911 Calls: Precarious Public Records

Listening to the 911 call of Brent McFarland, as he waits for an ambulance to come to the aid of his choking fiancee, is awful. He screams helplessly, tries to perform CPR, and begs her not to leave him for an excruciatingly slow 12 minutes. But what is arguably just as painful to witness is the ineptitude of the 911 responder, who offers no advice and simply repeats what McFarland says — like a 10-year-old trying to get under his mother’s skin — between bouts of silence. Also terrible are his screams as he runs around trying to beckon the ambulance to his house on his poorly mapped street. (You can listen for yourself here.)

McFarland’s girlfriend died on Sept. 4 in Mashpee, Mass., officially of choking “on a food bolus while intoxicated.” Now, two months later, McFarland is hitting the publicity circuit in his bid to see the emergency response system improved — whether that means getting the city to be more vigilant about street signs, or getting rid of hapless dispatchers and replacing them with people who will offer advice about, say, the Heimlich maneuver when someone is choking. In either case, his greatest weapon is the tragedy of his own phone call, and his situation is a good example of what oversight would be lost if 911 calls didn’t remain publicly accessible records.

There is certainly an argument to be made for keeping them out of the public sphere. After all, 911 calls are records that often capture people in their most vulnerable states. And the media isn’t afraid of playing them — over and over again — for sensationalism’s sake, even when oversight of emergency response is a non-issue. (This one, from 2009, in which a woman screams as her pet chimpanzee tears the face off her friend, comes to mind.) At least four states already exempt 911 calls from their public records acts, and as many considered similar bills this year.

Balance is key with all public records: There needs to be thoughtfulness to meet transparency halfway if the whole system is to work and remain as open as possible. As a professor of mine once said, “There is something deeply un-American about taking public officials at their word.” And if public records get abused too much, that’s all Americans will have. McFarland’s call is definitely a score for the Sunshine camp — but it’s worth remembering that his record should be aired in moderation and that plenty of other 911 calls shouldn’t be used at all.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • Paul-no not that one

    And the media isn’t afraid of playing them — over and over again — for sensationalism’s sake, even when oversight of emergency response is a non-issue. (This one, from 2009, in which a woman screams as her pet chimpanzee tears the face off her friend, comes to mind.)
    .
    I appreciate you including the link. Ironic.
    .
    That out of the way I fall in the better to have too much information out there than too little. As it is people with camera/phones (whatever they are called I don’t own a cell phone) too often are the only record keepers.
    .
    Media can be compromised/flattered/cajoled into bad reporting and trusting governmental bodies to self regulate is folly.

  • Katy Steinmetz

    I realize there’s some irony in including the link. I hope it can be forgiven in the name of providing a concrete example though.

  • Paul-no not that one

    No big deal, just struck me.
    .
    I like your professors line, it is in our DNA to question authority.
    .
    Thanks for weighing in KS.

  • formerlyjames

    I have to comment to justify wasting 13 min. listening to the tape. What I heard was a drunken, hysterical, incoherent man screaming. The dispatcher seemed to do what was possible under the circumstances. I found no fault with her.
    .
    That being said, on the larger issue of access to public records, I support full unfettered access to all public records. The name suggests that they belong to the public. Right?

  • stuartzechman

    Thank you very much for responding to commentary, Katy Steinmetz, it always makes for a better blog post.

  • gysgt213

    Public in the name? Oh I don’t think our government can see that.

  • Paul-no not that one

    And just because no one else has said it yet…
    .
    Flavor Flav was right.

  • http://jmcalli.wordpress.com jmcalli

    A telephone dispatcher isn’t going to be able to teach an hysterical caller how to perform a Heimlich over the phone. If Brent McFarland had learned CPR in advance he might have been able to respond appropriately and prevent this tragedy. The blame should not be placed entirely on the emergency response system and Mr. McFarland needs to take some responsibility for his own ignorance.

  • liberalmeltdown

    In the near future 911 operators will be employed to make decisions on who gets what treatment under government run heath care.

  • kbanginmotown

    Actually, it’s the conservative belief in the free market system that will require 911 operators to ask callers whether they have paid their “911 dues” before receiving assistance.
    .
    Just like that family in Tennessee whose house burnt down while firefighters stood watching…
    .
    http://abcnews.go.com/US/tennessee-familys-home-burns-ground-firefighters-stand-watch/story?id=11806407
    .
    That’s what you’re longing for, isn’t it Ebeneezer? A return to the “good old days” when the system helped decrease the surplus population…?

