In Response To Mayhem, The Nation Stands In Silence

Sometimes, the silence says it all.

And so, in a city that runs on rhetoric and bombast, the only moments that really mattered Monday were the ones when no one said a thing. The President stood with his wife, their heads down before the South Lawn, flanked by hundreds of White House staff, from the senior aides in $170 ties to the U.S. Park Service employees in government-issue green ball caps. No one spoke for about 75 seconds.

On Capitol Hill, in the same moments, just after 11 a.m., a mob of hundreds packed the stairway to Congress, Republicans, Democrats, their staffs, all clogging a space so dense that it looked like a rally, or a protest, or some sort of art installation. The whole of the elected United States government stood together, united against the utter stupidity of violence.

In the days since a troubled 22-year-old allegedly carried out his deranged wake-dream fantasy, much has been made of his meaning for our national politics. Eyewitnesses to the crime, local lawmen and mourning relatives have all been deputized as oracles, called upon to interpret the unexplainable. On cable television, the blogs and talk radio, the instinct has been to try to fit the absurd facts of a man upset over grammar, mind control and currency into a cogent political narrative. Pundits have performed close readings of the favorite books that Jared Lee Loughner mentioned on his YouTube page. Did Animal Farm make him a liberal? How does Mein Kampf break along the left-right spectrum? And what can be made of a man who embraces both George Orwell and Adolf Hitler?

It was for the most part a predictably embarrassing spectacle. Conservative Rush Limbaugh accused Democrats of trying “to profit from murder.” Liberal Paul Krugman accused the right wing of “eliminationist rhetoric.” On Fox News, Glenn Beck, predictably, couldn’t help but make the whole thing about himself, with a sprinkling of Van Jones, while junior members of Congress churned out press releases announcing the go-nowhere legislation they would release: to outlaw certain violent or threatening language from political discourse, to raise member allowances to pay for new security, to restrict the sales of high capacity ammunition clips.

But on Monday, all this noise was absorbed by the silence. The simple fact is that the nation’s political leadership, the ones who run both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, have behaved with remarkable poise since the horrors of Saturday.

The leadership has come together, and has mostly resisted the urge to find political advantage in the methods of a madman. Majority Leader Eric Cantor announced a voice vote Wednesday to condemn the killings. Speaker John Boehner and Minority leader Nancy Pelosi invited their colleagues to a bipartisan prayer service.

At the White House, President Obama addressed the tragedy for the second time. “Part of what I think that speaks to is the best of America, even in the face of such mindless violence,” he said. He spoke of the 20-year-old intern who ran toward the violence to help staunch the flow of blood, and the wounded woman who struggled to deny the killer a reload of bullets.

It is easy to forget, in the absurdity of our democratic system, that the people running the show can actually behave as a plurality of the American people want them to behave, responsibly, protectively with more than a particular ideological, personal or professional advantage in mind.  It is easy to forget that these men and women who dominate our newscasts are not as rotten as they seem. They just want desperately to win, and feel forced to play the role.

In a matter of weeks, President Obama will travel to Congress to speak to the nation about the State of the Union. He is unlikely to greet a body where a member will shout “You Lie,” or someone in the gallery will question his birthright. Both sides of the aisle will applaud at length, in unity. In short, the union is in a different state today than it was before the deranged shooter pulled his selfish stunt. And though the ruin he has left in his wake is unmistakable, it is not at all clear that his nation is one of the casualties.

Photo: Jason Reed, Reuters

Related Topics: jared lee Loughner, jared lougher, Congress, John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Thank you

  • lilaland

    This is actually a very poignant bit of writing, Michael Scherer. Humbling.

  • newfreedomblog

    Michael:
    .
    If this isn’t the best TIME.com posting I have read in over 3 years, I can’t come up with anything to best it. It is without doubt your best piece to date.
    .
    You are indeed a writer, a journalist. Thank you.

  • akismet-7c9dc167b9e7d4e037ecdee585df984c

    Well said.

    Thank you, Mr. Scherer

  • http://grapemusing.blogspot.com/ grape_crush

    Thanks for this post, Michael. You’re better at hope than cynicism.

    Having said that, one of your former colleagues has seen moments like these before.

  • hippooath

    Very nicely done

  • Mekhong Kurt

    @lilaland got the word I was seeking: poignant.

    You brought a teat or two to these tired, aging eyes, Michael. . . .

    I hope millions read this . . . and think about it.

  • Mekhong Kurt

    Please excuse my embarrassing misspelling. I meant “tear,” of course. . . .

