Morning Must Reads: Leaked

(White House Photo/Pete Souza)

–Ben Smith writes Cablegate calls into question the potency of American diplomacy.

–It’s no revelation that many leaders in the Arab world privately sweat Iran, but Mark Lynch argues the greatest potential for political blowback is in that sphere.

–Matt Yglesias questions whether private communications with those Gulf nations are really illuminating.

–Max Boot thinks the latest round of leaks is, as before, of negligible news value.

–The White House says it fears foreign governments will no longer confide in the U.S.

–The New York Times explains its decision to publish the WikiLeaked documents.

–Congress is back in session.

–Senator Kyl isn’t moving on START.

–Pentagon report or no, Senator Graham says no DADT repeal in the lame duck.

–Jim Talent is “seriously considering” a run at his old Senate seat, currently occupied by Claire McCaskill.

–Eying statewide office, Joseph Cao sidles right.

–Palin keeps things apolitical in Iowa.

–Damian Paletta reports Bowles and Simpson are tweaking their deficit plan in the run-up to the commission’s (symbolic) vote.

–A conglomeration of liberal think tanks release their own plan, notably including carbon and financial transaction taxes.

–Karen Tumulty considers American exceptionalism and why ambitious Republicans are talking about it.

–The EU greenlights Irish bailout.

–Vegetables: Economic of Contempt on money market fund reform.

–Side dish: Animus, Google and online commerce — a great story in the Times.

–Dessert: An illustrated lesson in becoming an expert.

What did I miss?

E-mail Adam

Related Topics: Barack Obama, Congress, Democratic Party, Iran, Media, Miscellany, National Security, Republican Party, Senate, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • nflfoghorn

    On Black Fri I got up @ 4am and found a 46″ LED TV @ HHGregg for $899.99. Later saw it advertised @ HHGregg for $999.99 and @ Sears for $1299.99. Giving my old one to my bro-in-law. The economy has turned around indeed!

  • nflfoghorn

    Wikileaks = so what else is new?

  • deconstructiva
  • nflfoghorn

    The Umpire. God rest his soul.

  • sacredh

    I was out at midnight on Turkey Day. I’m glad to see that I wasn’t the only capitalist out spending capital. I resorted to deceit and subterfuge in my shopping, but I kept it secret (until I posted what I did online).

  • sacredh

    I’m sorry to hear about Leslie. He was a funny guy.

  • nflfoghorn

    It’s still something inherently wrong about all this. It’s not like the Christ child needs an IPod. :)

  • nflfoghorn

    RE the pic: Truth be told, Hillary threw the elbow.

  • nflfoghorn

    But since we have to exit, exit laughing. Will he be preserved as a stuffed beaver? ;)

  • sacredh

    I disgree. An IPod might keep him entertained instead of getting all preachy on everybody. Nobody likes a primadonna.

  • deconstructiva

    FTW!

  • sacredh

    I want to go during sex. There’s just something about coming and going at the same time that appeals to me.

  • newfreedomblog
  • deconstructiva

    Maybe he’ll be encased in plastic.

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    Sheesh. Rather than bailing out its bond holders, Ireland could have written a $25,000 check to each of its citizens.

  • deconstructiva

    Sacred, you and Richard Pryor are on the same page.
    .

    .
    (yes, Scherer, Newton-Small, Steinmetz, etc. this is NSFW, but it’s Pryor so deal with it already. Maybe Tumulty can watch it and email you all the link to the wikileaks transcript)

  • sacredh

    I miss Pryor and I’m sure not above stealing a good line here and there. Words, not coke. I never understood the attraction people had for coke. If I ever wanted to feel nervous and jumpy I’d surely never shell out my money to accomplish that goal. It would have to be a freebie.

  • squirmz

    I got a hot deal on an iTouch for my wife. My 5 year old daughter has coopted it to play pocket frogs!

  • nflfoghorn

    I venture to think that Marilyn Manson is not on His playlist.

  • nflfoghorn

    …or just held a sweepstakes ;)

  • sacredh

    Bake sale!

