Morning Must Reads: Split

Reuters

President Obama delivers remarks at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s 33rd Annual Awards Gala in Washington September 15, 2010. (Photo by REUTERS/Jim Young)

–Obama splits the baby on the Elizabeth Warren appointment, naming her a special adviser sans Senate confirmation and rankling the Harvard prof’s boosters and detractors in the process.

–A new poll from The New York Times and CBS News offers a mixed bag for both parties.

–Senator Boxer hammers Fiorina over her business past in a new ad. It’s the topic of choice for California Democrats this year.

–Jerry Brown unveils his budget plan the fiscally defective state.

Scherer tests the Tea and Crowley follows the money in this week’s newsstand issue of TIME. Drop us a line and we’ll mail you one.

Reihan Salam mediates David Brooks vs. Paul Ryan.

–Tim Geithner is taking a harder line on Chinese currency.

–Frad Kaplan considers the Afghan corruption conundrum:

Here’s the dilemma: Crack down on Karzai too hard, and he’ll scream, storm off, and issue threats under fear that his sovereignty is being threatened. But go too easy on Karzai, let him solve the problem in his own way at his own pace, and his regime will look even more unaccountable and illegitimate.

–Mahmoud Abbas sounds a hopeful note on the ongoing Mideast peace talks.

–A doctored photo in Egypt reveals how the negotiators are all consumed with how things play back home.

–And Harry Reid often seems to find just the wrong thing to say.

What did I miss?

E-mail Adam

Related Topics: 2012 Election, Afghanistan, Barack Obama, Congress, Democratic Party, Economy, Harry Reid, Miscellany, Republican Party, Senate, State Governments, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • nflfoghorn

    He’s my pet, dawg.

  • m0mentom0ri

    “Obama splits the baby…”
    .
    That should be the tagline for his administration.

  • m0mentom0ri

    Christine O’Donnel, young earth creationist.
    .

    CHRISTINE O’DONNELL: Well, creationism, in essence, is believing that the world began as the Bible in Genesis says, that God created the Earth in six days, six 24-hour periods. And there is just as much, if not more, evidence supporting that.

    .
    “if not more”? Really?
    .
    http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/09/the_gops_delaware_senate_nomin.html

  • newfreedomblog

    What did I miss?

    .
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1312462/Michelle-Obama-thinks-First-Lady-hell-says-Carla-Bruni.html
    .

    ‘It’s hell. I can’t stand it!’ Carla Bruni reveals what Michelle Obama REALLY thinks of being First Lady”

    .
    I guess the First Lady of “I am proud for the first time in my adult life” is ready to throw in the towel.

  • newfreedomblog

    More draining in the swamp seems to be the order of the day for Nancy Pelosi.
    .
    Listen to the audio, it is nothing short of astounding.
    .
    http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/09/15/shock-audio-facing-obligations-from-leadership-democrat-house-member-puts-the-squeeze-on-lobbyist/
    .

    “A couple weeks ago, House Member Eleanor Holmes Norton made a fundraising call to a lobbyist. The lobbyist wasn’t available, so Holmes Norton left a voicemail.”

    .

    “This is, uh, Eleanor Norton, Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton. Uh, I noticed that you have given to uh, other colleagues on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. I am a, um, Senior Member, a twenty year veteran and am Chair of the Sub-committee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management. I’m handling the largest economic development project in the United States now, the Homeland Security Compound of three buildings being built on the uh, old St. Elizabeth’s hospital site in the District of Columbia along with uh, fifteen other, uh, sites here for, that are part of the stimulus.
    .
    I was, frankly, uh, uh, surprised to see that we don’t have a record, so far as I can tell, of your having given to me despite my uh, long and deep uh, work. In fact, it’s been my major work, uh, on the committee and sub-committee it’s been essentially in your sector.
    .
    I am, I’m simply candidly calling to ask for a contribution. As the senior member of the um, committee and a sub-committee chair, we have (chuckles) obligations to raise, uh funds. And, I think it must have been me who hasn’t, frankly, uh, done my homework to ask for a contribution earlier.
    .
    So I’m trying to make up for it by asking for one now, when we particularly, uh, need, uh contributions, particularly those of us who have the seniority and chairmanships and are in a position to raise the funds.
    I’m asking you to give to Citizens for Eleanor Holmes Norton, PO Box 70626, DC, 20024. I’ll send you a follow-up note with appreciation for having heard me out. Thanks again.”

