“Barbarians at the Gate: The GOP’s Health Reform Plan”

My colleague Jeff Kluger, who covers health and science, has penned an impassioned defense of the Affordable Care Act, inspired by his kids’ reaction to his recent outpatient surgery. An excerpt is below. Full piece here. Discuss.

I had a bit of surgery last week. It wasn’t much — the kind of outpatient operation that would once have had me hospitalized for three or four days, but with new, less invasive procedures, had me in and out in five hours. When I arrived home, my daughters (ages 7 and 9) met me at the door dressed in doctor outfits — a sweet welcome that made me smile. Before they provided me any make-believe care, however, the 7-year-old handed me a sheaf of homemade forms and said, “Please, sign these.” I’m not making this up.

My daughters are too young to know anything but a health care industry in which no visit to a doctor’s office can begin without a flurry of forms, a question about your health insurance and the ritual xeroxing of your card for safekeeping. Much of this — though certainly not all — is a result of our nation’s patchwork of coverage and plans as well as our lack of a coherent system of electronic medical records.

But my daughters — and everyone else’s sons and daughters — are at least growing up in an era in which a real (and admittedly imperfect) step had been taken toward changing things, with the signing of President Obama’s signature health-reform law six months ago.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • nflfoghorn

    Their health reform plan = destroying and circumventing the new law. Can they honestly do that and get away with it?

  • afguy

    They probably think so.
    .
    After all, the mindset is that ANYTHING they try is not illegal until the “Gang of Five” on the USSC say they can’t.
    .
    And, even then, they always have the option of legislatively refusing to fund some of the provisions, making them toothless or ineffectual.
    .
    I’m afraid we have some very bad times ahead.

  • newfreedomblog

    Gee, if you believed everything you read right here in the swamp, let alone all of the other lies which our esteemed lame stream media tell, Republicans are against any healthcare reform, and only want to harm you meme is really, REALLY getting old these days.
    .
    First fact. The Affordability and Care Act of 2009 is nothing short of the worst piece of legislation ever enacted into law. It does absolutely NOTHING to go after the real problem with our healthcare system, cost. Why is that so difficult for those of you on the left who want to continue this charade?
    .
    Second fact. ACA does not provide more care to people, it simply redistributes wealth so people who currently are not able to purchase healthcare, are not insured by their employers or people who just do not give a damn are still not covered. This does not even come into play until 2014 at the earliest time period and then the question begs to be answered how will it be paid for if not for HUGE tax increases on those of us who pay taxes into our bloated big government?
    .
    Third fact. The dream of an all inclusive, “Medicare for all” insurance program funded by the government is nothing short of socialized medicine. The same form of government sponsored insurance program seen in places like Great Britain and Canada which are quickly showing major failures, and increasingly look like they will never be sustainable.
    .
    What Republicans have been saying, what they plan to do is implement policies which drive down the cost of healthcare. Drive down the cost of insurance, and then people can chose whether they want to roll the dice and not get healthcare insurance, or pull out their wallets and pay for it. But, our socialized Democrat friends want to tell you what you should and shouldn’t do. These elitist in our society believe they know what is best for all of us, rather than to promote individual responsibility and freedom.
    .
    Again. Get out of my business. Get out of my life. Let me decide what is best for myself and my family. I do not need a bunch of 1960′s flower children to tell me now what is best for me. Get your own life on track first, then come back and talk to me about mine.

  • charlieromeobravo

    I would really like to see how the Republicans would sell the idea of reinstating preexisting conditions, lifetime benefit caps, revoking greater access to insurance for everyone, etc…
    .
    It’s a fun game they’ve been playing with healthcare reform: lying about death panels, calling it socialized medicine, lying about national healthcare implementation and results in other countries, driving down public support with misinformation then claiming the idea has no public support, “negotiating” with Democratic leadership to stall votes until more politically difficult times, promising to revoke what little did pass even though the likely hood of that happening is slim to none.
    .
    Can we just call congressional conservatives what they are? Regressives, the opposite of progressives.

  • afguy

    Tell me, Rusty…
    .
    Do you drive to work in the morning or just “teleport” yourself across space by the force of your own mind and avoid those public access items the rest of us mere mortals use to get around?
    .
    What a clueless, completely self-absorbed, jerk…

  • charlieromeobravo

    “Gee, if you believed everything you read right here in the swamp, let alone all of the other lies which our esteemed lame stream media tell, Republicans are against any healthcare reform, and only want to harm you meme is really, REALLY getting old these days.”

