Mixed Results on the Health Reform Referendum

There’s no doubt that voting for the Affordable Care Act made lots of Democratic incumbents vulnerable this year. Still, it’s difficult to attribute losses to a single issue. Exit polls indicate jobs and the economy were far more important to voters this year. But there are clear signs that pundits who predicted high-profile losses for the Democratic Party in districts and states where health care was a major campaign issue were right.

Despite a last-minute appearance in his district by Barack Obama, Tom Periello – a hero of liberals everywhere – went down swinging in VA-5. Periello was supposed to be a test case of whether proud liberalism could hold a red district in a tough year – he touted his vote for health reform and his district’s voters punished him for it. But even voting against Democratic health reform wasn’t a sure path to re-election. We had proof right in Periello’s home state where Democratic Rep. Rick Boucher, who voted against the original House health care bill and the final version, is on track to be defeated by Republican Morgan Giffith in VA-9.

In Colorado, Betsy Markey – who knew her vote for the final health reform bill was likely to send her home – was on track to lose even before her re-election campaign began. The night before the House passed the final version of the health care bill, Obama gave a speech to the Democratic caucus, espousing the virtues of liberalism and calling out Markey by name, saying he knew she was in a tough district but that he was proud she would vote for the bill. She did and she’s done, according to projections. Earl Pomeroy, representing North Dakota’s lone congressional district, also faced tough headwinds largely because of his vote for the ACA. (Unemployment in the state is much lower than the national average.) He will also lose, according to projections.

In Wisconsin, Sen. Russ Feingold decided – like Periello – to run on his vote for health reform. He ran ads touting his support for the law, but he too was swept up in the wave of anti-incumbency. Republican challenger Ron Johnson will win Feingold’s seat.

Voters in Georgia will, according to projections, elect Republican Ralph Hudgens, who opposes the ACA, as insurance commissioner. But in Kansas, Republican Sandy Praeger – who largely supports the ACA – is gliding to victory. (She won her primary and ran in the general unopposed.) UPDATE: In Oklahoma, incumbent Kim Holland lost her post to Republican challenger John Doak.

Voters in Arizona, Colorado and Oklahoma also had a chance to weigh in on symbolic ballot initiatives to amend their state constitutions to exempts residents from portions of the Affordable Care Act. These are symbolic because federal law trumps state law – the point of the initiatives is basically to send a message of opposition. Oklahoma voters resoundingly approved their measure. (Missouri voters acted similarly in August.) It’s still early, but Colorado voters look like they are more split, with 55% of voter voting against the measure with 24% of precincts reporting. In Arizona, even fewer votes have been tallied – the count stands at 56% approving the measure with 14% of precincts reporting.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know, until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, were the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, whom Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • liberalmeltdown

    If federal law trumps state law as you claim, then why does California have Medical Marijuana? It just depends on whether the feds have the resources and want to enforce the federal law. More examples: illegal immigration, AZ immigration law. It’s pick and choose.

  • http://thecorpsec.wordpress.com The Corporation Secretary

    Actually, the question of whether federal law, as expressed in the heath care reform legislation, trumps state law is now before the Federal District Court in Florida. The plaintiffs, including some state Attorneys General, claim that there is nothing in the United States Constitution that permits the federal government to impose a “penalty” on the citizens of United States simply because they failed to do something that the law requires (that is, obtain heath care coverage if not provided by their employer).
    thecorpsec.wordpress.com

blog comments powered by Disqus