Thank Tom Coburn for This Beauty

Per Ben Smith, Sharron Angle is now running an ad saying that Harry Reid “actually voted to use taxpayer dollars to pay for Viagra for convicted child molesters and sex offenders. What else could you ever need to know about Harry Reid?”

Presto, another example of members of Congress conducting politics under the guise of legislating. The source of that Viagra vote was an amendment to the health reform reconciliation bill introduced by Republican Sen. Tom Coburn that his office described like this:

No Erectile Dysfunction Drugs To Sex Offenders – This amendment would enact recommendations from the Government Accountability Office to stop fraudulent payments for prescription drugs prescribed by dead providers or, to dead patients. This amendment also prohibits coverage of Viagra and other ED medications to convicted child molesters, rapists, and sex offenders, and prohibits coverage of abortion drugs. (Note: the creation of exchanges could allow sex offenders to receive taxpayer-funded Viagra and other ED drugs unless Congress expressly prohibits this action – see additional background attached)

Voting for this amendment, which is obviously a no brainer, would have meant the reconciliation bill would have had to go back to the House for another vote, potentially stalling or killing comprehensive health reform legislation. Voting against it meant, you guessed it, fodder for TV ads like this one. Ad after the jump.

Related Topics: sharon angle, tom coburn, Congress, Democratic Party, Health Care, Republican Party, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • 53_3

    Um, this wouldn’t be any of that “character assassination” stuff that O’Donnell has been complaining about, would it?
    .
    Of course not…

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Kate. This insight about Coburn should give the blogosphere a lift. At least Coburn rose to the occasion when the moment was ready (to introduce this amendment, of course). OT, but do you have more thoughts on Mark’s VA post, Kate, such as how veterans view the VA system? Labyrinth or lifeline? Whither R efforts to privatize it? (Maddow has covered this)

  • blossom38

    We’ve just moved from “silly” season to “sheer stupidity” season.

  • deconstructiva

    What blossom said (about campaign ads, not you, Kate).
    .
    And really totally OT (hey, if Rusty can go OT so can I) but today is Vladimir Putin’s b-day. Did the swamp team send a card (or calendar, see link below)?
    .
    From: Sarah Palin
    To: Vladimir Putin
    Subject: HAPPY B-DAY!!!!!!!
    .
    Happy b-day, my believed!!! Come get your present. My place. I’m like totally watching you as I tipe, you betcha, but don’t tell Todd. He’s kicking Joe that backstammer Miller’s ass write now for not standing behind me. Love you!
    Sarah
    .
    Palin-O’Donnell 2012: Hands-On Experience. You Want It.
    Donate to SarahPAC today! Paypal, major credit cards accepted
    .
    .
    http://newsfeed.time.com/2010/10/07/happy-birthday-mr-putin-who-will-win-russias-battle-of-the-calendars/
    (check out BBC video in link, but no swampland calendar? sigh)

  • stuartzechman

    Thanks so much for this very important report, Kate Pickert.
    .
    Unless journalists perform their truth-telling and explaining functions as well as you have here, I’m afraid that political dirty tricks translated into un-debunked attack ads will rule the day, citizens will be misinformed, and our democracy will be further perverted.
    .
    My profound gratitude once again, Kate Pickert, thank you.

  • fhmadvocat

    This shows you why our legislative system is completely broke and why it is so hard for a sitting member of Congress to be elected President. Obama was the first Senator elected since John Kennedy. And really the only reason it worked out was because his opponent was also a sitting Senator, John McCain.

    The problem is you could have a bill which is 90% good – e.g. Mom, apple pie, etc. and 10% garbage, and as a legislator, you vote for it because of the 90%. However, when you run for office, your opponent reminds voters you voted for the 10% garbage.

    In this instance, this was Tom Coburn throwing a wrench into the works to slow down the legislative process. It was a delay tactic, which did not work. However, we should punish Harry Reid, because he did not fall for it.

