In the Arena

Election Road Trip, Day 21: Antipathy to Celebration

Sebastopol, California

Traveling companions: none

Event: dinner at the Iron Horse vineyard

First, I’m an idiot. I can not walk and chew gum at the same time. With still photographer Peter Van Agtmael having departed–for Iran!–I have been tasked with taking photos of the trip with my iPhone. I keep forgetting. This was especially tragic yesterday as I visited–courtesy of reader Phil Grosse–one of the more idyllic places on the face of the earth and had my first home-cooked meal in three weeks, a sumptuous event punctuated by ridiculously fresh and entirely home-grown fruits and vegetables.

The vegetable-grower is Barry Sterling. He and his wife, Audrey, are the parents of Joy Sterling, who runs the vineyard these days. All three are committed and active Democrats. But their wine-selling is nonpartisan. An Iron Horse sparkling wine was used when Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev toasted at the White House in 1985. An Iron Horse wine has been served, on occasion, at White House state dinners hosted by every President since. (There’s a certain irony to Reagan bringing Iron Horse to the White House: Audrey was the chair of California’s Fair Employment Practices Commission, which was defunded when Reagan became governor. “I wrote him a very angry letter and resigned,” she says.)

Barry was not always a farmer. He was a lawyer before he wised up. “I was tired of dealing with abstractions. I wanted to make something real,” he says. “I figured that if we couldn’t sell it, we’d drink it.” He also started growing fruits and vegetables. “I have 300 varieties of tomatoes on the property,” he said, “and I’d have more, if the kids would let me.” Dinner was served in their lovely home, an 1876 Victorian. By dessert, all their products–and much of their produce–had been tasted (in moderation).

The Sterlings are not only strong Obama supporters, they’re also Nancy Pelosi Democrats–friends of the Speaker. They run their business with rigor and honor. “We take care of our employees,” Joy said. Audrey quickly added that they were one of the few wineries that offered their workers health insurance. But that hasn’t been easy. A few years ago, their traditional insurers–Growers Insurance (a subsidiary of Blue Cross)–said they’d only continue coverage if each policy had a $5000 deductible. “Essentially, they threw us out,” Barry says. Happily, Kaiser Permanente was willing to take them on at a similar rate.

Business hasn’t been fabulous the past few years. Joy travels the country, selling her products, and finds that traffic is spotty in the high-end restaurants that carry Iron Horse. “They’ll be full on Wednesday, empty on Thursday. It’s entirely unpredictable. Given the troubles in the country, there’s an antipathy to anything involved with celebration. We produce a product that’s a drink of optimism. There isn’t a lot of optimism out there right now.”

Barry said he was deeply worried about the country. “I was born on the day of the 1929 stock market crash, so I’ve lived from the Great Depression to the Great Recession,” he said, “and I must say I’m amazed by how little progress we’ve made. We stopped regulating. We dropped taxes to unsustainable levels. I spent a good part of my life in the 70% tax bracket. It didn’t discourage me from working,” he said, referring to the supply-side argument that lower tax rates spur enterprise. “It made me work harder. My father lived with 90% rates during World War II. I’m actually mystified by the greed now. I don’t understand families like Koch brothers,” he said referring to the Republican Tea Party bankrollers. “They have so much money. Why do they need more?”

This post is part of my Election Road Trip 2010 project. To track my location across the country, and read all my road trip posts, click here.
Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • afguy

    “They have so much money. Why do they need more?”
    .
    It’s not about need any more… it’s about keeping score. And the deal itself. And winning.
    .
    Back in the ’20′s, one of the tycoons was asked how much money was enough for him. His reply was, “Just one dollar more.”

  • destor23

    First, color me jealous. Iron Horse Wedding Cuvee is awesome.

    Second, more seriously… A lot of employers out there don’t feel “thrown out” by an insurance program with a $5,000 deductible. Indeed, they seem to think it’s entirely an appropriate “benefit” for their employees.

    You’re just at the tip of how bad employers have been to America’s workers over the last decade. That, at some point, has to change.

