Why the DOJ is Eager to Appeal Today’s Health Reform Ruling

Earlier today, federal Judge Henry Hudson ruled that the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate is unconstitutional. While this is an important victory for opponents of the health reform law, it’s obviously not the end of the road. The Obama Department of Justice will appeal, as opponents of the individual mandate appealed other decisions upholding its constitutionality.

In a background briefing with reporters last week, one Administration official said he does not expect an appeals court ruling in the Virginia case before the second half of 2011. In a press conference today, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli – spearheading the case – said he expects the appeals process to take one year. A Supreme Court ruling after that would take an addition year, he said.

Cuccinelli wants the Department of Justice to agree to bypass the appeals process in the Fourth Circuit and ask the Supreme Court to look at the case right away. The DOJ is unlikely to do this. Let’s have a look at Cuccinelli and DOJ’s motivations.

Most legal experts, including Judge Hudson, expect the Supreme Court to make the final decision on whether the individual mandate is constitutional. In all likelihood, the high court will decide to examine one of the lawsuits challenging the mandate. There are some 20 such legal challenges ongoing or under appeal across the country. My guess is Cuccinelli, who is ambitious, high-profile and media savvy, wants his case to be the one that goes before the court.

The Justice Department, meanwhile, may not agree to expedite the process and skip the Fourth Circuit. Philip Klein of the American Spectator explains why:

During the Bush era, the Fourth Circuit developed a reputation as the most conservative in the nation, in large part because it sided with the administration on a number of key national security decisions, particularly involving terorist detainees.

But the balance has shifted dramatically since then, and currently Democratic appointees outnumber Republicans by an 8-to-5 margin, with two vacancies remaining.

At the start of the Obama administration, Republicans had the slight edge over Democrats, 6-to-5. In July of last year, chief judge and Republican appointee Karen Williams had to step down due to early onset of Alzheimer’s. Since then, Obama has been able to get three of his nominees to the court confirmed — Judges Andre Davis, Barbara Keenan and James Wynn.

Related Topics: Health Care
  • Latest on Swampland

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Obama Stumbles? Why the President’s Right to Talk About Bain

    The meme of the day in journo-world is that President Obama has stumbled at the outset of the general election campaign. The evidence for this? Well, uh, there isn’t very much, really–except that a few Democrats have criticized his campaign’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital and that Obama’s fundraising is merely humongous, instead of obscenely humongous. The two phenomena are linked, of course: Obama isn’t getting the usual haul from Wall Street because he has outrageously–outrageously!–tried to regulate the bankers who did so much to crash the economy in 2008. The handful of Democrats squawking are people who either (a) get money from private equity firms or (b) have retired and joined Mondo Casino. But there is another side to this story:

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Let’s also have a look at this district court judge’s motivations: http://gawker.com/5713041/judge-who-ruled-health-care-reform-unconstitutional-owns-piece-of-gop-consulting-firm

    Anyway, if you’re curious why Hudson, who was appointed to the bench by George W. Bush, ruled that health care reform’s individual coverage mandate violates the constitution, it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he as a major shareholder in a political messaging firm that gets paid to argue that health care reform’s individual mandate is unconstitutional. It’s really just that he’s a Republican.

  • grape_crush

    There’s not even the appearance of a conflict of interest there. No way should Hudson have recused himself or found another judge to hear the case.

    (that’s sarcasm, Freeper. Just thought I’d give you a heads-up)

  • deconstructiva

    Kate, thanks for showing us the Fourth Wall Circuit’s #’s / political gaming, if depressing that one has to play that. Of course, SCOTUS will have to decide just on the Commerce Clause vs. Tenth Amendment Smackdown alone. I hope you write a later tea leaf reading of SCOTUS members’ past / current trends on how they view CC vs. 10a issues. Or better yet, trade off with a teammate and let him / her do that (Steinmetz? Sorensen?) in exchange for a fancy steak dinner for you and the hubby …or swapped vacations.
    .
    No wait, do the dirty work yourself and make it a dead-tree / no-paywall cover story. Imagine the SCOTUS members dressed in red (Roberts, other conservatives), blue (Sotomayor, etc.), and Kennedy white as a ghost since he’ll be the swinger …all with the title “’SCOTUS and the MMA of ACA: How Kennedy, the Commerce Clause, and the Tenth Amendment Thingy Determine Whether You Live or Die Get HC or Not’ by Kate Pickert.” Thanks for staying on this story and your thoughts.

  • deconstructiva

    Bet the judge drew the short straw or the plantiffs went judge-shopping. Or Judge Judy was on vacation.

  • jsfox

    Let’s not talk about Hudson’s apparent conflict of interest in this case -
    via: http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/judge-who-ruled-health-care-reform-unconstitutional-owns-piece-of-gop-consulting-firm.php?ref=fpb

    Hudson’s annual financial disclosures show that he owns a sizable chunk of Campaign Solutions, Inc., a Republican consulting firm that worked this election cycle for John Boehner, Michele Bachmann, John McCain, and a whole host of other GOP candidates who’ve placed the purported unconstitutionality of health care reform at the center of their political platforms.

  • Ivy_B

    Hmmm. Wonder if Campaign Solutions, Inc. designed these ads. Pretty quick to have them up before 3:40 today.

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1210/Cuccinelli_fundraising_off_health_care_win.html?showall

  • paulejb

    Or maybe it’s just unconstitutional.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    In the ’90s the republican plan for health care reform was… wait for it…
    .
    .
    .
    A public mandate!!
    .
    .
    It was only after democrats decided it was a good idea that republicans turned against it, even the republicans who sponsored the failed bill in the ’90s.

blog comments powered by Disqus