    There may be many reasons not to vote for Harry Reid, but if this is being used as a reason, Lord help us all.

  • afguy

    Governing as an eternal political game of “Gotcha!”
    .
    We should be so proud of the example we’re presenting. I’m sure the other nations are just falling all over themselves to emulate our example.

  • deconstructiva

    Kate, if Coburn had not succeeded in slipping in prohibition of abortion drugs too, do you remember what would’ve been his plan B to kill the bill?

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Agreed 100%. If there’s zero downside to lying and to this antigovernance demagoguery, then it will continue. If the media accurately reports the news, imposing a burden on the liars and demagogues, then maybe we can have more sane discourse and policy. Thanks for this post.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Did Fred Davis make this ad? I heard that he was great.

  • certifiablylazy

    I gotta say, I don’t think this tweet from the author helps matters much.
    .
    “kpickert Harry Reid thinks taxpayers should buy Viagra for child molesters? That seems odd. http://tiny.cc/6qsd686i5i – 48 minutes ago”
    .
    How about “Childish Republican candidate with no time for media questions or policy discussion finds time to make bullsh!t ad against Democratic opponent.”

  • certifiablylazy

    Also, didn’t Congress repeal this amendment after the fact?

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    Huzzah!
    .
    Honestly, its a great word and entirely appropriate.

  • groenhagen2

    So the ad is truthful, unlike the one run by that little douchebag Alan Grayson in Florida. BTW, did I miss the liberals at Time criticizing that ad?

  • brittanicus01

    Presently Senator Reid is posturing, to suddenly represent the enigma of bank fraud and foreclosures. Viagra distribution is small fry compared to bills he will throw at us?We must however look to the immediate future and the damage Reid and his cohorts can do to our fragile economy.In the new session of Congress–Lame Duck or not–Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) will focus the Senate to enacting Sen. Robert Menendez,( D-NJ).law; a crippling blow to the 15 million out of work Americans by passing immigration Reform Package. If he has adequate votes this Liberal Senator clothed as a Democrat, will crack his whip and bring to the table another Amnesty by any other name. Stealthily hidden in the bill will not–ONLY–contain the Dream Act, but Agjobs attachment law for more Guest Workers for farms, by giving some structure of mass Amnesty. Since the 1986 Amnesty at least 3-4 million low income workers got their legal immigration papers and then determined that they could bring in immediate family members under Family Unification laws. As legal residents they could sponsor family members as long as the affidavit of financial support was signed. In many cases this became a game of fraud, as soon after this obligation was dropped and family members ended up in the welfare line.

    Chain Migration refers to the unceasing and often-snowballing chains of foreign nationals who are permitted to immigrate because the law allows citizens and lawful permanent residents to bring in their absolute, non-nuclear family members. According to FAIRS quote “In 2001, the United States admitted 1,064,318 immigrants–enough people to create a major city the size of Chicago” In 1986 between 1.34 and 2.66 million illegal immigrants in the country who could qualify for immediate legality. Philip Martin, a professor at the University of California at Davis and one of the leading experts on the IRCA program, described the 1986 bill as “rife with fraud.”5 In total, nearly 1.1 million illegal’s received amnesty under SAW, even though there were only an estimated 400,000 eligible. This implies 700,000 fraudulent legalizations. Somewhere between 4 and 5 million people gained entry under this bill.

    If we believe the numbers of foreign nationals domiciled in the US by government mouthpieces–there are 11 million and shrinking? In a previous count the Census Bureau has also developed estimates of its own. There assessment at the time of the 2000 Census suggests that the illegal immigration population was about 8 million. We are now Ten years ahead-so how can the administration estimate only 12 million? Create some kind of estimate yourself and give a conservative figure of family members brought here through family unification? Do we really want to be overpopulated? Our highways cannot handle the traffic now. Water shortages, energy disruption and loss of environment open land. Farmland disappearing. Even now water is in short supply in California and other border states. How will we keep up with supplying food to this sized population?

