More on the Rove GOP Money Machine

Witchcraft is fun to talk about, but when it comes to the outcome of the midterm elections almost nothing is more important than the potential impact of big-spending Republican independent groups nationwide. In the new  issue of TIME I explain this network of independent groups that are blasting Democrats on the airwaves nationwide, with the help of unlimited (and often undisclosed) campaign donations of $1 million or more. Democrats are countering with union support and a durable fundraising advantage on the part of their official party committees. But they may still find themselves be swamped by the grand plans of the Rove-Gillespie-Barbour axis.

A couple of good stories today shed more light on this effort. In one, the New York Times explains at greater length something I only had space to discuss briefly: The way in which some of these GOP groups are exploiting a loophole in the tax code which lets them keep their donors completely anonymous. Crossroads GPS, the offshoot of a group supported and advised by Karl Rove, is one of the prime offenders here.

But some of these groups are structured in such a way that does require public donor disclosure. (The difference has to do with how explicitly political these groups are; for details read the Times piece.) On that score, Salon‘s Justin Elliott reports that the parent group of Crossroads GPS, American Crossroads–which is required to disclose its donors publicly–raised 91 percent of its August money from conservative billionaires. Not exactly evidence of a grassroots movement. Of course, in past election cycles Democratic groups have also raised big money from billionaires like George Soros; liberals simply have their own robust independent-group operation going this year (something my story explains). Also, American Crossroads and Crossroads GPS combined may raise and spend more than $50 million in this cycle, meaning that $2.4 million August haul is only a small sample.

That said, as Elliott notes, because Crossroads GPS doesn’t have to disclose any donor information, the final percentage of billionaire support for these Rove-backed groups could be even higher than 91 percent–and we might never know.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • m0mentom0ri

    “Witchcraft is fun to talk about,….”
    .
    Words fail me.

  • afguy

    Are you happy now, Chief Justice Roberts?

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Thanks for this post– great reporting.
    -
    Sometimes it seems like Roberts’ rhetoric is intended more to defend the stats quo than uphold any particular philosophical or constitutional principles.

    In every major case since he became the nation’s seventeenth Chief Justice, Roberts has sided with the prosecution over the defendant, the state over the condemned, the executive branch over the legislative, and the corporate defendant over the individual plaintiff. Even more than Scalia, who has embodied judicial conservatism during a generation of service on the Supreme Court, Roberts has served the interests, and reflected the values, of the contemporary Republican Party.

    -
    Rehnquist was deeply skeptical about giving full First Amendment treatment to commercial speech in his first 10 or so years on the bench. Amazing how far we’ve moved from reason, common sense, experience, and the traditional view of the First Amendment.

  • textee

    Leftist political activist Michael Crowley huffs: “In the new issue of TIME I explain this network of independent groups that are blasting Democrats on the airwaves nationwide, with the help of unlimited (and often undisclosed) campaign donations of $1 million or more.”

    Scary ….

    Every year, militant, virulent, leftist political advocacy groups like Time magazine, ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, HBO, Castro News Network, A-Mess-NBC, HLN, the New York Times-Democrat, the Washington Post-Democrat, NPR, ESPN, ESPN2, ESPN News, ESPN Deportes, self-described “Comedy” Central, the Associated (with terrorists) Press, al Reuters, al Jazeera, al McClatchy, Sports Illustrated, Ladies’ Home Journal, Good Housekeeping, et al., spend BILLIONS of dollars promoting the Democrat party and other anti-American extremist groups. Nevertheless, Crowley is worried about a “network” of little donors (“often undisclosed”!!!!!!!) who are opposed to the fundamentalist anti-American ideology of Time magazine and the aforesaid political advocacy groups.

  • michaelfury

    “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

    - Karl Rove

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/12/10/forgive-and-forgetforget/

  • Paul-no not that one

    The big money donors turned off the spigot to the RNC and Steele a while back.
    .
    It’s not as if they were going to stop trying to influence elections, this is how.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Is textee Ann Coulter, do you think? Or maybe Bill Donahue?
    -
    http://www.thismodernworld.com/arc/2006/TMW07-05-06colorlowrescopy.jpg

  • afguy

    Sports Illustrated, Ladies’ Home Journal, Good Housekeeping…
    .
    To quote someone from a previous thread: wait.. wat?
    .
    Like I said before, you forgot Smithsonian and National Geographic. Oh, and don’t forget Reader’s Digest and TV Guide.
    .
    Super-subversive “rags”, all of those…

  • afguy

    Is textee Ann Coulter, do you think?
    .
    Dunno… have to see textee in a black dress to make a determination.

  • m0mentom0ri

    The Ladies’ Home Journal inclusion always cracks me up. I’m guessing they put Michelle Obama on the cover and did the usual fluff interview of her. Which in textee’s paranoid world makes Ladies’ Home Journal the Arbiters of the Communist Manifesto or something.
    .
    “Scary …” is right.

