A Slurpee Summit, Sans Slurpees, Yields Some Good Will

It took almost a month, but Washington’s political leaders finally want you to know they got the message: They will work together to get things done.

This is a small step, for sure, but it was by no means a certain one after the midterm election blowout on Nov. 2. The next day, Republican leaders in the House and the Senate came out swinging. “I think the group that should hopefully get the message out of yesterday’s elections is our friends on the other side of the aisle,” said Mitch McConnell, the top Senate Republican. President Obama responded with a veiled threat of his own. “The question is going to be do we all come to the table with an open mind and say to ourselves, what do we think is actually going to make a difference for the American people?” he said, sounding a clear note of doubt about Republican intentions.

On Tuesday, after more than two hours of meetings between Obama and the Republican and Democratic leaders, including 35 minutes of private discussions without staff, the tone was far less tense. The jockeying for position seemed to have given way to the first glimmers of collaboration. Republican leaders publically announced that they welcomed the opportunity to meet more often with Obama. The President admitted that he should have done better in his first two years to reach out to Republicans, and announced his intentions to invite Republicans up to Camp David. Afterwards, Obama made a point of avoiding the classic post-meeting spin.

“A lot of times, coming out of these meetings, both sides claim they want to work together but try to paint the opponent as unyielding and unwilling to cooperate,” Obama said, apparently departing from his prepared remarks. “Both sides come to the table. They read their talking points. Then they head out to the microphones, trying to win the news cycle instead of solving problems, and it becomes just another move in an old Washington game. But I think there was recognition today that that’s a game that we can’t afford; not in these times. And in a private meeting that I had without staff, you know, without betraying any confidences, I was pleased to see several of my friends in the room say, ‘Let’s try not to duplicate that. Let’s not try to work the Washington spin cycle to suggest that somehow the other side’s not being cooperative.’”

On Capitol Hill, the incoming Speaker John Boehner appeared with McConnell and the incoming majority whip Eric Cantor before reporters after the meeting, and they all resisted their normal habit of throwing rhetorical daggers down Pennsylvania Avenue. “There’s a reason why we have Democrats and Republicans. We believe in different things about the appropriate role of the federal government,” said Boehner. “But having said that, the more time that we do spend together, we can find the common ground because the American people expect us to come here and work on their behalf.”

The immediate outcome of the meeting was tangible: A negotiating plan to work out a resolution on extending tax cuts that are set to expire at the end of the year. Secretary of Treasury Tim Geithner and Office of Management and Budget chief Jack Lew will join four appointed negotiators from the House and the Senate, including two Republicans. The meetings could begin as early as Tuesday. The likely outcome of this meeting will be a temporary extension of all the tax cuts, though the terms have not yet been worked out.

The great political question of the next year is whether this stated desire for cooperation evolves into some semblance of trust, or whether it is simply a performance piece in the political contest both parties are playing to establish themselves as the best representatives of the American people. As Mark McKinnon, a former advisor to President Bush and John McCain, said Monday night on MSNBC, “The fact that it’s a big story that the President is meeting with members of the opposition party is shocking to regular Americans. This shouldn’t be news.”

But alas it is. What Americans found out today is that there is a glimmer of hope that one day, once again, it will not be news any more.

Related Topics: Barack Obama, Congress, Democratic Party, Republican Party, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • http://americadoneright.wordpress.com/ mcoville

    The message was not to compromise, it was to fix the mess.

    This blog post says it better with more words: http://libertyssong.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/republicans-were-not-swept-into-office-to-compromise/

    Obama said ““Both sides come to the table. They read their talking points. Then they head out to the microphones, trying to win the news cycle instead of solving problems, and it becomes just another move in an old Washington game.” This is the game the Democrats have been playing with a super majority for the last 2 years. Now that they lost the majority they are forced to listen to the people. You have to love the hypocrisy in Washington Democrats.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “The President admitted that he should have done better in his first two years to reach out to Republicans”
    .
    At the risk of trivializing a serious problem BHO has a lot of battered spouse in him.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Extending the tax cuts for the rich indicates Obama has folded, yet again. That must be what they mean by working together.