    In Nov. 6, 1986 Because of their low education levels, illegal immigrants have a poverty rate that is roughly twice that of native-born Americans and therefore the majority will become public charges. The Immigration Reform and Control Act were passed by Congress in order to stop illegal immigration from Mexico, seen as a threat to the economy. Many members of Congress felt immigration was “out of control” because legal and illegal immigration had come to account for approximately thirty to fifty percent of U.S. population growth. The 1986 bill criminalizes the act of knowingly hiring an undocumented worker (in an unsuccessful attempt to reduce illegal immigration) as Businesses ignored the law and the government’s failure to enforce the laws so the numbers have grown all out of proportion..

    Many foreigners are competing with Citizens and legal residents as cheap labor exploited by farms, businesses, the construction industry, factories, services and entertainment commerce. Millions have now materialized in the blue and white collar jobs that should be in the hands of the jobless Americans. Thousands of contractors have sewed their own demise by using cheap labor, dropping wages and the quality of work. Isn’t it time we decide who will push the overall public agenda for a decent future for our families and grandchildren, and not seek to gain votes in future elections by pandering to the major minority population as the Liberals are? One problem being legal households also gives refuge to an illegal alien family member and there are thousands of fraudulent cases of a legal brother loaning his Social Security number to an uncle or Aunt. Even a child given instant citizenship under the 14th Amendment Social Security number is not sacred, as the card is utilized by another in the family circle.

    The Democratic leadership including Sen. Harry Reid, Barbara Boxer, and Speaker Pelosi do not seem to understand the relative difference in an individual who came to America legally and followed the processing as real immigrants do, if they wish to settle in this great country of ours? The new Tea Party candidates for Congress believe in the “Rule of Law” and understand you cannot cut corners to reside here in the US, and that changing the laws is pandering to millions of illegal aliens who ignored the laws and thought nothing in sliding past the border guards or lying about their true intentions when hoping on a plane. Only the Liberal extremists and the majority of Democrats see this as not a contravention of our laws and are willing to overlook, what to them is a minor civil infraction. Why have Democrats and a few in the GOP gutted the real border fence? Why has ICE director John Holder not arresting every illegal alien to be deported or imprisoned?

    Why is California’s Sen. Boxer voted–YES–to supplying funds to Sanctuary Cities or not limiting welfare to illegal aliens? Both politicians are responsible for pressing –ONE-for ENGLISH. Why did Sen. Harry Reid try to table E-Verify, giving fewer accesses of jobs to legitimate US workers and only make the law to extract illegal workers voluntary? Choose who you vote for very cautiously, because returning Sen. Reid, Boxer, Pelosi, Napolitano to Washington. ALL INCUMBENTS MUST GO. ANTICIPATE IN STATES WITH A CLOSE RACE, DEMOCRAT ORIENTED LIBERAL modus operandi:have been known to overlook illegal aliens voting for their Pride and Joy? ABSENTEE BALLOTS SHOULD BE A CAUSE FOR CONCERN. Any new Lib-Dem will certainly bring down another giant amnesty that is like a tree, with very costly hidden roots; that will be digging into your payroll check for extra taxes.Billions of dollars could easily turn into a trillion in public welfare? The Tea Party is extremely conscious that neither party can be trusted in most instances to serve the American people. Democrats are looking for potential future votes and Republicans are looking out for a continuous pipeline of discount labor.

    Tea Party activists have their own agenda, to suppress the plans in Washington of both parties. To shrink government and return dignity to the middle class and good paying jobs to all Americans. Tea party candidates are not beholden to Sen. Reid or Minority speaker John Boehner and any associates and will not bend to the will of Washington elites. Both parties must be held accountable specifically to giving Amnesty to illegal aliens and the Hundreds of billions its costing taxpayers. Those lawmakers who ignore the new course for the people will be removed from office as many incumbents will be this November. Give Tea Party candidates a chance to prove their worth and not listen to the same old, tired rhetoric of the usual, entrenched politicians. Even now Tea Party candidates must abide by the rules of the American people, as they are not immune from losing their seat.