  • kbanginmotown

    while junior members of Congress churned out press releases announcing the go-nowhere legislation they would release: …, to raise member allowances to pay for new security,

    Any word on whether this will be done “Cutgo”? Will the “deficit hawks” suggest congressional pay cuts to offset the cost of additional security?
    .

    He is unlikely to greet a body where a member will shout “You Lie,” or someone in the gallery will question his birthright. Both sides of the aisle will applaud at length, in unity.

    Let’s hold our breaths about this prediction coming to pass, Michael…you first. ;)

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    “Every once in a while… every once in a while, there’s a day with an absolute right and an absolute wrong, but those days almost always include body counts.” – Jed Bartlet, The West Wing
    .
    As much as it is heartening to see everyone in Washington got the absolute right on a day where there was an absolute right, I’m afraid I don’t share your optimism about what the next day will bring

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Pessimistic ditto. Would it were so but if 9/11 didn’t have a lasting cohesive or enlightening impact, one lone nutter sure as hell isn’t.
    .
    “It is easy to forget, in the absurdity of our democratic system, that the people running the show can actually behave as a plurality of the American people want them to behave, responsibly, protectively with more than a particular ideological, personal or professional advantage in mind. It is easy to forget that these men and women who dominate our newscasts are not as rotten as they seem.”
    .
    As a fleeting response to mindless tragedy, yes. Beyond that, this is a fairy tale, Michael. As Grape points out, it’s a nicely illustrated fairy tale, and perhaps there’s even a need for such narratives in the aftermath of tragedy. But I think a plurality of Americans have a fairly accurate portrait of their elected officials. As Marcellus’ said in Hamlet….

  • lupercal5

    refreshing. let us not forget that the Press is a leader in shaping our collective consciousness. You sir have done your part in helping the nation heal.

  • liberalmeltdown

    Agreeing with you jcapan. Hope that doesn’t scare you.

    “It is easy to forget that these men and women who dominate our newscasts are not as rotten as they seem. They just want desperately to win, and feel forced to play the role.”

    Indeed, it would take a lot of forgetting. Forgiving is one thing, forgetting…
    .
    How can they not be as rotten as they seem, given the last few days? This nation will not heal; it has been broken. When you do what needs to be done to win a battle at all costs, you end up losing.
    .
    Our system has become so absurd with the demonizing from both sides that it is really just a silly pissing contest.

  • apr2563

    Nicely said Michael. Now, lead by example and encourage your peers to avoid publicizing the hateful rhetoric and hyperbole and report the issues. Thank you.

  • dollared

    Sorry to rain on your rhetorical parade, Michael. It’s a well written piece, but factually incorrect. There is no room for you to play false equivalence on the subject of obstruction, intimidation and violence – it is 90-10% on the side of the Conservative movement. From hidden hundreds of millions funding attack ads, to killing abortion doctors, to attending presidential events openly showing weapons, to blowing up federal buildings, to a candidate for Senate advocating “Second Amendment remedies” if she loses, to record numbers of filibusters, to bad faith negotiations on health care reform, to former vice presidential candidates advising activists to “reload,” the right wing has been the party of violence. There is no comparision between one side and the other.

    Somehow you think Krugman writing a column accurately describing Republican advocacy of violence is somehow equivalent to Beck’s threats of violence, intimidation and mass revolution. But Krugman is absolutely right. We can have a moment of silence. But we will make no progress as a nation until the band of violent, dangerous Republicans and Tea Partiers, funded by reclusive billionaires who fund K Street, Karl Rove and the Tea Party, are called out by the non-Fox press for what they are – an attempt by a violent, well funded minority to frustrate the will of the majority of Americans.

    Nicely written column. But its false equivalency is part of the pattern that ensures nothing will change. Have you been in Washington so long that you can’t see that? You need to read up on McCarthy again, and remember that is wasn’t until the press refused to go along that we recovered our democracy again – for a while.

  • liberalmeltdown

    You are delusional. The left has violent protests all around the globe. Ever hear of the G-20?
    .
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/27/g20-toronto-protest-riot

  • featherya

    Liberalmeltdown (January 11, 4:35 am):

    Your information is incomplete and dated.
    Yes a few people (this is proven) rioted, but information about police and government abuse of power have since come out. The police beat nonviolent citizens; people who just were getting groceries were arrested. The police arrested journalists doing their work, and held citizens later proven innocent in deplorable conditions. There is going to an inquiry about the whole mess.

    What I say is documented fact:
    http://www.thestar.com/news/torontog20summit/article/902236–toronto-journalist-witnessed-police-brutality-at-toronto-g20

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/27/toronto-police-attack-pea_n_627042.html

    Your inaccuracy peeves me off. If you want to attack the left, get your facts straight.

