Miller, McAdams Focus Their Fire on Murkowski

Wasilla, Alaska

There will be two names on the ballot in the Alaska race for U.S. Senate this November: Joe Miller and Scott McAdams. But in events today for both those candidates the 800-pound gorilla in the room was incumbent Senator Lisa Murkowski, who announced Friday she will seek a write in bid to keep her seat after losing the GOP primary to Miller last month.

Democrat McAdams’s press conference to unveil his five-point education plan on Monday was aimed at leaching teacher support from Murkowski. The National Education Association early on endorsed Murkowski and the group on Friday reaffirmed their endorsement of her candidacy, even as a write in. But McAdams, who has the support of the AFL-CIO, believes that rank-and-file teachers will come his way when they realize what a long shot Murkowski’s candidacy is. “I have a natural connection with teachers,” says McAdams, who got his start in politics petitioning the school board that he would eventually sit on to allow him to form a football team. “And I believe in the hearts and minds to teachers they will recognize that I am the true school advocate in this race.”

The Sitka mayor — the fifth largest town in Alaska, McAdams was quick to point out, right behind Wasilla — seemed nervous in my interview with him, though that may be due to his lack of experience with national reporters and issues. He has good reason to be nervous. Murkowski poses as much, if not a greater threat to him than she does to Miller. McAdams has yet to prove himself as a viable candidate to the powers that be in Washington and, though he’s raised $300,000 in the last three weeks, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has yet to invest in his campaign beyond dispatching a few staffers. There were also some prominent Democrats at Murkowski’s Friday night rally, leading to local speculation the Dems might be flirting with Murkowski in case she actually wins.

Amidst the yoga balls and organic snacks that fill McAdams’ campaign offices, I watched a McAdams staffer this morning brief volunteers on talking points for a call banking session to infrequent voting Democrats. The themes all revolved around Murkowski: her voting record (against the Obama agenda), her lack of seniority (Mitch McConnell said if she wins he wouldn’t give her committee leadership positions in punishment for challenging a GOP primary winner). “If Murkowski appeals heavily to organized labor she’ll take a lot of votes from McAdams,” says Randy Ruedrich, chairman of the Alaska Republican Party, which is supporting Miller. “If she runs as a social liberal, she’ll take even more votes from McAdams.” Part of what got Murkowski into trouble with GOP primary voters is her pro-choice, socially moderate stances. In a state where registered Republicans nearly double the number of registered Democrats, McAdams can’t afford to lose any of his base.

Miller’s challenge, says Ruedrich, is to “to respond to Democratic accusations that he’s an extremist. In the general election, Miller’s campaign needs to ramp up a message that can be clearly understood by all Alaskans.”

But it’s not just Dems making that case. “What I look at is, do you represent the values of the state of Alaska? Do you represent the people here in terms of what it is that they need, they hope for, what they hope for their future?” Murkowski told CNN on Sunday. “And Joe Miller simply does not represent that. He is suggesting to us, in my opinion, and in the opinion of many, many Alaskans, some pretty radical things.” Miller, on CNN on Monday swung back calling Murkowski “hypocritical” and accused her of “breaking her word” to support the GOP nominee whomever he or she is.

Waiting in Joe Miller’s cramped Wasilla offices – ironically, one floor below a branch of Murkowski’s official senate offices — for the candidate to arrive this evening, I watched his campaign manager hash out the race with some volunteers. Over McDonald’s fries, cookies and chips and salsa, Robert Campbell said dubbing his boss extreme “is an insult to all Republican primary voters and we saw massive turnout, record turnout in this race.” Campbell said the campaign is seeking a debate with Murkowski. “I would love for there to be a debate tomorrow and from every day on,” he said. “I couldn’t want my candidate out in front of Senator Murkowski talking to the public more, I’d want that every single day.”

When Miller arrived, he too focused his fire on Murkowski. “This is not in the bag by any means,” he told the two dozen or so supporters who came out to hear him. “Any time that you’re dealing with an opponent that, by some reports, has $1.8 million in the bank; that she’s announced she’s going to have a mudfest; that she’s announced she’s taking the gloves off; we know we can’t take it for granted and what that means is we’ve got to fight even all the more harder to get the message out.”

