Obama Joins the Children’s Book Brigade

First, a few quick bits of context for Obama’s children’s book, Of Thee I Sing, released last week and now climbing up bestseller lists.

The cover image for Obama's new book, courtesy of Random House.

- According to the publisher, Alfred A. Knopf, Obama finished writing the book before he was in office. So let us put a hold on the indignation at his penning stories with a backdrop of 10% unemployment.

- This book is part of a $1.9-million, three-book deal with Random House, though all proceeds from this particular work will be going to a scholarship fund for the children of veterans — donations being standard fare for celebrity-bred kidlet reading. Just a few of the other presidential children’s books include Jimmy Carter’s The Little Baby Snoogle-Fleejer, Laura and Jenna Bush’s Read All About It! and Lynne Cheney’s A Patriotic Primer. (Though there’s still room to dream of those unwritten, like Richard Nixon’s Everybody Snoops or Bill Clinton’s Where the Wild Things Cigar.)

- The book has 31 pages, featuring 13 history-making Americans, all dedicated to the president’s two daughters, for the price of $17.99 (tax not included).

Now to the book itself. The subhead is “A Letter to My Daughters,” and the writing comes in a Q&E (question and example) format. For instance, Obama, listing his daughters’ admirable qualities, writes, “Have I told you that you are a healer?” Then on the opposite page he waxes lyrical about Sitting Bull, “who healed broken hearts and broken promises.” (Not specifically mentioned are Mr. Bull’s deep distrust of the U.S. government and the good reasons for that.)

The illustrations, done by the illustrious Loren Long, are striking. And the compilation of figures is primed to pull on just about everyone’s patriotic heartstrings. In addition to Sitting Bull, Obama invokes Georgia O’Keeffe, Albert Einstein, Jackie Robinson, Billie Holiday, Helen Keller, Maya Lin, Jane Addams, Martin Luther King, Jr., Neil Armstrong, Cesar Chavez, Abe Lincoln and George Washington. But the book seems more designed for winning melting-pot points than children’s hearts and minds, given that most of the poetic descriptions would do little but generate questions for 3-and-up readers.

Take Jackie Robinson’s embodiment of bravery: “A man named Jackie Robinson played baseball/ and showed us all/ how to turn fear to respect/ and respect to love.” It evokes a sense of being at Glenn Beck’s Rally to Restore Honor, where heartwarming, lovely sounding, largely nonsensical vagaries — like instructions to “wrap truth in boldness” — generated applause without understanding. What does it mean, for example, when Obama says Jane Addams taught people to “let their spirits grow wide” or that MLK “saw the birth of his dream in us”? These are nice sentiments — but much easier to express to humans who aren’t known for asking questions and requiring specifics.

It does beg a comparison to Democrats and their generally muddled messages. But the more practical implication of the book’s style is that parents reading Of Thee I Sing to their children better brush up on their history first — because they’ll be doing most of the story-telling.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    Conservatives accusations that Obama is trying to “indoctrinate America’s children” in 3… 2… 1…

    Though they needn’t worry. America’s children can’t read. If Obama had instead directed an X Box game, they would have cause to worry.

  • readalouddad

    Illustrious Loren Long indeed!

    My kids love all his picture books and hopefully this one will be as good.

    If you haven’t read any of his picture books, check out Otis, Drummer Boy, Toy Boat and Long’s version of The Little Engine That Could.

    Smashing!