    I might be tempted to agree with you except that Republicans didn’t offer any alternative ideas of their own last year when the legislation was being crafted and didn’t negotiate in good faith to influence the legislation, only to stall the votes and kill it with misinformation.

  • nflfoghorn

    “First fact: The Affordability and Care Act of 2009 is nothing short of the worst piece of legislation ever enacted into law”
    .
    .
    Your opinion doesn’t necessarily = a fact. In your case your “fact” is not a fact at all.
    .
    Second and Third “Facts” fall under the same partisan reasoning.

  • liberalmeltdown

    Let’s call progressives what they are: progressively worse.

    So what’s in Obamacare? You don’t even know, still.

    You still don’t know that Keynesian economics doesn’t work.

    60% of people don’t want Obamacare. The cost continues to rise. There will be less care. Adding more people to a system without adding more doctors results in poorer care and more expensive. Just because in your dreamland you don’t want it too, doesn’t mean jack.

  • newfreedomblog

    “Can they honestly do that and get away with it?”

    .
    You betcha!!
    .
    Wait until we take your food stamps and defund all the rest of the entitlement programs you are currently on sucking the life out of this country.
    .
    You just might have to go out and get a JOB for a change. How are you at flipping burgers, foggy?

  • freeinpa

    Key to the entire message:
    .
    “admittedly imperfect) step had been taken toward changing things, with the signing of President Obama’s signature health-reform law six months ago”
    .
    Admittedly imperfect which is probably the understatement of the year. If you were foolish enough to believe the premises on which this “imperfect” intrusion on taxpayers was based, you quickly come to the conclusion its not misunderstood, they were all lies.
    .
    Everyone is not covered
    .
    It did not bend the cost curve
    .
    Services will be cut
    .
    It will add to the deficit
    .
    You cannot keep your insurance or doctor if you want, its only if the government allows it.
    .
    Fall out has begun: Children only policies are being dropped, costs are rising and that is the beginning

  • nflfoghorn

    ‘Don’t know everything about HCR but I know enough to know that it will do us more good than harm (but I guess the article did nothing for you anyway).
    .
    The rate of new doctors may or may not be enough to keep up with demand, but the vast majority of patients will be needing preventative care, not surgeries. Therefore costs should be held in check. Notice I didn’t say ‘costs will go down’ but it’ll be a lot slower than it used to be.

  • nflfoghorn

    Meet Freep, the walking talking point.

  • afguy

    Fall out has begun: Children only policies are being dropped, costs are rising and that is the beginning
    .
    Not sure a lot of this can TRULY be blamed on the legislation itself, Free.
    .
    But it does make for a nice, convenient excuse for doing something they were going to do anyway.
    .
    And they’ll have an excuse to raise the rates again when they add that coverage back in.
    .
    Nice racket they have there…

  • grape_crush

    First fact…(blahblah-blah)…It does absolutely NOTHING to go after the real problem with our healthcare system, cost…(blahblah-blah)…
    .
    False. Examples of controlling costs would be some of the new fraud controls or providing funding for prevention and public health programs or overpaying on Medicare Advantage plans.
    .
    Second fact. ACA does not provide more care to people…(blahblah-blah)…This does not even come into play until 2014
    .
    False. For example, the ACA’s provisions prevent insurance companies from denying coverage to children under the age of 19 due to a pre-existing condition. Starting tomorrow.
    .
    http://www.healthcare.gov/law/timeline/
    .
    Third fact….(blahblah-blah)…The same form of government sponsored insurance program seen in places like Great Britain and Canada which are quickly showing major failures, and increasingly look like they will never be sustainable.
    .
    False. Great Britain’s NHS (began in 1948) and the Canadian single payer system (1966) are supported by taxes. It’s not insurance. Sure, they need tweaking as times change, but nowhere near to the extent that ours in the US does.

  • charlieromeobravo

    “Everyone is not covered”
    .
    This is true, but this was not promised.
    .
    “It did not bend the cost curve”
    .
    This is debatable on paper, but only time will tell.
    .
    “Services will be cut”
    .
    Also debatable but not likely based on the analyses I’ve read.”
    .
    “It will add to the deficit”
    .
    Not true. No one with any degree of independence believes this.
    .
    “You cannot keep your insurance or doctor if you want, its only if the government allows it.”
    .
    Not true. Anyone who know anything about the AHA believes this except the magical thinking conservatives.
    .
    “Fall out has begun: Children only policies are being dropped, costs are rising and that is the beginning”
    .
    Costs have already been rising. If we get a net increase of people with insurance coverage, that’s a win. No one can reasonably expect costs to go down 6 months after the bill is signed. Most of the provision don’t kick in for years.

