The Wives Win!

The end of the lame duck is in sight.

The House late last night passed the tax bill after progressives gave up their demands to strengthen the estate tax provisiondemands that nearly brought down the bill. Members are sticking around Washington now, waiting until how the government is funded the next few months is resolved by the Senate.

Senate Democrats, meanwhile, last night ditched plans to pass an omnibus — a giant spending bill that rolls together the fiscal 2011 appropriations bills — in favor of a simple resolution that will continue funding the government at current levels through early next year (once the Senate passes this, the House follows suit and then goes home — likely late Friday or early Saturday). Reid abandoned plans for the omnibus after Republican support began to waiver in the face of Tea Party outrage: Jim DeMint swore he would do everything in his power to block the pork-laden legislation including forcing the clerk to spend two days reading the 2,000-page measure and invoking rules challenges.

Democrats’ capitulation on the estate tax and the omnibus have helped smooth the way for both chambers of Congress to adjourn by early next week at the latest — appeasing all those angry congressional spouses unwilling to spend the Holidays alone again. The Senate still has to pass the New START treaty and the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. They will also try to pass the DREAM Act and a bill helping 911 first responders, though it’s unclear if they have the votes for those bills.

Even if the Dems get just Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and New START, the lame duck will have been much more productive than most people, myself included, anticipated. Adding to the stimulus, health care reform and financial reregulation, the work finished in the lame duck could make the 111th Congress the most productive session since Lyndon Johnson’s Great society.

 

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: bush tax cuts, don't ask don't tell, lame duck, START, Congress, Democratic Party, Harry Reid, Republican Party, Senate, Tea Party
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Did your headline mean to out every female in Congress?
    .
    That aside, “Reid abandoned plans for the omnibus after Republican support began to waiver” seems to be a very polite version of events.
    .
    From what I read Reid and Durbin felt double crossed, that assurances weren’t kept.
    .
    You were there, which is more accurate?
    .
    Any thoughts on McCain’s behavior after it fell apart?

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    OT, apologies

    You know that fortune cookie game, where after reading the fortunes you add the words “… in bed.” This headline just pushed close enough into that zone that I thought of the game, and now I can’t help chuckling when reading the main swampland page.

  • anon76

    As Paul points out, ‘Wives win’ is a great way to negate the work of the women in the senate. I’d hope to hear one of those “I don’t make the headlines for my posts” clarification.
    .
    More on topic, how is it that the party of “noun, verb, 9/11″ can get away with filibustering the first responders bill? And how is it, for chrissakes, that there has been nearly no coverage of this in Swampland? Please, PLEASE ruffle some feathers on this one, JNS. I imagine passing this is something on which almost every Republican and Democratic voter can agree- hopefully some media scrutiny can push the pols to do the same.

  • deconstructiva

    Actually Jay, the wives may lose since they’ll have to send the pool boys and gardeners away sooner …then it’s back to the same ol’ boring grind with the hubbies (literally). Of course, Sen. Out-Of-Touch-With-Reality would not bother to ask why the pool boy is still kept around the house in winter after the pool is drained and covered over. (I’ll let others complain about the lousy tax deal and the early capitulation).
    .
    I wish Reid would’ve forced DeMint to read his own damn entire bill out loud. Or if a clerk has to do it, hire an auctioneer and it can be done in ten minutes. Or in totally disparaging non-PC fashion hire someone with a speech impairment…
    .

    .
    or this…
    .

    .
    (yes language here would make Scherer and Crowley blush, Newton-Small and Steinmetz less so, Pickert and Tumulty least of all, nothing fazes them)

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Because they’re actually the party of “No, noun, verb, 9/11″.
    .
    “No we won’t fund the first responders because spending more money on them will vindicate the actions of the terrorists on 9/11″

  • pelhamite1

    I think there votes are there for the 9/11 Bill (thanks, in no small part, to Jon Stewart), START and DADT, especially if retiring Senators like Voinovich decide to to tell McConnell to go f— himself. The DREAM Act, looks like a heavy lift (I don’t think it gets all the Democrats’ votes). Sadly, the chance of any of these being passed got a lot tougher with the illness to Ron Wyden, yet another one of things no one could have predicted.

  • Cookie Puss

    Funny how all the GOP support in the Senate for the omnibus disappeared right around the time it was clear the estate tax amdt was going to fail in the House.
    .
    Come February, the Republicans will come back and say we need deep cuts in this, that and the other thing to get the deficit under control. And they won’t budge on the debt limit unless they get them.
    .
    Barry and Harry got out-gamed again. Bloody re-runs.

