State of the Union Preview: Obama’s Unofficial 2012 Kickoff

How many memorable State of the Union speeches can you think of? I can conjure just three indelible moments from the past 20 years. There’s Bill Clinton’s 1993 vow, complete with theatrical pen-wave, to veto any health insurance bill lacking universal coverage. Chastened by the Republican Revolution two years later, Clinton declared that “the era of big government is over.” And in early 2002 George Bush addressed a nation still traumatized after 9/11 and fatefully warned that an “axis of evil” menaced America.

The truth is that, for all the pomp and circumstance, State of the Union speeches tend to be small-bore affairs that make headlines but not history. They are occasions for tactical positioning and debate-framing.

That doesn’t mean they aren’t important. The short term matters, too. And that may be especially true at this transitional—and perhaps pivotal—moment in Barack Obama’s presidency. Over the past three months Obama has resurrected a presidency that seemed in danger of failure. With his successes in the lame duck Congress last month, his winning response to the Tucson massacre, and a steady new trickle of economic optimism, he has reclaimed some of the political capital snatched from him in the November elections. Witness his rising approval rating, and the way Republicans–having enjoyed their cathartic vote to repeal health care in the House—are now arguing amongst themselves about what budget cuts they actually dare to enact.

But this remains a fragile political moment for the president. The economic recovery is painfully slow. The public is still skeptical about big government and debt-fueled spending. The war in Afghanistan is unpopular, Middle East peace is elusive as ever, and China seems to be overtaking the U.S. on the global stage.

To continue on his sure-footed path, Obama will have to address all these problems—and demonstrate he’s in a better position to handle them than his Republican adversaries. This will, in effect, be Obama’s opening pitch for re-election in the 2012 presidential campaign. With that in mind, here are three central themes—related to the economy, foreign policy, and political discourse itself—to watch for tonight:

1. The Budget Triple Lindy: When it comes to the budget and economy, Obama will have to perform a delicate dance. He’ll want to boast about the economy’s gradual comeback while also showing he understands how grim it still feels for millions of Americans. He’ll want to instill come consumer optimism (the cheapest form of stimulus, as Larry Summers likes to say) without repeating his spring 2010 mistake of raising false hopes about the recovery.

Talking about the budget will be even trickier. Advance previews from the White House indicate that Obama will try to make three simultaneous points, all of which feel in tension with one another. One is that America needs a new round of “investment”—i.e. spending on infrastructure, innovation and education—to keep our economy on a strong and globally competitive foundation. That said, Obama will argue that we simultaneously need to impose fiscal discipline to reign in our swelling debt. But point three is that such discipline has to be imposed over the long term. That the deep and immediate budget cuts proposed by conservative Republicans, he will argue, threaten to have an anti-stimulative effect that will harm the economy.

That’s a treacherous dance worthy of Black Swan. Which is one reason Obama might want to change the subject to the GOP’s fiscal stewardship. Specifically, he could take the advice of former Clinton speechwriter Steve Waldman and try some political jujitsu, by looking to highlight the paradox of debt-obsessed Republicans who consider big deficit-expanding tax cuts their top priority.

But listen closely to what Obama says about the long-term picture. Ever since a presidential commission on the debt issued a report in November that took on several sacred budget cows—including defense and entitlement programs—speculation abounded that Obama might endorse some of its ideas. Tonight would be an appropriate time to do so. (Although the White House is already ruling out one of the main possibilities—gradual reductions in Social Security benefits.)

2. Security and Diplomacy: Nearly five hundred Americans died in Afghanistan last year. But it’s been a long time since Obama discussed the war at any length during prime time. Will Obama offer anything more substantive than vague assurances of slow but steady progress? Probably not. More likely, he’ll deal with the painful subject as quickly as possible—preferring to emphasize the progress his administration has made in the fight against al Qaeda. He’s also sure to tout the happy story of setbacks to Iran’s nuclear program , as well as last month’s Senate ratification of a major nuclear arms treaty with Russia.

