The GOP’s Position: Not All Gravy

With predictions of 50-seat gains and chamber sweeps abounding, TIME took a closer look at what threats remain for the GOP. This interview with our Washington bureau chief, Michael Duffy, breaks down the dark lining to the Republicans’ silver cloud, as he sees it.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • certifiablylazy

    Mmmm, gravy….

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “The Dog caught the car and is shaking the bumper.” A reference to the Tea Party getting Republican nominations.

  • Alex Vallas

    It is incredible that the Tea Party has produced so many candidates that are clueless, offensive, and just plain nutty.

  • pelhamite1

    If I may submit a “friendly amendment”: the candidates that you describe are not, in formal terms, Tea Party candidates (although they are generally backed by the TP) but rather Republican ones. The assumption must be that they reflect the views of a major U.S. political party and its leadership.

  • herby002

    No, they are Teapublicans. They are teaparty candidates who have hijacked the Republican nominations. The Republican party has embraced most of them, and given them financial support in order to defeat Democratic party nominees. The Repubs are holding their noses as they shovel cash into the Teapublicans’ warchests, and sending out party operatives to oversee their election campaigns and advertising in the attempt to make the Teapublican candidates appear more “moderate” than the crazy ideas that got them nominated.
    The Repubs plan that any Teapublicans who get elected will be ignored as far as their stupid promises to voters are concerned, but will be expected to vote NO on any legislation that Democrats propose, just because.

    The assumption must be that a major U.S. political party and its leadership will prostitute its historic legacy of remaining true to its REAL conservative values, while working with its Democratic opponents to craft compromise legislation for the good of the nation as a whole.

    To put it simply, they are whoring for votes.

blog comments powered by Disqus