  • Paul-no not that one

    I don’t disagree with your take(s) but would add I thought TPM reported that Wyden would be available for votes until adjournment.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “When Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) announced today that he had been diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer, the news seemed to throw his vote into doubt on DADT repeal. The initial announcement suggested that after a pre-op doctor’s visit on Friday he’d be away from the Senate until early January.
    .
    But Wyden’s spokeswoman, Jennifer Hoelzer, has just confirmed to TPM that Sen. Wyden will be available this weekend to vote on the key DADT and DREAM Act votes.”
    .
    http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/12/wyden_vote_a_wild_card_no_more.php?ref=fpblg

  • apr2563

    Boxer, Feinstein, Klobuchar, Murkowski, Lincoln, Milkulski, Stebenow, McCaskill, Shaheen, Murray, Cantwell, Landrieu, Snowe, Collins, Gillibrand, Hagan, Hutchison must have spouses and families that are unconcerned about the Senators working over the holiday.
    .
    Solution: Elect more women.

  • apr2563

    I have yet to see one of the Villagers comment on McCain’s disgusting, smirking, unprofessional behavior.
    .

  • apr2563

    Yes, the Villagers have been outreported, again, by Jon Stewart.
    .

    .
    Stewart not only berated the Republicans but the traditional media for a lack of reportage. MSNBC has addressed it. 1 Fox Propaganda News member talked about it but failed to mention it was the Republicans killing the bill. Have I missed something. Have the Swampland posters shown any outrage? Oh, they were too busy posting about Sarah Palin.

  • grape_crush
  • Paul-no not that one

    That second link is pretty funny.
    .
    Palin has the media absolutely trembling. Particularly on TV.
    .
    Greta Van Roberts should sleep easy, she did well.

  • apr2563

    grape_crush: sorry missed this post. I just posted on another area. Good catch! I thought it was amusing. I was married to a hunter for a long time. Sarah would have been told to stay home.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    I don’t think wives should be given all the credit for the return of Voodoo economics. No one could have predicted the return given the theory has been considered discredited by the facts, for so long.

  • formerlyjames

    “the work finished in the lame duck could make the 111th Congress the most productive session since Lyndon Johnson’s Great society.”

    I gasp. That is the most obscene comment that could be made of this gang of destruction.

  • lcky9

    reason for the 9/11 bill NOT

  • lcky9

    reason for the 9/11 bill NOT making it was that they attached the DREAM ACT to it..that was REIDS fault.. come on if your going to tell a story or complain make sure ALL facts are presented..Personally I am in favor of STAND ALONE bills being the ONLY bills that go through.. one of the biggest problems with BOTH sides is hanging bills and Pork on perfectly good bills to see them go down in flames..this is deceiving to both the people and the country..and a practice that should be stopped..

    BTW reading ALL bills on the floor and making it mandatory that ALL congressmen/women and senators are present to listen is a GOOD practice and should also be done with all bills and laws.. for those of us who have senators or congress people who seem to NOT be able to read that many words.. the PEOPLE as well as those we PAY to do a job would be well served in doing so, we wouldn’t as the President puts it be miss informed and neither would our paid representatives..

  • lcky9

    Seems some are scared for the PEOPLE to know what is in the bills I find that strange since these are the same people who wanted to have transparency.. why is that?? Fact is Reid pulled the bill when they were coming up to the parts that had MORE spending for OBAMA CARE that the PEOPLE weren’t suppose to know about since it was not suppose to add anything to the debt.. GO FIGURE.. Some people I suppose would rather put their heads in the sand and just believe what they are told..never thinking..

  • lcky9

    Maybe old Barry and Harry should have done something more than play shell games all their live and socialize their hands move so fast they themselves get dizzy..

  • lcky9

    As one would gather all those on this board think they know history so much but haven’t read REAL history books BEFORE the progressives started changing them.. for that I feel pity for you.. this is not a party thing although I can tell you all think you have to pick a side than just listen to the propaganda they tell you.. it’s not.. this is the country that you will be leaving to your kids and grandkids..
    All of you have an advantage that your parents and grandparents DIDN’T have.. the internet.. C-Span had they had these tools I dare say this country wouldn’t be in the shape it is right now they would have put a stop to outsourcing, closing our manufacturing sector and a few other nice things our politicians have been doing.. like making sure after 2007 ALL babies are DNA tested upon being born and their DNA is now in a data base.. that bill was put through by Dobbs (D) and signed by Bush (R).. we have had nothing but PROGRESSIVES since Bush 1.. which is what our problem is.. go check and see what PROGRESSIVES think if your baby isn’t PERFECT or will take to much money in healthcare.. Sorry to say you better wake up and start THINKING before you SOUND OFF..