    Read Aloud Dad

    http://www.ReadAloudDad.com

  • m0mentom0ri

    Thought I’d swing by the Swamp, see how things are going…
    .
    So. It’s come down to this, has it? You are actually attempting to establish a correlation between a children’s book and a political rally, just so you can continue your false equivalency exercises.
    .
    I was going to complain that inebriated psuedo-libertarians posing as doctors have pretty much taken over the site. But now that I see this post, I honestly believe that that’s the audience you deserve, if this is what passes for political commentary.
    .
    I’ll check back in a few weeks and see if the place has been fumigated yet.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Katy. Hope you post a lot this week, but no My Pet Goat references here? Did Obama have to pay royalties or seek permission from the Gershwin and Kaufman estates for the book title? (Katy would already know this, but for those who don’t, Of Thee I Sing is a Gershwin Bros. / Kaufman musical that satirizes politics. How appropriate now.) W’s children book, alas, can’t use MPG for title, but maybe we can read Pardon Me But Don’t Misundersestimate Me, We’re Going on a WMD Hunt, If You Give Scooter Libby a Pardon, How the SCOTUS Stole the 2000 Election, or One Hanging Chad Two Hanging Chad Red Hanging Chad, Blue Hanging Chad.
    .
    And Katy, kudos for Nixon’s “title”. Playing Made-up Ex Libris, I’ll bet the opening line of Nixon’s book is, “Kids, next time you’re going to break into the pantry to steal cookies, make sure you tape the latch vertically – not horizontally – so the GD security guards (aka your parents) won’t find out. ‘Cause lying to cover it up can be a real pain in the ass.”

  • deconstructiva

    Future Prez (or not) Sarah Palin’s book: Mama Grizzlies Eating Their Own? If only Sitting Bull’s kids book was titled There Goes the Neighborhood: What Kids Need to Do When Those F’ing Settlers and Army Cavalries Arrive, but At Least Your Ass is Mine, Gen. Custer.

  • Katy Steinmetz

    Excellent book title suggestions.
    .
    I do know of the musical, but seems like royalties should be paid to her royal highness, if anyone — our “America” tune, from which that line is famous, just happening to be the same riff as “God Save the Queen.”
    .
    And one nitpicky, if-you-care note: The story was actually “The Pet Goat,” not “My Pet Goat,” as Mr. Moore told the world.

  • deconstructiva

    …and Bark, George by Dick Cheney.

  • Ike Jakson

    I shall join you maybe, but after the fumigation.

  • grape_crush

    Katy’s channeling her inner English professor again…I’m looking at it as a parent, ‘tho.

    These are nice sentiments — but much easier to express to humans who aren’t known for asking questions and requiring specifics.

    I dunno. Having to explain “What does that mean, daddy?” isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

    It does beg a comparison to Democrats and their generally muddled messages.

    No, it doesn’t.

    …parents reading Of Thee I Sing to their children better brush up on their history first — because they’ll be doing most of the story-telling.

    And that’s a bad thing…why?

  • textee

    Have either Obama or any of his minions claimed that the people featured in the book were not selected because of their race, ethnicity and sex?

    Is it still “racist” to recognize the fact that Obama’s entire existence is consumed with racial identity and racial division?

  • ricardo4max

    I wouldn’t use it for toilet paper. This evil imposter has done more harm to our nation in his term as President (and in his lifetime) than the sum total of all our wars and attacks on our soil!
    I pray daily that somehow someway his power to harm America any further is neutralized.

  • deconstructiva

    You’re right, thanks for “Goat” correction. I guess HRH Queen Elizabeth would receive the 1931 royalities since George V is still dead… unless Charles wants to collect the money for The Prince’s Trust while hissing, “Mom, step aside already, @#$$#^%*! I’m getting old and William’s finally marrying that hot chick Kate.” (Middleton, not Pickert) Keep up your great work, Katy.

  • deconstructiva

    I dunno. Having to explain “What does that mean, daddy?” isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
    .
    Depends on what needs to be explained. At the cat shelter I’ve volunteer at, many really young kids ask what “being fixed / spayed / neutered, etc.” means. I pass the buck to the parents so they can cover the Real World Awakening Lecture, Part One (if the kids run across the video tape of their parents’ wedding night, well that’s their problem) so I don’t get my ass chewed out for upsetting parents.
    .
    Having Junior ask, “Mommy, what’s a lap dance?” is rather awkward… let alone the weasel answer, “Go ask your father. HE would know.” And Dad replies, “Go ask your mother. SHE knows; she performed those before we married. Hell, that’s how we met…” Talk about future customers / profits for Big Pharma pill therapies.

  • np042

    Generally it might be considered racist if the first thing you do to discredit someone is bring up race. Since only people like you would think of something like this, I would guess no, no one has come out and said “Oh hey, we totally didn’t pick these people because they were black/hispanic/etc.”
    .
    I’m fairly certain race had a lot to do with MLK Jr, Sitting Bull, Caesar Chavez and possibly Billie Holliday (not familiar with him). I’m also fairly certain that yes, you are a racist.