  • chupkar

    My God people are cheerful today. Not a single real snark yet! It MUST be Christmastime!

  • sacredh

    We got our 3rd and 4th trees up last night. It does look like Christmas here in this devout atheist’s home. The top of the tree in the hallway is safely up the angel’s ass. She looks happy.

  • nflfoghorn

    Betcha you didn’t know angels are male ;)

  • newfreedomblog

    Slipping and sliding………..down she goes, where she stops nobody knows.
    .
    http://money.cnn.com/data/markets/

  • newfreedomblog

    Nothing on the “Food Safety Act” or Food Safety Farce?

  • sacredh

    Hmmmmmm…lace gauze dress. Breasticals. Are you sure? I didn’t ask and “she” didn’t tell. At the very least it was the Angel of San Francisco. I thought it was saying Father, not further.

  • newfreedomblog

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/8165769/Cancun-climate-change-summit-scientists-call-for-rationing-in-developed-world.html
    .
    More on Climate Change. As the world’s “leading Climatologists” meet in Cancun. They will decide your future for you.
    .
    Recommendation: “He said politicians should consider a rationing system similar to the one introduced during the last “time of crisis” in the 1930s and 40s.”

  • deconstructiva

    And not all angels have wings but some are barflies…
    .

    .
    …imagine Clarence in his nightie on top of the tree with a branch up his ass. I’d rather have Donna Reed under the tree (pun intended).

  • nflfoghorn

    So if a Repub was in office the Dow would be at 18K right? Brilliant!

  • sacredh

    I just thought of a comment that might be miscontrued as being inappropriate so I think I’ll take advantage of this semi-nice weather and do a little yard work. Have fun folks.

  • freeinpa

    “A conglomeration of liberal think tanks release their own plan”
    .
    Nothing new here either. More taxes (and no analysis of the economic impact of them) and more spending, oh I’m sorry “investment” along with edging closer to a complete takeover of HC by the government. They conveniently repeat the lie that HC Act will reduce the deficit and use the CBO as saying so without disclosing the little issue of Medicare that was not in the CBO analysis.

  • Art Pepper

    I just want to tell you both good luck. We’re all counting on you.

  • Art Pepper

    Don’t worry. We’re going to ignore this recommendation also. Tipping point, here we come…

  • Ivy_B

    Norfolk VA having problem with rising ocean.

    Many Norfolk residents hope their problems will serve as a warning.

    “We are the front lines of climate change,” said Jim Schultz, a science and technology writer who lives on Richmond Crescent near Ms. Peck. “No one who has a house here is a skeptic.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/26/science/earth/26norfolk.html?scp=1&sq=Norfolk%20Virginia%20water&st=cse

  • allthingsinaname

    A pay freeze. A whopping 2 billion in savings? On the backs of the middle class? Continued 700 billion tax break for the Rich?
    .
    There must be a Republican President in the WH.

  • freeinpa

    No just a clueless Democrat. Exactly how a freeze “saves” money is a charade. You save money by cutting pay or jobs not freezing pay.

  • freeinpa

    So global warming is the cause of marshes compacting and sinking. Who would of thunk it. I would have thought it was just lousy engineering! People build too close to water on swampy land then are surprised that they are flooded.

    Like many other cities, Norfolk was built on filled-in marsh. Now that fill is settling and compacting. In addition, the city is in an area where significant natural sinking of land is occurring. The result is that Norfolk has experienced the highest relative increase in sea level on the East Coast — 14.5 inches since 1930, according to readings by the Sewells Point naval station here.

  • allthingsinaname

    Oh Good Lord, you are an idiot!

  • freeinpa

    Well please enlighten all of us with your brilliance. Tell us how freezing salaries is savings and/or will cut deficit on a real basis not a projected one. Projections are the Charmin of government currency

  • nflfoghorn

    If you freeze salaries for two years you won’t pay cost-of-living increases or pay raises for two years.
    .
    This has been another episode of Simple Answers to Obvious Questions.
    .
    And ATI, you’re right.

