U.S. High School Seniors Trade Their Tobacco For Weed

The National Institute on Drug Abuse released its new survey of teen drug use today, with a remarkable finding: More high school seniors were smoking pot in 2010 than cigarettes.

For 12th-graders, declines in cigarette use accompanied by recent increases in marijuana use have put marijuana ahead of cigarette smoking by some measures. In 2010, 21.4 percent of high school seniors used marijuana in the past 30 days, while 19.2 percent smoked cigarettes.

The survey asked about drug use in the 8th, 10th and 12th grades. Use of MDMA, or ecstasy, is up, while binge drinking is down. Vicodin, barbiturate, steroid and cocaine use are down, while Oxycontin use stayed about the same. Heroin use was up slightly, but not in a way that concerned researchers. The biggest finding concerned the shifting social mores among teen pot smoking.

Related to its increased use, the perception that regular marijuana smoking is harmful decreased for 10th-graders (down from 59.5 percent in 2009 to 57.2 percent in 2010) and 12th-graders (from 52.4 percent in 2009 to 46.8 percent in 2010). Moreover, disapproval of smoking marijuana decreased significantly among eighth-graders.

One does not have to look far to identify the probable causes of this shift: The very public re-branding campaign of pot as a relatively harmless medicine. “We should examine the extent to which the debate over medical marijuana and marijuana legalization for adults is affecting teens’ perceptions of risk,” said National Institute on Drug Abuse director Nora D. Volkow. Clearly there is a need to deal with the way these messages filter down to kids. What is okay for a cancer patient is not necessarily okay for a 14-year-old. Anyone who argues that marijuana is harmless is simply misleading the public. But it is also true the Obama administration is struggling to find a counter-message. “No young person in today’s competitive world is going to be helped by using marijuana or other drugs,” said Office of National Drug Control Policy Director Gil Kerlikowske, in a release that accompanied the report.

But how is a blanket statement like that supposed to penetrate high school students, when so many of the most successful people in the nation, including the last three presidents of the United States, have admitted to smoking pot? How does it explain their successful friends who they know smoke pot? The truth, of course, is far more complex than Kerlikowske suggests. Much like alcohol, marijuana can be damaging, or devastating, or it can be relatively innocuous. The public policy goal should be to educate kids about the real risks, and the legitimate rationales and consequences behind parental expectations, a cause that the medical marijuana/drug legalization lobby has a clear responsibility to join.

Also, take a look at Healthland’s take on the issue here, which adds some historical context:

Although marijuana use is increasing, the current rates are lower than those reported in this survey in the 1970s and early ’80s — daily marijuana use peaked with the class of 1978, 10.7% of whom reported daily marijuana smoking.

As for alcohol consumption, 23.2% of high school seniors reported binge drinking, defined as consuming five or more alcoholic beverages on a single occasion, in the past two weeks, compared to 25.2% in 2009. That number, too, is fortunately nowhere near its peak of 41.2% in 1980.

And a recent story for TIME magazine attempted to answer the question of whether or not marijuana is addictive.

Related Topics: drugs, marijuana, Barack Obama, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • square1

    Get a life, Scherer.

    One does not have to look far to identify the probable causes of this shift:

    I agree.

    The very public re-branding campaign of pot as a relatively harmless medicine.

    Yeah. That and the fact that a pack of cigarettes costs more than a new SUV.

    BTW, if you want to take a bite out of crime, go saunter over to Joe Klein’s office and flush his stash of weed down the toilet.

  • jc46202

    One does not have to look far to identify the probable causes of this shift: The very public re-branding campaign of pot as a relatively harmless medicine.

    Got any data to back up that unfounded assertion of cause and effect?

    No. I didn’t think so. Come back when you do as there are lots of plausible explanations for the shift, only one of which you cited.

  • deconstructiva

    Michael, stop whining already. There have been many anti-weed propaganda public service efforts before…
    .

    .
    …and of course there have been other anti-smoking messages, even directly aimed at kids (remember this?) …
    .

