Rove vs. Reid

Karl Rove.

Politico spotlights a good angle to the subject of my new print piece this week: the huge Republican money steamroller poised to flatten Democrats from coast to coast in the midterms. If you read my story you’ll see that Karl Rove is a central player in this effort, particularly through the anodyne sounding group American Crossroads, which hopes to spend $50 million or more targeting Democrats and supporting Republican candidates this fall.

One main American Crossroads target, Politico explains, is the embattled Senate majority leader, Harry Reid:

[I]t’s clear Crossroads has had it in for Reid. The group raised eyebrows with its all-in approach, attacking Reid on the airwaves long before other Republican-leaning outside groups got involved. Such attacks helped give Angle cover when her sparsely staffed campaign couldn’t respond on the airwaves for weeks after the June primary.

For instance, when Angle’s campaign was dark on broadcast advertising for a two-week summer period in Las Vegas, Crossroads was advertising heavily and later suspended its ads when Angle went big on the air, according to tracking numbers…

In total, Crossroads GPS and American Crossroads — which was the brainchild of Rove and former Bush White House official Ed Gillespie — have spent $1.7 million in Nevada on ads slamming Reid, most notably on the economic stimulus. The group has earmarked an additional $10 million for Nevada and seven other states to bolster GOP voter turnout on Election Day.

The Politico story suggests the ad campaign reflects a personal vendetta on the part of Rove, who has expressed his personal animus for Reid before, although Rove allies deny it. But if Reid loses in November, Rove’s fingerprints will be all over the scene.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • deconstructiva

    Feh. Thanks to O’Donnell debacle, Is Rover losing his touch, so to speak? He didn’t think Christine could take matters into her hands and pull it off, but she did. THEN he jumped on her… bandwagon. Don’t waste bandwidth on him, Michael. Let FOX post his nonsense.

  • kevin

    But if Reid loses in November, Rove’s fingerprints will be all over the scene.
    .
    And if Reid wins, no one in the media will cast any doubts on the supposed genius of Rove.
    .
    I’m really not sure why you all have bought the hype around the man. Rove couldn’t get Bush a majority of votes in 2000; it was family consigliere James Baker who got them over the goalline with the Brooks Brothers riot in Floria. Rove only secured Republican gains in 2002 by shamelessly exploiting 9/11. And in 2004, he barely got Bush re-elected, with the lowest margin of victory for any sitting wartime president since Woodrow Wilson, even though he was facing an awful opposing campaigner in John Kerry. What’s impressive there?
    .
    And after that — he led the party to major losses in 2006 and set the stage for a massive defeat in 2008. And now? He’s getting bullied by Rush Limbaugh and getting pushed around by Palin and O’Donnell. Pfft.
    .
    Sorry, but Karl Rove is just Bob Shrum with a lucky streak.

  • newfreedomblog

    Wasted money. Good ‘ol Harry is going down with or without any ad campaign by Karl Rove. Voter anger, voter distrust of anything close to Washington insiders is so high this year that Harry is toast.
    .
    Cue the fat lady, its time to sing for Harry!!

  • textee

    How many billions of dollars in unregulated and unlimited funds are spent each year by leftist political advocacy groups like ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, A-Mess-NBC, NPR, ESPN, ESPN2, ESPN News, ESPN Classic, ESPN U, ESPN Deportes, the self-described “Comedy” Central, Oprah, HBO, the New York Times-Democrat, the Washington Post-Democrat, the Associated (with terrorists) Press,al Reuters, al Jazeera, al McClatchy, Time magazine, Sports Illustrated, Ladies Home Journal, et al., promoting the Democrat party and other anti-American extremist groups?

  • Ike Jakson

    It’s politics as usual, Michael. So what’s your point really?

  • Paul-no not that one

    Well if Politico AND Crowley say so that’s good enough for me.

  • destor23

    Michael, if Rove is such a bigshot, as you say, then why the embarassing genuflection in the face of Limbaugh and Palin?