  • nflfoghorn

    And Republicans are as pure as the driven snow. And cows don’t “go” in the meadow. And Heck has an occasional cold front.
    .
    (I can’t believe a mild p-word euphanism for “excrete” got moderated.)

  • newfreedomblog

    Well in just 2 short years from now, maybe we can elect representatives to Washington who truly will do the work of the people and not just give them lip-service.

  • trifecta55

    Obama rolls over, says he hasn’t tried hard enough, no reciprocation.
    .
    This is goodwill and compromise. The village is irredeemable at this point.

  • deconstructiva

    It’s puppet theatre. Even if Obama’s serious in reaching out to R’s their obstructionism makes this whole thing pointless. Michael, do you, Jay, MC, and Katy have a betting pool on tangible results from this Beer Summit II? Or a drinking game for upcoming pressers?

  • jsfox

    Then the Republicans need to listen as well. And a 70% of the American people do not want the tax cuts on the wealthy to be extended.

  • deconstructiva

    Yep, THAT word is not allowed, nfl. We can say “crap” but can’t mutter that word or say sht, literally.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Good golly!!! I never thought I’d be so disappointed in somebody I had felt so positive about. Obama was going to change the way Washington works–yeah, he’s given it over completely to the republicans. ?At this point I don’t even see any hope for the democratic party. I’d rather see all of the tax cuts expire than to continue to give wealthy people more that they don’t even need.

  • nflfoghorn

    I kind of see it that way…but one would like to see actual negotiation, not capitulation, before coming out appearing as though you negotiated.

  • charlieromeobravo

    “The President admitted that he should have done better in his first two years to reach out to Republicans…”
    .
    Oh, good lord. And here I thought that that he finally understood that the Republicans basically played them during the healthcare reform debate. What good is it to make more of an effort to reach out to someone who has no intention of cooperating with you?

  • nflfoghorn

    …otherwise BO appears to be saying he’s sorry before there’s anything to apologize for.

  • nflfoghorn

    Dude, he’s just channeling his inner Pollyana.

  • sacredh

    nfl, use p zero zero. I know p00 seems a little silly to get thrown into moderation but we can say pussy and prick. Go figure.

  • newfreedomblog

    Maybe next time you will elect someone even more controversial than Obama. Now who might that be?

  • sacredh

    prick prick prick prick prick pussy pussy pussy pussy pussy

    Give me p00 or give me death. Drama 101.

  • Art Pepper

    The likely outcome of this meeting will be a temporary extension of all the tax cuts, though the terms have not yet been worked out.

    Just remember: No matter how much you cut taxes, it literally does not add anything to the deficit!

  • sacredh

    Michael, it is the holiday season and we could use a “1000 Words” with a great picture to tear into. We’re a little cranky and could use some relief. You’ve picked some winners in the last few months. Another one would be greatly appreciated.

  • kbanginmotown

    Thank goodness it’s “WikiLeaks” not “WikiP!ss”…

  • kbanginmotown

    Seconded!

  • sacredh

    kbang, this is really OT but my sister has been after me for a year to watch Twilight. I finally did last night. My GOD! How was that piece of crap ever popular. I thought it stunk. I wanted Edward to rip her throat out and burn the body just to end the series. That was in the 1st 20 minutes. After that I was hoping for an extinction level event to take out everyone in the movie. I don’t mind a love story but there had better be a money shot every 15 minutes or so.

  • tyrantking

    If the Dems don’t force a vote on extending the tax breaks only for those making less than $250,000 a year can we all just agree that there really is no difference between the two parties? That they are all beholden to the same special interests?

    On a related note, I look forward to voting against Mr. Obama in my state’s 2012 democratic primary.