  • np042

    Yes, your democratically elected president is an imposter. As opposed to your democratically elect former president, yes?

  • Katy Steinmetz

    I don’t think brushing up on the history or answering those questions the book generates is a bad thing at all. (It requires more education all around and would more likely than not spark some great discussion.) I was just making the point that the story is not self-contained or explained in the book itself — something I would want a heads-up on before opening the thing for story time.

  • shepherdwong

    I’m fairly certain race had a lot to do with MLK Jr, Sitting Bull, Caesar Chavez and possibly Billie Holliday (not familiar with him).
    .
    Assuming that’s not a joke, holy crap! Have fun:
    .

  • shepherdwong

    You are actually attempting to establish a correlation between a children’s book and a political rally, just so you can continue your false equivalency exercises.
    .
    No, the problem must be Democrats and their generally muddled messages.

  • grape_crush

    Thanks for the response, ‘tho it leaves me wondering if you have kids…
    .
    …was just making the point that the story is not self-contained or explained in the book itself — something I would want a heads-up on before opening the thing for story time.
    .
    Understood. It’s just that I make a habit of checking out what’s in a kid’s book before opening it for storytime. It’s harder to do that with teevee or movies, ‘tho.

  • lreed580

    As a retired teacher and a parent, I would have welcomed this book both to read to my children and as a learning tool in the classroom!

    This book would have offered numerous learning opportunities/projects for students….history, language, art, etc.

    Reading to a child is as much about the experience of spending time together….the richness of the language, talking about the pictures, etc. And it’s certainly acceptable for a parent to acknowledge they may not know everything about a particular subject, but that it creates an opportunity for both the child and parent to explore and learn together. I plan on buying it for my grandchildren!

  • jc46202

    But the more practical implication of the book’s style is that parents reading Of Thee I Sing to their children better brush up on their history first — because they’ll be doing most of the story-telling.

    Which is kind of what parenting is all about, so why do you make this out to be a problem? Egads.

  • lepidusxvi

    Just for fun: Please list for me one factual thing he’s done that was worse than WWI, WWII, the Civil War, Vietnam, the Revolutionary War, the Gulf War, the Iraq War, 9/11, and the Afgan War combined?
    .
    Just curious ;)

  • kevin

    Oh, it gets better than that.
    .
    Last week, FoxNews.com ran a story on the children’s book with the totally fair-and-balanced headline Obama Praises Indian Chief Who Killed U.S. General.
    .
    Their alarmist spin on a children’s book was based on the fact that Obama selected Sitting Bull as one of his subjects and — in the alternate reality where Fox News viewers get their facts — it was Sitting Bull who killed Custer at the Battle of Little Big Horn, and not Crazy Horse.
    .
    http://nation.foxnews.com/media/2010/11/15/obama-praises-indian-chief-who-killed-us-general
    .
    So, once again — Fox News: Fairly Unbalanced.

  • kevin

    Ricardo is an Englishman who likes to pretend to be an American. By “our nation” he must mean the UK.

  • lepidusxvi

    $20 bucks says some other well-meaning educator does exactly the same thing, then gets rung through the cable news circuit for “indoctrination” before being summarily fired.
    .
    It used to be part of school was learning about the country’s leaders, now a days, I am sure someone would object to reading Churchill’s autobiographies on the ground he was the leader of the Labour Party and thus clearly a socialist.

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    @kevin.

    Wow.

    Fox News probably thinks all of this happened in India.

  • liberalmeltdown

    Then on the opposite page he waxes lyrical about Sitting Bull, “who healed broken hearts and broken promises.” (Not specifically mentioned are Mr. Bull’s deep distrust of the U.S. government and the good reasons for that.)
    .
    Not surprising that Obama leaves out how untrustworthy the government is. Liberals always trust big brother even when the evidence is clear that the government is out of control.

  • Art Pepper

    and possibly Billie Holliday
    .
    I’m hoping that one reason he chose Lady Day was her status as probably the greatest singer of the 20th Century.

