Robert Gibbs Sticks His Foot In It–But Not Like That

International diplomacy is amazingly messy up close. One would think that with hours of planning, and mutual pledges of cooperation, shout fests and shoving matches could be avoided. But they seem almost inevitable on international trips of the president (I recall shoving and shouting in Ankara, verbal threats in Beijing’s Great Hall) and they tend to focus on the press, which does not get the same Secret Service protection as some others.

Today, in New Delhi, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs used his foot on behalf of the U.S. press corps. From the pool report:

Indian officials decided to cut agreed-upon number of WH pool allowed into spray of extended bilat from eight to five. Katie Lillie and other U.S. officials lobbied hard for the eight, but no luck until Gibbbs announced loudly and persistantly on steps of Hyderabad House that he would pull POTUS of bilat with PM Singh unless “the White House 8,” as we’ve come to be known, were all allowed in. At one point, Gibbs literally had his foot lodged in the closing front door, asking if the Indian security officials pushing hard to shut it were going to break his foot. More angry words ensued, and after Gibbs convinced them, through high volume and repetition, that he was serious about pulling POTUS, we all made it inside, to hold with larger Indian press contingent, for start of extended bilat.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • grape_crush

    If only we saw that much fight from the White House on the important things.

  • Ike Jakson

    What an idiot?

  • Jim, Foolish Literalist

    I realize the Beltway press corpse places a very high value on its own care and feeding by the White House, and for some reason seems to believe the country at large shares those concerns, but isn’t the whole point of pool coverage to limit the number of bodies in a room? Do five tape recorders make that much of a difference vs eight? We were going to provoke an international incident so three reporters wouldn’t feel left out?

  • chupkar

    It seems like that is kind of how some things work in India though. Lots of bargaining and sometimes shouting about things. Lots of indignation and then lots of flowery compliments. I think New York is that way too. :)

  • pneogy

    I am not sure about New York, but you have India down pat.

  • chupkar

    WEll, NY would be minus the flowery compliments. I just had a friend who got married in a Hindu ceremony. Securing the temple was apparently as good as watching a live play.

  • http://redhatmandan.wordpress.com Daniel

    it’s ‘persistently’ not ‘persistantly.’

  • square1

    OMG! This is exactly the type of meaningless but ego-stroking gesture that could fundamentally alter how the press corps covers the Obama administration!

    Now, if they could only bring back Billy Dale to let the press corps sneak their travel purchases back into the U.S. duty free…

  • mtl4u2

    Gibbs was worried about the “White House 8″?

    Strange! I don’t recall Gibbs being that worried about the slaying of Reuters journalists in Baghdad or the extra-judicial 7 years detention of AJ’s cameraman in Gitmo?

    But hey! These guys were not carrying the Obama Gospel, weren’t they?

blog comments powered by Disqus