  • nflfoghorn

    How many billions of times have you repeated this tired old line of listing every non-Flox medium you hate?

  • michaelfury

    What you get for letting neofascist war criminals and their enablers skate free to rewrite history.

    “The final mission on behalf of President Bush is reportedly being spearheaded by two trusted members of his Texan kitchen cabinet – Mr Rove, the architect of his two White House election triumphs, and Karen Hughes, his former communications chief.

    They have been meeting senior figures in the current Administration to discuss how to “roll out the president’s legacy”, according to Stephen Hayes, a prominent conservative commentator and Vice-President Dick Cheney’s official biographer.

    Part of that strategy is to “set the record straight”, a senior Republican strategist told The Sunday Telegraph, and Mr Rove’s assertion on Iraq appears to have been an opening salvo in that campaign. He is the most senior White House insider to state so firmly that the president would not have gone to war had the intelligence been different.”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/12/10/forgive-and-forgetforget/

  • michaelfury

    “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

    - Karl Rove

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/09/08/silence-gives-consent/

  • certifiablylazy

    For context, could you list the media organizations that represent Real American views?
    ~
    I want to make sure I’m on the Right side of history.

  • m0mentom0ri

    “Ladies Home Journal”
    .
    Wait, wut?

  • afguy

    He didn’t mention Smithsonian or National Geographic.
    .
    They sometimes have pictures of naked furriners in them and I’ve seen articles on evolution there.
    .
    I’m very partial to Air & Space Magazine but all of those pictures of “flying machines” must be staged, because I’ve heard how unreliable science is.

  • grape_crush

    …Ladies Home Journal, et al.
    .
    I always knew that the editors of Cat Fancy were in on some Communist plot to take over the world.

  • deconstructiva

    …wonder how he feels about RedState since they banned his BFF Rusty.

  • afguy

    …wonder how he feels about RedState since they banned his BFF Rusty.
    .
    Well, the “Red” in RedState has got to refer to them Pinko Commies, so it just follows that RedState must be a Marxist site.
    .
    As Beck would say (using one of his patented charts), the logic is inescapable.

  • scooterfox

    newfreedumb,

    you are a perfect example of rove’s tactics working on the gullible masses. congratulations for pointing that out.

  • scooterfox

    testees,

    im still unable to make the connection between ESPN classic and the supposed underground liberal agenda.

    can you elaborate?

  • shepherdwong

    The Politico story suggests the ad campaign reflects a personal vendetta on the part of Rove…
    .
    Naturally. If the story suggested that the ad campaign reflects the desire of our plutocrats to replace a Democrat with a more useful tool in the typical Republican configuration, they might be telling the public the important truth, rather than enjoying some distracting and uninformative, though parochially delightful, Village m@sterbation.
    .
    Your print article was pretty decent.

  • afguy

    Here’s another to add to the list of “subversive influences” in our country – our local high school marching band.
    .
    We had a band competition this past weekend. The competition started off with the local scout troop raising the flag to half-staff (im memory of 9/11).
    .
    At the end, the local marching band had a performance entitled “Scheherazad”. For you unwashed swine out there, she’s the Persian queen and story-teller from “1001 Nights” (I had to look it up myself, so J/K). One of the props was a silhouette of the Taj Mahal to provide some atmosphere.
    .
    The following Monday, my son came in and said “We made a national radio broadcast!!” Someone helping to cook from the local utility company had called Alabama Public Radio and complained about our band director being a “Muslim preacher” and the band members being Muslim sympathizers because they had performed a piece of music with a Middle Eastern theme.
    .
    There was also a mention of our display of a “mosque” as part of the performance. (The fact that the Taj Mahal is a Hindu cultural edifice was apparently lost on the dolt in question.) Never let details get in the way of a good RW freakout go to waste, I guess.
    .
    We’ve all had a laugh but the ignorance of the world and just blind, unthinking prejudice in this country is getting embarrassing.