  • freeinpa

    “Meet Freep, the walking talking point”
    .
    And they have the advantage of all being true which makes it easier for the folks on the left to dismiss it as “talking points” rather than the fallacy and lies that this crappy bill was sold.
    .
    .
    “Not sure a lot of this can TRULY be blamed on the legislation itself, Free.”
    .
    . Sebelius seems to think so, hence the threatening letters to silence the companies.
    .
    .
    “Nice racket they have there.”

    America, What a country eh Afguy!

  • charlieromeobravo

    “And they have the advantage of all being true…”
    .
    Not even close. Half your points are only true in magical conservative talking point land.

  • afguy

    Wait until we take your food stamps and defund all the rest of the entitlement programs you are currently on sucking the life out of this country.
    .
    You just might have to go out and get a JOB for a change. How are you at flipping burgers, foggy?

    .
    “Have they no prisons… have they no workhouses? Better that they go ahead and die and decrease the surface population.”
    .
    Nice vision of a nation you have there, Ebenezer. One lump of coal or two?

  • freeinpa

    “”It will add to the deficit”
    .
    “It did not bend the cost curve”
    .
    This is debatable on paper, but only time will tell.
    .
    Not true. No one with any degree of independence believes this.
    .
    .
    Well Obama has admitted both and has finally fessed up.
    .
    “”You cannot keep your insurance or doctor if you want, its only if the government allows it.”
    .
    Not true. Anyone who know anything about the AHA believes this except the magical thinking conservatives.
    .
    Already happening. See what is happening with Medicare Advantage.
    .
    .
    Repeating your hopeful outcomes over and over and clicking your heels three times won’t make them not true. Not will flimsy time will tell. either They are all happening now and that is why Dems who voted for it are running away from it.

  • freeinpa

    Sorry and you keep denying them doesn’t make them not true. But maybe with the new HC you can get help with your delusions

  • stuartzechman

    Kate Pickert:
    .
    Jeff Kluger, who covers health and science
    .
    That’s funny, for someone who “covers” health, he doesn’t seem to have a basic understanding of what our system actually is.
    .
    He writes:

    Once again, for the 12 millionth time: if you don’t require people to buy insurance, no one will bother to do so until they get sick, meaning that the insurance business becomes all risk, no profit. How’s free-market coverage going to work then?

    But, of course, we don’t have “free-market coverage” in this country.
    .
    We have a system of legally sanctioned, state-based, regulated (more or less, depending on the state) cartels and virtual monopolies, whose business customers get a tax break designed to influence firms to buy their products at industry-fixed prices…and that’s just the private system. Medicare (and Medicare Advantage) and Medicaid are the other 40-plus % of the system, according to HHS’ CMS reports.
    .
    How can Jeff Kluger possibly say that this system is somehow “free market coverage” with a straight face?
    .
    It might not be socialized health care, like in Britain, or single-payer state insurance, like in Canada, but it sure as hell isn’t “free market coverage.”
    .
    Jeff Kluger is bizarrely unaware that he’s asking the patently absurd question “How’s free-market coverage going to work?,” if the state doesn’t also mandate market behavior by law. Does he really not know what he’s saying?
    .
    Well, gee whiz, Jeff Kluger, maybe it isn’t actually “free-market coverage” for the state to guarantee profits for favored industries, you know? Or maybe that term doesn’t mean what he thinks it means?
    .
    How is an individual who is this incoherent considered an expert on these matters, Kate Pickert?
    .
    If he’s such an expert, I take it that Jeff Kluger must have been writing column after column denouncing this poor dope for making such irresponsible claims as this:

    OBAMA: Let’s break down what she really means by a mandate. What’s meant by a mandate is that the government is forcing people to buy health insurance and so she’s suggesting a parent is not going to buy health insurance for themselves if they can afford it. Now, my belief is that most parents will choose to get health care for themselves and we make it affordable.
    .
    Here’s the concern. If you haven’t made it affordable, how are you going to enforce a mandate. I mean, if a mandate was the solution, we can try that to solve homelessness by mandating everybody to buy a house. The reason they don’t buy a house is they don’t have the money. And so, our focus has been on reducing costs, making it available. I am confident if people have a chance to buy high-quality health care that is affordable, they will do so. That’s what our plan does and nobody disputes that.