    .
    Imagine airing THAT today during “Dora the Explorer.”

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    If the social mores of marijuana use have evolved then the laws need to change, it’s that simple. That quote by the National Drug Control Policy Center about marijuana impairing your ability to compete in a globalized economy is pretty laughable given all the drinking that goes on at business events worldwide. It’s also really scary. Do we work to live or live to work?

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    Both ONDCP and NIDA identify it as the likely cause. Here is Kerlikowske: “And mixed messages about drug legalization, particularly marijuana legalization, may be to blame. Such messages certainly don’t help parents who are trying to prevent young people from using drugs.”

  • deconstructiva

    …and of course we don’t see ads like this anymore…
    .

    .
    Would love to imagine “Family Guy” hawking these….

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    Weed has been in almost every popular comedy tv show or movie aimed at the younger generation for the past 5 to 10 years.

    Message boards used by younger children are often full of topics about drugs and drug experiences. I’ve seen teens use those platforms to push for legalization and use for a long time now. Invariably 1 in 5 tend to get into harder stuff and they’re later saying don’t do this or that, but there’s always some new face pushing the drug scene.

    Its interesting. Most kids think weed is less dangerous than cigarettes. If you ask a kid if cigarettes are dangerous, they’ll say they are dangerous, addictive, and full of poison. Most people who smoke cigarettes know they can get lung cancer. People who smoke weed don’t think like that though. They see it as a safe and natural alternative. They don’t understand that burning anything and breathing it in is a way to get lung cancer. They know that as a substance weed isn’t deadly, but they don’t consider that it might be laced with something worse. They know it isn’t chemically addictive, but they don’t think about emotional addiction.

    Mostly, they talk about how it isn’t nearly as dangerous as it was made out to be. And they are partially right. But they also don’t know all of the facts or situations that can arise. They don’t consider that smoking weed can be just as impairing as drinking alcoholic beverages when it comes to driving.

    Marijuana is becoming accepted. And the exaggerations from the past are making that possible. But, whether that’s good for us is another thing entirely.

    It says something that 20% of american children are escapists though… Its probably higher than that though…

  • http://therealestamerican.wordpress.com therealestamerican

    Thank you, Mr Scherer, for being a Real American and responding!
    .
    The fact that almost half of their parents are hookah burning hippies who have probably used or are using the ‘Grass’ probably has more of an impact than a midterm campaign addressing the regulation of it. Just sayin’
    .
    As Real American, I do not partake. Though many have told me I behave as if I do. Go figure!
    .
    Of course, as a Free(dom) Market Supporting American, I have no choice but to support legalizing it and profiting from it!

  • http://therealestamerican.wordpress.com therealestamerican

    CNN correspondent Eric ‘the Red’ Erickson has the solution!
    .
    “The United States of America will likely be forced to invade Mexico”
    .
    http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2010/12/12/like-it-or-not-mexico-is-americas-next-afghanistan/
    .
    That’s why CNN is the most trusted name in News!

  • deconstructiva

    Maybe this time we’ll succeed since Pancho Villa’s still dead. Better yet, instead of fighting, let both countries merge. No more illegal immigration problem thingy, no more fence. (Actually if there has to be a merger to save our asses I’d go with Canada. Friendly people, lots of natural resources.)

  • freeinpa

    “Its interesting. Most kids think weed is less dangerous than cigarettes. If you ask a kid if cigarettes are dangerous, they’ll say they are dangerous, addictive, and full of poison”
    .
    It should be a surprise to no one. The left for years has treated smokers of tobacco and tobacco companies as bigger criminals than being an illegal alien. There have been full scale attacks to tax tobacco (that’s the lefts addiction to tobacco-taxes), banning smoking everywhere. All all brought to you by the roll-your-own fattie generation.

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    So what are they saying, Michael? That we shouldn’t have public discussions about legalization at all?

