State Pulls the Plug On SIPRNet

Late last week, after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton informed the White House of the likely fall-out from the WikiLeaks cable dump, the White House came back with a question: “What’s our corrective action?”

Clinton’s undersecretary for management, Patrick Kennedy, had a simple suggestion: pull the plug on SIPRNet, the classified DoD network that PFC Bradley Manning reportedly used to download the cables from State’s inhouse classified database. “The White House said do it,” says a senior administration official.

The publication by WikiLeaks of more than 250,000 diplomatic cables, many of them classified, is forcing an administration-wide intelligence retrenchment as agencies reconsider how to balance the need to share with the need to know. With its third major dump of controversial classified information in nine months, WikiLeaks is single-handedly tipping the balance back towards inter-agency “stovepiping”, or walling off information from other departments.

Post 9.11 the imperative from Congress and the White House was to break down the “stovepipes” that prevented sharing across the so-called intelligence community—the sprawling collection of intelligence offices in more than a dozen different agencies across the U.S. government and around the world.

At State, they created the “Net-Centric Diplomacy” database or NCD, where State stored classified information up to the top secret level. Agencies across government had access to that database through their own secure networks. In DoD’s case the network, created in 1995, was called the Secure Internet Protocol Router Network, or SIPRNet.

Late last week, at Kennedy’s recommendation and the White House’s approval, State disconnected SIPRNet from the NCD, senior administration officials tell Time. “Obviously there were some gaps within SIPRNet that DoD is actively correcting,” the senior administration official says, “And as a temporary precaution we have disconnected SIPRNet from the NCD.”

How long is temporary? DoD is investigating how Manning managed to download all those cables and get them to WikiLeaks, the senior administration officials tell Time. So far they have concluded that the failure came at Dod’s Central Command, the combatant command responsible for the middle east, which employed Manning in Iraq. Prior to Manning’s download, users of SIPRNet had been blocked from downloading data to removable media.

But at some point that restriction was lifted across all of CentCom. DoD has been reimposing restrictions since the July dump of Afghanistan war documents by WikiLeaks. DoD has blocked the use of removable media; they have required in some cases a “dual key” system that requires a second user to approve moving data from a higher classification system to a lower classification system; and they are installing software programs to monitor unusual activity.

DoD is not completely cut off from State’s database. A separate system for the transmission of top secret information, the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System or JWICS, is still linked to the NCD. And State may reconnect SIPRNet in the future. “Once DoD has gone through and made its corrections on SIPRNet we’ll reevaluate whether to reconnect,” the senior administration official says.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    “WikiLeaks is single-handedly tipping the balance back towards inter-agency “stovepiping”, or walling off information from other departments.”

    No. That’s the government’s choice. The administration doesn’t have to react this way. It could just say “we probably overused our right to classify information in the first place” and just move on. The government could realize it has a responsibility to be more open with its citizens. But Wikileaks isn’t forcing the government to do anything, that’s just silly talk.

    Oh and why an anonymous source on this?

  • mjwilstein

    George W. Bush talked with Mark Zuckerberg about Wikileaks today:
    http://gtcha.me/f7bX93

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    See, while I would agree with regards to the last two dumps, in this particular instance, I’ve seen very little I have issue with being maintained in confidentiality. Yes, nothing was actually news, but the reality is that a lot of this documentations has serious ramifications for many governments – not just the US. Up here in Canada, there’s a bit of an identity question coming up after some quotes came out of our intelligence director that is going to stir up a bit of a firestorm and who knows whether it’ll help or hurt Harper. The leak that China was getting frustrated with North Korea and was contemplating the unification with South Korea under Seoul’s leadership is a significant change in their official positioning and its leak may force China to either double down on its commitment to North Korea – delaying its willingness to do accept unification by 5 years – or capitulate. Yemen is going to have a significant blow back because it has been leaked with proof that the US bombed Yemen rather than Yemen bombing their own back yard. The latter looks like their leader is dealing with a problem. The former looks like he’s a puppet for the American needs. Imagine how well that’s going down. Lord knows what’s still sitting there in terms of Pakistan and what possible ramifications that could have.
    .
    These are serious issues and they affect far more than the US government. Whether those governments should or should not have classified or hidden that information is something we can debate, but it is absolute arrogance for America or any other nation to make that choice for them.

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    Forgotten those are excellent points but the governments of Yemen and China are barely held accountable to their own people, much less me. If my government is bombing Yemen I kind of need to know who, what, where and why because it will be one of the things that informs my next vote.

  • liberalmeltdown

    To insure the safety of the public we need to send the network to an airport for a scan and a pat down.
    .

  • michaelfury

    “Post 9.11 the imperative from Congress and the White House was to break down the “stovepipes” that prevented sharing across the so-called intelligence community”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/points-of-failure/

  • http://rbmatudan.wordpress.com rbmatudan

    Let’s face it; the American government does not have the political will to be honest with the American people, whichever branch in the government they are. Violence and war has and will always stay…

    http://www.pathtoasia.com/jobs/

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Well, I guess here’s a question you should ask: would you rather the attack not happen at all or the attack happen with another nation claiming credit? Yes, I can think of plenty of cases where this is a false equivalency and plenty of cases where this scenario isn’t necessarily desirable (eg: we’re being the strongman for some tinpot dictator), but many of these nations would be far less willing to assist American interests if their people/opponents/whatever knew they’d signed off on the deal.

blog comments powered by Disqus