How Will Obama React? The Clinton ’94 Example

The big drama right now is just how large the GOP’s gains will be. The consensus seems to be a House pickup in the 55-60 range, roughly, and 6-8 seats in the Senate, leaving Democrats with a narrow and largely unworkable majority in that chamber. (Jon Chait has some sociological complaints with those forecasts.) But I’m also very curious to see how Barack Obama will respond to the coming Republican wave in his just-announced Wednesday afternoon presser. How much humility will he show, how much will he promise cooperation versus standing his ground?

As a reference point, here’s the transcript from Bill Clinton’s November 9, 1994 press conference, with the rubble of the old Democratic Congress–and, some thought, his presidency–freshly smoldering around him. It’s an interesting read–Clinton struck a hard note of conciliation, admitting that Democrats had not done enough to change the culture of Washington (sound familiar?) and urged Republicans to “join me in the center of the public debate where the best ideas for the next generation of American progress must come.” But he also warned against “jeopardizing this economic recovery by taking us back to the policies that failed us before.” (Sound familiar?)

The American people sent us here to rebuild the American dream, to change the way Washington does business, to make our country work for ordinary citizens again. We’ve made a good start by cutting the deficit, by reducing the size of the Federal Government, by reinventing much of our Government to do more with less. We have increased our investment in education and expanded trade, and our economy has created more than 5 million jobs. We’ve also made a serious start in the fight against the terrible plague of crime and violence in this country. I remain committed to completing the work we have done.

Still, in the course of this work, there has been too much politics-as-usual in Washington, too much partisan conflict, too little reform of Congress and the political process. And though we have made progress, not enough people have felt more prosperous and more secure or believe we were meeting their desires for fundamental change in the role of Government in their lives….

To those who believe we must keep moving forward, I want to say again, I will do everything in my power to reach out to the leaders and the Members of this new Congress. It must be possible to make it a more effective, more functioning institution. It must be possible for us to give our people a Government that is smaller, that is more effective, that reflects both our interests and our values.

But to those who would use this election to turn us back, let me say this: I will do all in my power to keep anyone from jeopardizing this economic recovery by taking us back to the policies that failed us before. I will still work for those things that make America strong: strong families, better education, safer streets, more high-paying jobs, a more prosperous and peaceful world. There is too much at stake for our children and our future to do anything else.

I suspect Obama will take as much care as Clinton to show humility in the wake of Tuesday’s results. But I would expect less talk of the political “center”–a place Bill Clinton has always been more comfortable openly celebrating.

P.S. And contrary to my memory, it wasn’t until April 1995 that Clinton was reduced to his famous assertion that “the President is still relevant here.”

Update: Greg Sargent adds useful thoughts about why Obama is less likely than Clinton to embrace centrism. (“Obama has always preferred to cast himself as a uniter more in terms of temperament than ideology.”) Also see Ron Brownstein.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know, until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, were the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, whom Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • michaelfury

    “it wasn’t until April 1995 that Clinton was reduced to his famous assertion that ‘the President is still relevant here.’”

    —————————————–

    “The Oklahoma City bombing provided Bill Clinton with an opportunity to stand out as a leader. Just at a time when Newt Gingrich and the Republican agenda dominated the political arena and Clinton felt the need to reaffirm his relevance, he was able to bring the country together as only a president could.”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/valor/

  • charlieromeobravo

    “…leaving Democrats with a narrow and largely unworkable majority in that chamber.”
    .
    …because the Republicans will not cooperate with Democrats no matter how many concessions they’ve made to get them to come to the table. It’s a shame that Democrats treated the Republicans like they were good faith partners over the last two years.

  • deconstructiva

    Michael, the most obvious Clinton / post ’94 comparison would be a 2011 govt. shutdown. Do you think there will be one if the R’s / TP’s take the House? Where the hangup will be is debatable: Obama veto, Senate D’s hold up budget, cost-cutting hungry TP’s fight their old-school pro-biz / MIC / corporate welfare R’s and can’t agree on budget / try to cut off ACA funding (thoughts, Kate or Jay?), etc.? Indeed, do you, Scherer, Jay, and Katy (and Kate?) have a betting pool on govt. shutdown with over / under odds?

