Does Sarah Palin’s Handling of This Week’s Events in Tucson Tell Us Anything about her Presidential Ambitions?

Sarah Palin today released a video on Facebook expressing her grief and outrage over Saturday’s shootings in Tucson. She also explained her rhetoric and hit back at those who have suggested that the level of political discourse in the country is, in part, to blame for Jared Lee Loughner’s unhinged rampage. “We know violence isn’t the answer. When we ‘take up our arms’, we’re talking about our vote,” Palin says in the seven-and-a-half minute video. “Yes, our debates are full of passion, but we settle our political differences respectfully at the ballot box – as we did just two months ago, and as our Republic enables us to do again in the next election, and the next.”

Palin’s been caught in the backlash of the shooting for putting crosshairs over Gabrille Giffords’ district last year in a graphic of 20 midterm districts Palin was targeting. Her first reaction was a brief post offering her condolences on Saturday. Rebecca Mansour, Palin’s speechwriter, then told a conservative talk show that the targets depicted were not crosshairs but, rather, surveyor’s symbols – ignoring the fact that Palin herself had once called them bulls eyes. “If you’re explaining, you’re losing,” says John Weaver, a GOP consultant and former close aide to John McCain. “Fairly or unfairly — and I think it’s unfair that she’s been dragged into this — but this is an opportunity to give a different impression and try to repair long standing negatives.”

Palin today attempted just that. In the video, shot in front of her fireplace at home in Wasilla, she looks directly at the camera and speaks calmly and soothingly, even when striking at her critics. “After this shocking tragedy, I listened at first puzzled, then with concern, and now with sadness, to the irresponsible statements from people attempting to apportion blame for this terrible event,” Palin says. “Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own. They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with those who proudly voted in the last election.”

The post showed a moment of leadership, says Mark MicKinnon, a former adviser to President George W. Bush. “Palin’s video is a very powerful and thoughtful response. This is evidence of political maturation and evolution on her part,” McKinnon says.

The former Alaska governor and 2008 vice presidential nominee already stood apart from the field of potential 2012 candidates before Tucson– as she told me, she draws the sharpest contrast with President Obama. On the day when Obama himself is due to give a speech about the tragedy, Palin’s video strikes a tone that is rarely heard from the strident Republican: one lacking the passionate battle cries she has become known for. At the same, her message hasn’t changed and she goes after a familiar enemy: the “lame-stream media.” “Especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn,” she says. “That is reprehensible.”

The Facebook post will do little to help improve Palin’s high disapproval ratings, says Todd Harris, a GOP consultant who has advised McCain, Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio. “It’s beautifully written but it’s message is aimed squarely at people who already agree with her,” he says.

And it did little to convince those establishment Republicans who remain dubious of her potential candidacy. “In decision after decision since 2008, Palin has simultaneously and consistently increased her celebrity status and lowered her credibility as a candidate for President,” says Matthew Dowd, another former Bush advisor. “Sarah Palin reminds of one of the long-driving phenoms in golf. She makes a good novelty act and will be on some highlight reels, but won’t ever be a tournament champion till she works on her short game and can use a putter. Drivers aren’t the best clubs in the finesse part of the game.”

All of which is to say, if she is running for President, she’s focusing on her base — and betting that base will be big enough to deliver her the nomination.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: gabrielle giffords, shooting, tucson, 2012 Election, Congress, Media, Republican Party, Sarah Palin, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • stuartzechman

    Facepalm.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Now, now, Stuart, don’t be mean.
    -
    Maybe this was satire.

  • newfreedomblog

    Other than your entire goal here was to continue to frame Palin as a totally impossible winner in any Presidential election, I am proud of you Jay.
    .
    I actually for the first time, I came away with a semi-positive impression of Sarah Palin. Congrats.

  • Cookie Puss

    If responsibility criminal acts begins and ends with the perpetrator, I’d like to see some German stump porn in primetime because that could never turn somebody into a sexual freakazoid.

  • sacredh

    I will give her credit for this. At least she didn’t start off by saying “I am not a b!tch”.

  • newfreedomblog

    I think the word I am missing above is “marginalize”. But, good job anyways.

  • http://www.stevebeste.com Steve Beste

    What does the half-alien / half-smiley face logo in top left mean?