  • kvsebastopol

    I actually work for the Sterlings at Iron Horse and feel very lucky to be able to come to a job every day at this winery. Plus the tomatoes and wine are quit delicious.

  • petalumaphil

    Echoing destore23, yes, Wedding Cuvee is awesome. But you know this by now.

    I’m so glad you visited with the lovely Sterling family. It’s so wonderful in this time of greed and divisiveness to find folks who want to take care of their workers, don’t mind paying their fair share to live in this wonderful country, and not only don’t mind, but actively seek out opportunities to benefit their neighbors and their society.

    And make a mighty fine wine, too.

    Phil Grosse

  • grape_crush

    First, I’m an idiot.

    Any bets on who takes a swing at that first?

    “They have so much money. Why do they need more?”

    I dunno if it’s just about the money.

    The Koch brothers transferred their father’s guilt from working for Stalin and subsequent hate of Communists on to a strong dislike of any government role in everyday life. One might say that they are still trying to please their Daddy, but it’s equally as likely that their activism is based on financial self-interest and/or various Libertarian delusions.

  • destor23

    Remember, David Koch lives in NYC. $17 billion is like lower middle class here.

  • grape_crush

    Actually, I just remembered something in that [New Yorker profile of the Kochs]:

    Gus diZerega, the former friend, suggested that the Kochs’ youthful idealism about libertarianism had largely devolved into a rationale for corporate self-interest. He said of Charles, “Perhaps he has confused making money with freedom.”

  • allthingsinaname

    Sorry Joe, your trip seems pointless to me; full of fluff.

  • afguy

    But is he Sordid™?

  • grape_crush

    But is he Sordid?
    .
    Excellent at-bat.
    .
    Considering he’s having trouble with a camera, could you say he’s a Polaroidid idiot?
    .
    If the picture he takes is fuzzy, could you say he’s a distorted idiot?

  • afguy

    Considering he’s having trouble with a camera, could you say he’s a Polaroidid idiot?
    .
    grape,
    .
    Let’s see if I can “fine-tune” the name-calling a little…
    .
    How about Polaroidiot?
    .
    If the picture he takes is fuzzy, could you say he’s a distorted idiot?
    .
    Does “fuzziot” sound better?
    .
    Either of those roll off of the tongue a little better?
    .
    If so, glad I could help… you can send the financial “honorarium” to my home address. ;-)

  • stuartzechman

    Joe Klein:
    .
    You write:

    …they were one of the few wineries that offered their workers health insurance. But that hasn’t been easy.
    .
    A few years ago, their traditional insurers–Growers Insurance (a subsidiary of Blue Cross)–said they’d only continue coverage if each policy had a $5000 deductible. “Essentially, they threw us out,” Barry says.
    .
    Happily, Kaiser Permanente was willing to take them on at a similar rate.

    , which suggests that you’re happy (along with Iron Horse’s employees) that the folks who work there are lucky enough not to shell out big-time, along with the winery, for their medical expenses.
    .
    It seems as if you’re enthusiastic about employees not having to bear the burden of shopping around with their own –and not their employers’– money for health care.
    .
    That’s odd, because, during the health care legislative debate in October of 2009, you wrote this:

    The only way to create health-care reform that will survive and be popular is to write a bill that doesn’t stint on funding and promises to control future costs. The best way to do that is to end the $250 billion in subsidies the Federal Government pays to employees who receive corporate health-care benefits — benefits that aren’t taxed.
    .
    The money would be better, and more fairly, spent giving people tax credits to pay for health care, according to their income. This would have the additional benefit of controlling insurance costs, since people are more likely to shop for the best deal if they’re spending their own money rather than their employer’s.
    .
    The idea is a nonstarter, however, because organized labor has negotiated excellent health benefits for its members over the years and doesn’t want to see them curbed. The unions are opposed to the next-best idea — a tax on gold-plated health-care plans, which would raise an estimated $28.7 billion per year — for similar reasons.
    .
    Read more: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1932981,00.html#ixzz10l0mW8An

