What’s the Democratic Agenda?

If you’re a Democratic candidate this fall, unemployment and the stalled economy are already making your life miserable. But you’ve also got another big campaign challenge: What’s your agenda? For many Democrats this year, it’s simply not clear. Let’s take a tour: The party has already used up one of its most reliable issues over the past decade—health care—with decidedly mixed political results. Reforming Wall Street after the 2008 financial crash is also a checked box. Other domestic issues are not the stuff of campaign ads in swing districts. Talk of major new greenhouse-gas regulation to slow global warming, once a key applause line for candidate Obama and the Democrats, is now politically toxic. With voters highly skeptical of government spending, few Democrats are echoing president Obama’s new call for a $50 billion infrastructure bank. Social issues like abortion and gun control are on the back burner. And foreign policy is tricky. President Obama has touted the end of the U.S. combat mission in Iraq, neutralizing the issue that fueled the 2006 Democratic takeover, and Afghanistan is a muddle that has the Democratic party internally divided. (In the process of writing this item I found that Nate Silver made a similar argument just yesterday.) This is why so much Democratic campaign rhetoric is focused on Tea Party foibles, memories of George Bush, and GOP ties to Wall Street.

It may also provide important context for President Obama’s speech today calling for an end to the Bush tax cuts for couples with incomes over $250,000 (and $200,000 for individuals). While everyone from House Republican leader John Boehner to centrist economic uber-pundit Mark Zandi to Obama’s recently departed budget director Peter Orszag have suggested that those high-income tax cuts be extended for another two years, Obama is drawing a line that will allow Democrats to contrast themselves with Republicans on one of the core issues–income taxes–that define voters’ behavior.

But even the tax cut fight could have a limited impact for Democrats. For one thing, the party was never able to turn public opinion against the original Bush plan back in 2001 (albeit under very different budgetary and economic circumstances). For another, because the Bush tax cuts are set to expire at the end of this year, their fate will be debated and settled before the new Congress is sworn in. Meaning that Democratic candidates will still be left searching for a clear and compelling political agenda.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • afguy

    Here’s a more intriging question – what the h*ll is the GOP’s plan if they regain power?
    .
    I have a heck of a lot better idea of the Dem’s policy intentions for the country than I do from the GOP.
    .
    Other than the obvious “if Obama’s for it, we’re ag’in it”…
    .
    Would you describe the GOP agenda as either “clear” or “compelling”? If not, at least tell us what the heck it is.

  • mycophile

    I read this characterization somewhere (re-worded in my own):
    .
    Democrats have 250 different ideologies. Before they formulate a plan of operation, they are waiting to debate them and/or coalesce them into a number of them much closer to one. And then construct an agenda that can help manifest the goals of that (those) ideologies.
    .
    Republicans, first and foremost, have an operating plan — the ideologies they espouse are but ways to claim that the their operating plan is informed by an agenda to prormulgate an ideology, when, in fact, it is no such thing.
    .
    As a result, they are winning (in a game that is irrespective of “winning” or “losing” elections), because actions speak louder than words (so to speak).

  • mycophile

    but the Rs are never going to tell the truth about what their operating plan is, because they would all be lynched if they did.

  • Michael Crowley

    Fair point, the GOP agenda is also obscure–something I have also commented on, including here: http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/08/24/speaker-boehner-2/.

    But in an anti-incumbent environment the Republicans have the wind at their back and can better afford to keep things vague.

  • destor23

    I knew that if the Democrats fixed health care, drew down forces from Iraq and passed landmark financial legislation that it was going to be excellent news for Republicans!

    Sheesh, Michael, sometimes I think that if the Obama twins aced a standardized test, I’d read a post on Swampland explaining how it makes Bristol Palin smarter.

  • destor23

    * not sure how “twins” got in there. End of day, cut me some slack.

  • Ivy_B

    Late to the party, but it is Peter Orszag and he recommended the extension only if there had to be a compromise. You could look it up.
    .
    Of course the error of what he said has been repeated so often that it is now part of the CW.

  • afguy

    Obscure?? It’s downright nebulous.
    .
    Bad choice of words – a nebula is something you can see and describe.
    .
    How about a “faith-based” policy position… as in “have faith that they have one”.

  • destor23

    Oh well then, if everybody thinks it’s true who cares about your pesky facts?

  • Paul-no not that one

    “But in an anti-incumbent environment the Republicans have the wind at their back and can better afford to keep things vague.”
    .
    Sure, It’s not like a reporter would call them on it.

  • afguy

    So our political process has become a “zero sum” endeavor?
    .
    If the Dem’s are having issues then it just naturally follows that the R’s are a good alternative, even if they caused the problems in the first place and have given us NO, repeat, NO meaningful insights into what they intend to do?
    .
    I heard Chuck Toddler last night seeming to admire the GOP for having re-branded themselves without presenting any concrete proposals, relying completely on voter dissatisfaction with the present party in power.