  • Michael Crowley

    Ha, no betting pool–but I do write about this question in my upcoming print story which will be available later this week. The short answer is that I think it’s hard to predict, I’ve spoken to both Ds and Rs, GOP veterans and Tea Party agitators, and I don’t see a clear consensus. Many Republicans are very wary of how things panned out in ’94 yet some think Obama is weaker now than Clinton was then. So stay tuned.

  • kathy

    Where are you getting your “consensus” of 60+? I’ve seen a couple of sites reporting a “consensus,” largely driven by Charlie Cook and Nate Silver, of 55+

    What he does may be governed by events beyond his control. A package containing explosives was found in Andrea Merkel’s office today. We’re living in parlous times right now.

  • grape_crush

    …leaving Democrats with a narrow and largely unworkable majority in that chamber.
    .
    How is that different than what they have now?

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks for heads-up on your story. Hopefully it will be online too and NOT stuck behind paywall or is only dead-tree. I think the odds for an attempted shutdown are strong, just a hunch.

  • textee

    Now that Obamao’s longtime, serial, criminal voter fraud outfit ObamAcorn has been shut down, who do Obamao and the Democrat party have casting illegal votes for dead people, dogs, cats, paramecia, illegals, Mickey Mouse, Minnie Mouse, Scooby Doo, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and the roster for the 1927 New York Yankees?

  • Michael Crowley

    I believe that’s Cook and Rothenberg; but perhaps the number is high, I will add a link to Silver

  • kbanginmotown

    Amen.

  • kbanginmotown

    No f#cking kidding….

  • square1

    But I would expect less talk of the political “center”–a place Bill Clinton has always been more comfortable openly celebrating.

    Really? Obama in uncomfortable celebrating the “political center”? Has Michael Crowley ever listened to President Obama? The guy has “bipartisan” tatooed on his forehead.

  • Michael Crowley

    He talks about bipartisan comity but mainly in the context of dialogue and understanding between people of differing views. He really doesn’t celebrate “the center” anywhere near as much as Bill Clinton did, who had assiduously defined himself as a centrist DLC Democrat.

  • newfreedomblog

    Breaking down Clinton’s words, paragraph by paragraph.
    .

    “The American people sent us here to rebuild the American dream, to change the way Washington does business, to make our country work for ordinary citizens again. We’ve made a good start by cutting the deficit, by reducing the size of the Federal Government, by reinventing much of our Government to do more with less. We have increased our investment in education and expanded trade, and our economy has created more than 5 million jobs. We’ve also made a serious start in the fight against the terrible plague of crime and violence in this country. I remain committed to completing the work we have done.”

    .
    The unfortunate thing for Obama is that he cannot lay claim to anything remotely close to “the American people sent us here to rebuild the American dream, to change the way Washington does business…”. He can’t because he has done everything exactly opposite to what the American people were hoping he would do, and what he promised. We still have shaded government deals (healthcare and the various Louisiana Purchase deals / Cornhusker Kickbacks), lobbyists still walk the corridors of both the Capitol and the White House, and the Democrat Party is still controlled by Big Business, Big Labor, and Big Anything except for average middle class Americans. The only “work we have done” is continuing the past 80 years of growing government even bigger. As Tea Party candidate after Tea Party candidate is elected, their one main goal is to go to Washington to downsize the Federal Government. That is not in Obama’s play-book.
    .

    “Still, in the course of this work, there has been too much politics-as-usual in Washington, too much partisan conflict, too little reform of Congress and the political process. And though we have made progress, not enough people have felt more prosperous and more secure or believe we were meeting their desires for fundamental change in the role of Government in their lives….”

    .
    The only fundamental change which has taken place is the “fundamental transfer of wealth”. Wealth from those who have some, to those too lazy to go out and work for it. Obama money has been promised to anyone who would vote for him. Today people are saying no more. The Sleeping Giant is awake. The Sleeping Giant is not longer sitting idly by while corrupt politicians buy their way into office with pork and earmarks from our hard earned tax dollars. Those elected will be told “no more”.
    .

    “To those who believe we must keep moving forward, I want to say again, I will do everything in my power to reach out to the leaders and the Members of this new Congress. It must be possible to make it a more effective, more functioning institution. It must be possible for us to give our people a Government that is smaller, that is more effective, that reflects both our interests and our values.”