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    head + wall

    “We know violence isn’t the answer. When we ‘take up our arms’, we’re talking about our vote,”

  • hippooath

    Run. Not away. Reload or something. Win the primary and enjoy the nature of reality and wall of reason.

    Her statement only convince me that the only thing they didn’t allow her was to make it hers. This was not a mama grizzly Sarah speak. This was a clinical mummywrap of victimhood.

    At least she didn’t say ‘I am you’.

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    It’s the vimeo logo — the you-tube-esque service Palin used to post the video online.
    JNS

  • sacredh

    The high forehead indicates a large brainpan and superior intelligence. Either that or she’s fighting with Levi again and he hacked into her computer and put it there as a joke.

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    Jay, Jay, Jay…

    Are there any other fringe political figures in the country whose presidential ambitions your constantly wonder about? If so, you should write about them, too.

  • hippooath

    ‘Can you believe this sh!t’
    .
    Or ‘I come in peace’ (anyone that can figure out the movie reference gets a virtual cookie of personal choice’)

  • pneogy

    “When we ‘take up our arms’, we’re talking about our vote,” Palin says in the seven-and-a-half minute video.”

    Sure. And what you think are cross hairs are really surveyor’s marks.

  • afguy

    Either Twilight Zone episode ot “The Day the Earth Stood Still”.
    .
    Am I close?

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    They’re chads.

  • ogliberal

    Her use of “blood libel” was not a particularly good move, given the history of the term. (look it up) Even Jonah Golderg – the man who coined the phrase “liberal facists” – thinks it was a poor choice of words.

    So I guess we should add Sarah to the Tuscon shooting victim list…poor Sarah, always playing the victim.

  • stuartzechman

    Thank you for responding to commentary, Jay Newton-Small, it is always greatly appreciated.

  • sacredh

    “All of which is to say, if she is running for President, she’s focusing on her base — and betting that base will be big enough to deliver her the nomination.”
    .
    I’ve been saying that for a long time. The nomination would be Sarah’s win. If she gets the nomination she’s in the history books. The speaking fees, book deals and everything else would be the gravy.

  • ogliberal

    “The nomination would be Sarah’s win.”

    Which is the last thing the GOP wants. I know it’s early but look at the state polling, especially swing states. Even in states like VA and NC Obama leads Palin by double-digits. In NJ he leads her by over 20. (to be fair he also leads other GOP contenders, even Christie, by smaller double-digit margins in NJ) And for Palin, being early might not mean much. Everybody knows who she is. Her unfavorables are below 40%. She doesn’t have much room to grow outside of her base. As you noted, her base can win her the nomination. But it can win her the general – not even close.

    Romney has a huge RomneyCare=ObamaCare problem. Huckabee has a Willie Horton problem…and the Club for Growth/Norquist types do not like or trust him. Gingrich and Santorum are non-starters. Pawlenty just doesn’t have it. The GOP’s best chance is probably for a Mitch Daniels-type – like, say, Mitch Daniels – to emerge as the nominee. He polls terribly now but that’s because nobody knows him. He’s been consistent re: his fiscal conservatism and focus on the economy. He won’t scare away moderates with far-right stands on social issues and he will probably appeal to the Norquists of the world. But he has no “crazy”, doesn’t appear to be willing to go there, and that will hurt him in the primary. Might be best for him (and Huntsman) to wait for 2016 after the crazy can be somewhat purged from the GOP.

  • http://attendingtheworld.wordpress.com/ attendingtheworld

    I can only say one thing about Palin: Plain White Trash!

    She’s a militant and a loser. Did you know that the Devil himself actually left Alaska because he thought he had no more “work” there? He’s filing a discrimination law suit against Palin: she had stolen his work.. and replaced him!

    ATW

  • pintortwo

    “Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own. They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens…”
    .
    ..the citizens of Iraq too? Pashtuns in southern Afghanistan? The Palestinians? How about Iranians? Or people looking to build mosques in lower Manhattan?

  • palininatowel

    Who cares about “tea leaves?”
    .
    What’s sadly humorous is her reading from a teleprompter. (It’s reflected in her glasses.) Makes me want to line up every quote from her regarding Obama’s use of teleprompters.
    .
    And why doesn’t this self-professed “hockey mom/regular gal” simply “speak from the heart” without the aid of a teleprompter?
    .
    In a moment of great tragedy, she is reduced to reading a self-serving statement someone else wrote that is nothing more than a shallow, painfully obvious attempt to resurrect her reputation and once again play the role of victim of the “lamestream media.”
    .
    Where’s the “normal, everyday American” who just speaks from the heart, warts and all?
    .
    She’s a self-serving phony. Leave it to the ever-narcissistic Palin to turn a horrible tragedy into an event that is, somehow, all about her and how she’s been victimized.
    .