    .
    Anyone at all doubt whether Washington is corrupt, dishonest, and needs to be totally cleaned out?

  • Paul-no not that one

    I’ll give the TPers this much. They have got juice.
    .
    One lousy day of beating on Rove and he rolls over and plays dead.
    .
    So funny.
    .
    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/09/karl-rove-gives-in-to-odonnell-fever-video.php?ref=fpi

  • newfreedomblog

    –Scherer tests the Tea in this week’s newsstand issue of TIME. Drop us a line and we’ll mail you one.

    .
    Reading this almost seems like Michael may have taken a sip or two of the “tea”. Welcome aboard Michael!!
    .

  • m0mentom0ri

    Christine O’Donnell, financial genius.
    .

    Asked about a financial disclosure showing that O’Donnell only had $5,800 of earned income last year, O’Donnell told me that she actually made more but didn’t have to and wouldn’t disclose how much. “The only thing they can use against me is that I’m not a multi-millionaire,” said O’Donnell.

    .
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/christine-odonnell-wont-rule-out-third-party-run?page=2

  • m0mentom0ri

    GOP gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino, uhmmm…. horse enthusiast.
    .

    According to the WNYmedia blog, “every one of [the emails] was originally sent by or forwarded by” Paladino. Many include anti-Obama sentiments (including an “inauguration rehearsal” clip featuring African tribesman dancing), racial epithets (“motivational” posters featuring the n-word), several nude photos and hardcore porn videos (emailed during business hours no less), and the aforementioned bestiality video (which he sent with the subject line “easy steady big fella”).

    .
    http://gothamist.com/2010/04/12/paladino_really_enjoys_forwarding_b.php

  • afguy

    FTW!

  • http://publius2000.wordpress.com publius2000

    Maybe we should call him “Palomino”….

  • freeinpa

    Maybe Rove is smarter than libs and he quickly figured out that the light at the end of the tunnel is an oncoming train (Tea Party train).

  • freeinpa

    Maybe she hopes to go to Congress and become a millionaire like many of the life long Demos have done in Congress

  • freeinpa

    I guess we will see how quickly Coons lead over O’Donnell whittles away as this becomes more widespread. Delaware and much of its economy is based on being the home state of many incorporation and been noted as a business friendly state. They may not be so eager to support an admitted Marxist.

    “Chris Coons: The Making of a Bearded Marxist.” In the article, Coons, then 21 years old and about to graduate from Amherst College, chronicled his transformation from a sheltered, conservative-minded college student who had worked for former GOP Delaware Sen. William Roth and had campaigned for Ronald Reagan in 1980 into a cynical young adult who was distrustful of American power

  • homerhk

    oh for goodness sakes I thought that you two might be a little to smart to take a media meme as gospel truth. Obama has taken a decision that would allow Warren to be a strong voice for the consumer agency NOW (and not pending confirmation) and to set it up in her own way. As special advisor to the President she will have more access to Obama than she otherwise would were she just a nominee for a regulatory agency that hasn’t been created yet.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    I know this is a waste of time but what in that statement makes him a Marxist?

    Have you ever actually read a book written by Marx?

  • kevin

    Are conservatives unable to understand satire? Was the “bearded” preface not a tip-off that he was being sarcastic?
    .
    No wonder every right-wing effort to copy the Daily Show crashes and burns. You people have no sense of humor.
    .
    Actually, maybe that’s not right — you’ve given us Angle and O’Donnell and Paladino to laugh at, so maybe you’re more into performance art humor.

  • kevin

    Oh, more “evidence” provided by Andrew Breitbart!
    .
    Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, shame on you. Fool me three times, then I must be a gullible idiot named Rusty.

  • freeinpa

    And let the spin begin:

    It was a joke, it was satire, it was long ago, Joe Biden made me write it…….

  • diecash1

    Maybe she hopes to go to Congress and become a millionaire like many of the life long Demos have done in Congress

    Yes because that is a strictly partisan issue. No Repubs in Congress have ever done that. Riiiiight.

  • freeinpa

    Face it, there are more professional politicians that are Demos than Repubs. Sucking at the public trough is more likely a career path for the left.

  • kevin

    Which is it, freep — do we take as gospel everything a candidate said when they were young, or do we judge them by what they say today?
    .
    I’ll happily put Coons joking about becoming a “bearded Marxist” up next to O’Donnell’s totally sincere comments that masturbation is a social epidemic, that women don’t belong in the military, that condoms don’t protect against AIDS, that there’s “more evidence” of creationism than evolution, and all the rest of her past statements that she’s desperately running away from.