  • deconstructiva

    afguy, great story. I hope they didn’t mention that “Scheherazade” was composed by a… Russian …(eek!) Maybe those folks still think the Soviet Empire™ exists. Maybe Putin does too, but I digress. If Boehner takes over the House next year I wonder if he’ll reinstall the House Un-American Activities Committee. Alas, Nixon is still dead so he can’t chair it.

  • grape_crush

    …But it is still directing the heavy firepower — much of it funded by big corporate and Wall Street interests for whom the Tea Partyers have little love — that could decide who controls Congress after election day.

    So the current crop of right-wing loons and useful idiots running for office this year is being backed by big business and hyper-conservative, partisan millionaire and billionaire sugar daddies?

    You’d think that there would be more of an issue made of this in the straight media. It certainly sounds like something that Dem politicians should be talking about

    “I want you to consider this — right now, all across the country, special interests are planning and running millions of dollars of attack ads against Democratic candidates. Because last year, there was a Supreme Court decision called Citizens United. They’re allowed to spend as much as they want without ever revealing who’s paying for the ads. That’s exactly what they’re doing. Millions of dollars. And the groups are benign-sounding: Americans for Prosperity. Who’s against that? Or Committee for Truth in Politics. Or Americans for Apple Pie. Moms for Motherhood. I made those last two up.

    “None of them will disclose who’s paying for these ads. You don’t know if it’s a Wall Street bank. You don’t know if it’s a big oil company. You don’t know if it’s an insurance company. You don’t even know if it’s a foreign-controlled entity. In some races, they are spending more money than the candidates…. They’re spending more money than the parties.

    “They want to take Congress back and return to the days where lobbyists wrote the laws. It is the most insidious power grab since the monopolies of the Gilded Age. That’s happening right now. So there’s a lot of talk about populist anger and grassroots. But that’s not what’s driving a lot of these elections.

    “We tried to fix this, but the leaders of the other party wouldn’t even allow it to come up for a vote. They want to keep the public in the dark. They want to serve the special interests that served them so well over the last 19 months.

    “We will not let them. We are not about to allow a corporate takeover of our democracy.”

    More of this, please.

  • afguy

    decon,
    .
    The only important thing is that we sorely need an enemy.
    .
    Those d@mned Soviets up and quit on us so we had to look around for a replacement.
    .
    The Muslims have “agreed” to be our next “red menace” (whether they wanted to be or not).

  • kevin

    Meanwhile, the conservative crazy just keeps on coming in Delaware.
    .
    It’s been overlooked that the Teatards not only knocked out the moderate Republican favored to win the Senate race, but they also knocked out the moderate Republican favored to win the House seat too.
    .
    Instead of a sure-thing, Republicans now have a nut job running who said this:

    “Do you know, where does this phrase separation of Church and State come from? Does anybody know? … Actually, that’s exactly, it was not in Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists. He was reassuring that the federal government wouldn’t trample on their religion. The exact phrase ‘separation of Church and State’ came out of Adolph Hitler’s mouth, that’s where it comes from. Next time your liberal friends talk about the separation of Church and State ask them why they’re Nazis.”

    http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/if-you-thought-christine-o%E2%80%99donnell-was-bad%E2%80%A6
    .
    Not surprisingly, the NRCC has already abandoned the race.

  • nflfoghorn

    Those 527s like to ostensibly campaign for three party candidates but the ad only focuses on one (the other two are in fine print).

  • pneogy

    “(The fact that the Taj Mahal is a Hindu cultural edifice was apparently lost on the dolt in question.)”

    The Taj Mahal is certainly an Indian cultural edifice. The mausoleum built by a Muslim emperor in memory of his beloved queen probably doesn’t qualify as a Hindu cultural icon.

  • nflfoghorn

    Let’s not go splitting harems.

  • kevin

    I’d hardly call Donald Trump a “Muslim emperor.”
    .
    Wait, what?

  • afguy

    To pgeony: I stand corrected… the Taj Mahal is one of the more recognizable buildings anywhere, but esp. from that part of the world. One of the Seven Wonders of the World, if I’m not mistaken. That’s why the band used it.
    .
    And to nfl: a “rimshot” for you!