    .
    Wow, what a “barbarian at the gate,” huh? Just listen to how unreasonable and uninformed that demagogue sounds. No serious person would ever agree with that sort of brainless populist, fantasy-land, “all-dessert policy menu” policy!
    .
    Obviously he didn’t listen to geniuses like Jeff Kluger tell him “for the 12 millionth time” how “free-market coverage” works, right, Kate Pickert?
    .
    But maybe Jeff Kluger wasn’t writing such things during the time when it mattered, when Democrats and Independents were being sold on a candidate who expressly ran on the rank stupidity of policy that solved the high health care cost problem by getting more customers to insurance companies —therefore guaranteeing profits.
    .
    What was he writing, Kate Pickert? On what subjects did Jeff Kluger cast his impressive expertise?
    .
    Why look!
    .
    He wrote “The Science of Romance: Why We Love,” Thursday, Jan. 17, 2008, while that debate was raging in the Democratic primary!

    The last time you had sex, there was arguably not a thought in your head. O.K., if it was very familiar sex with a very familiar partner, the kind that–truth be told–you probably have most of the time, your mind may have wandered off to such decidedly nonerotic matters as balancing your checkbook or planning your week…

    Or this spectacular bit of “science and health” coverage, “Does Obama Want to Ground NASA’s Next Moon Mission?,” Thursday, Dec. 11, 2008

    Getting into a shouting match with the HR rep is not exactly the best way to land a job. But according to the Orlando Sentinel, that’s just what happened last week between NASA administrator Mike Griffin and Lori Garver, a member of Barack Obama’s transition team who will help decide if Griffin keeps his post once the President-elect takes office. If the contretemps did occur, it could help doom not only the NASA chief’s chances, but the space agency’s ambitious plans to get Americans back to the moon.

    Wow, what stellar speculation on the basis of a reportedly heated exchange at a Beltway book party!

    The dust-up between Griffin and Garver is said to have occurred last week at a book launch party in Washington when, according to the Sentinel, a red-faced Griffin told Garver she was “not qualified” to make engineering decisions. Horowitz, who was not at the party but knows the NASA boss well, says he doubts that Griffin raised his voice.
    .
    “I think that’s bulls—,” he says.

    Yes, Kate Pickert, I’m sure there’s a Pulitzer down the road for the author of that amazing piece of journalism –”If the contretemps did occur,” of course.
    .
    The question for you is what exactly qualifies Jeff Kluger, the author of the 2008 airport shop sleeper “Simplexity: Why Simple Things Become Complex (and How Complex Things Can Be Made Simple)” to write about health care systems, besides the fact that he’s a TIME “senior writer”?
    .
    This is Jeff Kluger’s resume, from his Wikipedia entry:

    Jeffrey Kluger is a senior writer at TIME Magazine, and author of several books on science topics including Splendid Solution: Jonas Salk and the Conquest of Polio; Simplexity; Journey Beyond Selene; and Lost Moon: The Perilous Voyage of Apollo 13. The latter work was the basis for Ron Howard’s 1995 film Apollo 13.
    .
    From June 1992 to September 1996, Kluger was a staff writer for Discover magazine, writing the humor column “Light Elements”.[1] He also worked as a writer and editor for the New York Times Business World Magazine, the Family Circle magazine, and Science Digest.
    .
    Kluger began his work with TIME in 1996 specializing in science coverage. He was named a senior writer in 1998.[2] During his time at TIME magazine Kluger has written articles covering the Mars Pathfinder landing and the Columbia disaster.
    .
    Kluger was awarded the Whitman Bassow Award by the Overseas Press Club of America in 2002, an award he shared with two other colleagues. The award was given for “best reporting in any medium” on the international issues of global warming.

    Apart from his own declared expertise at “making complex things simple,” what makes Jeff Kluger in any way qualified to comment upon or analyze the politics or problem of health care in the United States, Kate Pickert?
    .
    I mean, what makes him more qualified to write a TIME Magazine piece lecturing us all on how “free-market coverage” is supposed to work, than, say Eve Gittelson at Daily Kos, or David Dayen at Fire Dog Lake, or Ian Welsh at Open Left?
    .
    Or commenters here like Square1, or Shepherdwong, or Cliff, or grape_crush, for that matter?
    .
    I’d like to know what special expertise qualifies this guy to pontificate about how “It’s naive to believe that with the current law — or any law — we’ll ever be living in a health care utopia,” Kate Pickert, as if there’s some constituency out here demanding utopia, instead of real people demanding a health care system that works for them, that makes health care itself affordable –change they can believe in, you might say.
    .
    Well, Kate Pickert?
    .
    Is there something about this person’s record on health care policy I may have missed? Is he some kind of unsung Austin Frakt or Ezra Klein?
    .
    Why on earth –apart from TIME’s obvious editorial policy of talking up this incompetent, center-right health care policy before the November elections– did you link to something by “Jeff Kluger, who covers health and science,” Kate Pickert?