A write in candidacy is incredibly difficult and has never been done successfully in Alaska. The last person to try was former Gov. Wally Hickel — whom I interviewed last year for my Palin story but, I’m sorry to say, passed away in May — in 1978. He got 26.4% of the vote and that was using stickers that voters could affix to the ballots – a practice banned by Alaska a decade ago. Murkowski, thanks to her famous (for Alaska) family, enjoys a high degree of name recognition – though how many people can actually spell Murkowski remains to be seen (the Alaska Division of Elections says they’ll try to honor voter intent as best they can, but where does one draw the line? L. Mszciki?). A poll done by Dittman Research & Communications, a GOP firm, Aug. 28-Sept. 1 has Murkowski leading in a three-way race 37% to Miller’s 31% to McAdams’ 24%. So, despite the logistical hurdles, clearly the gorilla has some heft, or McAdams and Miller wouldn’t be focusing so much of their fire on her.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: alaska, joe miller, lisa murkowski, scott mcAdams, senate race, 2012 Election, Congress, Democratic Party, Republican Party, Senate, Tea Party
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • undeclaredvoter

    Please don’t let Joe Miller and the Alaska Republican party play loose with the facts. There was no “massive, massive” turnout. According to public records at the Alaska Division of Elections, 55,366 of the 128,349 registered Republicans voted in the primary – or 43%. That’s the second-highest Republican turnout in a primary election (2008 was higher in both numbers and percentage) – but it’s hard to say it was “massive”. Undeclared and Nonpartisan voters in Alaska may also select the Republican ballot (to vote their choice or to make mischief in the primary). A total of 109,750 of those who chose the Republican ballot voted for U.S. Senator, from which Joe Miller got 55,878 votes, 2,000 more votes than Lisa Murkowski. We don’t know which ballots the undeclared and nonpartisan voters took, or how they voted, but we do know that 80,072 Undeclared (27% turnout) and Nonpartisan (40%) voters voted in the primary election.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Thanks for this on-the-ground look at the race in Alaska. Hope you’re enjoying things up there.
    -
    How accurate can we take polls to be in Alaska? I would think that polling there would be more difficult than anywhere else in the country. Here’s Nate Silver’s take on how a race with Murkowski in it might pan out.
    -
    I was all set to bristle at your description of the political aims of McAdams’ education plan (“give us substance!”), but I clicked through, and then clicked through again, and if this pdf really is the plan, well, it certainly isn’t all too wonky a blueprint.

  • apr2563

    Jay, please ask Miller what he would cut from the proportionally huge federal aid Alaska receives.
    .
    http://firedoglake.com/2010/09/01/while-tea-party-candidate-joe-miller-complains-about-federal-government-alaska-swims-in-federal-dollars/
    .
    Also, you might ask him about the $14,000 federal subsidy he received to raise barley.
    .
    http://messageboards.aol.com/aol/en_us/articles.php?boardId=529805&articleId=900616&func=6&channel=Member+Guided+News&filterRead=false&filterHidden=true&filterUnhidden=false
    .
    Does he think all that federal aid delivered to Alaska and him personally should be returned?

  • mudlock

    “There will be two names on the ballot in the Alaska race for U.S. Senate this November.”

    Technically, there will be three. You’re forgetting David Haase.

  • mudlock

    How accurate are the polls? Well, they had Murkowski in a landslide for the primary, so there’s that…

  • Paul-no not that one

    apr’s first question really is the crux of the matter.
    .
    TPers continue to make an argument that federal spending needs and can be cut.
    .
    I wouldn’t expect Palin to answer that question, she’s not running for anything, but candidates for Congress-which controls the purse strings-have an obligation to be at least a bit specific.
    .

  • kathy
  • halcyan

    But, but, but…

    Your facts do not comport with my conclusions! I have a story to peddle, and it is that the Tea Party is monolithic and massive.

    Thanks for the reality check!

  • kevin

    OT, but maybe this will get the press to stop focusing solely on Christine O’Donnell’s masturbation and witchcraft insanities, and start focusing on her more earthly wrongdoing:

    “Christine O’Donnell is clearly a criminal, and like any crook she should be prosecuted,” CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan said in a release. “Ms. O’Donnell has spent years embezzling money from her campaign to cover her personal expenses. Republicans and Democrats don’t agree on much these days, but both sides should agree on one point: thieves belong in jail not the United States Senate.”
    .
    CREW is requesting that the U.S. Attorney’s office in Delaware open a criminal investigation and asking the Federal Election Commission to audit O’Donnell’s campaign expenses.
    .
    The group said its allegations are tied to former O’Donnell aide David Keegan’s affidavit stating O’Donnell, who has run for Senate three times, paid her rent for two months out of campaign funds in 2009 and also used campaign funds for meals and gas. In addition to misappropriation of campaign funds, CREW argues that O’Donnell is guilty of lying about the expenditures and committed tax evasion by not reporting the money as income.
    .
    Representatives for O’Donnell, whose financial disclosure form said her earned income between March 2009 and June 2010 was just $5,800, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20016966-503544.html

  • sacredh

    “Representatives for O’Donnell, whose financial disclosure form said her earned income between March 2009 and June 2010 was just $5,800, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.”
    .
    $5,800 is quite a bit of money to live on for 16 months (if you’re a cat).