  • 3xfire3

    With all the money Harry has coming in from out of state to support his campaign, Crossroads support of Angels campaign is a drop in the bucket.
    .
    It would be nice and honest if Michael would have shared that information but then those kinds of facts would interfere with the false impression he is using to make the story fit his partisan views.
    .
    Remember Michael. When you don’t tell the whole truth you are in realty Lying. Didn’t you learn that when you were part of Journolist.

  • afguy

    I’d hardly call Donald Trump a “Muslim emperor.”
    .
    But I think we both agree he wants to live like one.

  • 3xfire3

    Election 2010: Wisconsin Senate
    .
    Johnson (R) 51%, Feingold (D) 44%
    .
    Sept 17, 2010
    .
    After a decisive win in Tuesday’s Republican Primary, businessman Ron Johnson now holds a seven-point lead over incumbent Democrat Russ Feingold in Wisconsin’s U.S. Senate race.
    .
    The latest Rasmussen Reports statewide telephone survey of Likely Voters shows Johnson picking up 51% support, while Feingold earns the vote from 44%. One percent (1%) of voters prefer some other candidate, and four percent (4%) remain undecided.

  • kevin

    Rasmussen: Telling Conservatives What They Want to Hear Since 2004™

  • afguy

    Remember Michael. When you don’t tell the whole truth you are in realty Lying. Didn’t you learn that when you were part of Journolist.
    .
    Remember, 3xfire3, when you “cherry-pick” polls or statistics and ignore other available information to support just your side of a discussion, you are in reality Lying.

  • scooterfox

    3x what does Journolist have to do with lying about real estate?

  • 3xfire3

    Are Conservatives Evil?
    .
    I curious as to how many Liberals posting on this site actually agree with shephardwong’s post.
    .
    Please read the following comments and give me your thoughts.
    .
    3xfire3′s post
    .
    “Conservatives and Liberals both have the same end goals. Neither are evil as you seem to think. We both want what is best for our fellow citizens and our country and the world. Our approaches are different but our end goals are the same.”
    .
    “Conservatives are not evil people but fellow citizens who have different core beliefs on how to solve the problems of our country and its citizens.”
    .
    shephardwong’s post
    .
    “On the citizen level, as starkly opposed to the professional level (your leaders are decidedly evil), I never said “conservatives” are all evil people, though some are obviously miserable @ssholes, racists, homophobes, etc. My take it that most of you are ignorant, brainwashed and strongly motivated by tribal identification and the desire to dominate your perceived foes. Your fanatical devotion to lying hucksters whom you know nothing about and the fact the most of you haven’t the faintest idea what your talking about on most of the issues you claim to be motivated by leaves me little choice.”

  • afguy

    Are Conservatives Evil?
    .
    No. Many are very likeable and honest but too many of even those are closed-minded, fearful or mistrustful of what they do not know or understand (including science, unfortunately) and willfully ignorant of a lot of the rest of the world.
    .
    My religious beliefs would put me at odds with a number of those on this blog calling themselves liberal or progressive but I can agree with them on a number of the social issues, just as I can agree with the religious beliefs of many calling themselves conservative while deploring the manner in which they project their religion.

  • 3xfire3

    Kevin,
    .
    Keep on dreaming. It will be over pretty soon. Sleep tight.

  • kevin

    He’s right, you’re not evil. And yes, he’s right that far too many conservatives are “ignorant, brainwashed and strongly motivated by tribal identification and the desire to dominate your perceived foes.”
    .
    Ignorance? Creationism, climate change denialism, anti-intellectualism in general. The Tea Party clamoring for lower taxes when taxes are at their lowest level since 1950? Claiming a restoration of the tax rates we had under Reagan is “socialism”? Yeah, that’s ignorant. Check.
    .
    Brainwashed? Certainly. I can always tell what new line is being pushed by the Fox/Rush propaganda machine because Rusty rushes her to regurgitate it every morning.
    .
    Motivated by tribalism? Absolutely. The conservative posts here are 1% about policy and 99% about how liberals will “rue the day” and “get what’s coming in November.” You guys act like this is a Jets-Giants game, and not a discussion on matters that will affect the lives of real people.