  • afguy

    Sebelius seems to think so, hence the threatening letters to silence the companies.
    .
    Not sure that makes what they say ACTUALLY true, but I’m sure she believes others may actually swallow their rationale for doing it.
    .
    There’s too much being done NOW, ostensibly because of things going to happen down the road.
    .
    That just strikes me as spin and profiteering on their part.
    .
    Simply because they can get away with it…

  • afguy

    Sorry… supposed to have been a reply to 5.5

  • GivenUp

    I’ve always been partial to the description “reactionary.”

  • kjk28

    I’m always a sucker for a cute kid story – this sounds like something my kids would say. However, If I’m reading this correctly, the author believes that the Health Care Plan will do away with most, if not all,of the “flurry of forms” prior to receiving medical care. Is their any evidence that the HCP will reduce paperwork? Is their any evidence that a governmental program has reduced paperwork?

  • freeinpa

    Bend the cost curve
    .
    “– A new government report estimates that the health care overhaul passed in March won’t stem the country’s ballooning medical costs”
    .
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/atlantic/20100910/cm_atlantic/washealthreformworthitreportsaysitwontbendcostcurve4976
    .
    .
    Reduce the deficit
    .
    ” The total budgetary impact of enacting the reconciliation proposal (the amendment to H.R. 4872), the Senate-passed health bill (H.R. 3590), and the Medicare Physicians Payment Reform Act of 2009 (H.R. 3961). CBO estimates that enacting all three pieces of legislation would add $59 billion to budget deficits over the 2010–2019 period.”
    .
    .
    Keeping your doctor and insurance
    .
    “The WSJ report explains that several of the participating insurance companies requested — and were denied by HHS — small increases in their payment rates and permission to make slight cutbacks in services provided. It goes on to explain that this denial is forcing some insurers to drop the business for 2011, and probably even more will for 2012 — thus forcing some participants to change insurers and doctors, whether they want to or not.”

  • freeinpa

    You may be right. But this is not the first group that has been threatened by this administration.

    I agree things are being done now as a consequence of the bill which will mean one of several things: higher costs, lower service or lack of choice of insurance or doctor. I guess that’s the imperfect part of the bill

  • kevin

    That’s right, Rusty. All of us who voted for Obama — 69,500,000 or so Americans — we’re all on welfare.

  • kevin

    You still don’t know that Keynesian economics doesn’t work.
    .
    I know, I know. Aside from the massive economic growth America saw with Keynesian spending in the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s, when has Keynesianism ever been proven to work?
    .
    The Republican way of relying on the magical tax-cut unicorn theory is so much better, as we saw when the last decade saw the first broad-based economic decline in a hundred years.
    .
    http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2010/01/01/GR2010010101478.jpg

  • kevin

    It’s in there, but it’s not set to be implemented until October 2012 in order to give health care providers time to switch over to electronic record keeping.
    .

    Reducing Paperwork and Administrative Costs. Health care remains one of the few industries that relies on paper records. The new law will institute a series of changes to standardize billing and requires health plans to begin adopting and implementing rules for the secure, confidential, electronic exchange of health information. Using electronic health records will reduce paperwork and administrative burdens, cut costs, reduce medical errors and most importantly, improve the quality of care. First regulation effective October 1, 2012.

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/healthreform/timeline
    .
    As for government reducing paperwork, yeah, there have been small efforts to do it before:
    .
    http://www.smallbusinessadvocate.com/small-business-articles/house-acts-to-reduce-paperwork-dot-dot-dot-602

  • afguy

    The fact is that many both so-called “liberals” and “conservatives” HATE this bill but for differing reasons.
    .
    Conservatives for what’s in it – liberals both for what’s in it and what’s NOT in it, and was negotiated away before things even got started.
    .
    So, from my perspective, saying that a majority of Americans disapprove of Health Care Reform, because they hate this bill as written, is more than a little disingenuous.
    .
    Many think it went too far but something was needed – others agree that an overhaul is needed too, but the bill didn’t go far enough in certain areas.
    .
    I have a real problem trusting a bill that was written behind closed doors by a lobbyist for one of the health care giants. It has “bias” written all over it because of crap like that.
    .
    And having some of the legislators thank her for her efforts was just too much!