  • allthingsinaname

    My comment to you was that you would suggest that he cut jobs and pay, all the while you complain about the economy and the unemployed. Besides the fact that a pay freeze does save money, but does more damage then good.

  • deconstructiva

    Prepaid “Kardashian Kards” not a good deal…
    http://money.cnn.com/2010/11/29/pf/prepaid_cards/

  • freeinpa

    “This has been another episode of Simple Answers to Obvious Questions.”
    .
    As provided by a Simpleton. The “freeze” makes the unfounded assumption that the “savings” won’t be spent somewhere else like in the rising costs of Medicare or extension of unemployment benefits or some other “investment”
    .
    The complaint about unemployment is the ongoing assault by Obama and liberals over tax policy, regulation and other costly mandated expenses that keep businesses from hiring. Higher overpriced workers (yes they are) from tax dollars is the most grievous form of capital allocation that exists. For every dollar spent by government it reduces private spending by $3.

    .
    The most fearful words in economics “I from the government and I am here to help you.”

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    –Palin keeps things apolitical in Iowa
    .
    If anybody believes Palin held a book signing in Iowa for any reason other than to test the waters, I have a bridge to nowhere for sale, too. She didn’t hold any political meetings, but she wouldn’t have many of those if she happened to be elected, either. What amazes me is that she actually talked to the media. Gotta keep her name in the spotlight, though. You betcha.

  • allthingsinaname

    “Let’s hope it doesn’t take President Obama long to realize that President Gimmick isn’t going to do him or the nation any good. And then he — and we — can put President Gimmick back in the closet, where he belongs.”
    .
    http://www.dailykos.com/

  • nflfoghorn

    So I guess to you 1 + 1 = 95. Those darn libruls will spend savings somewhere else ’cause it’s just in their nature. Truth by extrapolation, right Freep?

  • nflfoghorn

    GM and Chrysler workers had plenty to be thankful for this past weekend, right? Or is this preserving jobs thingy more government intervention?

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    President Obama, I am now reconsidering whether you deserve reelection. I’ll be looking for primary candidates who appose you.
    ·
    Congrats, you lost a fairly supportive individual who voted for you and convinced others to vote for you, who stood by your supposed necessary compromises which had been claimed to have been necessary to make bills pass.
    ·
    This, along with your half hearted attempt on DADT, your unwillingness to challenge Republicans for the good of America, & your general failure to bring about meaningful & effective re-regulation of the banking/mortgage industry have done me in.
    ·
    Before, I could have passed all these things over and said, at least he’s trying. Today, you’ve told me you aren’t trying. You are giving in. I’m not giving in with you anymore. Thanks, but no thanks.

  • nflfoghorn

    OK you dissatisfied folks – who’re you putting up against him? On the Dem side I mean?

  • allthingsinaname

    He has taught me that just saying no does work! He is going to hear it from me.

  • allthingsinaname

    No one. The point is I do not care. We cannot win with him.

  • freeinpa

    How much will the DREAM Act cost? Extrapolate that!

  • freeinpa

    Going through normal bankruptcy without the government handing over billions of taxpayer dollars, would have resulted in the same number of jobs preserved. What was not preserved was the taxpayer since Obama handed the UAW shares paid for by the taxpayer benefiting only the auto workers without creating/preserving a single job!
    .
    Thankful? They are laughing all the way to the bank

  • freeinpa

    Now since the NYT is such a big fan of publishing classified documents, I wonder if they would agree to have published all internal memos and emails of its journalists and editorial board. Since they (want to) play an important role in the public interest would it not be informative for the public see their goals, successes, compromises and frustrations?
    .
    Yeah right!

    The Times believes that the documents serve an important public interest, illuminating the goals, successes, compromises and frustrations of American diplomacy in a way that other accounts cannot match.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/world/29editornote.html

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    I don’t know who, but we need to find someone. Someone who is actually willing to be a Democrat and not say sorry for it. I’d prefer it not be Clinton, but I’m sure that’s who the majority would push.