  • Art Pepper

    Geology is a liberal plot.

  • diecash1

    there are more professional politicians that are Demos than Repubs

    Care to back up that fact-free assertion? No? Okay then. This is just another attempt by you to demonize Dems and avoid criticizing Repubs when both are committing the same offenses. Should you wish to have any credibility, you’ll stop making issues such as this partisan when they are assuredly bipartisan.

  • hippooath

    “Which is it, freep — do we take as gospel everything a candidate said when they were young, or do we judge them by what they say today?”
    .
    I was wondering about that myself. In one breath what she says can’t be used because she was like 20 something when she said it, but in another a ironic comment from Coons proves that he is and will always be a Marxist.
    .
    And that’s called spin.
    I understand partisans as much as I understand women.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Yeah, that’s what happened.

  • freeinpa

    Hey Kevin:

    That’s the same argument you used about the stimulus for Africa ball washing the other day with CNS.

    Looks like you are the fool

  • newfreedomblog

    Only a gullible idiot like you little kevie would even go so far as to disqualify an audio tape of the woman in her own words.
    .
    Did you have to take a special course on how to be so stupid as you are in order to make your ridiculous comments?
    .
    But, when the only thing you put out for reading consumption is either a totally fabricated lie, or completely unfounded and unsourced.
    .
    Good job little liberal. You do offer the best the liberal nut-cases can put forward.

  • freeinpa

    The left continues to deny the Tea Party and only focuses on trying to paint them as racist and nut jobs (libs are projecting).

    The tears will flow in November when you wake up and find this “”extreme” group is called America

  • freeinpa

    Look at those in Congress now and how may have been carried out with their boots on in the past couple of years

  • freeinpa

    ” we take as gospel everything a candidate said when they were young, or do we judge them by what they say today?”

    Turn around isn’t fair play I guess when you use it against liberals. I’ll check yesterdays posts to see if you had the same response to the salacious posts about O’Donnell yesterday. I’m guessing though I won’t find one.

    And in the case of liberal politicians you can’t believe what they say now

  • m0mentom0ri

    How to use a compliant media to redefine torture.
    .

    The figures below, for the New York and the Los Angeles Times, shows that in the last decade the newspapers switched from calling it “torture,” to using descriptors (they call it “softer treatment” and include adjectives like “harsh,” “controversial,” or “aggressive”), or simply calling it waterboarding (“no treatment”).

    .
    http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/09/14/media-treatment-of-waterboarding-is-it-torture/
    .
    Way to go, media!

  • Paul-no not that one

    I was complimenting the TPers on turning Turd Blossom into a quivering mass in a days time.
    .
    Impressive.

  • afguy

    Homerhk,
    .
    We are thinking beyond this single example. In his past searches for “bi-partisanship”, he’s “split the baby” on more than this one occasion (and either ended up with neither half of the kid or only a toenail or two).
    .
    I’d much rather he actually tried to get her confirmed (and settle for this measure) rather than seemingly starting with this half-measure.

  • Paul-no not that one

    As I think about it I bet Rove hasn’t been that scared since he was a little boy and a little girl was mean to him because he was supporting Nixon against JFK.
    .
    I think she punched him and after crying he vowed to be a republican for life.
    .
    I think that’s his story.

  • kevin

    Jesus, that’s all you two have got?
    .
    Can we get some conservatives in here who can make an actual argument? This is like fighting a five year old.

  • kevin

    O’Donnell was sincere in what she said.
    .
    But Coons’ headline was a joke. You know, like you.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “‘[Michelle Obama] the only one in (Carla’s) eyes able to challenge her for the title of the world’s sexiest and most glamorous first lady’”
    .
    From your own article.
    .
    Well, I am glad that you find Michelle Obama sexy.
    .
    I wouldn’t say that she is “the world’s sexiest and most glamorous first lady”, but if you think so, Rusty, that’s fine with me.
    .
    BTW: remember my point of Republicans focusing on insignificant people?
    .
    John Boehner or the first lady – who makes more policy decisions?
    .
    Palin or Michelle Obama – who, in her own right has a political following?
    .
    McCain, O’Donnell, Rand Paul… I could go on.
    .
    But, thank you for making the point that Republicans attack the most insignificant characters while Democrats challenge the Republican Party and Tea Party leadership and, you know, Michelle Obama is kinda hot.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Freakinpa,
    .
    O’Donnell is two years older than I am and not earning anything which resembles an income.
    .
    You should call her “Rev Jim” and a “failure at life”.
    .
    Either that or you are such a pathetic right wing sycophant that you’ll blame Democrats for how she couldn’t ear enough to take care of a pet puppy much less a real income to support herself.

