“Forgotten Crimes”

Spitzer has better taste in prostitutes.

“a two-minute ad”
.
When you say “ad” do you mean this is running on air. That is to say a paid for ad? Or a hoping for free distribution ad?

To quote another commenter, from another thread, “Oh goodie, more swamp cleaning!! Hip hip hooooooooooooray!!”

No longer ‘hoping for free’, Paul. I’d say, “received for free”.

It will run on cable TV in Louisiana.

HA!
.
But is the reverse true? “Vote for Melancon – he only does high-class women”? Some way to convince voters! But, given that many Louisianans didn’t even know Vitter was ho-ing around, what does that say about THEM?

“He wasn’t there 15-20 minutes at that”

5-6 minutes to undress and shower…3-4 minutes to dress and pay…

Heh. “Five-Minute Vitter” it is.

Alex, you forgot the Diapergate thingy. No cover-ups here, please.
.
also, as for any RW’ers here or Vitter defenders elsewhere re: “The man broke the law. There ought to be consequences for that,” any possible Vitter defense is blown away by Stormy Daniels (so to speak).

(too bad she didn’t run. Alas, poor Sanchez stumbled + blushed thru this. Imagine Olbermann or Maddow handling this.)

OT, but speaking of “skanks”…
.
I want someone (actually, ANYONE) to perform a “community service” and explain to me the attraction of “Jersey Shores”…
.
Honestly, I felt like I lost brain cells just because I happened on the cable channel it was on.
.
Bad enough that even my 16-year-old son asked WHY I was wasting my time watching that stuff, even briefly.

“He did his thing”
.
Somehow I doubt that said “thing” was akin to BO doing his dance

“David Vitter: Your 300-second man in the 111th Congress”

“Imagine Olbermann or Maddow handling this”
.
Guard Duck will only say “sur”
Rach would likely say “who’s the hot chick?”

Thanks Alex

“I’m David Vitter and I approve this massage.”

I can’t figure that attraction out myself, and I have two teens and a tween.

Imagine Olbermann or Maddow handling this.
.
Handling WHAT, decon?
.
Inquiring (and dirty) minds want to know…

“Melancon’s latest ad puts Vitter’s ability to keep his polls up in doubt.”

Well you know what they say about Louisiana:
.
Have the state is under water, the other half is under indictment!

Given the circumstances of Mr. Vitter’s crime, I guess the relevant question is whether stimulus funds were used.

On a more serious note, while I by no means consider this kind of advertisingI guess), I can’t but help but think of the pained expression on Mrs. Vitter’s face during his half assed me culpa press conference. If there’s going to be collateral damage, it’s too bad it has to be her.

“Critics question Vitter’s endurance.”

It beats “Kate Plus Eight” and “Hoarding: Buried Alive.” But let’s not get started on “Sister Wives,” yikes.
That’s all I can honestly come up with.

I think O’Donnell can answer that better than any of us, but such an interview would have to get a grip on things and deal with the center. Then again, does the Daniels interview rub O’Donnell the wrong way?

Shame that his own prostitution isn’t the salient crime being exposed to Louisiana voters.

In a critical vote today, Senator David Vitter continued to shill for the corporate special interests by voting against advancing the DISCLOSE Act, an important piece of legislation that requires corporations and special interest groups to disclose their role in political television ads. The DISCLOSE Act will restore transparency to political campaigns following the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which rolled back important campaign finance rules and effectively allows corporations, special interests, and even foreign nations to secretly spend unlimited amounts of money to influence elections. Due to obstruction from members of the Republican Party like Senator Vitter, the Senate won’t even be able to debate this important legislation on the Senate floor.

http://beta.dscc.org/news?type=press_release&press_release_KEY=1675

One Nation – The Barack Obama supporters on the far left extreme is doing a rally in Washington busing in all kinds of crazies from the left.
.
Here is a little video presentation which really tells who they are…nothing short of unbelievable.
.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/beck-backlash-one-nation-rally-union-coalitions-busing-in-astro-turf-members-to-show-up-beck-tea-party/

Whewn Vitter “runs an idea up the flagpole”, I wonder who salutes?

Edit: “Critics question Vitter’s endurance as Congressional friction increases.”

Nice to know Vitter’s not the only neocon comparing size….

1001 reasons to kick Harry Reid to the curb this November!
.
A fantastic idea!!
.
http://www.harryreidvotes.com/

I suspect she’s promised to deal with any future “indiscressions” sharply, pointedly and with one decisive stroke.
.
And I imagine he spends a lot of time sleeping with one eye open, and on his stomach – after locking up all of the cutlery.