  • shepherdwong

    Liberals always trust big brother even when the evidence is clear that the government is out of control.
    .
    Didn’t you watch George W. Bush and Dick Cheney fear-monger and lie the country into an illegal war, expose a covert CIA operation to intimidate/discredit a political critic, launch a massive, illegal electronic-spying operation against the American people and then vote for them for President and Vice President?
    .
    Beside being a worthless hypocrite and liar, you’re a complete f@cking moron.
    .
    http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/03/fisa-and-warrantless-surveillance-then.html

  • apr2563

    Katy: I read a lot to my children. I always knew what a book contained before I read it to them. We would also discuss the book. I would be thrilled with a book that allowed me to introduce them to historical characters and pique their curiosity. It is a “child’s” book.
    .
    Maybe it will pique the curiosity of FPN (Fox Propaganda Network) enough to discover that rather than the book extolling a general killer, Obama writes about a Native American leader who was battling genocide. Also, Crazy Horse, not Sitting Bull led the battle at Little Bighorn against Custer.

  • apr2563

    shepherdwong, thanks for the video and in particular the choice of song. Lord she was great.

  • apr2563

    Here’s hoping you get a paper cut.

  • kevin

    Liberals always trust big brother even when the evidence is clear that the government is out of control.
    .
    That’s absolutely right. I remember when the Bush administration admitted that it had been listening in on the phone calls of millions of American citizens without a warrant, in direct contravention of the FISA law. The brave conservatives were marching in the street protesting this almost literal copying of Orwell’s Big Brother, but all of us liberals were defending Bush. We have no shame.

  • liberalmeltdown

    Ah, has Obama overthrown the Patriot Act? Closed Gitmo? Posted those bills online before passing? Had a debate on C-span? How are those civilian trials going? Reformed government, I mean other than giving more favors and more money to corporations? You must be terribly frustrated.
    .
    Obama hasn’t done anthing different than Bush and your bogey man Cheney concerning Iran, Afghanistan, and Gitmo.
    .

    Congress extends Patriot Act, no new protections
    WASHINGTON | Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:07pm EST
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Legislation to extend expiring provisions of the anti-terror USA Patriot Act won final congressional approval on Thursday, with Democrats unable to add additional civil liberties protections.
    On vote of 315-97, the House of Representatives approved the bill, a day after it cleared the Senate. It now heads to President Barack Obama to sign into law.
    The Obama administration wanted to extend the measure because of provisions it says are important in tracking suspected terrorists, including roving wiretaps to track multiple communications devices. But some lawmakers wanted additional privacy measures to protect against abuses.
    With the Patriot Act provisions set to expire on Sunday, lawmakers agreed to extend them for a year, and effectively put off a showdown on efforts to bolster safeguards.
    Democrats had sought changes to protect law-abiding U.S. citizens, but Republicans managed to tie up their efforts, arguing that changes would undermine the tracking of suspected enemies of the United States.
    Democratic Representative Jane Harman opposed the extension, citing abuses of the law during the administration of President George W. Bush.
    “While I strongly support using the most robust tools possible to go after terrorists, Congress must revise and narrow — not extend — Bush era policies,” Harman said.
    The Patriot Act was quickly passed by Congress after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.
    The extended provisions include: authority for “roving wiretaps” to track an individual’s use of multiple communications devices; gaining access to certain personal and business records; and tracking so-called “lone wolf” suspects who are not members of an organized enemy group.
    The provisions have been cited as necessary by lawmakers in the aftermath of the failed attempt by a Nigerian man to blow up a U.S. commercial passenger jet and the shooting rampage at Fort Hood in Texas by a military psychiatrist who had been communicating with an anti-American cleric in Yemen.

  • ohiolibb

    Obama hasn’t done anthing different than Bush and your bogey man Cheney concerning Iran, Afghanistan, and Gitmo
    -
    Why do you think his approval ratings are dropping? Certainly not cause he’s a socialist communist fascist Kenyan muslim terrorist.

  • prairielogic

    Wow… your ignorance is astoundingly pathetic. You are surely a constant embarrassment for family and friends… and they probably just put up with you as one does with an ugly and crude old uncle or something.

blog comments powered by Disqus