  • sacredh

    ogliberal, I agree with most of what you say and it most probably isn’t what the GOP wants, but it may be what Sarah wants. There isn’t another member of the GOP out there right now that can come anywhere close to Sarah’s fundraising ability. Romney could use his personalwalth to fund a strong primary challenge, but even that didn’t help him much in 2008. I don’t believe Sarah puts much stock into what anyone else wants. Her base could easily deliver her some early primary victories and dry up the funds for other more serious candidates.

  • palininatowel

    Jay, why do you continue to treat anything Palin has to say as important? She’s the clown out there launching incendiary devices into the public realm (along with Beck and others), yet, somehow, “reporters” like you have to pretend that anything that shows up under her byline is actually written by her.
    .
    I think we all know that is not the case.
    .
    You should quit posting this phony garbage until she agrees to live interviews with news organizations other than Fox. This is simply repeating her PR-staff-written pieces and, once again, places you in the realm of stenographer or among the 10-year-olds at the birthday party playing “Telephone.”

  • jymallyn

    “her reading from a teleprompter”?

    Wow. would I love to see the “out-takes.”

    Probably will see them if Stewart or Colbert gets hold of them.

    Politics has become like baseball or football in terms of allegiances. And Faux, Beck, Limbaugh, and Palin have become “Team Stupid.”

  • mbnelsen

    Are there any grownups who will take this opportunity to do some self-reflection and ask what each one of us can do to tone down the rhetoric, instead of using it as yet another opportunity to finger-point and name-call?

  • sacredh

    “What’s sadly humorous is her reading from a teleprompter. (It’s reflected in her glasses.) Makes me want to line up every quote from her regarding Obama’s use of teleprompters.”
    .
    She had to use the teleprompter. There was just too much to scribble on her hands and not be noticeable. She’d have looked like “The Illustrated Man”.
    .

  • lilaland

    head + wall

    “We know violence isn’t the answer. When we ‘take up our arms’, we’re talking about our vote,”

    ……………………………………………………………………………….

    lol. kind of like when she said don’t retreat but reload.
    She said she was talking about voting…

    but then.. watch the end of this,

    http://tv.yahoo.com/blog/sarah-palin-teaches-bristol-how-to-shoot-guns–1789

    Palin can go fck herself. She is so full of crap.

  • morristhewise

    Popularity can breed contempt that is why the Popemobile was invented, if Giffords had used one she would not have been hurt. Millions of ordinary people would be as safe as a Pope traveling in a bullet proof bubble, that is why auto manufactures should start displaying the Popemobile in showrooms.

  • gwbc

    As in the vice-presidential debate, expectations were set so low that some can claim this is a reasonable statement- for her. However it is a time for leaders to rise and her use of the term “lamestream media ‘ shows she can only rise a lttile bit. Her use of the term “blood libel” is offensive to those and their descendants . who have suffered from the use of this term.
    I agree with Jay’s conclusion , this is for her base, not for the country.

  • jillib

    “Does Sarah Palin’s Handling of This Week’s Events in Tucson Tell Us Anything about her Presidential Ambitions?”

    Yep, it sure does. Her statement and actions make it clear any chance she had at becoming president have been squashed.

    (That swooshing sound you hear is the collective exhale of the establishment republicans.)

  • palininatowel

    She is trying so hard in the video. She looks like some poor high school kid trying to “act.”

    “Look, look at me! I’m concerned! I’m caring! I’m sensitive! And I still adhere to our inviolable core conservative principles! Ronald Reagan! See? I said ‘Ronald Regan!’”

  • powerpoultry

    Sarah Palin is majestic & magnificent in the video. She proves once again: She doesn’t retreat, she reloads. Rule, Barracuda!

  • filmnoia

    Jillib has beat me to it. In answering Jay’s initial question, the answer is “Yes”. The real loser here is not sociopathic Sarah, but Obama. Palin is toast. Obama would have mopped the floor with her. If it had been a contest between her and Barack we would have more blood flowing in the streets. The GOP will retreat to Romney, who is still trying to figure out what to say about Tucson. I guess his poll results haven’t been calculated yet.

