Catholic Bishops Don’t Support Repeal

Of course, they don’t technically oppose repeal either, according to a letter the USCCB sent members of the House yesterday. But the letter–signed by the chairs of the USCCB’s committees on pro-life activities, domestic justice, and migration–did lay out three criteria that the bishops require in order to support health care legislation:

  • Ensure access to quality, affordable, life-giving health care for all;
  • Retain longstanding requirements that effectively protect conscience rights and that prohibit use of federal funds for elective abortions or plans that include them; and
  • Protect the access to health care that immigrants currently have and remove current barriers to access

The repeal efforts fails mightily to meet points one and three. As for the second, conscience protections in health reform are unchanged from previous law. And while health reform supporters and opponents continue to argue about whether the law allows federal funding of abortions (David Gibson of Politics Daily had the most comprehensive consideration and knock-down of pro-life concerns last spring), it’s hard to argue that repealing health reform would eliminate all federal funding of abortions. After all, the Hyde Amendment still allows federal money to be used for abortions in the case of rape or incest; federal dollars subsidize state Medicaid programs, some of which permit abortions for reasons other than rape or incest; and the federal government uses employer tax credits to subsidize private insurance plans, 87% of which cover abortion services.

Somehow, I kind of doubt that Catholic members of Congress who vote to repeal health reform will be called to account by the Church. And yet, as the bishops note in their letter, the Pope’s support for universal health care is unequivocal. Last fall, Pope Benedict said that in the health care sector “it is important to establish a real distributive justice which, on the basis of objective needs, guarantees adequate care to all.” Just another crazy European socialist, eh, John McCain?

Full text of the bishops’ letter after the jump:

January 18, 2011

United States House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Representative:

As Congress prepares to resume debate on health care reform, we wish to make clear the position and priorities of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops on this vitally important issue.

Throughout the last Congress the Catholic bishops of the United States affirmed our strong support for universal access to health care. Basic health care for all is a moral imperative, not yet completely achieved. It has never been, and is not now, for the bishops to decide the best means to realize that essential goal. However, regardless of which means are chosen, they must fall within certain fundamental moral parameters, which the bishops have a duty to articulate strongly and clearly. We have urged and continue to urge that legislation on health care reform reflect the following three moral criteria:

  • Ensure access to quality, affordable, life-giving health care for all;
  • Retain longstanding requirements that effectively protect conscience rights and that prohibit use of federal funds for elective abortions or plans that include them; and
  • Protect the access to health care that immigrants currently have and remove current barriers to access.

Rather than joining efforts to support or oppose the repeal of the recently enacted health care law, we will continue to devote our efforts to correcting serious moral problems in the current law, so health care reform can truly be life-affirming for all.

In the 111th Congress, H.R. 5111 was introduced by Congressmen Pitts and Lipinski to ensure that the new health care law will maintain longstanding federal policies on abortion in the areas of federal funding and conscience rights.  H.R. 6570 was also introduced by Congressman Fortenberry to ensure that all people — Catholics and others alike — maintain their current ability under federal law to provide and purchase health coverage that is consistent with their faith and values. We will strongly support laws like these in the new Congress and we will seek ways to ensure a more just health care system for immigrant families.

For nearly a century, the Catholic bishops of the United States have called for reform of our health care system so all may have access to care that recognizes and affirms their human dignity. As Pope Benedict recently stated, in the health care sector “it is important to establish a real distributive justice which, on the basis of objective needs, guarantees adequate care to all.”  Moreover, “if it is not to become inhuman, the world of health care cannot disregard the moral rules that must govern it” (Message to the Pontifical Council for Health Care Workers, November 15, 2010). We wholeheartedly commit ourselves to health care reform that achieves these worthy goals. We will advocate for addressing the current problems in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as well as others that may become apparent in the course of its implementation.

Sincerely,
Cardinal Daniel DiNardo
Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston
Chairman
Committee on Pro-life Activities

Bishop Stephen E. Blaire
Diocese of Stockton
Chairman
Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development

Archbishop Jose H. Gomez
Archdiocese of Los Angeles
Chairman
Committee on Migration

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • allthingsinaname

    Just another crazy European socialist, eh, John McCain?
    .
    Well if not that, how about the Anti-Christ?

  • Ivy_B

    Glad Amy is back. The positions of the Catholic Bishops have been sorely missed.

  • http://grapemusing.blogspot.com/ grape_crush

    Ha! My thoughts exactly. At least they’re on the side of the angels this time…
    .
    Wonder if Amy has any comment on the Catholic Bishops’ position on this:
    .
    ["Mandatory" Reporting of Child Sex Abuse Claims Conflicted with Canon Law, Archbishop Said]
    .
    “A newly revealed 1997 letter from the Vatican warned Ireland’s Catholic bishops not to report all suspected child-abuse cases to police — a disclosure that victims groups described as ‘the smoking gun’ needed to show that the Vatican enforced a worldwide culture of cover-up.
    .
    The letter, obtained by Irish broadcasters RTE and provided to The Associated Press, documents the Vatican’s rejection of a 1996 Irish church initiative to begin helping police identify pedophile priests following Ireland’s first wave of publicly disclosed lawsuits.
    .
    The letter undermines persistent Vatican claims, particularly when seeking to defend itself in U.S. lawsuits, that the church in Rome never instructed local bishops to withhold evidence or suspicion of crimes from police. It instead emphasizes the church’s right to handle all child-abuse allegations, and determine punishments, in house rather than hand that power to civil authorities.”