Ariana Huffington sponsoring buses to the 10.2.10 rally by the far left extremists!!
.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/arianna-huffington-pledges-buses-for-stewart-rally/

“When asked about what he did with various prostitutes, Vitter replied, ‘Depends’.”

In Ariana’s own words, “if’s anyone needs a vide to zee rally, we have plenty of da buses to get you dare”

DCon, wasn’t he a writer/producer on “The West ‘Thing’”?

Maybe you could list their billionaire corporate sponsors, you know, like these traitors who are bankrolling the Teatards while they flush the country down the toilet for fun and profit:
.
http://theweek.com/article/index/206405/the-billionaire-koch-brothers-tea-party-puppetmasters

@ 4.2: sic

Aaand rustyblog finally appears, desperately trying to shift the conversation away from the current topic.

Oh heck sheperdwrong, are you still peddling that old rag magazines lies? That story was debunked months ago buddy.
.
Get with the program. The Koch Brothers are not funding the Tea Party. Libtards fall for all that far left propaganda all of the time.
.
Do you have a special red phone to Alan Grayson’s campaign, he loves to lie about people and what they say too.

Perhaps because that bit of Beltway harlotry is unexceptional.

Mrs. Vitter’s performance when this broke was amazing.
.
She yelled at the media to leave her family alone and…they dropped it.
.
I’ll never forget watching her bully them. Nor will I forget how well it worked.

LOL @ Freeper.
.
This is the first time you were intentionally funny and made me laugh.

“Aaand rustyblog finally appears, desperately trying to shift the conversation away from the current topic.”

.
This is old news grapecrushy. Vitter and hookers…gee, is that all you lame stream idiots have to push now?
.
I like fresh, news. News about what is currently going on in America. Stories like good ‘ol Alan Grayson and his total lies about his opponent. How he cut and pasted together the video of his opponent to make him into some evil far right extremist and likens him to the Taliban.
.
But, you would think TIME.com would spend a little time on this up-coming weekends liberal astro-turf rally they are putting together don’t you think?

…amounts of money to influence elections.
.
Guess I just mis-understood… I thought he was in favor of spending money to influence erections.
.
Given his and the lobbyist’s relative positions on the matter, I’m sure her’s was a stance he was certain he could get behind.

“David Vitter’s poll numbers aren’t the only things sinking today in Washington. While Vitter’s amendments could best be described as flaccid and were widely considered a let down even among his own partners, it is expected that the swelling news of his brief debriefings will lead to a rather hairy situation for the RNC and the possible ejaculation of Vitters from congress. It remains to be seen whether the big man, Bhoener, will comment on this latest rough position.

So, I guess Vitter does believe that his private sector can be stimulated with money, why does he think the nation is any different?

It beats “Kate Plus Eight”…
.
Those kids on that show have grown up thinking the camera crew is part of the family.
.
Can’t see any way those kids aren’t going to have some “issues” when the spotlight is turned off when they are no longer “cute and cuddly”.

Okay I lied/misrecalled.
.
She didn’t yell. She just looked tough, in her animal striped top, and “as a mother” asked the media to leave them alone.
.
She starts at about 2:50
.

Hey, I’ve got an idea – as soon as Republicans are caught with their pants down, why not change the topic to why you don’t like a Democrat?
.
No wingnut troll in Swampland has ever done that before! How original!
.
I was expecting to see references to Monica Lewinski, Marilin Monroe and FDR’s mistress along with Elliot Spitzer (who quit right away since he had some dignity – unlike Vitter).

Now, patrick,
.
We’re talking “free enterprise” stimulus here… not government-provided.
.
He thinks the rest of us “swine” should just go out and “rent our own” without a subsidy.

How Barack “Hussein” Obama is eliminating GOD as the Creator out of our founding documents.
.

“Just one week after President Barack Obama came under fire for omitting man’s “Creator” as the source of his “inalienable rights” — as described in the U.S. Declaration of Independence — he’s done it again. This time, the president was delivering remarks at a Democratic Party fundraiser in New York City, raising money for his party’s midterm election races.”

.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-omits-creator-from-inalienable-rights-again/

As bad as you were spanked by jcapan in the other thread, one would think you would have the common sense to leave the swamp for awhile, partricksartor.
.
But, like a bad penny, you keep coming back for more.
.
Hey, want to know a secret patty? Just call jcapan a Eugenics supporter (which he is), and he’ll leave like he did the last time from the swamp.
.
Just saying is all…..LOL!!