  • afguy

    Or maybe Kat from LAInk.

  • sacredh

    Spot on! I had toast this morning and Sarah’s profile was clearly visible. I was going to worship it but the butter and jelly were already out. She was delicious.

  • post american

    Only a deranged and unstable person puts the cross hairs of gun targets on Politicians they disagree with.

    The U.S. Secret Service blamed Palin’s crazy rhetoric for a huge spike in violent threats on President Obama.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/sarah-palin/3405336/Sarah-Palin-blamed-by-the-US-Secret-Service-for-death-threats-against-Barack-Obama.html

    I never blamed her for the shooting, I just wish the poor lady would take a course in reasoning/critical thinking!

  • Alex Vallas

    Sarah Palin’s speeches were filled with hatred, bigotry and racism (hardly disguised). She outright lied on numerous occasions, including her famous “death panels” and statements towards the President. She was highly effective as a polarizing figure. The crosshairs and gun toting ads were beyond poor taste. She may not have “blood on her hands” for the incident in Arizona, but she cannot deny that she did much to divide the country. She apparently thought her cutesy wootsie statements and cheerleader actions were endearing. Sorry, they were stupid. She is a less than bright individual that got caught in her egoism.

  • http://milascurtains.wordpress.com milascurtains

    How ANYONE with normal brain could ever propose , that this ignorant , angry, aggressive woman could be something…something close to be The President?
    The ne, that rules in 140 symbols on twitter and holds nuke button 24/7 in her crazy hands?
    Give me a break, people.
    Move on to reality.
    Her show is over.

  • lct1

    This is hardly a case of her doing or being anything even remotely-”presidential”. It’s her handlers and consultants TELLING her, “Okay, this is what you should do…” Sarah is simply another talking head
    (and, to be fair, Nancy Pelosi is another one), who is guilty of believing her own press. I’m just waiting for her to say, “I can see assasination victims from MY house!”

  • http://ryncanada.wordpress.com 1rync

    if a school age child put cross hairs on a school they would be arrested, Sarah Palin thinks it is OK to put cross hairs on a member of Congress, enough said!

  • allthingsinaname

    Facepalm, I had to look it up; facepalm. There goes my career.

  • Aria

    Palin either stands a shot because of how many Americans are stupid enough to vote based on liking a celebrity (notice how rarely they lose whenever they run for any office, from mayor to president), or she’ll be the GOP’s complete undoing precisely because she can dry up to well from voters via her fundraising abilities. Already a growing number of the GOP are becoming weary of her. If they thought she’d do a fine job, this wouldn’t be the case. But it’s going to come down to the typical voter, and the typical voter is pretty stupid and bases their votes on what they’ve passively come to know about someone through TV shows, snippets on the radio, and what the covers of magazines say at the check-out stand.

  • Aria

    Heh, she turned it around. No one but her has said anyone’s claimed this started with the general citizens. With us. Most of us have been saying it’s been starting with the politicians spewing vitriol. Of course she either doesn’t understand this or is deliberately ignoring this.

  • 53_3

    Either Sarah Palin’s star is falling, or the crackpot right wingers “audience” is getting smaller…

  • Aria

    For some reason, the law isn’t applying to her. If you or I were to put crosshairs on a politician, we’d be in Gitmo before nightfall.

  • http://charleslfreeman.wordpress.com Charles L. Freeman

    Dear Mrs Palin:

    I’m not one of your supporters by any stretch of the imaginatio­n but, even I don’t think you are directly responsibl­e for what happened in Tucson on Saturday.

    However, it would have been somewhat refreshing and a bit uplifting to hear you say something along the lines of, “While I never meant for anyone to think that I advocate the literal taking up of arms to achieve what our side may have failed to do at the ballot box, I now see where some of the things I’ve said in the past and some of the graphics posted on my websites could lead some to think that. I hope everyone on all sides of the political spectrum will join me in pledging to be more thoughtful and discerning in the future about the tone and content of our political discourse.”

    Of course, that would require taking responsibility for your words and actions and as we’ve clearly seen since August 29, 2008, that’s just not how you roll. You never make mistakes; the meanies in the “Lamestrea­m Media” and on the left misconstru­e at best and lie about at worst, everything you say, do or mean.