  • freeinpa

    “So, from my perspective, saying that a majority of Americans disapprove of Health Care Reform, because they hate this bill as written, is more than a little disingenuous.
    .
    Many think it went too far but something was needed – others agree that an overhaul is needed too, but the bill didn’t go far enough in certain areas.”
    .
    I am not sure its disingenuous. The bill stinks. Like it or not incremental changes should have been made first. Medicare is a nightmare and there is no real control over it Rather than building a horse with 3 camel humps they should have addressed what we have. Portability, children coverage then work on the rest a piece at a time. Yes time consuming but look what we have and look where we are headed.
    .
    Yes our profiles in courage (both parties) let lobbyists and staffers write the bill.
    .

  • liberalmeltdown

    Where do you get your information? LaLA land? More patients, same amount of Doctors or less. Some have decided to change careers because of Obamacare. Less incentives for someone to go through the years and expense of medical school, and you come up with prices should be held down. Sure.

    Show me the stats on that massive growth caused by government spending.

  • newfreedomblog

    Based on job loss, this recession has not hit bottom yet, or so the charts show.
    .
    http://thinkery.typepad.com/.a/6a00df3520d4968833011169104eea970c-pi
    .
    The ’81 recession as a result of the poor handling of the economy by the first idiot, Jimmy Carter to hold the White House had much deeper job cuts than today.
    .
    Even Clinton’s recession he handed over to Bush II was not as severe as today, but the recession and recovery period was one of the longest in recent memory, over 48 months.
    .
    Keynesian economics have been thrown out the window on this recession. Despite the record amounts of money Obama has thrown at this recession, we still see no end to the misery. As a matter of fact economists all over are now saying basically “all bets are off”, they have no clue as to what to do. Fact being, we are now seeing Obambis crack team of economists leaving everyday to get out of the burning building he has created.
    .
    Stimulating the economy comes down to creating a climate which small and large business will thrive and grow. What Obama is doing now is not only stifling growth, but is actually making it even worse.
    .
    Then add all of the spending out of control programs Obama has initiated and we are full well on our way to the 1st ever bankruptcy of our country.

  • charlieromeobravo

    The same could be said for your assertions. You’re not providing any evidence, just your opinions. As far as bending the cost curve and adding to the deficit, the GAO is on my side. What are you pointing at to back up your opinion? Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich?

  • afguy

    The bill stinks. Like it or not incremental changes should have been made first.
    .
    Given what I have seen, given the opposition to ANY change on one side and the gutlessness on the other, I don’t have a lot of faith in anyone having the political will to go back and make it better in the future.
    .
    As I’ve said before, it won’t really affect me. I have too many “hereditary” issues that would disqualify me from any cost effective coverage.
    .
    Just hoping for something better for the boys and their families down the road. Just trying to get them through college is going to take all I have on a number of levels.

  • edismeiamhe

    I think while Jeff wasn’t looking during his recent hospital stay, they mistakenly performed a full lobotomy.

    Here’s some observations from the people under the lash of Obama Care:

    President Obama today is proudly touting the success of the biggest disaster of his presidency: ObamaCare.

    The trillion-dollar, government takeover of our health care officially kicks in tomorrow, but it has already had a destructive impact on our economy and health care system.

    Obama’s crowing about his health care debacle shows how totally out of touch he is with the American people. Polls show that 56 percent of likely voters believe that ObamaCare is bad for the United States and 71 percent think the health care law will hurt the economy.

    The facts speak for themselves, here are the top ten failures of ObamaCare after only six months:

    1. Premiums Have Gone Up: Obama promised that families will pay less for their healthcare premiums under his plan. Quite the opposite has happened. Insurance companies are making double-digit rate increases to consumer premiums in anticipation of the cost of new mandates by ObamaCare. The estimated premiums rate increase for consumers is between 1% and 9%, a direct impact from the new regulations.

    2. You Can’t Keep Your Current Plan And Doctor: Businesses will be forced to change their employees’ healthcare plans in order to meet the new regulations. An estimated 69% of businesses will be forced to change their plans, forcing countless millions of Americans to change plans and doctors.