  • scooterfox

    come to think of it, what does Journolist have to do WITH ANYTHING? It has always been a non-issue. Always.

  • Art Pepper

    Are conservatives evil? Not at all. But I dispute the claim that today’s GOP is actually conservative.

  • kevin

    Thanks for proving the point about tribalism, 3xfire.

  • afguy

    Kevin’s a good example of a liberal with which I can disagree on a few points but have a coherent discussion with otherwise.
    .
    For example, I can disagree with him on Creationism because my belief about that is not in line with most of those calling themselves Conservative, either. (Don’t think we could have just “happened” but know we adapt to our surroundings, which is the definition of evolution)
    .
    As for Conservatives, my biggest disagreement is with the the almost religious belief in the positive value of “greed” in American society. Ambition and responsibility is one thing but the “I want it ALL, I want it now, and I’m entitled to what I can get – screw the rest of you” ethos is killing us as a society. It’s warned against in nearly every religion but I can’t remember the last time I heard a sermon on the perils of the “love of money”. “Free-market capitalism” has become the dominant religion in this country – NOT Muslim, Protestant, Catholic or Jewish.
    .
    I’ve always believed that three teenagers with b-b guns will be able to take us over, by the time the political operatives get finished finding all of the wedge issues needed to divide us along to win the next election.

  • apr2563

    Rove initially dispaired of O’Donnell’s nomination because she was untruthful and incompent. Also, the funniest, hypocritical reason, that she may be unethical and lack integrity. Why doesn’t his head explode?
    Then after Blush took him to the woodshed, he walked back on his comments.
    Yet, he supports an equally crazy and incompetent, Sharon Angle.
    This is without a doubt the wierdest election season I have ever witnessed.
    I almost wish I could see a Senate debate that included O’Donnell, Angle, Paul, Inhoff, DeMint, Miller, and the other TPers. What a spectacle that would be? There would be a contest to see who could be the most reactionary, Christianist, troglotyte in the group. It would almost prove their theory that we haven’t evolved.
    .
    And please no lecture from 3X that my post is hate filled. It is done with love.

  • afguy

    GHWB banished Rove for a time because his tactics were just so over the top. However, he also brought him back when his campaign started to fail, telling him to “do what was necessary”. This allowed the cultured Bush Sr. to keep his hands clean from the grubby details and questionable tactics Rove used.
    .
    Ditto Bush Jr. Brought Rove back when he started to trail and basically said, “Just win … don’t tell me… I don’t wanta know how you did it.”
    .
    Rove enjoys this. Don’t think anyone likes or really respects him – he’s like the Mafia hit man you hire to “get rid of a problem” while you take a vacation in the Bahamas as an alibi.

  • freeinpa

    Hey Scooter:

    “you are a perfect example of rove’s tactics working on the gullible masses. congratulations for pointing that out.”

    And you are the perfect example of the liberal delusion that everyone but them is stupid and everyone but them lies. Problem with that reasoning is you are lying to yourself and deluded to think anyone cares what you think

  • freeinpa

    “How many billions of times have you repeated this tired old line

    About one less time than you have complained about Fox

  • freeinpa

    “It’s been overlooked that the Teatards not only knocked out the moderate Republican favored to win the Senate race, but they also knocked out the moderate Republican favored to win the House seat too.”
    .

    Now is it the same people telling us Coons will win in DE. Judging by how well the “experts” did in picking the winner of those two primary contest, Coons better have a back-up plan

  • freeinpa

    “come to think of it, what does Journolist have to do WITH ANYTHING? It has always been a non-issue. Always.”

    .
    Because Lord Scooter deemed it so. The left loon bats here go on and on about how conservative get their talking points from Limbaugh, Beck etc without any real proof, but journalist conferring how they should report something is a non-issue.

