Torture Chamber

The NYT‘s excellent Peter Baker writes today about the silver lining for Barack Obama if the Congress should go Republican. A GOP Congress, after all, could be a useful foil for an embattled Democratic president (much as Bill Clinton stepped on the back of the Gingrich-Dole Congress as he climbed back to popularity after 1994).

The big caveat, as Baker notes toward the end of his piece, is that Republican control of Congress means the power to torment the White House through investigations, public hearings and subpoenaed officials.

But on this score, there’s a real difference between the House and Senate. If the House flips, the new chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform will be Darrell Issa. While Issa is pledging to pick his targets carefully to avoid overreach, he’s still a tough partisan clearly eager to make the White House squirm. By contrast, the would-be chair of a GOP Senate’s oversight panel, the Committee on Government Reform and Homeland Security, is Maine Republican Susan Collins–a low-key moderate who would be far less inclined than Issa to drag Obama staffers over the public coals.

Which is why two Democrats close to the Obama White House recently told me that if one chamber has to flip, they would prefer it be the Senate. Unfortunately for the Democrats, however, it looks extremely likely to be the other way around.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • apr2563

    Rep.Sean Bielat, running against Barney Frank, compares not allowing gays in the military to people under 5’2″ not being allowed to serve. You don’t see them protesting.
    .
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/24/sean-bielat-gays-are-like_n_773018.html
    .
    These are the kind of brainiacs that will be serving in the House if there is a tidal wave.
    .
    Issa, I cry because I can’t be governor of CA, might spend time investigating all of the things the Dem House ignored from the Bush era.

  • sacredh

    Of course if the house flips and the senate doesn’t, the senate could do some tit-for-tat investigations of their own.

  • sacredh

    There could also be a silver lining for the democrats if the republicans start a bunch of investigations. With all the problems the country is facing, playing more partisan politics instead of doing what the voters want the congress to do could backfire on them in the 2012 elections.

  • apr2563

    Which is exactly what they did during the Clinton era. Since the Reps are programmed to do the same stupid things over and over it is likely they will repeat their overreach.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Same section, better piece.
    .
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/24/opinion/24berman.html
    .
    “Boot the Blue Dogs”

  • sacredh

    You gotta love them for never learning from their mistakes. They do the same stupid sh!t over and over again. It’s pretty obvious their party is dumbing down like they’re on a mission to hit the lowest common denominator. They’re treating anti-intellectualism like it’s the gospel according to St. Tea Bag.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Well, I’m happy to hear there might be a “silver lining” for el presidente, that he may not be “tormented,” and that he’ll possibly have a “foil” to defray focused accountability. “Squirming” White Houses–a sight to behold, that.

    B/C it’s all about the comfort level for our elected officials. Let’s not dare contemplate what this horseracey b-s means for Americans. It’s all a villager parlor game. Anything beyond the manicured lawns of Versailles is wholly irrelevant.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    It doesn’t really matter if the promised investigations prove to be a “silver lining” for Obama. The point is, the republicans tried this “lets investigate everything” when Clinton was in office. Most Americans don’t have the attention spans or the memories of a gnat and so repubs think the same will work again. It won’t, because those of us who remember the ’90s and the wasted millions on investigations that meant nothing will waste no time in reminding others. And we will keep reminding them. This country can not afford any more republican games.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Erie, not sure if you’re getting me. I’m taking issue with Crowley’s skewed read–that elections or the issues ostensibly driving them are important merely for the candidates or office holders involved, without any discussion of what might be best for their constituents.
    .
    IOW, I don’t much care if the WH squirms a bit, is uncomfortable, constipated, or otherwise inconvenienced (regardless of which party holds it). Ditto congress. It’s banal horse-race/sh!t

  • http://redstatedebate.wordpress.com redstatedebate

    That might just be the dumbest thing I have ever read. There is a good article on the Beast, that explains what you are doing… Five Signs Your Party Is Doomed… As a bonus you can go here and see the new ad against Pelosi.

    http://conservativeblogscentral.blogspot.com/2010/10/nancy-pelosi-on-trial-in-few-good-men.html

blog comments powered by Disqus