    3. National Budget Deficit Is Worse: Sixty-one percent (61%) of all voters nationwide say the healthcare law will increase the federal deficit.

    4. More Children Are Uninsured: Anthem Blue Cross, Aetna Inc. and other insurance agencies are dropping child-only policies, citing huge, unexpected costs from ObamaCare. An estimated half a million children in the United States will be affected by the policies.

    5. Small Business Taxes Increased: Small businesses—the engine of the U.S. economy—are suffering from increased tax filing regulations and anticipated healthcare mandates. Over 40 million small businesses will be required to file new tax reports for health care. The tax credit for the regulations only covers one-tenth of these business’s losses.

    6. Small Businesses Health Care Burden Increased: Almost half of all smaller employers are anticipating “significant increases in healthcare costs in the short term.” These business owners are likely to cut back on hiring and expansion because they fear a new healthcare burden.

    7. More Government Spending: The Congressional Budget Office has already adjusted the cost for ObamaCare since it passed, adding another $115 billion to the taxpayer’s tab. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has adjusted upwards its cost prediction since the bill took effect from 6.1% per year to 6.3%. By 2019, U.S. spending on health care will reach $4.6 trillion.

    8. Senior Citizens Suffer from Medicare Cuts: The Medicare Advantage program which covers nearly a quarter of seniors will cut plans from $3-$5,000 per beneficiary. Doctors are refusing to take seniors because Medicare only covers part of their bills.

    9. Minorities Get Worse Health Care: ObamaCare forces 16 million Americans into Medicaid, a poorly performing welfare program. The President considers moving Hispanic and blacks into Medicaid an improvement in their healthcare. No one else does.

    10. Democrats Losing Elections: Current polls show that 61% of likely voters want the bill repealed and the Tea Party movement has demonstrated America’s anger toward ObamaCare. The primaries this summer have shown that Americans are voting for members of congress who will repeal Obamacare.

    At the White House Rose Garden bill signing six months ago, Vice President Joe Biden told the President that Obamacare is a “big f—ing deal.” Biden was correct. ObamaCare is a big f—ing deal; it is the death-knell of this liberal presidency.

  • edismeiamhe

    And…that’s the truth…pfffttt

  • diecash1

    Just more garbage from “Human Events”. Were you afraid to post a link to the story edisme? Don’t sweat it. I’ll do it for you:
    ..
    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=39109

  • afguy

    Laugh-In… Lilly Tomlin… right?

  • 53_3

    Rusty, freeinpa, edismeiamhe:
    .
    When enrollment opens, I plan to add my two sons, who are out of the house, working, but have no insurance.
    .
    If you don’t like the fact that I am gong to add them to my employer’s health plan, all I can do is present all of you right wing crackpots this harmonious salute:
    .
    (_).)ppppfffffffttttttt UP YOURS!

    .
    Thank you. That is all.

  • earljr1

    edismeiamhe and free, you are both absolutely correct. Jeff Kluger writes this little fluff piece with NO understanding of how obamacare will negatively impact our health care industry. Our University has had a team of lawyers dissecting this bill ever since the democrats did their little victory dance and guess what? they say it is virtually unmanageable, We know for a fact how many patients we are treating and we are at full capacity now. How Obama and his team of politicians expected us to absorb millions of new patients without serious disruption to our existing infrastructure, is beyond our comprehension. Many of my colleagues cannot and will not, accept new medicare patients because of the uncertainty of this bill and our seniors will be the hardest hit. This is patently unfair to them and you can place the blame squarely on obamacare.. George Meredith once wrote…”More brain, O Lord, more brain! or we shall mar utterly this fair garden we might win” Yes, indeed, this bill was passed so a “victory”? might be claimed and they now own it. It very well could be the albatross that removes them from office, too.

  • 53_3

    Bullsh!t Rusty!
    .
    The recession of ’81 followed years of what is politely termed as “stagflation”.
    .
    I was there. I remember.
    .
    And you are one stoopid idjit…

  • 53_3

    see 13 earljr.
    .
    Up yours.
    .
    That is all.

  • apr2563

    Give me some of that old fashioned “socialized” medicine that:
    provides health insurance for everyone
    has more efficiencies
    has better outcomes
    is less costly for the country

  • apr2563

    Wow Stuart. Bravo!!!!

  • liberalmeltdown

    They don’t get it.

    They just want it, and if you say it can’t happen you are just mean, mean, mean.