  • http://liuhuyang.wordpress.com liuhuyang

    welcome to our website === w w w ( ccshopping ) – u s === ..The new update, a large hot ..
    WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT.
    YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

  • sacredh

    Isn’t there a busy intersection you people can play in? We’re not buying any of your sh!t so shove it up your ass and get the hell out of here.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Jay, good summary of current status there. Thanks also for your twitpix of AK scenery; please post some here with next swamp post. Given AK’s smaller population, it’s likely all candidates have met / known more residents personally to some degree than possible in say, CA or NY.
    .
    Thus, polls aside, I wonder how much residents there are satisfied (or not) with Murkowski, both professionally and personally. No doubt her family name has some affect (thanks to her father), but if real people are telling you that she’s delivering the goods, more might cross D and R lines and write her in. Maybe anti-Palin feelings play in too since Lisa and Sarah aren’t exactly drinking buddies. Any info. there?

  • Paul-no not that one

    Or at the very least include a good link!

  • mfbattle

    Jay,

    Now you have given the data for the poll we can examine it, but you still did not mention that it was paid for by Murkowski supporters, correct?
    Now the poll seems odd to me. Two versions of the question “who you would support” were asked, one identifying Murkowski as the Libertarian candidate, the other as an independent or write-in candidate. Now the results from the two questions were reported as one answer. So this means that some people were asked if she was a libertarian and others a write-in candidate? Also, some may have believed that Murkowski would win the primary. The poll was carried out BEFORE Murkowski conceded, and after. I think we should ignore this poll.
    Also, there is no confidence interval. My guess with only 383 respondents it would be big, so we could not say there is a statistical difference between Miller and Murkowski. And interestingly Murkowski had the highest number of supporters who reported that they may change their support. Why didn’t you report that?

  • mfbattle

    should be “does this mean”

  • http://redstatedebate.wordpress.com redstatedebate

    Why is the in fighting and the dems mass exodus from Obama not being reported here and why is this story not getting any attention? http://conservativeblogscentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/bean-and-wieners-obama-voter-wakes-up.html

    When liberal voters start hammering Obama, it is new!!

  • mfbattle

    redstatedebate,

    Your link was not to a story but to a badly photoshopped picture of the President “holding” a can of beans. Should the media now cover photoshopped pictures? I know that many of you think the fact that some nutjob says he is a Kenyan is news, but really!

  • kmdyson

    Though she is very far to the right from my perspective, I’m a socialist, I say good on Ms Murkowski!

    In a society that holds ‘choice’ above all as a core right of all citizens…why are the candidates suddenly not wanting a third choice on the ballot?

    Or is ‘choice’ only desirable when you have the best chance of being it?

  • mfbattle

    So you felt the same about Joe Lieberman?

  • mfbattle

    Murkowski ran as someone who can deliver pork because of her seniority (unlike Miller). What is she going to run on now?

    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/21/murkowski-stripped-of-committee/

  • roccojohnson

    Something that really bothers me are government-sanctioned education agencies being allowed to play partisan politics with our kids’ future. Those agencies are charged with educating our children, and partisan politics should not be allowed to interfere with that in any way, as is current practice. Individuals employees have all the same rights to their own political view like any other citizen, but it should be on their own time, just like at any other job. Partisan agendas should be left at the door.

    The National Education Association has no business playing partisan politics and endorsing any candidate. The voices of all employees should carry equal weight, and conservative employees should be heard as well. Conservatives are commonly bullied and forced out at the NEA and state education associations. This isn’t right, and I guarantee you if the shoe was on the other foot liberals would be crying bloody murder.

  • roccojohnson

    Please re-read Time’s acceptable use policies. I wouldn’t visit your site just on principle, because of your clear violation of the terms of use policies for posting.

    This is not the place for solicitation.

  • mfbattle
blog comments powered by Disqus