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Thanks for passing along this press release, Amy.
    -
    Does the USCCB have the ability to swing public opinion on this issue? Have their past proclamations led to grass-roots action? What about in Congress, are they potentially well-positioned to sway a few votes?
    -
    Remember, despite the USCCB’s position on abortion, rank and file Catholics have the same pro-choice views as non-Catholic Americans.
    http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0803430.htm

    The CARA study of 1,007 Catholic voters found 41 percent unaffiliated with either the Democratic Party or Republican Party, with 38 percent who are registered Democrats and 21 percent who are registered Republicans. In the CARA study:

    – Seventy-eight percent said the U.S. should guarantee basic health care for all citizens.

    – Fifty-eight percent said a woman should have the right to choose an abortion. …

    According to Pew’s survey of more than 35,000 people nationwide, including more than 8,000 Catholics, the following characteristics define Catholic Americans’ views on political issues. Unless otherwise noted, the figures for Catholics mirror those for the population as a whole within 5 percentage points or less.

    – Sixteen percent believe abortion should be legal in all cases, and another 32 percent say it should be legal in most cases. Just 18 percent said it should be illegal in all cases; 27 percent said it should be illegal in most cases.

    -
    This suggests to me that the USCCB’s influence is limited. Of course I could be missing something, but if not, why do we care about this press release?
    -
    Thanks for reading!

  • allthingsinaname

    .
    Because it is a common sense approach.

  • paulejb

    All of a sudden, the left cares what the Catholic Bishops have to say about a subject. Will wonders never cease?

    I thought that those people were women oppressing superstition mongers not to be taken seriously. What’s changed?

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks for the letter, Amy. I hope you interview some of the bishops and cardinals face-to-face with more pointed questions and post here. Now that they listed their principles you can tease out the details – and possible contradictions – so their full agenda is available for all. Besides, you can bring the little one along in a stroller and have the bishops hold her (and bless her?) while you take pix: great for the family scrapbook and maybe even a “1000 words.” We’ll be nice, promise.

  • deconstructiva

    You need to go back and read Amy’s posts prior to her maternity leave. The interest has always been there.

  • http://tisias.wordpress.com tisias

    Well the actual influence of the Catholic Church upon everyday life has waned in the past century. I would know, as a Catholic. I know people who are both for and against this act from all sides of the spectrum.
    Sure, it is a “good” endorsement for the the Affordable Health Care Act, but it is de facto neutral. All it really says is that the Catholics are against abortion and they support healthcare reform. Pretty moderate, rational religious support that doesn’t make a difference.

    The only religious groups that influence their flock as far as politics are the evangelicals.

  • allthingsinaname

    I even post links to the Catholic Catechism as it supports the Left’s ideas on Social Justice.
    .
    http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p3s1c2a3.htm#1928
    .
    Have a great read please.

  • apr2563

    And, the church is busy ordaining Episcopalian bishops who are converting to avoid the acceptance of gay and women clergy in their church.
    .
    http://www.christianpost.com/article/20110117/former-anglican-bishops-ordained-into-catholic-church/

  • apr2563

    The right needs to understand that the left is able to understand that people and institutions can be right on some issues and wrong on others. Our minds are able to have some independence and openess.

  • apr2563

    tisias: I agree. I left the church a long time ago. But, I have family members who attend church every Sunday and holy day. They continue to take the sacraments. However, they have little respect for the Pope or the cardinals and bishops.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “And, the church is busy ordaining Episcopalian bishops who are converting to avoid the acceptance of gay and women clergy in their church.”
    .
    The Vatican always wanted to get England back.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Paully,
    .
    There was and, to a lesser extent, still is a Christian left.
    .
    Think of Martin Luther King Jr. and, for that matter the entire Civil Rights movement was churches and unions who lead.
    .
    Modern black churches as well as Latino Catholic Parishes are very progressive.
    .
    In the 1960s don’t forget the Berrigans brothers and Catholic priests.
    .
    Martin Sheen is a devout Catholic.
    .
    (Charlie, not particularly and not very political, either.)
    .
    Also don’t forget that Libertarians are often atheists and Republican.

  • paulejb

    apr2563,

    “…the left is able to understand that people and institutions can be right on some issues and wrong on others.”

    Really? Does that include the Tea Party and Sarah Palin?

  • paulejb

    patricksartor,

    “There was and, to a lesser extent, still is a Christian left.”

    Maybe so, but it has little use for Catholic dogma which is considered to oppressive and wrong headed.

  • sacredh

    “The Vatican always wanted to get England back.”
    .
    I smell another Crusades brewing.

blog comments powered by Disqus