    Liberalism, our watered-down piecemeal version of socialism, still relies on a rhetoric of fantasy — and self-righteous fantasy at that. The liberal proposes his dream of, say, national health care; and then he reviles as “inhumane” and “lacking compassion” those who assume the burden of imagining the real consequences.
    -Joseph Sobran

  • freeinpa

    “The same could be said for your assertions. You’re not providing any evidence, just your opinions”
    .
    You could but that would be one more thing you are wrong about. See post #10 Links to government reports and Obama himself fessing up.

  • freeinpa

    diecash1

    Other than your predictable distaste for anything written by conservatives. Which items are wrong? I had links in #10 from government reports and the Messiah himself with several of the same conclusions.

    Face it you bought the line of bull crap and now you are defending lies.

  • freeinpa

    as Edith Ann

  • stuartzechman

    Thanks for taking the time to read through all of that, apr2563.

  • freeinpa

    Wow you are really spanking us today. So I won’t contest. And here is th ereason why:

    Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience

  • diecash1

    Other than your predictable distaste for anything written by conservatives. Which items are wrong?

    I reject your hypothesis. Show me an intelligent piece written by anyone, conservative, liberal or otherwise, and I can respect it.
    ..
    This piece is utter garbage, full of half truths and supposition. For example, take #3 regarding the budget deficit. Some unnamed survey says that 61% of voters believe that it will raise the deficit is fact? Hardly. It’s garbage. ~20% of people believe the sun orbits the earth too though that doesn’t make it a fact.
    ..
    #5 and #6 are strictly supposition without any supporting data.
    ..
    #7 is a prediction and as you’ve said yourself, it’s awfully difficult to predict the financial ramifications over time of something so large.
    ..
    #10 is garbage.
    ..
    I don’t have time to throughly refute this piece as I have other pressing matters and I’ve done so at length to items such as this as you’ve posted before but I’ll say this regarding the premium increases: This law expands HC coverage and the net effect is to provide more comprehensive coverage to more people for slightly more money than we currently spend. You can believe it or not and only time will tell.
    ..
    BTW, have you had a chance to read the Repub “Pledge to America” in the link in Altman’s post yet? I’m curious to see if you find anything useful in it besides the empty platitudes being offered. I think it’s weaker than the ten points in the HE article.

  • liberalmeltdown

    Exactly free.

  • herby002

    13.1 “Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.”
    13.2 “Exactly free.”

    So I won’t.
    ‘Bye, freeinpa & liberalmeltdown.
    I have to go see the Repub Penis to America.

  • kjk28

    Thanks, Kevin. Put me in the “I’ll Believe It When I See It” column.

  • downtown007

    Why would someone as smart as you defend (and honor) US capitalistic helath care over socialized medical care when you look at these number? Please look at Canada and GB who you singled out as having horrible socialized medicine

    Ranking of countries by life expectancy:

    Canada #11
    Great Britain #22 – and other horrible countries who have adopted socialized medicine over the years

    France # 10
    Spain # 6
    Switzerland # 4

    The US is down at # 38 (behind Cuba)

    Sad that you just use stupid Repub rehtorical terms (such as socialism) when real facts are available.

  • edismeiamhe

    Sadder yet to see that you are quoting outdated staistics from the World Health Organization which is captive to the United Nations.

    Have you bothered to read the factors they tried to evaluate? I can see them paddling up the Amazon to get the facts from the local natives.

    You know how much the UN Nations like to kick the U.S. in the ass, and rub our face in the dirt at evefy opportunity. And yet you treat them as the ultimate in expertise in this area.

    How nieve…

    Why do you suppose so many foreigners pay all that cabbage to come to the U.S. for treatment?

    Would you like to be in France or England under Nationalized Heal Care, (Like the Obama Single Payer Plan) and wait six months for an MRI?

  • edismeiamhe

    By the way, check this out:

    “The World Health Organization’s ranking of the world’s health systems was last produced in 2000, and the WHO no longer produces such a ranking table, because of the complexity of the task. ”

    I dare say they no longer produce such a ranking, nor should they. It was too whimsical and difficult for them to handle accurately in the first place

    Who in their right mind would believe that France (Going bankrupt over their inefficient socialized medical proram) and Singapore (with its hundreds of thousands living on houseboats), rank above the U.S.

    Better find another axe to grind in favor of Socialized anything.

    Remember the Laissez Faire concept? “That government governs best that governs least”

    Late breaking news for you…it works.

blog comments powered by Disqus