Above all, look for Obama to linger on the subject of China. As Joe has reported, Americans are deeply anxious about Beijing’s rapid ascent. Obama will be quick to boast about progress made during Hu Jintao’s recent state visit here. But he’ll also want to demonstrate that he hasn’t gone soft on points of US-Sino friction like trade and currency.

3. Mr. Grown Up: Obama’s speech in Tucson resonated because it harnessed an apparent national desire for more comity and civility in politics. While this is an ideal Obama has long promoted—it’s never been as politically potent as it is now. Look for him to return to the theme tonight.

Doing so will test Republican leaders who rode the fervor of their base to big midterm gains but are now nervous the Tea Party’s boiling rhetoric could alienate the independent voters who want the parties to work together. (When Republican Rep. Joe Wilson shouted “You lie!” during Obama’s September 2009 address to Congress on heath care, he may have been channeling anti-Obama anger in a way that usefully riled his party’s base. But the climate has changed since then, and any incivility on the part of Republicans in the chamber will likely play to Obama’s advantage.)

It’s easier to be civil when you’re setting the agenda from the White House than it is when you’re leading the rancorous opposition on Capitol Hill. The more Obama raises the standard, the less room John Boehner and Mitch McConnell have to operate.

Taken together, you have the outlines of a presidential campaign pitch. And if Obama hits upon some themes that wind up carrying him to re-election next year, maybe tonight’s speech will be remembered as a historic one after all.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • liberalmeltdown

    Mr Hypocrisy makes another speech. Oh gee, I can’t wait. Please, please lecture me on how I SHOULD be better. Meanwhile, you can be a lying, scumbag politician. You fool over half the people; ain’t that a crime?
    .
    Your minions carry out you mission. You say, let’s be more civil, you piece of crap. For the last four years you have done nothing but attack. Now, you want to claim the higher ground. F U and the the stupid little horse you rode in on.
    .
    You make me want to puke. Nothing you say is truth. You go where the wind blows you. Or, where your handlers think that they can blow the wind. You are stinkin’ it up in here.

  • kbanginmotown

  • kbanginmotown

    President Reagan’s “evil empire” speech certainly set a defining tone for his presidency, although later on it hampered both his and President Bush Sr’s ability to work constructively with the collapsing USSR and newly formed CIS.
    .
    Funny how demonizing your enemy does that…

  • newfreedomblog

    il·lu·sion (-lzhn)
    n.
    1. a. An erroneous perception of reality.
    b. An erroneous concept or belief.
    2. The condition of being deceived by a false perception or belief.
    3. Something, such as a fantastic plan or desire, that causes an erroneous belief or perception.
    4. Illusionism in art.
    5. A fine transparent cloth, used for dresses or trimmings.
    .
    This Mr Crowley is exactly what you and most people who have been touting the meme that “Obama is moving to the middle”.
    .
    Obama has not moved anywhere. He is firmly locked in the same place he has been since being elected President. The only things which have changed are the words to describe what he wants to do going forward. Nothing more.
    .
    “Investment” for Obama means more massive spending. Spending of dollars we simply do not have. Period.
    .
    The lame stream media which you represent so well are the ones who are desperately hoping Obama swings to the middle tonight in his speech. To your perception and delusion, that may be the case. People hear exactly what they want to hear, especially when the speech is given by the golden tongue of the ages, Barack Hussein Obama.
    .
    But let not the fact that JOBS are still the number one issue at hand, this speech will deliver no hope for jobs for those 14 million + Americans who are facing the end of their un-employment benefits soon. This is the key to whether our “dear Leader” is re-elected in 2012. If he is not successful in reducing un-employment by the end of 2011, Obama goes down in history as yet another one-term failed Democrat President.
    .
    When your policies to date have focused on everything but what they should have focused on, it is extremely difficult to change mid-stream. He has wasted his time in office on far left liberal dreams for America. We the People are not stupid, no matter how hard you try to paint the picture otherwise.

  • http://youni89.wordpress.com Youni

    there was not a single bit of actual logic in your ranting. People like you are whats bad for America.