  • Paul-no not that one

    You think it’s just “the left” that is addicted to tobacco taxes?
    .
    Pawlenty raised bundles with increased tobacco taxes. Of course he called them “fees” to keep his No Taxes Purity Ring.

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    blah blah blah
    ·
    Take of your right tinted goggles.
    ·
    Cigarettes are bad for you and cause cancer and can kill you.
    ·
    Marijuana also isn’t that great for you and has plenty of risks, including lung cancer.
    ·
    ~ signed a member of the left.
    ·
    Marijuana is hardly a “left only” drug.

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    No. Not at all. Just that the legalization community has a responsibility to minimize the harm done by pot, especially among young people, just like the alcohol makers have a responsibility for teen drinking. There needs to be a more nuanced message. There are lots of reasons to support legalization, but the idea that pot is a harmless drug is not a legitimate one, especially for kids.

  • megatronrises

    Thanks for this interesting post Michael – much appreciated!

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    I’m honestly going to disagree there. The US government spends millions of dollars every year trying to educate kids on the potential ills of drugs through a variety of programs. The responsibility is already covered. The tobacco lobby is not required to attach a warning to every rally – the manufacturers of tobacco products do. The liquor lobby is not required to attach a warning to every rally – the manufacturers of liquor are required. When the marijuana community can manufacture and sell marijuana openly, then yes, they should be attaching those warnings.
    .
    It isn’t like the marijuana lobby is actively trying to undermine anti-drug efforts – unlike the tobacco industry in the past. They aren’t actively trying to make it look cool but rather achieve the same status as tobacco and liquor products. That’s far from the same thing.
    .
    So no, Michael, it isn’t their responsibility.

  • freeinpa

    “Cigarettes are bad for you and cause cancer and can kill you.”
    .
    The why not push for it to be illegal? Bacon causes cancer, whiskey causes liver damage. Let’s make them all illegal. Not likely to happen is it?
    .
    So let’s tax it and sue the tobacco companies until they give us billions for health care. Right they did that and it was spent.
    .
    “Marijuana is hardly a “left only” drug.”
    .
    Hardly but I suspect more prevalent.
    .

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    That makes a lot of sense, Michael. I might argue that the government, as a fierce prohibition advocate, hasn’t been entirely responsible over the course of this debate either.

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    I agree with you Michael.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Addictive, smiktive. Anything can be addictive. Like the article stated, even eating carrots can be a addiction. I know people who are addicted to carbohydrates. The important thing here is that we are wasting millions of dollars a year on the war on drugs.
    .
    However, if pot legal, not only would people know for certain that their joint isn’t laced with a harder drug, by taxing it heavily we could pay for the war on the harder drugs.
    .
    I have to admit to one fallacy to that plan, however. Not long after pot is lagalized, the poor will make up the bulk of the users. Just like they make up the vast majority of cigarette smokers today. And I’ve always viewed tobacco taxes as little more than another tax on the poor who are forced to pay the tax because they can’t afford the addiction treatments like the pill or patch which are easily 2-3X the cost of a carton of cigarettes. A similar phenomena will happen eventually if pot is legalized.

  • apr2563

    freeper: Cigarettes are addictive. Take it from someone who has emphysema. I tried quitting several times. Finally, after ending up in the emergency room, I quit. It is a lethal drug. By the way, you can buy cigarettes on line very cheaply, tax free. You would approve.
    .
    I have smoked marijuana. Rarely and not for years. But I never had addiction become a problem. Nor did I move on to harder drugs. Not denying some do. My 2nd ex certainly was addicted. He was 12 years younger than me and of that era. However, truthfully, he was so hyper I was grateful for the weed. Cheaper than lithium.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    When the stress burns my brain just like acid raindrops,
    Mary Jane is the only thing that makes the pain stop.

  • apollyon07

    “Its interesting. Most kids think weed is less dangerous than cigarettes.”
    .
    I DO find it interesting that kids are RIGHT about this. Good sign for future drug policy!