  • featherya

    Dollared:

    Just to let you know, I am a Canadian, who would be considered quite left by US standards. I have studied US politics throughout history closely and have seen misbehavior by all in the political spectrum. Be careful about painting one side as completely virtuous and the other as demons. There are unpleasant types on both sides.

    I have known conservatives I deeply respect and liberals I very much dislike. Be careful about painting any movement with too broad a brush – I would make the same comment to any conservative out there.

  • paulejb

    dollard,

    You should try the Daily Kos, dollared. That left wing hate site had some very unpleasant things to say about Congresswoman Giffords.

    And may I remind you of the riotous actions of your ideological comrades when it comes G20 or WTO conferences.

  • michaelfury

    “The whole of the elected United States government stood together, united against the utter stupidity of violence.”

    Staggering hypocrisy.

    Silence indeed.

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/04/11/the-rest-is-silence/

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    You guys are all confusing cause and effect. In the USA, the association of the left with the antiwar movement and the association of the right with the pro-gun movement is a historical fact. But it is not the left or rightedness that is directly related to violent tendencies. It’s just the way things are playing out currently.

  • jc46202

    I appreciate the thoughtful post, but think it’s a bit of a sad sign that something like this even has to be written:

    The simple fact is that the nation’s political leadership, the ones who run both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, have behaved with remarkable poise since the horrors of Saturday.

    It should be a given that our nation’s leaders won’t politicize tragic circumstance instead of something that we are surprised by and feel the need to point out. Our democratic discourse has indeed declined.

  • featherya

    People,

    Tell me, this discussion focused on assigning blame and attacking is doing what? This approach is damaging your country.

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    How does very practical legislation to eliminate high capacity clips, which serve no purpose for hunters, sport shooters or home defenders, count as the kind of “go nowhere” nonsense that you’re listing among the responses here? Sure, legislation that limits speech is stupid but Lautenberg’s idea to regulate clip capacity is just common sense.

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    I just meant that in the current political climate, with the current Republican congress, and the current power that the NRA has, the high capacity legislation is all but impossible to pass into law. I was also distinguishing between those in the leadership who are resisting the urge to push contentious legislation, and those junior members that are. I was not arguing that there is no merit to the case for high capacity restrictions.

  • nflfoghorn

    So I guess it doesn’t matter that gun tragedy hit home to them, long as the NRA keeps spitting out the checks.

  • Alex Vallas

    Hopefully this will result in more civility in Congress. I seriously doubt if the followers of Rush, Glenn, Rove, Cheney and Palin will stop listening to these voices of hate and bigotry. It is also time for the media to quit covering every utterance that Palin breathes. They quote her as if what she says really matters. Her comments result in more polarization. There is no doubt that the GOP and the Tea Party have led in lies, distortions and bigotry to enhance their personal agendas. Maybe this tragedy is an awakening. The Dems are not totally without fault.

    The accused has been descriibed by many as left wing. However, his rambling Internet missives likely come from the writings of the Milwaukee-based, far right activist David Wynn Miller. Miller tells The Daily Beast/Newsweek “I expect he’s been on my website… He’s just repeating things I’ve had up on my site the past 11 years.”

    Many years ago I had the good fortune to escort numerous members of Congress as Chief of the Special Visitors Bureau at the American Embassy in Rome. The delegations were comprised of both Republicans and Democrats. There was never a lack of respect of the other side and everyone was civil and polite in meetings with Italian officials and during dinner and tours. Its time to learn from the past.

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    Thanks, Michael.

  • allthingsinaname

    “In the days since a troubled 22-year-old allegedly carried out his deranged wake-dream fantasy, much has been made of his meaning for our national politics”
    .
    Well yes and the Right claims it is the work of a mentally ill person and has nothing to do with the words and visuals they use, Yet they seek the death penalty for a person they claim is not of the right mind.
    .
    Now the pundits are vilifying the left, again, for our complaints of the rhetoric being used.
    .
    Moment of silence? Then what? Sweep it all under the rug?

  • michaelfury

    “The Jonas Brothers are here. (Applause.) They’re out there somewhere. Sasha and Malia are huge fans. But, boys, don’t get any ideas. (Laughter.) I have two words for you — predator drones. (Laughter.) You will never see it coming. (Laughter.) You think I’m joking. (Laughter.)”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/05/06/killin/

  • libssd

    Michael, Thank you for a sane commentary on this unfortunate situation.