  • afguy

    Apparently they are relying on everyone having an almost criminal lack of long-term memory when they go to the polls in November.

  • nflfoghorn

    I would never trust someone who won’t reveal his/her plans.

  • apr2563

    All people like Todd and much of pundocracy care about is the game not the policy or the outcomes effect on the country.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “I would never trust someone who won’t reveal his/her plans.”
    .
    Imagine if all jobs, like elected office, would hire somebody based upon a “secret plan”.
    .
    Job interviews would be like this:
    .
    “Well, you have a few credits left before graduating and we don’t usually hire people until after they graduated, the ad says that we want somebody with three to five years experience and you have no experience in this field, please tell me why you are the most qualified for this job.”
    .
    Interviewee:
    .
    “It’s a secret. I am far, far more qualified for this job, but, I can’t tell you why until after you hire me.”
    .
    “You’ve got the Job!”
    .
    Damn, I would have gotten a few multi-million dollar CEO jobs if other jobs worked that way.

  • shepherdwong

    “It’s a secret. I am far, far more qualified for this job, but, I can’t tell you why until after you hire me.”
    .
    Don’t forget, as a Republican, he’d also tell you that the organization he was asking for a job in is actually “the problem.”

  • nflfoghorn

    “How do you plan to fix Medicare, Senator X?”
    .
    “I can’t tell you yet – wait ’til after November 2.”
    .
    .
    Are Republicans allasudden Supreme Court nominees??

  • nflfoghorn

    “Of course the error of what [Orszag] said has been
    repeated so often that it is now part of the CW”
    .
    Orszag has a new show this fall? Is it before or after “Top Model”??
    .
    .
    Oh…..

  • bryanfred

    True, but much of the Democrats’ success in 2006 and 2008 was the flip side of what we’re witnessing now. Obama was about as opaque a presidential candidate as we’ve ever seen but he was opposite Bush in almost every way, which was good enough. Now it’s 2010 and people are saying, “okay, you’ve held Congress for four years and the Presidency for two, and things are not getting better.”

    In 2004 we were hearing about permanent Republican majorities. By 2008 it was permanent Democratic majorities (side note: ignore grand prognostications from pundits). Easy come, easy go in a two-party system.

  • freeinpa

    “I have a heck of a lot better idea of the Dem’s policy intentions for the country than I do from the GOP”
    .

    Let’s see people have no idea what the Republican plan is (or so liberals say) and they know what the Dems plan is. HMM What that says is no matter what the Repubs plan is or may be, they electorate prefers it to the Dems plan.

  • freeinpa

    Maybe all the Democrats should follow Moonbeam’s lead:
    .

    “I have a plan and I’ll tell you after I’m elected”

    .
    http://www.breitbart.tv/jerry-brown-i-have-a-plan-ill-tell-you-after-the-election/

  • freeinpa

    Obama’s new plan for election success:

    .
    U.S. names Asian carp czar

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Republicans name Freeinpa official crap czar.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “…they electorate prefers it to…”
    .
    A little proof reading goes a long way.
    .
    The generic polls are tied this week, Freeinpa. Nobody is yet sure who prefers what.
    .
    Do us all a favor and do not not do what you, Rusty and 3X do and pretend that you are an entire country and say, “the American people think…”
    .
    I know I know what I, one of the American people think far better than you will ever know or think I think.
    .
    Try to put all of these in terms of “I”, “conservatives”, “the Tea Party”, “my dog and I” but don’t pretend that you are an entire country.

  • kbanginmotown

    @Paul-NNTO:

    “But in an anti-incumbent environment the Republicans have the wind at their back and can better afford to keep things vague.”
    .
    Sure, It’s not like a reporter would call them on it.

    Sweeeet!

  • stuartzechman

    Thanks so much for responding to commentary, Michael Crowley, it is very much appreciated.

  • carpevis

    Why does the title pick on the Democrats?

    Does ANYONE in Congress have an agenda besides “no”?

    The right wing is just as clueless as the left, simply because they’ve done absolutely NOTHING except focus on thwarting the left. If elected, they’ll be far less than effective than the left has been just because all of their ideas are stopping things.

  • afguy

    Maybe they can now concentrate on stopping themselves?

  • afguy

    Let’s see people have no idea what the Republican plan is (or so liberals say) and they know what the Dems plan is. HMM What that says is no matter what the Repubs plan is or may be, they electorate prefers it to the Dems plan.
    .
    Do you have any idea how idiotic and blindly tribal that sounds, Free?
    .
    Also, I’ve noticed that even YOU can’t enunciate what the GOP platform is, regardless of what the others here say. Boehner has been rather proud of the fact that they are intentionally keeping things rather vague.
    .
    If you think that the Repub platform is that great, sacrifice a few screen pixels or keystrokes here and tell the rest of us what it is. Sooner or later, the party position has to be expanded beyond “Just Say No” for them to govern.
    .
    Or is the party simply all about just tearing down what you don’t like or doesn’t benefit you personally?

blog comments powered by Disqus