  • nflfoghorn

    My head hurts from your “logic.” A “normal” bankruptcy would’ve taken years to complete and by then the whole industry in the U.S. would’ve collapsed, including Ford. Think for a change, willya?

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Hmm. Multiple trees. Well, Christmas is based on Germanic pagan ritual that were co-opted by the Catholic Church. I am no Christian, but I love Christmas, I love the ritual of the trees, the lights and the gifts. I even love spending that little bit of money that should stay in saving. But hey, its Christmas afterall. Just leave Jesus out of my festivities and I’m a happy gift giver.

  • sacredh

    erieangel, I feel the same way. Christmas has zero religious significance for me. It means what I want it to mean. I don’t worship the devil but we do the house up for Halloween too. We decorate for almost all of the holidays. We do it because we enjoy them. I like giving and receiving gifts. I love the Christmas cookies and specials. I love Christmas music. I look at it as celebration of family and friends. We still have two trees to go btw. One less than last year. I gave one away.

  • freeinpa

    No brain brain hurts because anything requiring thought overwhelms you. There are pre-packaged bankruptcy that take months- tops not years (CIT, MGM, Combustion Engineering).

    The difference, Obama would not have been able to give company ownership to the UAW or controlled which dealership to close (largely Republican supporters). Nor would Obama had been able to not have the UAW labor contracts voided as what typically happens in a bankruptcy.

    Whether or not Ford would have collapsed is one of those arguments that ranks up with “jobs saved” by the stimulus. You can’t prove it.

  • sacredh

    gumOnShoe, I’d prefer Hillary for two reasons.
    .
    1. I think she’d win.
    .
    2. I think she’d win.
    .
    I would like to see a real liberal but I don’t think it’s possible for a liberal to win. November erased any hopes of liberal’s chance for me. It’s not what I want. It’s what I think is possible. If Obama doesn’t run and Hillary doesn’t either, I don’t see anyone on our side who could get to the White House. The base is p!ssed but the independents and moderates will decide it again.

  • artraveler

    If an auto parts supplier provided parts to three companies and market was reduced to one company, his fixed costs go up by three although his variable costs would obviously stay the same. Ford would have had to absorb a cost increase on their vendor-supplied parts or the vendor would go under that that includes a lot of smaller companies spread all over the midwest but freepa doesn’t really care about working people anyway.

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    Yeah, but if you look at the other side, what are they putting up? Romney, Palin, Huckabee? That sounds familiar, and none of them seem very electable to me.
    ·
    If it came down to Palin or Clinton, I’d pick Clinton. But I’m not a fan of hers. I especially don’t like picking relations that have already been in power to be in power again. B. Clinton lucked out with the economic boom from computers, but he certainly gave us plenty of problems, including the onset of this financial crisis by allowing deregulation to begin with. H. Clinton might be electable, but electability shouldn’t be the qualifier in a race that could be this open.

  • sacredh

    “Yeah, but if you look at the other side, what are they putting up? Romney, Palin, Huckabee? That sounds familiar, and none of them seem very electable to me.”
    .
    I agree, but I thought Ron Paul was unelectable too. People are angry and vote with their emotions when they’re PO’d. That in itself can be a game changer. We’re coming out of the worst recession in 70 years and a bright shiney object (Palin) is going to attract far more consideration than she deserves. I still feel that if she wants the GOP nomination she can get it based on early possible primary victories and her ability to raise mountains of cash.
    .
    Romney seems like the most electable out of that group but if Palin doesn’t run, I think a darkhorse may come out of the woodwork. Perry from Texas or even Rubio from Florida isn’t out of the realm of possibility. A Perry/Rubio ticket would have a great deal of appeal. I’m putting Rubio in there because it has to have occurred to the GOP that siphoning off some of the Hispanic vote could make a huge difference.
    .
    I think Palin would get her ass kicked in the general election by almost anyone, but the primaries are a whole different ballgame. Huckabee has too much baggage to be a serious candidate in the general election. I doubt he could even make it 2/3′s of the way through the primary.

