A Senate Spat Over For-Profit Education

TIME’s Elizabeth Dias files this report:

A Senate Health, Education, Labor, & Pensions Committee investigation into federal investment in for-profit colleges devolved into a political squabble this morning, with Republican Sen. Richard Burr calling Sen. Tom Harkin’s investigation a “witch hunt.”

The proceedings were charged from the start. Before testimony even began, Republican Sen. Mike Enzi walked out of the hearing in protest: “I”ll leave [Sen. Harkin] to go ahead and beat up on the for-profit schools.” Then Burr, the only other Republican present, blasted Harkin for failing to weigh for-profit schools’ graduation rates more heavily in his investigation (despite the discussion of graduation rates in the hearing today after he left).

Sen. John McCain, who joined the debate after it had begun, said the debate “exemplifies the really sharp divisions between our two parties and our philosophies of government. Perhaps in January we will have a different agenda for this committee and the United States Senate.” Then he too turned and left the room. McCain’s comment suggests that reform of for-profit regulations is another issue at stake in the midterm elections. “Is [McCain] implying that if the Republicans take over the Senate they won’t do anything about the for-profit sector?” Sen. Harkin asked. Harkin announced he would introduce legislation to regulate for-profit abuses after the next Congress is seated.

For-profit schools have sought to improve their public image since hearings opened in June. The Career College Association quietly changed its name to the Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities (APSCU) on Sept. 22. The APSCU is now running television commercials tailored to political hot-buttons; two ads claim for-profit colleges are essential for both green and health-care jobs. And yesterday, the APSCU organized a 2,000-person rally supporting for-profit schools at the U.S. Capitol, where CEO Harris Miller acknowledged abuse is unacceptable and reminded students that Congress might now listen to their for-profit advocacy since leaders seek student votes.

But given the report Harkin released this morning–which noted that more than half of students at many for-profit schools drop out within the first two years–it remains to be seen how deep the sector’s makeover goes. And given the divided agendas revealed this morning, student education and taxpayer dollars, invested in Pell grants for for-profit school students, may still hang in the balance.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • afguy

    “Send in the clowns…. don’t worry, they’re here.”
    .
    Sorry, Blue Eyes, the lyrics just fit.

  • afguy

    How about a show of hands…
    .
    All in favor of sending these petulant children to bed without their supper…

  • Paul-no not that one

    I apologize for suggesting yesterday that the Senate is broken.

  • certifiablylazy

    Just like a liberal. Always apologizing for our American exceptionalism.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Well sure, I have an Apology Tour coming up. Spring 2011.

  • afguy

    P-NNTO,
    .
    Just being “broken” would be a marked improvement.
    .
    They are venturing over into “national embarrassment” territory.

  • Paul-no not that one

    In all seriousness the Senate is referred to as “The Adults” as opposed to “The Children” in the House.
    .
    Another example of what we are told is…

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    But given the report Harkin released this morning–which noted that more than half of students at many for-profit schools drop out within the first two years–it remains to be seen how deep the sector’s makeover goes. And given the divided agendas revealed this morning, student education and taxpayer dollars, invested in Pell grants for for-profit school students, may still hang in the balance.
    -
    No. No, no, no.
    -
    The makeover is not what’s important. The agendas are not what’s important.
    -
    Remember, the reason we care about the government is because it implements policies that affect people’s lives.
    -
    Why is there a controversy about for-profit schools? Should federal funds go to them? Should there be a limit on how many funds go to each student? What are the different policies being proposed? Would they work?
    -
    This article provides zero useful information.

  • certifiablylazy

    @ 3.2 – I’d be happy to spend my hard earned Real American dollars on that adventure.

  • fhmadvocat

    With all due respect to Harris Butler, whom I have met and I respect, remember most of these students are financing their education with public money. Most of the time, I think the government should stay out of the private sector (investigations into sports are the most ridiculous), but when we are talking about students getting a quality education, supposively a liberal arts education, we really need to examine whether the primary purpose is to give an education or simply to collect paychecks from the Federal government.
    This is not a “witch hunt” but a serious issue which needs to be examined. I know Republicans would like to leave it all to the private sector, the problem is when education fails as a business. You can’t get those years back.

  • formerlyjames

    For profit prisons, for profit wars, for profit education. Drilling a hole to hell. Taking the right wing logic to it’s conclusion, do we need Congress? Why? Do we need government? Why? Beats me.

  • perrywhite1

    I’d guess Republican congressmen want a Congress they can belong to, because it has the best retirement plan in America. Fully subsidized by the American taxpayer, of course, whose Social Security is at risk from Republican congressmen.

    ‘Tis a puzzlement.

  • artraveler

    The main issue is that many of these students never make enough money to repay their loans or drop out and spend the next 10-15 years trying to dig out of the debt. The colleges have, of course, kept all teh money.

    Republicans want a guaranteed outcome on public school students, how about the same when we are footing the bills on student loans when they drop out because they weren’t qualified to begin with. Let’s compare their admittance criteria to the public universities and see whether their judgement is based on potential student achievement or profit for the school since the school doesn’t take the loss, the taxpayers do.

  • apr2563

    Can’t McCain just go away. He not only has flipped on so many issues, he has become knee jerk incoherent. It must be the Palin syndrome.

  • 3xfire3

    No. It’s just tough being around ignorant Liberals.

  • afguy

    Careful, 3x. I’d be VERY careful about throwing around the word “ignorant” toward others, if I were you.
    .
    You obviously haven’t checked in the mirror lately.

  • afguy

    Anyone who can’t put to paper (or keyboard) and describe to others what they believe as a philosophy could EASILY be described as “ignorant” and, in your case,”willfully” so.
    .
    Something about “people living in glass houses” and all that…

blog comments powered by Disqus