  • apollyon07

    Anyone who has researched this knows the truth: that marijuana is much less harmful (and addictive) than two drugs that are currently legal and taxed: alcohol and tobacco. 85,000 people die annually from alcohol overdoses (note: this does not include the enormous amount that die from drunk-driving incidents)
    .
    How many OD from marijuana?
    .
    ZERO.
    .
    How many have ever OD’d from marijuana?
    .
    ZERO.
    .
    Wake up people. Just because the government says something does not make it true.
    .
    Anyone who argues that cigs are worse than pot is beyond ridiculous. Legal does not mean safe. Illegal does not mean dangerous.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Apolly!
    .
    Welcome back! Where’d you disappear to?
    .
    But, I think you meant, “Anyone who argues that cigs are not worse than pot is beyond ridiculous.

  • apollyon07

    Riiiight. Yeah I probably should have proofread.
    .
    I’ve been reading the Swampland articles off and on still, just not commenting as much. I’ve admittedly gotten discouraged from commenting from seeing how nasty people are to each other on here. And I’ve kind of lost interest. But when I see an article on our ridiculous drug policies, I will never hesitate to give my input!

  • apr2563

    Michael, pot can never be as destructive of individuals and families as alcohol is.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    I could use your back-up down here in the Swamp.

  • sasquatch08

    Maybe this is the reason that violence in schools is dropping?
    .
    Seriously though, who really cares? Anyone with half a brain knows that the DARE scare stories are total BS. I smoked pot from high school, though college and eventually stopped because it was time to grow up, didn’t mess me up just caused me to watch a lot of the History/Discovery/Animal Planet channels. Did I try harder drugs? You better believe it, the list of drugs I haven’t tried is way shorter than the list of those I have. Still here, still breathing, don’t use any of them anymore and no I never went to rehab.
    .
    What’s killing people when it comes to drugs? Largely the law that creates a very lucrative black market where it’s worth it for poor people (and even drug king pins who are worth millions or billions) to kill each other over drugs, turf to deal on or customers.
    .
    Do drugs have bad side effects. Yes. Can you die from ODing on some of them. Yes. Is it a good idea to pick up a meth habit? No. Maybe people would understand this if we didn’t lie to them from the time they can understand English in a vain attempt to keep them from every smoking a joint. I mean, you can smoke weed or snort coke and be POTUS…
    .
    Personally, I started smoking weed because my friends did and I could see that it had none of the effects that DARE told me it did. So I tried it and found out for myself I had been lied to. At 15 years old what leap of logic did I make? That they must have lied about all the other drugs too!

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    F*ckin A, right!

  • http://smutco.wordpress.com/ smutco

    Well I’ve just had a pleasant surprise while looking at the “The NSDUH Report – State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving” from SAMSHA. The fact that I had a pleasant surprise when looking at government statistics about “drugged” driving is a shocking surprise in itself.

    —————————————————————————————
    Trends in Driving under the Influence of Illicit Drugs
    —————————————————————————————

    When combined 2002 to 2005 data are compared with combined 2006 to 2009 data, the Nation as a whole experienced a statistically significant reduction in the rate of past year drugged driving (from 4.8 to 4.3 percent), as did seven States: Alaska, California, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Michigan, and Pennsylvania (Table 2). No States had a statistically significant increase in the rate of drugged driving.

    http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k10/205/DruggedDriving.h
    tm
    —————————————————————————————

    Well ain’t that a slap in the face of the “drugged driving” hysteria that the Know Nothings like to include in their standard issue hysterical rhetoric?

    Should I mention that 4 of the 7 states cited by SAMSHA as having statistically significant reductions in “drugged” driving From 2002 to 2009 are medical cannabis states? Do we also point out that Michigan wasn’t a medical cannabis state until 2008?

    This tidbit is also included:

    “Reductions in past year rates of drugged driving were found both among persons aged 16 to 25 (12.9 to 11.4 percent) and among persons aged 26 or older (3.0 to 2.8 percent)”.

    Wow, I wonder why this report didn’t make the headlines. It was published way, way back in last week, 12/09/2010.