    , which suggests that you’re in favor of high deductible insurance as a matter of policy –that whole “magic of the market, individuals shopping for best price” thing you espouse.
    .
    So, on the one hand, you visit a small business that you laud for finding “gold-plated” health insurance for their employees, and on the other, you propose that these very same employees pay taxes on these very same insurance benefits as if it was salaried income, so they can have more “skin in the game,” somehow “controlling insurance costs,” as you put it.
    .
    Is the wisest health care policy that which taxes employees’ benefits, and therefore promotes $5000 deductible plans, “since people are more likely to shop for the best deal if they’re spending their own money rather than their employer’s,” or is it the policy that does not discourage the folks who work for Iron Horse to spend their own money on the wildly over-priced health care, as if they were insurers negotiating with providers?
    .
    According to your opinion circa last year, you should be telling those employees to suck it up, accept the $5000 deductible, and “shop for the best deal,” not slapping Iron Horse on the back for managing to get them “gold-plated health-care plans” at a comparable price.
    .
    Well, Joe Klein?
    .
    Which is it?
    .
    Should Americans be required to shop for health care in today’s market with their own money, or not?

  • apr2563

    Bravo.
    Klein seems to have some attention deficit. He flips and flops more than most politicians.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Joe, you’re really channeling Steinbeck here.

  • afguy

    Not complaining, mind you…
    .
    But why aren’t there more “t_rds in the punchbowl” right now?
    .
    The quiet is almost… blissful….
    .
    OMG… did I just jinx it??

  • destor23

    UR A Librul Scoombag!

    Better?

  • stewartiii

    NewsBusters: TIME’s Joe Klein Profiles Liberal Vineyard Owner Practically Pining for Days of Higher Taxes
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2010/09/27/times-joe-klein-profiles-tax-rich-winery-owner

  • afguy

    Thanx, destor… I needed that!

  • herby002

    Joe – a question:
    “Audrey quickly added that they were one of the few wineries that offered their workers health insurance. But that hasn’t been easy. A few years ago, their traditional insurers–Growers Insurance (a subsidiary of Blue Cross)–said they’d only continue coverage if each policy had a $5000 deductible. “Essentially, they threw us out,” Barry says. Happily, Kaiser Permanente was willing to take them on at a similar rate.”

    Am I right that the “similar rate” from Kaiser is about the same as what they paid to previous Blue Cross rates, before Blue Cross attempted to shaft them?

    Note: Blue Cross is one of the California companies that told their private coverage subscribers last year that their rates would be increased up to 39% – with only 30 days notice – and said the policies might face more hikes “as needed” during the next year.

  • herby002

    And, Joe –

    ‘Big Lots’, a discount retail chain in California (and other states), has digital cameras for sale this week @ $40. TIME can afford that, right?
    Failing that option, they could probably ship you an old camera from the stockroom, left over from the glory days of LIFE photo spreads. You can still load & unload film rolls, right? Kodak still makes that stuff. Please don’t take the exposed rolls to Walmart for developing; Costco treats their employees decently. Or you could find local shops, who would be glad for your business, and would probably send your photos on to a post office further up on your travels, care of “general delivery”. ;-)

  • http://soquelbythecreek.blogspot.com/ Soquel by the Creek

    Oh yes, that magical time when had a 70% marginal tax bracket. Did it deliver a gusher of new-found federal revenue? No. Federal revenues remain relatively stable regardless of high marginal tax rates. The high marginal tax rate simply changes behavior. It modifies investment behavior, changes compensation schemes, adds to regulatory compliance costs, and discourages productivity once you hit the income threshold.

    Certainly, if more government and more taxation were the answer, then the United States and especially California would be unshakable, powerhouse economies.

    Do you want to see how wealthy Pelosi Democrats really spend their money? Then look no further than those funding California’s antidemocratic Proposition 27. It’s quite revealing. Oh, the hypocrisy.