    Now that your already fragile presidential hopes have been finally put to rest, please do America a really big favor: take your newly-earned millions and retreat to Lake Wasilla and let intelligent, reasonable and reality-based people handle things from this day forth.

    Thank you and God bless.

    Charles L. Freeman

  • paulejb

    The fact that Jared Loughner’s obsession with Congresswoman Giffords began in 2007 seems to have eluded our liberal friends. In 2007, no one had yet heard of Sarah Palin and the Tea Party movement was a long way off. The liberal rush to judgement on Loughner stands in stark contrast to that of the Fort Hood shooter.

  • hippooath

    “The liberal rush to judgement on Loughner stands in stark contrast to that of the Fort Hood shooter.”
    .
    How so?

  • apr2563

    I don’t understand the tech side of this. I see that the Palin video is blocked on this site, TPM, and Daily Beast. What causes that to happen?

  • hippooath

    My guess is that Sarah’s handlers found out and didn’t like the less then flattery reviews it got.

  • bob3905

    Yeah! Let’s all get behind Sarah! She’s tough, she’ll take no crap. She’ll get our military to take on the whole world if necessary! What a glorious war it will be. Us against EVERYONE!!! THE EMPIRE OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE WORLD!!! HA HA HA HA!!! SARAH LEAD US TO DOMINATION!!!

  • http://gaeliclass1.wordpress.com nichole32

    Well, april, I just checked her Facebook page and it’s blocked on that site too.

  • apr2563

    Thanks for the feedback. It is available on You Tube. It must be a Vimeo thing.

  • http://stan174.wordpress.com stan174

    Shooting of Gabrille Gifford is tragic – not that I am an admirer of any of the political parties in USA. They all support gung-ho attitude. Does anyone remember the millions of people killed in Iraq? Now the Afghanistan war is on. Next Iran is on the crosshairs of American Government.

    Will Americans ever learn?

  • flatlandpreacher

    Palin says, “Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own. They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio . . . .” So, I guess she’s okay with violent video games, pornographic movies, etc., since they apparently don’t have an influence on the behavior of people who view them. And what about any possible “acts of kindness” or “acts of courage” that might arise from someone inspired by one of her speeches or books? Is she saying she herself does not have an impact on others? Is it only bullets or clubs that have an impact?

  • flatlandpreacher

    That is a great analogy. Thanks! People MUST be consistent in how they approach these problems. If they aren’t, it’s a sign of “politics for the sake of power,” not for the sake of what is good.

  • http://chessexcellence.wordpress.com chessexcellence

    Really? You guys are worried about Sarah Palin winning the next presidential election?

    Gah. That’s about as likely as George W. winning twice…in a row… errr… wait, you did elect him twice, didn’t you… hmmm…

  • sacredh

    I just noticed something that changes everything. She’s wearing a flag pin. I know who I’m voting for.

  • paulejb

    hippooath,

    Do you live in a cloud? Barack Obama, the top military brass and numerous liberal pundits were cautioning us about rushing to judgement on Nidal Hasan as though we didn’t now that he was a Muslim fanatic taking his cue from Al-Qaeda in Yemen. Do only Muslim fanatics get a pass when it comes to a rush to judgement.

  • paulejb

    flatlandpreach,

    It only took two hours after the Tucson massacre before we saw liberal Paul Krugman take off on his political enemies on the right, blaming them for the actions of Jared Loughner. Subsequent facts proved that Krugman’s charges were in fact a “blood libel.”

  • paulejb

    stan174,

    Millions of people killed in Iraq? Where do you get your numbers? Most sources place the death count at less than a million since the start of the war.

  • paulejb

    flatlandpreacher,

    Jared Loughner was not big on talk radio or cable news. He was more into leftist government conspiracy movies.

  • diecash1

    to be fair, Nancy Pelosi is another one

    That’s some absolutely ridiculous false equivalence you’ve got there. Pelosi is a talented politician that successfully led the House Democrats when they were in the minority and the majority, plotting strategy and holding many difficult (and successful) votes. Other than both of them being women, there is no comparison between the two of them.

  • diecash1

    Subsequent facts proved that Krugman’s charges were in fact a “blood libel.

