Pre-Election Travel And House Democrats’ Outrage Amnesia

A couple weeks back, I wrote about the coincidence of a non-political White House aide, Elizabeth Warren, appearing in a key swing district just a few weeks before the midterm elections. I was told by the Treasury Department, which arranged the trip, that there was nothing political about Warren’s choice of venue, which appears to have been the case. (See update below.) The Center for Public Integrity has since found a number of other cabinet level trips to key swing districts that certainly appear to be unmistakably political. An excerpt from their report:

  • Education Secretary Arne Duncan’s Oct. 12 appearance in New Salem, N.D. with nine-term Rep. Earl Pomeroy to tour a local high school and discuss rural education;
  • Interior Secretary Ken Salazar’s Oct. 14 visit to Tracy, Cal. to appear with Reps. Dennis Cardoza, Jim Costa, and Jerry McNerney for groundbreaking on an aqueduct project that received $15.8 million in stimulus funds;
  • Energy Secretary Steven Chu’s Oct. 14 trip to a Cincinnati-area college with freshman Rep. Steve Driehaus;
  • Chu’s Oct. 15 stop in Massillon, Ohio to visit an environmentally-friendly food manufacturing plant with freshman Rep. John Boccieri;
  • Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa P. Jackson’s Oct. 16 “environmental justice” bus tour with four members of the Congressional Black Caucus in Oakland, Cal. Joined by Reps. Barbara Lee, Laura Richardson and Diane Watson of California, and Rep. Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri, Jackson highlighted several local environmental advocacy groups selected to receive $25,000 federal grants;
  • Salazar’s Oct. 19 trip to Las Vegas, where he and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid watched a groundbreaking ceremony for an electricity transmission line. After the event, the Department of Energy announced a $350 million loan guarantee for the project.

Coincidence? Is John Boehner naturally that color? Does Brian Wilson blow saves?

Of course it is impossible to know for sure absent truth serum or subpoena power, and the relevant agencies all deny doing anything untoward. This apparent habit of using non-political officials to do seemingly political duties is not a huge outrage in the grand scheme of government outrages–the line between policy and politics is mushy enough, and not well regulated by law. But it is striking that House Democrats, who saw this practice as tantamount to corruption during the Bush years, are now silent as the system works in their favor.

UPDATE: A person close to Warren calls to vigorously protest my lumping together her trip to Ohio with the other official travel to swing districts, and makes a couple of points: Unlike the other trips, the Warren visit did involve the local Democratic candidate. Also, Warren is headed soon to Berkeley, California, for another public event in a decidedly non-swing district.

Related Topics: 2012 Election, Congress
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • apr2563

    Michael, Has anything, in recent history, surpassed the politicization of a executive department then the work of the Gonzales Department of Justice?
    .
    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN171492672007081
    g
    .
    Anything to beat this Michael?
    Not just before elections but on-going:
    HHS, GSA, Justice, Int. Dept., Dept of Defense, NASA, FDA, EPA.
    .
    http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/18/mass-politicization/

  • earljr1

    Democrats being egregious? Don’t tell kevin and april…it could send both into cardiac arrest. Remember, Mr. Obama told us his administration would ALWAYS be 100% transparent, so I am sure these trips must be coincidental. P.S. kevie, the AMA is now admitting that cuts in medicare could force 60% of all doctors to limit, or stop seeing new medicare patients. Drastic cuts to medicare will mean seniors having fewer doctors to choose from and a significantly longer wait time to receive health care service. How about them apples?

  • constantweader

    Coincidences happen. And happen. And happen.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Let’s try a different train of thought: combined, the two reports surmount to 7 appearances in key districts. How many appearances have their been in the same time frame amongst individuals with similar levels of authority. If the number is, say, under 10, it’s unlikely coincidence. If it’s over, coincidence is possible. If it’s over 20, law of averages is (probably) in play.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Gah. Make that: “How many appearances have their been in the same time frame amongst individuals with similar levels of authority in non-key districts?”

  • Paul-no not that one

    If there reports about this isn’t that transparent?

  • georgiac

    Your insinuation would be more persuasive if you offered evidence that: 1). Cabinet members toured local sites with non-incumbent candidates (after all, it seems reasonable for administration officials to meet members of Congress when they are in their districts/states); and/or 2). Cabinet members do not make exactly the same kinds of visits in non-election years.

  • apr2563

    Michael, were Republicans precluded from joining in these events?

  • kbanginmotown

    Sorry, georgiac, that would require…ummm…research, in order to provide…ahhh…context.
    .
    Journalist used to do these sorta things, back in the day.

blog comments powered by Disqus