  • chohkmah

    I have to wonder how many times the political winds have to shift before writers in the media begin to realize that trying to call an election 2 years beforehand is an exercise in insanity….

    …236 years and counting… they’ll get it, any day now…

  • chohkmah

    “We the People are not stupid, no matter how hard you try to paint the picture otherwise.”
    .
    a) Once again, man, you’re not The People. Stop trying to speak for anyone other than yourself.
    .
    b) On the not being stupid bit, you prove yourself the contrary with each additional word you type.
    .
    Have a nice day. Careful not to pop that vein in your forehead.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Won’t the billionaire tax cut jobs be kicking in real soon?

  • 3xfire3

    “Obama’s speech in Tucson resonated because it harnessed an apparent national desire for more comity and civility in politics.—While this is an ideal Obama has long promoted”
    .
    Michael, how can you make such an ignorant foolish statement?
    .
    Obama has been the most divisive President in the last 50 years. His demonizing statements and name calling directed at his political opponents are worse than by any president I have ever witnessed.
    .
    To make such a statement shows what a Biased Partisan Hack of a Reporter you really are.
    .
    Try being honest sometime. You might find it to be a rewarding experience.

  • kbanginmotown

    Haha, chohkmah!
    .
    I could imagine our MSM hopping into a time machine to help those primitive reporters of 2 centuries ago…
    .
    “Yea, verily. With the candidacy-platform pronouncement of Mr Adams’ missive to-day, he hath surely established for himself the nomination of this great republick, two years hence…”

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Well said, Meltdown!

  • freeinpa

    “One is that America needs a new round of “investment”—i.e. spending on infrastructure, innovation and education—to keep our economy on a strong and globally competitive foundation”
    .
    This was the same speech to pass the stimulus plan. Result higher deficits, higher debt and higher unemployment

    .
    .
    “by looking to highlight the paradox of debt-obsessed Republicans who consider big deficit-expanding tax cuts their top priority.”
    .
    Minor problem the “Bush” tax cuts have now become the Obama tax cuts as a Democratic Congress and a Democratic President extended them
    .
    .
    “While this is an ideal Obama has long promoted—it’s never been as politically potent as it is now. Look for him to return to the theme tonight.”
    .
    As the old adage goes watch what he does not what he says. Obama calls for civility are the height of hypocrisy. He has called bankers and Wall Street evil. His “Republicans are our enemies” and” if they bring a knife we bring a gun” rhetoric makes his calls for civility a punch line.
    .
    .
    “in November that took on several sacred budget cows—including defense and entitlement programs—speculation abounded that Obama might endorse some of its ideas. Tonight would be an appropriate time to do so.
    .
    Obama has no credibility here either. It has been months since the Commission he created issued its report and outside of vetoing a change to an entitlement program he has offered no direction. In fact all of his rhetoric has been more spending (higher deficits). We aew still waiting for Obama to deliver on a campaign promise of going through the budget “line by line” to rid unnecessary spending. If he has and there have been no cuts forthcoming the American people have thier answer on the seriousness of this administration to deal with the debt and deficit issue.

  • nflfoghorn

    Let me get this right – you want to have sex with both the president AND his horse?
    You do realize that no one has mentioned that he owns a horse.
    As for your peccadillos, well, there’s counseling for both.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    There are a lot of words that can be used to describe a Chicago punk ass thug politician. Civil isn’t one of them.

  • nflfoghorn

    RE 5, 5.1 & 6:
    Go back to bed.

  • nflfoghorn

    Any mention of that TP response to the prez’s message? What does it propose – tax increases for the poor?

  • freeinpa

    Ah the lies the left continues to tell themselves.

  • writescoop

    take a chill pill, and quit carrying on like a drunken teabagger.

  • writescoop

    Dear newfreedomblog:
    Please repeat:
    “It is presumptuous and arrogant for me to consider my personal bloviations as constituting “We the People.”
    Again:
    “It is presumptuous and arrogant for me to consider my personal bloviations as constituting “We the People.”

    That might be a good place to begin shedding your own personal illusions.
    Thank you.