  • nflfoghorn

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • artraveler

    And don’t mess around with the niceties. Call them LIERS in large type. Too damn much tip-toing around this issue. Call them what they are. Loud and clear and IN THE HEADLINE!

  • 3xfire3

    Unfortunately these are the methods used by most politicians and the Media.
    .
    Take the comment, action or video clip out of context is constantly used by politicians and the media. TIME does it all the time.
    .
    Both Democrats and Republicans do it constantly. Look at Grayson’s Ad about Webster. It’s a lot worse than this Ad against Reid.
    .
    I notice that TIME and Liberals on this site don’t seem to have a problem with these practices when there done against a Republican. When it’s done against a Democrat everyone goes nuts demonizing the Republican that did it.
    .
    Liberals ask yourselves did Swampland write a story about Grayson attack on Webster. The answer is no. That shows how dishonest TIME is.

  • nflfoghorn

    MSU and take no questions. That’s the Tea Party Way.

  • apr2563

    Yes, when a doctor prescribes Viagra he first asks:
    “Are you a child molester?”

  • apr2563

    Kate: Just wanted to let you know I appreciate your reporting on this site. I can depend on your giving us facts and pointing out lies.
    Your interactions is also appreciated.

  • shepherdwong

    Thank you Kate, good reporting.

  • diecash1

    Gramps, what precisely does this

    Liberals ask yourselves did Swampland write a story about Grayson attack on Webster. The answer is no. That shows how dishonest TIME is.

    have to do with what KP wrote in this post? Too much time in the sun today? Maybe you can tell all of us what exactly it is that you find out of context in KP’s blog post, yes? I highly doubt it.

  • diecash1

    No, the ad is bullsh!t and the amendment was nothing more than a political stunt but I don’t expect you to understand the nuance.

  • 3xfire3

    No Thanks Kate, Bad reporting
    .
    If you were honest you would have reported on Grayson.
    .
    Since you’re totally Biased you did not. Go Journolist.

  • maurice2u

    5.1: “If there’s zero downside to lying and to this antigovernance demagoguery, then it will continue. If the media accurately reports the news, imposing a burden on the liars and demagogues, then maybe we can have more sane discourse and policy.”
    .
    While I agree fully with this sentiment, I think what we forget is that so called “news” is part of the entertainment industry. They are selling a product, not fullfilling any kind of public service. It just simply isn’t in their mission statement or business model to create a well informed public, no matter how much we might like that to be the case. Outside of possibly PBS and C-SPAN, the majority of news sources a responsible for nothing more than what say American Idol is: entertaining people to get ratings (or in some case subscriptions) that will spur advertising dollars towards profit.
    .
    The thing about it is we (as a collective) don’t want news. We want to be entertained. In a really sad, but accurate way, that is why Colbert, Limbaugh, Stewart, Fox News, Olberman, etc are top “fan” getters, and hardly anyone watches C-SPAN and even fewer know much substance about the topics they tend to be so “fired up” about. When people (as a mojority) choose news over entertainment, the salesmen will change their product lineup. I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting on that though. Human behavior continues to astound ……. and entertain. :)

  • shepherdwong

    Grayson didn’t lie. Not once.

  • maurice2u

    I liken this post to the fat woman in line boisterously proclaiming how terrible the chocolate is in the candy store as she continues to finish of the last of the free samples with onlookers shaking their heads in disbelief.

  • apr2563

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101007/ap_on_el_se/us_nevada_senate_angle

    Angles latest insanity. Sharia law has taken hold in the city of Dearborn, Michigan and Frankfort, Texas.
    Now Dearborn has a large Muslim population but Frankfort, Texas? I wonder if the courts in those cities know they are now practicing Sharia law.
    .
    This will bubble a couple of days, then her handlers will tell her to deny she ever said it. After all, she is lookin’ for the “juice”.