    It’s obvious that you’ve no idea what “blood libel” actually means……….no surprise there.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “Most sources place the death count at less than a million since the start of the war.”
    .
    FWIW: There are at least four different counts ranging from, I believe 50K to over One Million from various sources. There was a great NPR piece on that. But, nobody has called it two million.

  • pintortwo

    British medical journal The Lancet published a report from Johns Hopkins that stated:
    .
    “We estimate that through July 2006, there have been 654,965 “excess deaths”—fatalities above the pre-invasion death rate— in Iraq as a consequence of the war.” (link)
    .
    Adding what we might expect from July ’06 to now, it’s probably safe to say that their estimate is over 1 million.
    .
    .
    Opinion Research Business estimates as follows:
    .
    “we now estimate that the death toll between March 2003 and August 2007 is likely to have been of the order of 1,033,000.”
    .

    .
    Not millions, however, considering the above and that the UN estimated 4.7 million Iraqi refugees from the war out of a pre-invasion total Iraqi population of around 25 million people… Stan’s not too far off.

  • pintortwo
  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “Jared Loughner was not big on talk radio or cable news. He was more into leftist government conspiracy movies.”
    .
    Neither one of you have linked to a source.
    .
    If I am not mistaken, nobody has said yet what Jared Loughner did with his spare time.
    .
    BTW: Which conspiracy movies are “leftist”?
    .
    I love good thrillers but do not really know any that are really “leftist” per se. One great one was anti-far right (not leftist per se) many years ago called Arlington Road.
    .
    If you go for a good thriller and are not a militia member (since those were the only ones trashed in the film at all) I recommend it.
    .
    As far as I know, nobody knows what Loughner was listening to or watching since his parents have clammed up and he had no friends.

  • pintortwo

    Barack Obama, the top military brass and numerous liberal pundits were cautioning us about rushing to judgement on Nidal Hasan as though we didn’t now that he was a Muslim fanatic taking his cue from Al-Qaeda in Yemen.
    .
    You’re saying that the President and the Pentagon cautioned not to rush to judgment, but you immediately knew that this US soldier was a Muslim fanatic acting on behalf of AQ in Yemen…? and liberal pundits were wrong to follow our political and military leaders… and this shows liberals give a free pass to fanatics..?

  • 53_3

    After all, she did look really good as the dominatrix in the 2008 Presidential Campaign For McCain/Palin.
    .
    You remember that movie, don’t you?

  • 53_3

    I thought it was her perky breasteses…

  • sacredh

    Breasticals….ummmmm.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Correct me if I am wrong, anybody, but, so far it appears as if paulejb is a conservative, yet not a troll.
    .
    An endangered species in Swampland.
    .
    A political endangered species list?
    .
    Would conservatives oppose it like the actual endangered species list?

  • jkoch3

    @hippooath it is Mars Attack! Without a doubt love it!

  • http://growingwildflowers.wordpress.com Elena

    Here’s hoping she gets the 2012 nomination.
    That way, she’ll pretty much seal the deal for keeping conservatives OUT of the White House.

  • 53_3

    breasticles? Such as on a hot day?
    bresticules? Really really tiny ones?

  • markgillar

    The democrats have used cross hairs in their maps as well??? Oh wait, it’s ok when liberals do it. It only becomes offensive when a conservative does it.

    http://thespeechatimeforchoosing.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/listen-up-lefties-the-difference-between-the-dncs-bulls-eyes-and-sarah-palins-surveyors-crosshairs/

    To say the least, liberals have been even bigger hypocrites than usual this week.

  • markgillar

    She couldn’t be worse than an idiotic Marxist like Obama who is easily dumber than any president we’ve ever had.

    Here are but a few examples his stupidity as well as Biden’s and Pelosi’s.

    http://www.hootervillegazette.com/dumbdemocrats

  • markgillar

    Let’s review the fact here libs.

    Our Shooter Was:

    A Fan of Hitler
    A Fan of Marx
    Put a vid of a burning flag on YouTube
    Smoked Pot

    Was a registered independent
    Didn’t vote in the last election.

    Had nothing about about Palin or any other conservative on his website.

    Worshipped a skull in his backyard
    and claimed on his military application that he didn’t have a religion.

    Had been obsessed with his target since O7 before the Tea Party existed and before Sarah Palin was
    on the national scene.

    And one of you had the nerve to suggest Palin needs a class in critical thinking??? Every lib on this board needs to sign-up for just such a class.

blog comments powered by Disqus