  • http://smutco.wordpress.com/ smutco

    Let’s see, any more hysterical rhetoric contained in Mr. Scherer’s screed? Know Nothings rarely disappoint. Today it’s a re-branding of cannabis as a “harmless” medicine.

    The first point to consider is that the only people involved in this controversy who use the word harmless are the Know Nothing prohibitionists. They use this word to step up an easy to defeat straw man, because of course the assertion that cannabis is harmless is absurd. This is one of the Know Nothings favorite straw men but they do have a semi-trailer or two full of them. Gawd only knows what would happen if the Know Nothing didn’t have a steady supply of straw men. I think maybe their heads would implode because of the resulting inter-cranial vacuum.

    In my next post I’m going to make a list of all the “harmless” medicines that the Feds put into schedule 2. I’d really like to know when you expect these drugs to be legal since once you turn something into a medicine it is obviously your agenda to have them legalized for recreational use and distributed to elementary school children.

  • http://smutco.wordpress.com/ smutco

    In this post we’re going to explore the wonderful world of schedule 2 drugs. Schedule 2 where a drug with a high potential for abuse but has a recognized medical utility. So that must mean that the list I’m going to pose is just a number of harmless medicines. After all, if we label something “medicine” that must mean it’s ok for elementary school children! Oops, don’t look now but methamphetamine is FDA approved for children under 6, and likely available and in stock at your local pharmacy!

    Here we go:

    Cocaine
    Methamphetamine (Desoxyn)
    dextroamphetamine/amphetamine (Adderall)
    morphine
    oxycodone (Oxycontin)
    hydrocodone (dihydrocodeinone)
    fentanyl (Innovar, Sublimaze, Duragesic)
    hydromorphone (Dilaudid, dihydromorphinone)
    Secobarbital (Seconal, Tuinal)
    methadone (Dolophine, Methadose, Amidone)
    phencyclidine (PCP, Sernylan) ***not my mistake***

    Yes, PCP is a valid medicine and ok for doctor’s to prescribe as far as the DEA and the FDA is concerned. Fortunately for the world there aren’t any pharma companies that will make PCP for sale,and no doctors are prescribing it.

    Here’s one drug that’s NOT on schedule 2, but is on schedule 3: Dronabinol in sesame oil in soft gelatin capsule (Marinol, synthetic THC in sesame oil/soft gelatin)

    http://www.justice.gov/dea/pubs/scheduling.html

    http://www.ehow.com/about_5505775_desoxyn-vs-adderall.html

    Ya know, for a number of years I’ve been thinking about taking up a methamphetamine habit. But until I found out that it’s an FDA approved medicine for 6 year old children, I thought it sounded like it was bad for you. Well gosh, it’s got the goverment seal of approval, that must mean it’s safe. The government calls it medicine so that settles that.

    I’m also very curious about the fentanyl because I’ve heard it’s 80 times more potent than heroin. Fentanyl and Methamphetamine sound like two great tastes that taste great together now that I know that they are government approved as clean, wholesome fun.
    ——————————————————————–
    It’s simply unbelievable that people are stupid enough to fall for the prohibitionists bald faced lies, half truths and hysterical rhetoric.

  • liberalmeltdown

    Yeah, it’s additive. I have known people that were self described “pot heads” proud to be addicted to pot. The bad thing is the whole counter culture, underground. It leads to places where things get very sketchy. Drugs, sex and rock and roll. I can’t tell you how many lives of people I grew up with where destroyed by that culture. Dead, addicted, diseased, depressed, imprisoned, killed, disabled. It’s not all fun and games. Get high. When you can’t score some weed…how about freon, or…smoke whatever you got. How about it Miley?
    .
    Dead kids is all I see from the drug culture. First one I remember was 13. I was 12.