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Well, Icky, if YOU think that REPUBLICANS care SO much about the 9/11 survivors, then DON’T YOU think that THEY would have written a STAND alone bill assisting them and ONE, preferably WITHOUT, randomly CAPITALIZING words?
    .
    I think that if they thought it was priority, they would have made a stand alone bill of their own.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “Some people I suppose would rather put their heads in the sand and just believe what they are told..never thinking..”
    .
    Yes, and we call those people who only listen to, read and/or watch exclusively the right wing media and believe every word of it without thinking, wingnuts.
    .
    Icky, you aren’t a relative of Freeinpa, are you?
    .
    (Actually, that is an insult, but YOU do SEEM, man WHEN you CaPiTalIze wOrDS and lEteRs at rAnDOm.)

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Icky, re-read your remarks.
    .
    I have no idea what socializing a hand move means.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    @Icky: Wouldn’t it be nice if all spending had to be requested through a stand alone bill, that no earmarks could be added to a bill? Want money for the study of the honey bee population? Write a bill to request it, no more adding that request to another, totally unrelated bill and saying you’ll vote for the overall bill only if your earmark is in it.
    .
    I know the reason why the practice of earmarks had come into play–too many funding requests were being turned down but to attach these unnecessary expenditures onto bills that would probably be passed anyway means the goodies are passed easily. I mean I don’t remember hearing very often that a bill failed because of the amount of earmarks in it. But it is past time that they changed the rules.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Icky, did you let textee use your computer again?

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    socialize; their hands move so fast they themselves get dizzy…
    .
    .
    Fixed it with a semicolon.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “I know the reason why the practice of earmarks had come into play–too many funding requests were being turned down but to attach these unnecessary expenditures onto bills that would probably be passed anyway means the goodies are passed easily.”
    .
    Sounds accurate, nonpartisan and a reasonable explanation to me.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “…play shell games all their live…”
    .
    Rather than play shell games recorded on a VCR or DVD?

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Politics Daily had a story about Sarah Palin now needing the “lamestream” media. It won’t help much. She’s built her brand around the media outlets her supporters watch and read as well facebook and twitter only because she knows that those of us who watch the other networks, read the other outlets would simply laugh all the more at her. And she’s losing supporters like crazy. Sarah Palin is a phony and a liar and most in the country are coming to realize that if they hadn’t already.

  • sasquatch08

    “the work finished in the lame duck could make the 111th Congress the most productive session since Lyndon Johnson’s Great society”
    .
    Is this to suggest that simply passing things without bothering to read them makes Congress productive? If that makes you productive then we should have applauded the banks for being so productive by filing foreclosure papers by the thousands without reading them.
    .
    If you want to pass legislation, fine but don’t pass multiple multi-thousand page bills without reading them and call it “productive”. It’s actually counterproductive because it’s pretty much guaranteed that there will be large problems contained within that will waste a ton of Congress’ time when the unintended [or intended] consequences rear their ugly heads.

  • Cliff

    Democrats’ capitulation on the estate tax and the omnibus have helped smooth the way for both chambers of Congress to adjourn by early next week at the latest — appeasing all those angry congressional spouses unwilling to spend the Holidays alone again.
    .
    Fortunately for us, there are no other discernible side effects to this legislation, beyond the inconveniencing of various Senators.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Sasquatch,
    .
    Time is being reasonable here.
    .
    With the length of wording used in modern legislation congress has been using staff attorneys to create the specific wording. It is strikingly rare when somebody outside of a committee for the past, I believe, 80 or 90 years to read every word of a bill before voting on it.
    .
    Passing an agenda is success for a parliamentary body.
    .
    Reading 1,000 pages per day is not success. It is unnecessary tedium not done by either party.
    .
    Hell, it takes ten pages and up for an agreement to lease out office space, five pages to lease a car, to write an enforceable law is going to take up many pages with a huge percent of them being redundant and insignificant to the decision to support or oppose it.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    See my comments on how the health insurance tax is a poll tax.
    .
    So long as it is a head tax – a tax for having a head attached to your shoulders while not buried in a coffin – it is legal.