  • freeinpa

    Well I guess that’s what happens when you think

  • freeinpa

    Somehow Rev Jim you measure of success seems to only be money. There are failures in life no matter their net worth and you immediately come to mind.

    It is interesting how liberal like you rail against the wealthy but spend your whole life trying to be one.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Gosh, you TPers just can’t take a compliment.

  • freeinpa

    oh Kevin what a rapier like wit- well a half wit anyway. Funny how Demos keep electing jokes which is only natural since they are supported by clowns

  • freeinpa

    Since torture is illegal and no one has been convicted calling it torture is just a lie then isn’t it?

    Do they explain to what and why Obama the war on terror to?
    Oh Yeah Overseas Contingency Operation. And oh yeah he didn’t want to upset the people trying to kill us

  • freeinpa

    Do you know the expression “Beware Greeks bearing gifts”?

  • Paul-no not that one

    Sure, but that only applies to one’s enemies.
    .
    Fine I’ll agree with you that Turd Blossom saw the light on his own.
    .
    And that I have been over estimated the power of the TP.
    .
    Is that better?

  • freeinpa

    “McCain, O’Donnell, Rand Paul… I could go on.”

    .

    You have and will all without a single point!

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “It is interesting how liberal like you rail against the wealthy but spend your whole life trying to be one.”
    .
    What’s most interesting about that is that after posting, basically every single day here since March several times a day, you are so blind as to think that I have ever “rail against the wealthy”.
    .
    When I exceed $250k per year I will continue to support taxes being higher for those making over $250k per year since I always have and always will see taxes as a duty just like jury duty, selective services and voting.
    .
    When businesses pollute the environment such that polluted air goes from the property owned by the business to property not owned by the business or from the water table beneath the business to the water table not beneath the business, I support the households and businesses being encroached upon by pollution.
    .
    I do not see that railing against anybody or anything except for being against toxic waste.
    .
    This above your head since you see the entire world a your POV or Communist. So, I can never expect you to understand.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    What freakinpa writes:
    .
    “..Demos keep electing jokes which is only natural since they are supported by clowns…”
    .
    What can be logically deduced:
    .
    “I have no argument, so, I will just gratuitously insult you.”
    .
    If you expect to be respected more than dog crap on the bottom of a shoe, you should stop your random insults and, instead, find…. I don’t know… maybe a reasonable argument.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “…And oh yeah he didn’t want to upset the people trying to kill us…”
    .
    If you haven’t noticed, real life liberals (unlike your imaginary wealth distributors wanting Muslim fundamentalist extremists to conquer America and become communist, too you see in your fertile imagination) are not happy about how Obama has not closed down Gitmo
    .
    The man convicted of being the Boston strangler was posthumously exonerated due to DNA evidence more than 30 years later leaving nobody convicted for the crime, does that mean that being a serial killer is legal?
    .
    If not, then, just because nobody got convicted on torture charges does not mean that the actions were not torture nor in any way legal.

  • gum0nshoe

    Fox News sews Democrat Robin Carnahan over copyright infringement

    Basically, there was an interview that made a Republican candidate look bad. The campaign used the interview, without permission, as part of an ad.

    I find the situation hilarious.

  • apr2563

    Guys, while waiting for confirmation, her nomination will most certainly have a hold put on it. If the hold is eventually lifted, the hearings will be brutal and drag on. During this time, no agency will be set up.
    Obama frustrates me sometimes, but look at the whole picture. Now the agency can be set up and the process begun.

  • apr2563

    And, if she makes it through confirmation, there will be a filabuster. I would support allowing a filabuster to prove the point about who is not supporting the consumers. However, again, no agency would be set up.

  • apr2563

    http://wireupdate.com/local/u-s-poverty-rate-rises-to-14-3-percent-highest-since-1994/
    .
    Poverty rate at 14.3%. Highest since 1994.
    This is what years of Reagan economics, Republican legislation, and Democratic capitulation and triangulation has given us.

  • apr2563

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/9/16/902035/-Keep-your-eyes-on-your-wallet.-TIME-is-at-it-again
    /
    The historical wisdom of Time Magazine. Their take on the housing market in 2005 and today. Whoops.