  • nflfoghorn

    Urging you to go to bed for your own good doesn’t qualify as a ‘lie.’

  • freeinpa

    Not facing the reality of Obama is the lie which the left can’t face. He ran on a lie, governs as a lie and now will give us more–the left will hop on, then decry Republicans for incivility and governing as they said they would.

  • newfreedomblog

    The “poor” actually pay taxes? Geez here all this time I thought the poor were really looking for income distribution. You amaze me all the time foggy with your brilliance.

  • nflfoghorn

    Who did he lie to? What did he lie about? Are you serious about your opinion or do you just like to chain-yank on here? I suspect the latter.

  • newfreedomblog

    Dear chohkmah and writescoop;

    No, please do not be offended that I would include far left liberal extremist such as yourselves in anything with the words, We the People.
    .
    Not until we get an edict from our dear Leader, that we must now refer to ourselves as “Comrade” shall I ever include the likes of you two in any response on this blog.

  • freeinpa

    “Who did he lie to? What did he lie about?”
    .
    This is exactly what I mean by not facing reality. Lies? I will go line by line in the budget, You can keep your HC insurance , physician, Friend of small business after attacking continually and saddling with more regulation in 2 years than any other president. We welcome ideas from the other side who our “enemies”. Fluent out of both sides of his mouth.

  • nflfoghorn

    You and your ilk are way too assumptive….

  • nflfoghorn

    And you’re a novice at satire apparently. I said that the tea party would likely get poor people to PAY taxes as part of its MO. I said nothing about the fact that in most cases people who are below the poverty level don’t have to file (or if they do they’ll get a refund). Your response implies that being poor = sponging off the government. Believe what you want – that hasn’t stopped you before.

  • diecash1

    Obama has been the most divisive President in the last 50 years.

    More evidence of your ongoing delusion. Perhaps your dementia doesn’t allow you to remember the “I’m a uniter, not a divider” speech of your hero, W. The irony of that is obviously lost on you.

    Try being honest sometime. You might find it to be a rewarding experience.

    You might really want to try taking your own advice just this once. If you were at all honest, you would admit that you’re utterly clueless and hopelessly biased.
    ..
    So old, yet so dimwitted; an impressive accomplishment for sure and you make it look so easy!

  • nflfoghorn

    He may have motives you disagree with, but that doesn’t mean he’s lying to you or anyone else. Like you guys keep saying, elections have consequences.

  • freeinpa

    “He may have motives you disagree with, but that doesn’t mean he’s lying to you or anyone else”
    .
    That is 100% unadulterated crap! You are rationalizing why he lies to justify the lie.

  • bobell

    freeinpa — Of course the poor pay taxes. (And why the scare quotes around “poor” — Do you think they’re all hiding diamonds in the mink coats hanging in their walk-in closets?) The working poor pay payroll taxes for SS and Medicare, same as you and I. They pay sales taxes. They pay excise taxes. If they get a negative-income-tax subsidy from the Govt to keep them afloat, at least they’re working for it — they don’t get it if they don’t work. Is there something wrong with incentivizing work?
    .
    As nflfoghorn points out, you have a tin ear for satire. Do consider that not everything is said in complete earnest. That’s especially true around here.

  • shepherdwong

    As nflfoghorn points out, you have a tin ear for satire.
    .
    You need a reasonably good understanding of observable reality to “get” good satire. That’s one reason why there are no funny “conservatives”. Not intentionally funny, I mean.

  • shepherdwong

    The public is still skeptical about big government and debt-fueled spending.
    .
    What’s “big government”? We’re a 21st Century superpower with 300 million people, “big government” sounds about right.
    .
    When the public policy is driven by public “skepticism” about a completely meaningless “conservative” propaganda invention, we have a problem.

  • textee

    What exactly does “civility” have to do with the fact that a Bush hating leftist, atheist, American flag burning militant, dope smoking pot-head and whack job 9/11 Truther conspiracy theorist (who like 61% of the Democrat party thinks that George W. Bush had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks) named Jared “No! I won’t trust in God!” Loughner killed six people and injured a dozen more?

