Bush.

blog comments powered by Disqus