  • sasquatch08

    Patrick,
    .
    I am not expecting people to read every single word of every single bill. While that would be nice it’s unrealistic.
    .
    What I object to is that when a news organization finds something that’s totally insane like the taking over of student loans in the HCR law, all the politicians scratch their heads and say “I didn’t know that was in there!”
    .
    Of course they didn’t know it was in there because you didn’t even attempt to read let alone understand what was in this bill. Now to be fair that’s because reading 2000+ pages and understanding it in 72 hours is probably not possible.
    .
    How about a limit on how long a bill can be? Like maybe 200 pages max. That way, if someone doesn’t read it it’s clear that they were lazy. It also breaks up things into manageable chunks.
    .
    This is part of what I was talking about earlier. Average people can’t understand a lot of this because they have an actual life to live and bills to pay. If you really really wanted to be totally informed on the ACA so you could contact your congressman or senator and voice your opinion you had to take 3 days off work and pay a team of lawyers to help you make heads or tails of large sections of legalese. Try doing your own taxes without a computer program to aid you. It’s the same thing “refer to section 4752.a” which is in another book, and once you find 4752.a it refers you to section 2196.m in yet another large book and on and on and on. The tax code is a set of books that stands half as tall as I do if it’s not taller than that. Literally no one fully understands it.
    .
    If average people could understand all of this stuff why, Patrick is it that we need debt commissions or presidential think tanks or tax attorneys… or lawyers at all for that matter?
    .
    If one person could really understand this, why does a total genius like the President (whomever he may be) have an army of advisors? If anyone should be expected to be knowledgeable on all things government shouldn’t it be him? But no, even he has advisors for everything; economic, diplomatic, military, science, international relations, trade… the list goes on. And those advisors are broad spectrum advisors backed up by dozens of other specialized advisors who for example specialize in Russian-European relations Or Chinese trade policy.
    .
    There are ten thousand government programs that help make up our yearly budget. They range from ethanol subsidies, to title 9 subsidies to military hardware research.
    .
    The government is simply too big and cumbersome to be effective at doing anything except shoveling money into it’s craw by the hundreds of billions of dollars.

  • sasquatch08

    Patrick,
    .
    In response to your comment at 13.2, I would think someone as smart as you would understand that that’s a very very dangerous statement.
    .
    It’s a tax on NOT doing something the government wants you to. If they can tax something you don’t do they can force you to do anything or pay for not doing it.
    .
    How does a “head tax” as you put it sound for say… voting Republican? Sure you can vote Democrat but since you’re NOT voting Republican please add $1000 to the check you send the IRS this year. Or the same thing for not buy a Chevy Volt? Or not buying a gun? The last two of these could plausibly be argued (as is the ACA) that they are taxes for the general welfare. If everyone had a Volt it would help air quality and therefore help everyone. If everyone had a gun they could defend themselves and their neighbors against the 1-2% of people that are violent criminals and who already have guns, again helping everyone except the criminals.
    .
    Months ago I asked what would happen if we gave all this power to the Feds and another GW Bush was elected. Many people answered they would flee to Canada.
    .
    Now in my opinion if your “fix” results in you fleeing the country because the people you like are no longer in power it’s no fix at all. It’s a power grab that’s fine as long as YOUR party is in power because they can used the power to “fix” things (force everyone to do what you want), but after that has the potential for massive abuse (force YOU to do what you DON’t want) if it’s wielded by someone whose politics you don’t like.
    .
    In short it’s a very bad idea from the jump. Just like lots people in Venezuela are finding out about electing Dear Leader Chavez.

  • http://yimarker.wordpress.com yimarker

    welcome to our website:

    http://yep.it/rpqkiz

    [U G G] [Boots]: $60- $100

    [C H I] Digital hair iron , [G H D] Limited Edition: $30- $45

    NFL NHL?MLB NBA Jerseys: $30

    Jimmy Choo ?Christian Louboutin High Heels: $65

    Coach,Gucci,LV,Prada,Juicy,Chanel handbag $33

    Polo, Ed Hardy, Gucci, LV, Lacoste T-shirts $15

    True Religion jeans, Ed Hardy jeans,LV,Coogi jeans,Affliction jeans: $33

    North Face , Spyder, MONCLER,AF Jacket/coat: $45-100

    cool sunglass $15

    new era cap $10

    === http://yep.it/rpqkiz ==
    ◢███◣      ◢████◣
    ◢◤  ◥◣    ◢◤   ◥◣
    ◤    ◥◣  ◢◤     █
    ▎ ◢█◣ ◥◣◢◤  ◢█  █
    ◣◢◤  ◥◣    ◢◣◥◣◢◤
    ◥██◤ ◢      ◥██◤
        █ ●     ● █
        █ 〃  ▄  〃 █
        ◥◣  ╚╩╝   ◢◤
         ◥█▅▃▃▃▃▅█◤
           ◢◤   ◥◣
           █     █
          ◢◤▕   ▎◥◣
         ▕▃◣◢▅▅▅◣◢▃

blog comments powered by Disqus