  • herby002

    new,

    Here’s the answer, from your own link:
    .
    “Stocks stage an afternoon comeback
    Nov 29 4:17pm:
    After tumbling early Monday morning, stocks bounced back to end the session still down, but much closer to breakeven.”
    .
    I feel so so sorry for your disappointment. Not.

  • herby002

    new,
    From your link:
    .
    “In a series of papers published by the Royal Society, physicists and chemists from some of world’s most respected scientific institutions, including Oxford University and the Met Office, agreed that current plans to tackle global warming are not enough.”
    .
    Obviously you don’t believe in science. Poor you.

  • herby002

    free,
    .
    I’m sorry… I went to the link but I couldn’t find the article that talks about what you (as usual) criticize.
    Help me out, please: tell me what article(s) you cite from which you drew your learned opinion, and where specifically, in the article(s) I can find references to healthcare.
    .
    Seriously, a little help here?

  • herby002

    free,
    “13.10 – How much will the DREAM Act cost?”

    I don’t know. How much?

  • herby002

    And when you figure out how much you’re being scammed out of, it costs you $6 more to cancel the card.
    .
    Gawdd!

  • herby002

    But the senator “was for it before he was against it”.
    Where’s the SBV when you need them?

  • herby002

    “Romney seems like the most electable out of that group but if Palin doesn’t run, I think a darkhorse may come out of the woodwork. Perry from Texas or even Rubio from Florida isn’t out of the realm of possibility.”
    .
    Romney would have the same problem as last time: as he tries to move right in the primaries, he has to convince the TPers that his Mass. government HC is not government HC. He’d get praise from G.H.W. “No new taxes!” Bush, but I don’t if that would help or hurt.
    .
    Perry might get a look from the “I like mavericks” crowd, but how many people want a POTUS who floats the threat of allowing Texas to cede from the Union, or
    withdrawing states from the federally funded Medicaid program.
    .
    My personal choice remains Ms. Palin. I hope she gets the Teapub nomination, then quits halfway through the campaign!

  • herby002

    Art,
    .
    In addition to Ford, the foreign-owned assembly plants would face the same problems. With so many domestic and foreign vehicle models sharing parts, a vendor which loses half of its business if GM and Chrysler go bust will probably fail too – and won’t be around to provide those “common parts” to VW or Toyota.
    .
    BTW, free,
    .
    Your buddy Rush Limbaugh, also, likes to repeatedly claim that Obama intentionally closed down Republican-owned dealerships, but he offers no proof.
    Can you prove that Obama, rather than Chrysler, selected the dealerships to close?
    Can you prove that Obama was “punishing” Republican dealers/donors?

    Let me steer you to the truth:
    .
    “Silver crunched the numbers, and found that 88% of auto dealers identified themselves as Republicans. Doug Ross came up with 92% as the number of car dealers who donated to Republicans. Could it be that more Republican dealerships are being closed because dealers are much more likely to be Republicans? ”
    http://www.politicususa.com/en/Obama-GOP-Dealerships
    .
    “Among the dealerships set to close, 12 percent of a random 50 selected for review donated to Republicans and 8 percent to Democrats. Of the dealerships remaining open, 14 percent of a random 50 selected donated to Republicans and 10 percent to Democrats. In both samples, the average size of donations was similar for both parties.”
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/chrysler.asp
    .
    If you have some facts to prove your contention, please supply them…

    That’s what I thought.

  • kathy

    You missed Joe Scarborough scorning the Republicans in the green room who complain about Palin but won’t say so publicly:

    “Republicans have a problem. The most-talked-about figure in the GOP is a reality show star who cannot be elected. And yet the same leaders who fret that Sarah Palin could devastate their party in 2012 are too scared to say in public what they all complain about in private.

    Enough. It’s time for the GOP to man up.”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/45687.html#ixzz16m6JCwZC

blog comments powered by Disqus