  • sasquatch08

    @liberalmeltdown
    .
    See this is why people generally don’t trust the anti-drug crowd. I’m far from liberal, but there’s no way I can support the rhetoric you’re using here. “Dead, addicted, diseased, depressed, imprisoned, killed, disabled [children]” is the argument the right and left love to use for anything they can’t really defend with facts.
    .
    Most of the dead and disabled were shot by gangbangers who make millions because it’s illegal or the cops who over reacted. Ditto the imprisoned.
    .
    As for addiction, yes some things are addictive and are not to be played with lightly, you could hurt yourself. But you can hurt yourself with a myriad of things you encounter every day. Staple guns, nail guns, cars, buses, trains, electrical sockets, hand guns, heavy machinery, hammers, or even drywall stilts can all be dangerous or even lethal if they aren’t respected.
    .
    I’ll ask you the same thing I ask the liberals on here on a regular basis. What ever happened to personal responsibility?
    .
    If you’re dumb enough to pick up a meth addiction in 2010 I can honestly say I don’t feel bad for you and I sort of hope it kills you because you’re a MORON who is doing nothing more than proving Darwin right.
    .
    The crux of the problem is what you’re participating in here; lying to people about “soft” drugs only encourages them to use the “hard” ones because they figure that they’ve been lied to about how dangerous they are too.
    .
    As an example when I took DARE back in the mid-1990′s they actually told us that smoking marijuana has the following effects (I am not making this up at all, this is what I was told by the DARE booklet): A man smoked a joint in his house one day, and started to feel really strange. He started to become paranoid that he was physically changing so he walked to the mirror in his bathroom. Once there he noted to his great dismay that it was not his face staring back at him but rather a hideous green monster! Then the face started to melt! The man lost it! He ran to his bedroom closet, removed a handgun and committed suicide right there on the spot with a single gunshot wound to his head!
    .
    As you can tell this is utter and complete crap. First off it’s an obvious lie because if it was true marijuana would kill thousands of people each year in a similarly horrible manner yet in its multi-thousand year history of use it has killed exactly 0 people. Secondly, if the guy killed himself how did he tell the investigating officers what he saw in the mirror so that it could be put in the DARE booklet as a warning to others?
    .
    This kind of propaganda, using obvious and outright lies is what gets people into harder drugs. When you smoke pot the first time you realize that they totally lied to you about it, which by extension makes you think that they lied about everything else. When they told you that pot was super dangerous it was untrue, so it must hold that they lied to you when they said heroin or meth were dangerous.
    .
    DARE: government work at it’s best, and they expect me to believe the ACA will work? Please.

  • http://smutco.wordpress.com/ smutco

    So there really are people stupid enough to believe that there are people today, are sober as the proverbial judge, that will instantly find themselves on skid row if allowed to get high legally on drugs other than drinking alcohol or the fumes of model airplane glue. That’s simply preposterous.

    liberalmeltdown’s entire screed consists of nothing other that bald faced lies, half truths, and the typical hysterical rhetoric generated by Know Nothing prohibitionists.

    Oh, one other question. Why in the world didn’t your precious law keep those fictional straw men in your post who had their lives “ruined” by the “drug culture”?

    This is simply a tragic case of the blind leading the blind and society is suffering because of the ignorance of the Know Nothing prohibitionists.

  • liberalmeltdown

    “This kind of propaganda, using obvious and outright lies is what gets people into harder drugs.”
    .
    What happened to personal responsibility?
    .
    I thought that’s what you were asking? You are confused…wonder why…
    .
    Look my friend, I go back aways in time, pre-gangbangers. Drugs kill people. One of my best friends in High School died like Jimi Hendrix from heroin in his sleep; choked on vomit. Personal responsibility at 16? WTF are you talking about? His older brother was a pusher and passed H off as THC. It killed his brother. You think that’s the only story I have Bro? No. I have many more. You want to use drugs big boy, go ahead. Just realize that is NOT just about you. When your supplier (that guy that is so trustworthy) sell to kids and helps support drug wars around the world it affects more than just you MR Personal Responsibility. F ing hypocrite.

blog comments powered by Disqus