HAHAHAHHA
.
HAHAHHA
.
HAHAHA
.
AAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
.
That Kenyan Marxist fascist, Maoist, Socialist Satanists Voodoo cultists.
.
Removing God.
.
Except God is never mentioned.
.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights”
.
By their creator – Buddah, Allah, Jehova…ma and pa.
.
That horrible, horrible man,

grape: I was going to do a diaper joke, but your pun is so much better.

Here is a question for you hippo. If “God” or the “Creator” (which is in the Declaration of Independence) is removed, and it isn’t Buddah, Allah, Jehova or any other deity, who then gives you your rights as defined in the Constitution?

“why not change the topic to why you don’t like a Democrat?”
.
More sanctimoneous twaddle. And exactly what does the left loons do when they are caught with pants down or hand in the cookie jar?
.
Usually irrational defense followed by it doesn’t matter and its the issues that count. There are around 50 posts of juvenile cracks which I guess is the issue with liberals.

Heaven forbid (lol), that it be the combined people’s will as evidenced in a “State” through a social contract.
.
You honestly don’t think people could agree to live together and respect each other by granting each other rights without some almighty “I’ll send you to hell” being to keep the children in line?

…who then gives you your rights as defined in the Constitution?
.
We gain our rights from each other…Haven’t you ever heard of a Social Contract?

“…who then gives you your rights as defined in the Constitution?”
.
My Dad…?

You people are truly disturbed and stupid indeed. Have you ever heard that if man gives you your rights, man can also take those same rights away from you at a later time? Have you ever even thought that one out at all?
.
Nothing short of unbelievable.

There’s too many so-called Christians that don’t act like they REALLY believe in a Supreme Being who will come back at some point and “kick some serious booty”.
.
Or, at the very least, they seem to think that, like politics, it’s not what you actually DO that counts, it’s what you say you’ll do (and whether or not you belong to the right “clubs”). I guess they think that their election promises will get them in – NOT whether or not they actually delivered on them.
.
Funny, but MY copy of the Bible doesn’t read that way.

gumonass,
.
“David Vitter’s poll numbers aren’t the only things sinking today in Washington.”
.
Are you nuts? Current Polls show Vetter with over a 19.5% lead.
.
I don’t support Vetter but the people of Louisiana do.
.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/la/louisiana_senate_vitter_vs_melancon-1095.html

Well, they did elect Edwin Edwards once whose campaign slogan was “Vote for the crook… it’s important.”
.
But the fact that his opponent was David Duke may have had a little to do with the appropriateness of that slogan too.

“You people are truly disturbed and stupid indeed. Have you ever heard that if man gives you your rights, man can also take those same rights away from you at a later time? Have you ever even thought that one out at all?”
.
I thought that was evident to everyone. Its why you have people complaining about the patriot act. Its why Nazis were able to revoke rights all the time. Hell, everyone knows its possible to kill someone, keep someone from being happy or pursuing happiness, or enslave another person.
.
inalienable rights are hardly inalienable. It just sounds good. Its a good justification. There’s no such thing as natural rights, which is why if you want rights you have to be willing to protect them every day of your life.

Have you ever even thought that one out at all?
.
Yup.
.
…if man gives you your rights, man can also take those same rights away from you at a later time..
.
Yup. We only have the rights that we choose to extend to or retract from each other.
.
That’s why the Preamble goes:

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Sad that you don’t know that, rustyblog.

Yep, the country works only to the degree we mutually agree to not start turning on each other.
.
Like now… maybe why things aren’t working so well?
.
Half the country thinks the other half doesn’t deserve to be here.

It was tongue in cheek innuendo… I have full confidence that this won’t actually change enough minds.

“Here is a question for you hippo. If “God” or the “Creator” (which is in the Declaration of Independence) is removed, and it isn’t Buddah, Allah, Jehova or any other deity, who then gives you your rights as defined in the Constitution?”
.
When did Jesus say that he gave you the rights to free speech?
.
Before or after he said “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”.
.
In gods 10 commandments where are the specifics of the constitution mentioned?
.
We’ve (humanity) lived under tyranny and under democracy. Before and after the constitution. The constitution and your rights are not a unique concept. What makes the right?
.
We do
.
The declaration of independence is the concept of selfdetermination. And it’s a prelude to the constitution as it defines the responsibility to safeguard our government – us – have to it’s people.
.
Here are some news for you. We’re not the only country with a defined codified constitution. Other nations have them too. And they didn’t need a particular creator to come up with them. All they needed was the humanistic concept of that we’re all created equal. Warts and all. Who created us? Jehova, Buddah, Allah…ma and pa or the great cookie monster?
.
I don’t know.
.
Does that change the definition of our rights? No it doesn’t.