  • herby002

    apr,

    She won’t deny she said it if she’s not challenged to prove it, and she’s made a practice of only talking to friendly media who are not likely to ask for proof of her statements… like Fox News, Christian radio, local right-wing radio & TV talk shows, etc.

    You’re right, though, about the Angle strategy. Most of the Reid campaign’s radio & TV ads have been replays of Angle’s most-damning quotes. In response, she has repeatedly said, “I didn’t say that”. Even when she was confronted with tapes showing she did say that, she strikes out at the questioner(s), shouting, “You’re just attacking me with misleading quotes from Reid ads because you want to defend him for the 14% unemployment rate in Nevada that Reid is responsible for!”

    When questioned about her statements that Social Security should be killed, she said she never said that. Then she said that what she meant was Social Security should be phased out; but current recipients should continue to receive payments. Then she said that the government should set up a privatised investment system so people could choose among a number of low-risk securities to buy into. Then she said she meant, not “privatised”, but “personal” investment funds. Then she said that, should these government-selected securities go into the tank, and the money that we “invested” in them be in danger of being lost, a guaranteed floor would come into effect so that our invested money would be made good in our “personal accounts”. She didn’t say, and she wasn’t asked, which institution would donate that money, but I think she would have said THE GOVERNMENT.

    Then, do we want to discuss how she said we should privatise the Veterans Administration health care system – like put it in the care of Anthem/Blue Cross, Blue Shield, etc.?
    Oops! She never said that, and what she meant when she said that was not what Harry Reid said she meant when he quoted what she said – and I have to go on the Hannity show now and thank you for your questions.

  • ricardo4max

    Thank you Tom Coburn! We appreciate all that you have done and are doing to save this country.
    Unfortunately, this oppressive tyrannical radical left Obama regime and its thug accomplices, such as Dirty Harry Reid, are working overtime to destroy our economy. This so-called health care reform is so full of big govt freedom eroding Marxist style measures and anti-business legislation that, without repeal, we are doomed.

  • ricardo4max

    GO Sharron Angle! How much better will our country be without this crooked demented Senator? LOTS!!!

  • 3xfire3

    Diecash,
    .
    You have a very limited mind.

  • 3xfire3

    shep,
    .
    You are totally insane.

  • 3xfire3

    Nate Silver’s Forecast
    .
    Angle leads by 2-3%
    .
    Chance Each Candidate wins the Seat
    .
    Angle…..66.3%
    .
    Reid……33.7%
    .
    The Fat Lady is about to sing.

    .
    http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/forecasts/senate/nevada

  • diecash1

    Diecash,
    .
    You have a very limited mind.

    Well look at that! A completely logical and substantive reply from Gramps! Oh…..wait a minute…..nope, check that. It’s just more idiocy from the resident senile far-right moderate conservative.
    ..
    Perhaps you could attempt an actual reply containing facts, reason and logic. Maybe you could look those terms up on the interwebs so you’ll understand what I mean.
    ..
    What precisely did KP take out of context in her reporting here? You often (routinely) make these sort of contentious statements with no basis in fact. Feel free to explain how the amendment proposed by Coburn wasn’t merely a political stunt and how this ad isn’t merely a continuation of that. Or you could continue to demonstrate your “wit.”

    Take the comment, action or video clip out of context is constantly used by politicians and the media. TIME does it all the time.

  • diecash1

    Do you work at being this stupid or is inanity just one of your natural gifts? I’m putting my money on both.

  • afguy

    You know, 3x, instead of calling him insane, you MIGHT have pointed out to shepherdwong where Grayson was lying. You know… specifics.
    .
    Address the issue rather than engaging in the name-calling you claim to find so distasteful so often.

blog comments powered by Disqus