    .
    Reaching for Obama will be for more big Government programs like Obamacare. Nothing he will attempt to do from this point forward could be recognized as being for smaller Government. As a true communist / socialist, he will continue to embark upon a path of a European-like government here in the US.
    .

    “But to those who would use this election to turn us back, let me say this: I will do all in my power to keep anyone from jeopardizing this economic recovery by taking us back to the policies that failed us before. I will still work for those things that make America strong: strong families, better education, safer streets, more high-paying jobs, a more prosperous and peaceful world. There is too much at stake for our children and our future to do anything else.”

    .
    The only paragraph which we have heard over the past year which he will continue to spout off in speech after boring speech. Hopefully Americans begin to tune him out, and simply say “you only have 2 more years to screw us over Bubba. Your days are numbered”.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Obama still advertises himself as a Liberal willing to compromise in the middle. He doesn’t see himself as a centrist, he just looks like one to everyone not in Washington.

  • square1

    Oh, ACORN hasn’t been shut down. We have simply moved operations underground. We have setup voting machines along the border so that illegals can cast their ballots as they cross over.
    .
    Also, we have infiltrated the prisons. All the minority prison guards are secretly ACORN agents. For months, Operation Crime Pays has illegally registered millions of felons and provided them with absentee ballots.
    .
    Once Obama is re-elected, the Democrats will ram a reparations bill through Congress. Every white American will be forced to give $25 to any minority that asks for money on the street (Asians and Native Americans will neither collect nor pay out, however.)
    .
    Those who refuse to pay will be sent to re-education camps where they will be forced to watch gay porn.

  • 3xfire3

    square1,
    .
    In your dreams. Obama has been the most partisan, my way or the highway, of any President in our history.
    .
    He views anyone who dares to disagree with his views as the enemy.
    .
    He is quite simply a Partisan Ideologue.

  • hippooath

    Square1,
    .
    Awesome. Bravo. You have just channelled your inner and far more lucid tea partier.

  • hippooath

    “Obama has been the most partisan, my way or the highway, of any President in our history.”
    .
    Care to show an example or should I just take your word for it?

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    hippooath: When most major bills pass with the slimmest of minority support, every opposition person on the planet can provide you a thousand examples of when Obama was “partisan”. Intelligent people realize that Obama was merely drawing a line in the sand to not be drug further towards the right wing positions than he already had conceded and that Republicans ignored every attempt by Obama to reach out to them, but then the onus of proof is not on those who claim he is partisan (because they have their evidence) but rather the onus is on those of us with the bizarre number of data points on points where Obama tried to work with Republicans and concessions he made for the Republicans and how that stacks up to the number of concessions Republicans made. Which is about the point where the trolls stop debating with us.

  • Michael Crowley

    I think that’s at least a defensible point. But he doesn’t use the same rhetoric as Clinton.

  • Michael Crowley

    I bumped my number down. Thanks for fact-checking me. Although in reality any attempts at numerical precision feels a little tenuous right now.

  • Asharaxx

    I dunno, textee. Maybe conservatives have picked up the slack, considering their penchant for having cartoon characters and cenetarians as their role models/leaders.

  • Michael Crowley

    Unworkable maybe. Narrow–no.

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    Depends on what you mean by narrow. Personally, anything that doesn’t break the filibuster line feels pretty narrow to me. It’s inexact language though, and it feels petty to argue over…

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    Maybe he’ll react more like Bush in 2006. Bush conceded nothing and even escalated the Iraq war that cost his party the midterms.

  • freeinpa

    “We’ve made a good start by cutting the deficit, by reducing the size of the Federal Government, by reinventing much of our Government to do more with less”.
    .
    Well here is one part of Clinton’s speech that won’t make the teleprompter

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Michael: sorry, could you provide context? Are you saying he is the most partisan or not the most partisan?

  • sacredh

    square1, that was supposed to be a secret.

  • sacredh

    “Those who refuse to pay will be sent to re-education camps where they will be forced to watch gay porn.”
    .
    Wouldn’t it be easier just to charge them to watch gay porn?