    The first 12 comments stayed on track, then the discussion predictably derailed. Everybody needs to take a deep breath and back off — something that the internet, with its largely faceless postings, discourages. As Pogo said many years ago, “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”

    http://secondthoughts.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451cfe069e201156e4e4746970c-800wi

    I applaud representatives Boehner and Cantor for taking positive steps to lower the rhetoric this week (although both provided prime examples of over the top rhetoric last year). I still hold to the slim hope that more civility will appear in our political discussions in 2011.

  • Alex Vallas

    How did my comments derail from the subject?

  • downtown007

    I sincerely hope that when our elected officials and uneducated pundits even think of polarizing their base to create roadblocks to needed discussion they will think of one person

    Nine-year-old girl Christina Taylor Green

    Lets vow to not have this sweet young girl die in vain.

  • michaelfury

    Mind if I borrow your headline, Mr. Scherer?

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/09/08/silence-gives-consent/

  • dollared

    Thanks for engaging, Michael. As for LiberalMeltdown, who thinks that young people throwing trash cans through Starbucks windows at WTO is the same as political assassination, and Paulejb, who thinks that an anonymous commenter on a a DailyKos thread saying “she’s dead to me” is the same as an officially sanctioned Republican candidate suggesting that if she loses that “there are second amendment remedies (shooting a US Senator) if we lose,” you merely prove my point about false equivalencies.

    I said the advocacy of violence and the resort to intimidation runs 90-10 on one side. I’m happy discuss whether it might be 95-05 or 80-20. But no person with any respect for the truth thinks that the sides are equivalent. I truly regret having to point this out and turn a hopeful post sideways. But I have too much respect for the truth – and too much hope we can all change things for the better if we face the truth – to sit silently and let The Media Narrative bathe in a lie of false equivalence.

  • Alex Vallas

    Very true. I can barely stand to watch the videos of this little girl who appeared to have such a great future without tearing up. To lose a child to hatred is beyond my imagination. Hopefully, Congress and the Political Pundits will take note and calm down their rhetoric.
    I was brought up in an age where we didn’t even bother to lock our doors. We kids would play well after dark without fear. As much as possible, we would follow the adages “do into others as you would have them to do into you” and “courtesy is contageous.” It is time to restore some of those values.

  • sacredh

    Michael, very nicely written article. A tragedy can bring out both the best and the worst in us. Thank you for choosing the best.

  • apr2563
  • http://roschinc.wordpress.com roschinc

    Regardless of one’s political stance, when events like the one in Arizona occurs, it affects all Americans.

    When madness attacks a Kennedy, a Reagan or a Giffords there is no them or us, just US.

    The best honor we can bestow on the Arizona victims is to make this temporary unity into a permanent state of mind.

    We should not forget the power of evil but lets yield the unstoppable power of Goodness and with God’s help we will make this great country a place where everybody can pursue happiness in peace, again.

  • Mekhong Kurt

    @dollared, while I understand your point of view (or hope I do, anyway), I think, and hope, you may be more negative than anyone needs to be. I hope — but I don’t know, which I want to be very clear about. My crystal ball is plenty murky.

    To clarify my position, yes, most of the venom has come from the right, with even those on the right not espousing vitrol nor engaging in behavior implying violence refusing (or “eclining”) to condemn such words and actions. Which is sad. (For instance, my Representative and both Senators are Republicans, and though I don’t believe any of the three go along at all with the hate and violent words and imagery, neither have they previously spoken up against others — and that dismays me, immensely.)

    I will venture to speculate that Michael may be trying to avoid sounding overly partisan by placing blame where it belongs, even if that requires fudging over the factual record (which it does so require, as is correctly suggested by your post).

    All that said, I doubt that were President Obama to announce he won’t run again or even if he were to resign now, it will take years for the wound to heal, a wound I believe is partly (largely) because of some republicans and partly because of some Americans listening to hate radio and the like.

    Before someone on the right responds — who even one angstrom unit left of center can begin to match, say, Rush Limbaugh or Glen Beck? They have no liberal contemporaries, let alone equals.

  • Mekhong Kurt

    @libssd, I thought dollared’s comment ( #13) was on-track, so I responded to it. Also, after reading @Alex Vallas query how he had gone off-track (#22.1, in reply to your post), I went back and read his earlier comment (#19), anbd, like Alex, I’m sort of scratching my head, as his comment seems perfectly reasonable and on-topic to me.

    Speaker Boehner and Representative Cantor do deserve some applause, as you note, if [IMHO] rather *muted* applause, given their rhetorical track records over the past year and more, as you rightly point out.

blog comments powered by Disqus