  • freeinpa

    If it makes you feel better I’m good

  • freeinpa


    What’s most interesting about that is that after posting, basically every single day here since March several times a day, you are so blind as to think that I have ever “rail against the wealthy”.
    ..
    What I think and you have proven is that you have no idea what you are talking about even when talking about yourself.

  • freeinpa


    “What can be logically deduced”

    This would be funny if you had any logic or could deduce anything. You only contribute you out and out failures but go back and check all the name calling you have done can you logically deduce then you have no argument.
    ..
    I can deduce that after reading that you are posting without the mindless drivel of you trying separately to sound relevant and intelligent.

  • freeinpa

    And I see Rev Jim is still nothing but a burden to society.

    “If you haven’t noticed, real life liberals (unlike your imaginary wealth distributors.”

    So real life liberals don’t want raise taxes for more spending, more entitlements and growing other entitlements ? So real life liberasl wnat to get rid os HC, SS and other programs because they don’t beleive in wealth re-distribution? Is that what you really want to say?

    BWHWHAHHAAH! You are an idiot. Or is only liberal sin your delusional mind that want to do it.

  • freeinpa

    What did they sew her to?

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “You have and will all without a single point!”
    .
    Are you saying:
    .
    A) Rand Paul, John Boehner, Sarah Palin… that they are all unimportant to you.
    .
    B) That we should care as much about if the first lady is sexy or not as much as you should care who the future of your party is.
    .
    Or
    .
    C) All responses to you are useless.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “What I think and you have proven is that you have no idea what you are talking about even when talking about yourself.”
    .
    LOL
    .
    You are so amazingly arrogant it is hilarious!
    .
    You know me better than I do!
    .
    You don’t know the first thing about me in reality.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “..go back and check all the name calling you have done can you logically deduce then you have no argument.”
    .
    Actually, when you look back I will respond to your name calling by proving you wrong using several outside sources and then “name call” back to you.
    .
    Would you like me to go back and bring examples or will your brain hurt from too many facts?

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “So real life liberals don’t want raise taxes for more spending…”
    .
    No, we need more spending momentarily to jump start the economy and to pay the Bush deficit.
    .
    ” …more entitlements…”
    .
    No, there are no proposed entitlement programs. Food stamps, section 8 housing and Social Security are fine.
    .
    “… and growing other entitlements ?”
    .
    Money for the disabled and otherwise needy go up with the cost of living if that is what you mean.
    .
    “So real life liberasl wnat to get rid os HC,”
    .
    Health Care was, for many decades “free” (as in passed onto other patients) in emergency rooms. So, if you mean to “redistribute” it from your health insurance company to the poor person’s employer paying for insurance, I guess health care reform would be redistributing money to you. I’m sorry that you do not wan to keep it. If you like paying $5 per aspirin through your insurance company health care reform can’t save you.
    .
    ” SS and other programs because they don’t beleive in wealth re-distribution?”
    .
    I had no idea that when conservatives liked the “good old days” that you meant that you liked the Great Depression before Social Security.
    .
    People get back what they put into social security for the most part.
    .
    Well, the alternative to having social security and other means of taking care of our poor which we have had for 75 years is that the poor steal all of your sht to get by.
    .
    I don’t want anybody stealing my things, but, for a SOB like you, I hope you do get robbed.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Freeinpa,
    .
    You know as well as I do that you are the ultimate source of insults here and if you ever responded without insults, you wouldn’t get insulted all of the time.
    .
    I’d be willing to stop calling you a freak child molesting meth addict if you stop your really strange reference to a 1970s TV show.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Welfare 557.3 Billion.
    .
    http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/us_welfare_spending_40.html#usgs30240
    .
    budget for 2010 totals $3.55 trillion
    .
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_United_States_federal_budget
    .
    That would 15.69% of tax money going to welfare programs.
    .
    If your taxes are 30% of your income then 15.56% of 30% = 4.66% of your income.
    .
    If you own your own home, have children, etc and make under $250k per year, you are paying considerably less than 30% of your income.
    .
    So this “wealth distribution” you are so upset about is about 3% to 4% of your income.
    .
    The rest of your taxes go to other things, the largest of which is defense.

  • http://hddfjgfghj.wordpress.com hddfjgfghj

    welcome to our website === w w w (www.Ccshopping ) – u s === ..The new update, a large hot ..
    WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT.
    YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

blog comments powered by Disqus