    Proposition 27 Revealed!
    http://soquelbythecreek.blogspot.com/2010/09/proposition-27-revealed.html

    What a surprise! There are at least two vineyard owners among the list of well-connected, big-money contributors.

    http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/irNzPYoCZfYe6mlT53qy6Q

    Be a dear and pass the cabernet.

    As for the Koch brothers, they are not alone in attempting to distort the democratic process. George Soros is on that billionaires list, too!

    Capital Rivals: Koch Brothers vs. George Soros
    http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle—koch-brothers.html

    Oh wait, George Soros also funds Proposition 27 just like media billionaire Haim Saban.

    But I’m sure both must be lovely people because they’re Democrats.</sarcasm>

  • fnabors

    Greedy? Who is more greedy: 1. people who want to keep what they have earned, or 2. people who want to take what they have not earned from others? It’s easy for him to talk about raising tax rates on income. He’s already made his millions. The last time the tax rate was 70% was 30 years ago, when he was 50 years old, and that rate applied to people making over $200k, equivalent to $600k today. If Mr. Sterling has any diary entries from 30-40 years ago in relation to the taxes he was paying, I’d love it if he’d publish verbatim what he said back then. I would bet (oops, I don’t have any money to bet with) that he wasn’t saying how happy he was to be paying for the wonderful good works of Washington DC. If Mr. Sterling is so displeased with the low tax rate, why doesn’t he just send an extra hunk of his money to Washington every month? Why is he discontented unless he and his friends take our money too?

  • chazmartel

    If Mr. Sterling truly wishes to return to the days of 90% tax rates, nothing is stopping him. He can pay all the money he wants in taxes. He could voluntarily put himself into that exclusive 100% tax bracket! Why doesn’t he? Why is he being so greedy?

  • 123shall

    One wonders if liberals like Klein will ever understand the equal moral footing of big government programs being just as greed-driven as corporate power building.
    Of course, consumers have the option of not buying a product from a corporation, but they have no recourse to paying their taxes (unless they are a Democrat who doesn’t get caught.)
    Funny how that works, ain’t it?

  • conversefive

    Yes, there is absolutely no reason this gentleman should not be paying 70% in taxes. Who is to stop him? He can stop taking any deductions on his 1040 and simply write a check for 70, 80, 90 or 100% of his income should he choose! He along with all of his very wealthy socialist friends! Further, if this gentleman is not paying the 70% thinks he should, then who is he to call anyone greedy? I for one resent that. Until these wealthy socialists (George Soros, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates and the Google moguls) who call for higher income taxes stop hiding their income, taking deductions and start paying what they think “the wealthiest among us” should pay (oh, except them, of course) they should stop calling others “greedy.”

  • nocosmologist

    Ah, the good old days of 70% (and more!) tax rates. Double digit inflation, unemployment and interest rates. Gas lines and Jimmy Carter. It was such a wonderful time.

    Yes, by all means let’s go back to that.

  • 123shall

    Oh, no… wealth distribution is promised AFTER they die. They are obviously martyrs.

  • ertdfg

    You want to take most of other people’s income for your personal whims and goals; and they’re greedy for not giving you all their money?

    Um, any chance you could find a dictionary, or a shred of common sense, or a hospital to check you for a head injury?

    I guess the least greedy person in the world is the mugger int eh alley; looking to take funds from others and redistribute it against their will; how noble, how compassionate, what a role model.

    Those evil greedy people who don’t like being mugged are the villains here; right? Or is that somehow different? Seems pretty much the same to me.

  • http://soquelbythecreek.blogspot.com/ Soquel by the Creek

    For those that feel that they unfairly benefit from the Bush Tax Cut (or the Reagan Tax Cut, or the Kennedy Tax Cut), I have put together a short but helpful information site that describes how you can legally contribute more to the United States government and also receive some well-deserved recognition.

    Useful Information for Under-taxed Taxpayers
    http://soquelbythecreek.blogspot.com/2010/09/useful-information-for-under-taxed.html

    Please, give generously!

blog comments powered by Disqus