You people are truly disturbed and stupid indeed. Have you ever heard that if man gives you your rights, man can also take those same rights away from you at a later time? Have you ever even thought that one out at all?

Have you never heard of prison? How is it that the society of man can take away a person’s rights of any sort by sending him to prison or sentencing him to death? Have you ever even thought that one out at all? No? Not surprised.

“Have you ever heard that if man gives you your rights, man can also take those same rights away from you at a later time?”
.
Well Dad used to say that he brought me into this world and he could take me out.

Always love that one, shep.
.
Since ALL parents seem to use it, it’s got to be in the “parents’ handbook” somewhere, with a copyright waiver saying they can use it all they want without attribution..

er, um, ah, ditto.

“Since ALL parents seem to use it, it’s got to be in the “parents’ handbook” somewhere, with a copyright waiver saying they can use it all they want without attribution..”
.
At least. After all, they’re our Creators, shouldn’t they have some inalienable rights too?

No, that was not me.
.
I replied to his hi s giving porkdumpling a spanking.
.
Besides, spankings is what the two of you live for.
.
http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/09/28/obamas-new-tone-inexcusable-irresponsible/
.
Read it again.
.
Reading, writing, math, biology, geology, economics, history, law, the constitution and climatology are among the weak points you have.

” There are around 50 posts of juvenile cracks…”
.
First, only a radical ideologue would support a candidate who was caught in a whorehouse. Democrats had lost all respect for Spitzer the moment he was caught. So, this is a non-serious post of the most part intended for dirty jokes.
.
Second, neither one of you are exactly nuns here. You have been crude often and juvenile nearly all of the time.

“gumonass,”
.
Mr. Magoo – 3X,
,
You just, by default, gave everybody permission to make fun of your handle since you do not hold the high ground anymore on that verbal equivalent of tossing a pillow at somebody’s head.

Thomas Jefferson, who is the closest to modern conservatives (as Lincoln, who wanted radical change through abolition of slavery would be the closest to a modern liberal – as the parties slowly began to switch stands between the Civil War and the New Deal) as a deist did not want the word “God” used. Pre-Darwin, there were fewer atheists/agnostics, but more deists.
.
“Creator” was chosen as to support the separation of Church and State. God was intentionally left out.

Although no longer the case, during the time of the Revolutionary War, religion was associated with monarchy.
.
“The Divine Right of Kings is a political and religious doctrine of royal absolutism. It asserts that a monarch is subject to no earthly authority, deriving his right to rule directly from the will of God. The king is thus not subject to the will of his people, the aristocracy, or any other estate of the realm, including (in the view of some, especially in Protestant countries) the church. According to this doctrine, since only God can judge an unjust king, the king can do no wrong. The doctrine implies that any attempt to depose the king or to restrict his powers runs contrary to the will of God and may constitute heresy.”
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_right_of_kings
.
The idea of Christianity being inherently democratic is revisionist history.
.
Obviously there are, for all practical purposes, no more Christian believers who believe in the Divine Right of Monarchs, but, our founding fathers were not favored by the traditional religious conservatives of that time.
.
Once again, I am not saying that Christianity is nor ever should have been opposed to democracy, but, it is not inherently democratic. Democracy is about people agreeing to share power amongst one another as equals given the right to govern by the governed from the homeless man to the billionaires standing as equals under the law with no need for any deities to be involved unless divine inspiration makes one chose how to vote. (Forgive me, if I am wrong, but, if there is a omnipotent god and he wants one person or another to be president, member of congress, etc, etc, couldn’t he divinely inspire people to vote for the right person? I would think so. And if so, all elected officials or blessed by God. If not, none are.)

.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1736687,00.html
Yes, justice is served. As usual, the john (Vitter) escapes justice. The madame he used to get his diaper service faced up to 55 years in prison and committed suicide.
His wife, I am sure, could live quite comfortably with out Vitter. Why in h*ll would she stay with him?

Sad story, Apr.
.
Thanks for the link.

Marxism socialism treason tyranny the destruction of America versus an encounter with a call girl ? Hmmmmm……

The hypocrisy of liberals (aka Democrats) never ceases to amaze me.
And when are the Dems going to debate issues instead of mudslinging? Answer: NEVER. They can’t win in the arena of ideas.

Is Stormy Daniels still running for Louisiana State Senator?

I wrote her book, but I have been able to keep up with her.

Thomas Chi
Published
Vote for Stormy Daniels by Deborah Palfrey