    Also, does anyone know why a virulent, polarizing, divisive, partisan militant like Obama (and his useful idiots of the Washington/New York/American press corps) are calling for “civility”?

  • hippooath

    3x,
    .
    Gave up on civility huh? So directly after the speech you had a lot of favorable things to say about it and now Obama is the most divisive?
    .
    Sometimes it’s hard to change.

  • diecash1

    Unimpressive pile of stupidity as per usual textee. This particular rant seemed to lack your usual level of nuttiness. See if you can step it up a bit.

  • paulejb

    My guess is that the speech will be a great ball of nothingness. Barack Obama will try to demonstrate that he is still relevant in face of the stunning rejection of all things Obama by the voters last year.

    His problem will be that he really has nothing to say. It’s not likely that he will renounce his big government agenda and demand a roll back in government spending. There is little he can say about the laggard economy after 2 years of ineffectiveness. The subject of foreign affairs is out as the public just wants to hear about jobs, jobs, jobs. So, I expect we will merely hear a rehash of Rodney Kings philosophy of “Can’t we all just get along?”

  • paulejb

    nflfoghorn,

    Well, Barack Obama may not actually own a whole horse, but he does hang around with a lot of people who can be described as part of a horse.

  • paulejb

    kbanginmotown,

    Unless of course labeling the enemy an “evil empire” helps precipitate the collapse. Than it is a shrewd move.

  • nflfoghorn

    @ 1.6: We’re all guilty of hanging around those ;)

  • nflfoghorn

    “I will go line by line in the budget, You can keep your HC insurance , physician…[f]riend of small business after attacking continually and saddling with more regulation in 2 years than any other president. We welcome ideas from the other side who our ‘enemies’”
    .
    Conversely –
    *we found yellowcake
    *Saddam is preparing ‘nuke-u-lar’ weapons of mass destruction
    *too many regulations caused the recession
    etc. etc.
    .
    I tire of the tit-for-tat.
    .
    I will grant you that not everything that comes out of a politician’s mouth is genuine or matches my beliefs. But I don’t, as you do, routinely, pervasively and automatically assume that a political opponent has motives other than to make the country better in his/her eyesight.

  • apollyon07

    I’m just curious, how would you have preferred the Soviet Union be described? As a “compassionate realm”?

  • paulejb

    nflfoghorn @ 1.7

    Speak for yourself, foghorn. I try to avoid people who are the south end of a horse traveling north.

  • paulejb

    apollyon07 @ 2.2,

    “Home sweet Home?”

  • paulejb

    Derek @ 3.2,

    Sorry, no tax cuts. Just a two year delay in tax increases.

  • http://loachdriver.wordpress.com loachdriver

    It’s laughable that for three years or more the Lamestream News Media has mocked “Birthers,” but it’s utterly quiet now that the State of Hawaii has finally admitted it cannot find Obozo’s long-form hospital generated birth certifacte, assuming that there ever was one.

    It evidently doesn’t exist. Nor ever did.

    We’re awaiting apoligies to Birthers from the Lamestream, but we’re not going to attempt to hold our breath for such apoligies to be made. Such apoligies probably will never be made.

    The Lamestream is owned lock, stock & barrel by the Dems. The Lamestream follows orders from the Dems just as did the Soviet press followed Stalin’s orders.

  • diecash1

    What’s laughable is your post. Not an iota of fact in it. Keep on believing rainbows, unicorns and the “liberal” media. Just another ignorant birther, nothing more.

  • paulejb

    diecash1,

    What you seem to be ignoring is the fact that the new Democrat governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, took it upon himself to revive the subject. He promised to provide proof of Obama’s Hawaii birth but couldn’t follow through.

    This has nothing to do with “birthers” and everything to do with the arrogance and ignorance of Democrat office holders.

    You can’t tell me that the White House was pleased with Gov Abercrombie’s political stunt. Abercrombie just has egg on his face.

  • diecash1

    FYI, the ignorant birther is the jacka$$ that posted at 12.

blog comments powered by Disqus