  • Art Pepper

    Sacredh – have you seen the Buffy vs Edward remix?

  • sacredh

    Art Pepper, I have dial-up but I have a feeling it’s something I’ll like. I’ll load it up (God knows how long that will take) and come down when I think it’s finished. Thanks. Is there a steam roller or a wood chipper involved?

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    It is hard to imagine where the Obama team thinks their votes are going to come from in 2012.

  • Ivy_B

    Thirded.
    .
    And to the disappointment as well.

  • shepherdwong

    It is hard to imagine where the Obama team thinks their votes are going to come from in 2012.
    .
    It had the desired effect on the intended audience. See: “[w]hat Americans found out today is that there is a glimmer of hope…
    .
    It’s just hard to imagine why the Obama team still thinks their opinion matters to anyone any longer.
    .
    Anyway, the only other play for Democrats is to go full-on populist and turn the Party against the ruling oligarchy. Safe to say, Obama and the Conservadems see that as political suicide and, by all appearances, they’re probably correct.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    I imagine they will try the “wasted vote” argument again, claiming they are not as bad as Republicans, but even that approach seems to be losing it’s effect.
    .
    I can’t think of a better time for someone to create a third party of the Left than now.

  • earljr1

    I think the wheels have come off the Obama bandwagon and he will be hard pressed to gain favor for a second term. If Hillary were to seek the nomination, I think she would win, hands down. I expect Romney to be nominated by the Republicans and he will choose Rubio as his running mate…a ticket viewed very favorably by independents. If all of this pans out, it will be a VERY interesting election cycle, needless to say.

  • Art Pepper

    Is there a steam roller or a wood chipper involved
    .
    Alas, nothing so graphic.

  • shepherdwong

    I can’t think of a better time for someone to create a third party of the Left than now.
    .
    Until now, I’ve been viewing that sentiment as little more than severe frustration combined with pipe-dream naïvete. However, if the oligarchs keep pushing their luck, along with our buttons, I think a real, working-class populist campaign could beat either party’s status quo candidate. It can’t be “of the Left”, of course, any more than it can be “of the Right”. It would have to stick strictly with economic arguments and be led by someone who couldn’t be pigeon-holed as liberal by the Village Scribes or feared to be a closet fascist by liberals.
    .
    But if the fiscal scolds end up having their way: more pain inflicted on everyone but the miscreant plutocrats, it could happen.

  • kmdyson

    This compromise thing is a crock. If the Democrats agree to everything the Republicans demand it’s called compromise…if there is any talk of social justice or equality in any policy…the Republicans will shut all so called negotiations down. Let corporatism rule…there is no place for the rest of us in their world…

  • kmdyson

    “I can’t think of a better time for someone to create a third party of the Left than now.”

    Well said…it is indeed time to move to the left and disable corporatism before we all starve to death sharing the 1% of the wealth the plutocrats allow the 98% of the population to share…

  • sacredh

    Art Pepper, thanks for the video. That was pretty funny. I’m very puzzled by one thing though. How on earth can any woman think that guy is good looking? I’d rather look like me than him. OTOH, I used to think that Tina Turner was about the hottest thing I’d ever seen. I guess it’s all just a matter of taste.

  • kbanginmotown

    @Art: Thanks for the video! Like sacred, I’ve never watched Twilight nor Buffy. I feel that I understand them both, now. (and still glad I didn’t watch them…) ;)
    .
    @sacred: I stopped for gas in Logan, OH, on the way back to my adopted Wolverine State – did you feel a disturbance in the Swamp-force? ;) I had meant to buy a scratch-off lotto ticket while I was not too far from the sacred-epicenter of karma, but forgot to do so. Hopefully, I brought some of that luck back with me…
    .
    Also: your Christmas shopping/decorating updates are an inspiration every holiday season. You’ve motivated me to get the lights out of the attic so far! *sigh*…

blog comments powered by Disqus