    Scooter use a helmet next time your out.

  • freeinpa

    “But I dispute the claim that today’s GOP is actually conservative.”
    .

    Ding ding! Hence the Tea Party and why Mike Castle is getting a one-way bus ticket back to DE

  • grape_crush

    It has always been a non-issue.
    .
    Especially considering that private mailing lists aren’t exactly uncommon, anyway.
    .
    http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0910/Meet_the_new_list.html

  • apr2563

    He worked with Lee Atwater and learned his lessons well, didn’t he?

  • shepherdwong

    From the link: OBAMA WARNS OF ‘CORPORATE TAKEOVER OF OUR DEMOCRACY’
    .
    I wonder where Obama was for the past two years of the corporate takeover of our democracy. Oh, that’s right, he was negotiating our surrender.

  • scooterfox

    newf…

    no delusions here. intelligent people can see the difference between smoke and mirrors put on by the so-called conservative info-tainment industry (beck, limbaugh) and PR wizards (like rove(r)) and the real thing.

    so-called liberal politicians are rarely liberal, and watching people like you and textee and 3x (or are those just your three different logins, to pad your numbers, like certain polls…) rail against them was once amusing, but these days is just like watching avid WWF fans insisting the the fights are real.

    … and… true liberals are smarter.

  • scooterfox

    it IS a non-issue. Journolist was nothing more than a (semi) private forum where they thought they could talk freely, as if in a bar, or on a walk in a park, throwing personal opinions around and being themselves in a casual manner… in other words, being human beings. Anything said on there has no bearing on their professional works.

    The same thing happens in breakrooms in retail stores, factories, etc, around the world. Its not an issue.

    Except for those who think its all in the name of ‘merica to butt into EVERYONE else’s business.

  • afguy

    I think it would be really interesting to know what Atwater apologized for right before he died of cancer.

  • sacredh

    Let’s not forget Rolling Stone, where generals go when they want to retire. Of course they forced McChrystal and his savvy group of aides to shoot themselves in the foot by letting them shoot their mouths off. Hey! reporters! They won’t say anything.

  • sacredh

    Name me one emperor that would comb his hair like that.

  • sacredh

    “I think it would be really interesting to know what Atwater apologized for right before he died of cancer.”
    .
    Please forgive me. I got in bed with the Devil and didn’t show the proper respect.

  • scooterfox

    so, which is it? Is Obama surrendering the government to the corporations or is he letting the government take over corporations?

    Seems you can’t have it both ways, but I get the same two contradictory arguments out of both sides of the same mouth all the time.

    Then again, logic is a dead art.

  • shepherdwong

    …or is he letting the government take over corporations?
    .
    That’s a Teatard delusion, regardless of the Goldman-Sachs-Citicorp-AIG-Wellpoint-Blue-Cross-Merck-Pfizer-sized mountain of evidence before them.

  • kevin

    PPP said O’Donnell would edge past Castle, and she did. And PPP is now saying O’Donnell is going to get crushed by Coons, and she will.
    .
    But feel free to stick your fingers in your ears until Rasmussen tells you want you want to hear. I’d hate to nudge you out of the Fox-Rush-Rasmussen cone of ignorance.

  • maverick2k9

    And Michael Crowley, the journalist, never bothers to find out why Rover has 2 organisations with similar names – Crossroads GPS and American Crossroads.
    -
    So that corporations that don’t want to “suffer the fate of boycotts will simply launder their money” to Crossroads GPS that can spend cash on campaigns and will not have to disclose how they’re being funded.
    -
    1. American Crossroads for Rusty and Freepy type donors.
    2. Crossroads GPS for the faceless billionaires and the oilgarchs and Haliburton type organisations.
    -
    Now remind me, Why the f@#@ did you become a “journalist”?