  • m0mentom0ri

    See also: Mike Pompeo; Koch Industries.
    .
    “With $31,400 in contributions from KOCHPAC, Koch Industries is by far the greatest contributor to Pompeo’s campaign. ”
    .
    http://thinkprogress.org/2010/09/21/koch-mike-pompeo/

  • Ohg Rea Tone

    Using the tactics of the KKK masquerading as a modern Tea Party does not change the irresponsibility of the tactics. ………

    http://thefiresidepost.com/2010/09/21/the-kkk-by-any-other-name-is-still-the-kkk/

  • acameronw

    Textee,

    You are rapidly establishing a reputation as one of the most brilliant satirists of our still young century. The way you so convincingly assume the guise of a ranting crackpot is nothing sort of stunning. (ESPN and The Ladies Home Journal indeed.) And the deft way in which you illuminate the danger of unchecked corporate money pouring into our political system be referring to million dollar donations as “little” is sheer genius. I hope all Swampland readers recognize your true worth as wielder of irony for satiric effect. Keep the posts coming! In fact, I’m going to read yours again.

    Wait a minute… Oh, my God…

  • sacredh

    Do you ever get the feeling that textee is keeping the duct tape, tin foil and plastic sheeting industries alive? Is the yard really a perimeter? Are the bodily fluids being guarded? Wipe the table off when you leave McDonalds. Fingerprints.

  • sacredh

    Suppose they gave a circle jerk and nobody came.
    .
    It’s worth thinking about.

  • formerlyjames

    It is a sad note for democracy. Paul Krugman in the NYT yesterday noted that the rich are different from the rest of us. They have more influence. Blame it on the Roberts right wing court, blame it on the self-serving gazillionaires who the government bailed and allowed bonuses for their brilliance in wrecking the economy, blame mother nature. I blame stupidity. Of the middle class and those of the lower financial levels who lap up the right wing nonsense. That is, nonsense for most, but more breaks and bonuses for those who already have more money can any human could need.

  • afguy

    Well, if Coulter was the “pivot” that’s VERY possible.
    .
    In ALL SORTS of ways…

  • formerlyjames

    But sacredh, everybody comes to the circle jerks. See my comment below.

  • jywang9

    There’s definitely a lot to lay on the shoulders of the Roberts Court. But several academics make the argument that the problems with campaign financing, as evidenced with these corporations and Rove, were already in place even before the Citizens United decision earlier this year. The argument being to that the floodgates to corporate spending were already open.

    This piece by Adam Liptak for Columbia breaks it down for both sides—those shouting from the hilltops that Citizens United dramatically changed everything (such as President Obama), as well as those who say it’s not nearly as big of a game changer as everyone thinks.

    http://bit.ly/bJyzRi

  • apr2563

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/politics/blog-network/2010/09/americans_for_prosperity_gop_i.html
    .
    Here is a favorite Republican trick, vote caging. It is right up there with blocking access to Dem headquarter phones.
    .
    Another good trick:
    http://www.alan.com/2010/09/06/gop-dirty-tricks-recruiting-street-people-to-run-on-green-ticket-to-take-votes-from-democrats/
    Recruit fake candidates for the Green Party.
    .
    You have to admire the “Christian” loving Republicans for their ability to put aside ethics to win at any cost.

  • apr2563

    Sacred h: Thanks for reminding me of the premier movie that displays the fruition of right wing paranoia.
    “Sir, I have a plan”
    “Mein Fuhrer! I can walk!”

  • maverick2k9

    Because Crossroads GPS doesn’t have to disclose any donor information, the final percentage of billionaire support for these Rove-backed groups could be even higher than 91 percent–and we might never know
    -
    I wonder what would have been the headlines/report if Michael Crowley went back in time and reported on the Watergate scandal. My attempt :
    -
    “Democrats allege that break-in at the DNC HQ was financed by a Republican slush fund connected to the President, but we might never know.
    -
    Now remind me, what is a journalist supposed to do? Google for information?

  • apr2563

    I am finding it really amusing to here the pundocracy mulling over the reasons that Newt Gingrich is getting involved with his nasty comments about Obama. They immediately think he is running for President. Of course, they also think he is a great intellect.
    .
    They never look at his history. He has openly considered running for President in every election but 2004. He’s a smart enough guy to know he has no chance in h*ll of being elected.
    .
    What does he want? He wants money. With his faux entry into elective politics he can raise pac money, sell books, update his bona fides at Fox, and at the conservative think tanks. This is how he makes his living.
    .
    Sarah Palin is using the same method to make a living.
    Mini-me O’Donnell has been running this hoax for over 5 years. No work, just a perpetual candidate. But, whoops, she got nominated so she has to actually run.
    .
    When was the last time these people held a real job? Jimmy Swaggert would be proud. They sure have found a money making scheme that the press is too stupid to figure out.

  • http://mizclay.wordpress.com mizclay

    does it sound like a bunch of crooks running elections and especially the carl rove bunch. why would honest people want to find the loop hole? it must be really beneficial for carl rove to get his wealthy people taken care. we dont have to worry about raising taxes on the upper wealthyest people. they dont pay taxes now and they wont pay taxes then. loopholes my friends.

blog comments powered by Disqus