  • Michael Crowley

    oh i was responding to 7.2 there

  • kathy

    Appreciate your attention to detail. Though none of us should be surprised if it’s well north of 60.

  • grape_crush

    …it feels petty to argue over.
    .
    I wasn’t trying to zing Crowley. I just don’t know – given our dysfunctional Senate – how much of a difference any Dem majority would make legislatively. Don’t expect anything new, that’s for sure.
    .
    If the GOP somehow pulls off getting control of the Senate, then I fully expect Obama to capitulate to the center-right just like Clinton did. If the Dems maintain control, expect them to spend most of their time struggling to keep their centrists from passing bad legislation sent from the House.
    .
    Two years, nothing gets done while the world gets warmer, there’s two wars that need winding down (‘tho deployments to Afghanistan are being planned for after 2012), unemployment stays high, and income disparity grows.
    .
    Bummer, hey?

  • hippooath

    “When most major bills pass with the slimmest of minority support, every opposition person on the planet can provide you a thousand examples of when Obama was “partisan”.”
    .
    I hear you. Fringe don’t do nuance well.

  • westender3

    Hey,I’m Canadian,live in a border town.Went across today and voted eleventy times for the D.

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    My point was not in agreement with either of you completely. I honestly think the sticking point here was the fact that they couldn’t get around a filibuster and because of that certain things were dropped right from the outset as being to confrontational.
    ·
    They didn’t have a solid majority, if they had one things would have been different, but I agree that nothing is going to change since no one will control congress after this election.
    ·
    I don’t think anyone will attempt to shut down government, I think instead we’ll see more stalling to make Obama look worse than he is by Republicans when they realize they can’t make strides to pass their own legislation. Further than that, though, I don’t think the Republicans have united around a platform that allows them to actually pass anything, which is the most telling argument against them doing anything. They haven’t even promised to do anything.
    ·
    Side note, I don’t think zing’s are petty, they are an art form. ;) My comment was literally directed at the word narrow.

  • liberalmeltdown

    7.6 to say that Obama has reached out to Republicans is just absurd.
    .
    He uses class warfare constantly. That’s not reaching out. His rhetoric is all about demonization of business, Wall st, corporations, etc. The irony being that he has bailed out his buddies on Wall st., while sticking it to small business.
    .
    The whole time he was forcing Obamacare on us, he never once took serious questions. Never had a serious interview. Well, he’ll get lots of tough questions now. I doubt that he will answer them. He doesn’t seem to be able to answer a tough question.

  • hippooath

    “7.6 to say that Obama has reached out to Republicans is just absurd.
    .
    He uses class warfare constantly. That’s not reaching out. His rhetoric is all about demonization of business, Wall st, corporations, etc. The irony being that he has bailed out his buddies on Wall st., while sticking it to small business.
    .
    The whole time he was forcing Obamacare on us, he never once took serious questions. Never had a serious interview. Well, he’ll get lots of tough questions now. I doubt that he will answer them. He doesn’t seem to be able to answer a tough question.”
    .
    It’s hard to argue against what if alternate realities.
    .
    Do you seriously believe in this cr@p?

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    He had two full press conferences, negotiated with everyone from the Group of Six to Republican Leadership (to Blue Dogs). Does anyone remember the stunt where he went to the Republican caucus meeting? He answered every single question. For you to claim that he never took a question, never took an interview, is a very pathetic attempt at rewriting history.
    .
    But hey, let’s hear some of your questions that you think he hasn’t answered. Let’s see if we can’t find the answer.

  • apr2563

    Michael: I already included this Bingo card (courtesy of Andrew Sullivan/Brendan Nyhan) in Joe’s post on the elections. I hope you share it with your fellow pundits. It will be handy as you all make your ad hoc comments on what it all means and also bring you a chance to have some fun. Let us know who yells Bingo first.
    .
    http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/11/election-night-bingo.html

  • apr2563

    http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/11/the-most-covered-candidate.html
    .
    Weigel let’s us know who were the most covered candidates and compares pundits to judges at American Idol. Well said.

  • mjwilstein

    Here’s Christine O’Donnell’s concession speech to cheer you up:
    http://bit.ly/aOs7lg

blog comments powered by Disqus