  • 3xfire3

    maverick,
    .
    “So that corporations that don’t want to “suffer the fate of boycotts will simply launder their money” to Crossroads GPS that can spend cash on campaigns and will not have to disclose how they’re being funded.”
    .
    Kind of like all those organizations that George Soros funds. Now I understand.
    .
    I guess big contributors for the democrats, like unions don’t have to worry about boycotts. Their the ones along with Acorn and the SEAU who supply the muscles for money that lead the boycotts. Nothing like a little intimidation to get ones way.
    .
    Democrats with all their Hollywood pals and Soros and others will still have a lot more money to spend in this campaign then the Republicans.
    .
    But you will still try to demonize anyone who supports the Republicans.
    .
    Even though the democrats will have substantially more campaign money they will still lose big.

  • 3xfire3

    scooterfox

    “And you are the perfect example of the liberal delusion that everyone but them is stupid and everyone but them lies. Problem with that reasoning is you are lying to yourself and deluded to think anyone cares what you think.”
    .
    I could not have said it better myself. Scooter is a real nutcake. He has bought into all the Liberal lies and actually believes they are true. Very gullible. One is born every day. .
    .
    Liberals think they are smart but they are really dumb. They base their lives on the big Lie. That’s the same method that Hitler used and it didn’t work out to well for him.
    .
    One has to feel sorry for these people. When your whole life is built on lies you become a very miserable person living a very miserable life.

  • diecash1

    Liberals think they are smart but they are really dumb. They base their lives on the big Lie. That’s the same method that Hitler used and it didn’t work out to well for him.

    Absolutely pathetic but I’d expect nothing else from a senile, hateful jackass. In three sentences you insult the intelligence of liberals, accuse them of living some unknown “big lie” and compare them to Hitler. Rustyblogwhore’s got nothing on you, you delusional old fool. Way to raise the discourse yet again with your confused and fevered ramblings.
    ..
    Oh yeah……..I call Godwin’s Law.

  • maverick2k9

    Kind of like all those organizations that George Soros funds. Now I understand.
    -
    No. You dont. Let me explain:
    -
    1. Who funds “those” organisations?

    Ans: George Soros – THERE YOU HAVE IT, the name and face of the person and the causes he funds and supports. If you hand him a megaphone, I’ll bet he will say so himself, shouting from the rooftops.

    2. Who funds Crossroads GPS? …
    Ans: ……………silence……Yeah, I am waiting for your answer.. 3xfire
    -
    As I said, you wouldn’t realise it, if facts came and b!tch slapped you in the face.

  • kevin

    Bingo.

  • 3xfire3

    Is there something illegal here?
    .
    In the 2008 election Obama, who said he was committed to campaign reform, changed his mind when he found out he could raise more money on his own then he would get if he accept government campaign funding. And Democrats raised a lot more money than McCain and the rest of the Republicans.
    .
    I didn’t hear you complaining then. As usual the children on the Left are being a little Hypocritical.

  • 3xfire3

    Bradley A. Smith Professor, election law and campaign finance :
    .
    “This spring, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairman Chris Van Hollen and the immediate past chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Chuck Schumer, introduced the DISCLOSE Act, a gimmicky acronym for “Democracy Is Served by Casting Light On Spending in Elections,” but which wags have dubbed the “Democratic Incumbents Seeking to Contain Losses by Outlawing Speech in Elections” Act.

    Purportedly a response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United vs. FEC, which held that corporations and unions have First Amendment rights to spend money to urge voters to vote for or against candidates, Schumer admitted that he expected the bill to have a “deterrent effect” on political speech presumed to be hostile to Democrats.”
    .
    At least Schumer is being honest about his motives.

  • maverick2k9

    3xfire, you can ramble on and on.. like a senile old fool.. but deflection won’t work this time.
    -
    So, before you go on yet another “Obama is a secret muslim” fishing expedition, answer the question:
    -
    Who funds Crossroads GPS ?
    -
    BTW, I think the title of this blog post should be :
    -
    Hollow men Vs Reid
    -
    When will these shadowy faceless billionaires show some spine, come out in the open? such pu$$ies, all of them.

blog comments powered by Disqus