  • sasquatch08

    For once I agree almost completely with a post from the Time staff on here.
    .
    Katy is right. On the one hand 911 operators have to be responsible and there is no way to make sure they are without the public record requirement. On the other hand the 24/7 news media does love to replay and replay and replay something sensational, possibly at the expense of some innocent victim. My problem is that I am not sure where that balance is without unduly restricting either the right of the public to know when a public servant is incompetent or causing more harm than good by overplaying a 911 call, when people surely are at their most helpless.
    .
    In response to the comment by formerlyjames of “What I heard was a drunken, hysterical, incoherent man screaming. The dispatcher seemed to do what was possible under the circumstances. I found no fault with her.”
    .
    First, are you effing serious? She was supposed to tell the guy how to do the Heimlich, that was laid down in her training and the contract she signed [see TV coverage] and she CLEARLY didn’t even TRY. She failed to do her job, and as such should be fired just as any employee that fails to live up to their contract.
    .
    Second, he was drunk. Maybe he was, but you have no evidence of that, and even if you did; now being drunk in your own home is a crime? Or at least something that makes you not worthy of receiving the very services your TAX money pays for? It makes you a lesser form of life? Would you say the same thing if they were both drunk and some criminal came in and shot her causing that phone call to be made? I think not.
    .
    Thirdly, he was hysterical? Wouldn’t you be? The person you love most in the whole world is dying in front of you, you have no idea what to do about it and are begging for some sort of help and not getting it yet you’re going to be totally devoid of emotion about it? Please, even morons know that’s a line of BS.
    .
    Now I know why Liberals think some Conservatives and Libertarians are callous, because some people say dumb s**t like what you’ve just articulated.

  • sasquatch08

    jmcalli:
    .
    Firstly the Heimlich and CPR are totally different and CPR wouldn’t have saved this woman at all as her airway was blocked below the mouth. You clearly don’t know how to preform CPR or the Heimlich either, so stop trolling.
    .
    Secondly there are hundreds of examples of 911 calls where the dispatcher was able to provide enough information of CPR or the Heimlich to allow the caller to save the victims life, or at least (in the case of CPR) to sustain the victim long enough for trained EMS personnel to take over and save them. Again stop trolling and take a First Aid class.
    .
    And don’t come back at me saying you work for EMS or some other BS, because anyone with enough brains to Wikipedia “Heimlich” and “CPR” and basic knowledge of the human windpipe will rapidly find out your comment is a sure sign you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about.

  • herby002

    If you had your druthers, there wouldn’t be a 911 system, since it’s anti-competitive.
    In your world, the guy would have no help for his emergency beyond rifling through his Yellow Pages to find ‘Emergency/Ambulance/Physician/Subcription’ while the woman chokes, as he dictates his credit card number to the clerk on the other end of the “service” he dialed.

  • nibblybits

    Your rant is ridiculous. There is such a thing as personal responsibility, regardless of political leanings.
    .
    This guy and his girlfriend are drunk in their house. Suddenly, she starts to choke. And he has “no idea what to do about it,” as you say, and he calls 911, crying hysterically for 12 minutes. First, there shouldn’t be an adult in America who doesn’t know the Heimlich maneuver. He had the power to save her life, but was helplessly incompetent instead. Second, yes, people are allowed to be stupid drunk in their own house, but then if something horrible happens and they are incapacitated to deal with it, they shouldn’t blame someone outside the house for that horrible thing. Third, when he called 911, he got what his taxes paid for — assistance sent to his house. What he didn’t pay for were instant miracles from a human being sitting in a call center miles away.
    .
    If that moron felt helpless, it’s because he was too unprepared to do anything about the situation he was in. And it’s human nature for him to blame everyone but himself for a death that he could have prevented if he had paid attention for 10 minutes in 8th grade health class.
    .
    I’m astonished on a daily basis at people’s capacity to rationalize their own incompetence and misfortune. It’s always someone else’s fault. It’s never my fault or that bad things happen. She choked. It’s a horrible horrible thing. If the person who was there beside her had kept his head and performed a basic first aid maneuver that we all should know, then maybe the result would have been different. Don’t know. What we probably do know is that this guy has a lawyer and is probably suing 911 for millions of dollars.

  • http://jmcalli.wordpress.com jmcalli

    Hey, Sasquatch08,

    You’re the idiot troll.

    If you knew anything about EMR you would know that both the Helimich and CPR are part of the continuum of BLS (Basic Life Support). The “ABC’s” the basis for emergency response. They are all taught together – choking/airway obstruction, CPR, assisted breathing, etc. Anyone who takes a CPR (BLS) course knows these things. But you obviously haven’t and aren’t qualified to comment.

  • http://jmcalli.wordpress.com jmcalli

    Sasquatch08:

    Quote from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choking (apparently you didn’t check your own source) -

    “CPR
    In most protocols, once the patient has become unconscious, the emphasis switches to performing CPR, involving both chest compressions and artificial respiration. These actions are often enough to dislodge the item sufficiently for air to pass it, allowing gaseous exchange in the lungs.”

    CPR and Heimlich are taught together. Anyone who takes a CPR course learns both.

    Idiot.

blog comments powered by Disqus