In the Arena

Election Road Trip Day 1: The Opacity of the Process

Republican candidate for Congress Pat Meehan goes door to door to hand out fliers explaining his intentions if he is elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. Photograph by Peter van Agtmael- Magnum for TIME


Philadelphia, Pa.

miles traveled: 290

traveling companions: Peter Cove and Lee Bowes of America Works

events: Door-to-door campaigning with Republican Pat Meehan in Drexel Hill; Polish picnic with Republican Mike Fitzpatrick in Doylestown; Allentown Fair with Democrat John Callahan in, uh, Allentown.

Joe Klein talks to a potential voter in Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania. Photograph by Peter van Agtmael- Magnum for TIME
USA. Drexel Hill, PA. 2010.


A day of hand-shaking, no great shakes, but an insight: I realize that, like most reporters, I’m always waiting for the moment when a constituent gets up in a politician’s face and gives him or her what-for. That’s a story! It happens fairly frequently in town hall meetings, where citizens have the strength of numbers. But when a politician is out at the fair shaking hands, it’s usually a steady flow of supporters, interrupted occasionally by an awkward silence. That’s because people are polite. And so, 90% of the transactions I saw today involved constituents telling politicians: you go guy. This tends to reinforce the delusion among all politicians that they are God’s gift to democracy and, no matter what the polls say, they’re gonna win–because, didya see all those folks who said they were going to support me? (Did you see all those other folks who didn’t open their door or changed directions abruptly, heading away from the politician and toward the kielbasa stand? I didn’t think so.)

I did see one interesting confrontation today between candidate John Callahan–a young, energetic Democrat with a great record as mayor Bethlehem, running against the Republican incumbent Charlie Dent–and a muscular, shaved-head guy named Kenneth, just out of the Army after serving two tours in Iraq.

Kenneth was mega-skeptical from the jump. What are you going to do in Washington? He asked. Callahan said, “The same sort of things I’ve been doing here” and went into the litany of 5,000 jobs created and $2 billion in private development projects in Bethlehem over the past few years. It turned out that Kenneth was one of Callahan’s constituents. “I haven’t raised your taxes in the past four years,” Callahan said. “Oh yes, you did,” Kenneth shot back, “My school taxes went up this year.” Callahan tried to patiently explain that the school board was independent; he didn’t have any control over school taxes. “I wish I did,” the mayor added mournfully.

“I can’t believe that with all the power you have, you don’t have any influence,” Kenneth said. Callahan assured him that it was true and moved on. “I can’t believe teachers are getting raises and raising our taxes, while people are losing jobs and struggling, ” Kenneth told me later. “That’s not right. It’s not fair.” In fact, Callahan had quickly become an afterthought: Kenneth was down on government–and his views leached from local school taxes to the Congressional race to the situation in Washington, which–you’ll not be surprised to learn–he thinks is a mess. So this is complicated: it’s not just Obama who’s on the hotseat this year. It’s all of government…and, just below the radar, the notion that public employees aren’t taking any of the hits that private sector employees are and, indeed, holding out for raises in some cases, is rankling. It’s not for nothing that Pat Meehan, the Republican running for Joe Sestak’s Congressional seat, tells voters that 8 million private sector jobs had been lost and 650,000 public sector jobs have been created. And that the only thing his neighbors have seen of the stimulus package is the replacement of traffic lights on Town Line Road. This is something Democrats don’t seem to understand: people aren’t thrilled about 650,000 new public sector jobs. They realize they’re paying for them and assume that all the government is doing is busy work, replacing one red-yellow-green with a newer red-yellow-green.

Joe Klein talks to an Iraq war veteran at the Allentown Fair. Photograph by Peter van Agtmael- Magnum for TIME
USA. Allentown, PA. 2010.


Even more distressing was latest news from my friends Peter Cove and Lee Bowes, who created America Works, which–according to several academic studies–is among the most successful welfare-to-work programs in the country. In recent years, they’ve expanded to prison-to-work and veterans-to-work (especially homeless veterans). They will place 20,000 people, more or less, in jobs this year–almost all of them in the private sector. “We’re having trouble with the Obama Administration,” said Lee. Why? You might ask. Well, America Works is a for-profit company and the Obama Administration has limited job placement programs to not-for-profit groups. That is ridiculous, the sort of below the radar decision that Administrations of both parties make to please their interest groups. (In this case, the labor unions who’ve been getting and wasting job training funds for decades–and the public employees who fear that if private companies can get people to work, they’ll be fewer jobs for public employees who deal with the poor.)

Briefly, here’s how America Works…works: Peter and Lee have built several decades worth of credibility with major companies, who trust them to provide reliable workers. They train the prospective workers, not so much in skills, but in how to work–get up on time, dress respectably, don’t go crazy if the boss criticizes you, smile, offer a firm handshake. They don’t get paid (mostly local and state governments) until the worker has stayed on the job for six months–and then they collect a fee of $5000. Most of the jobs they offer pay $12-14 per hour. “Our clients have changed over the past decade,” Lee said, “from women on welfare to men–prisoners and vets–and the jobs have changed from secretarial and file clerks to private security, warehouse operations, hospitals. There are plenty of jobs out there, but our employers are bit more picky than they used to be.”

And then Lee, who is a deep Democrat, whose father and grandfather were labor organizers,  shocked me: “I’m beginning to wonder about extending unemployment benefits for so long. You have a fair number of people who were construction workers and middle managers making $75,000 per year who are waiting it out, hoping their jobs will come back. But if there are $12-14 per hour jobs available as security guards, why shouldn’t they be working them instead of having their neighbors pay for their unemployment insurance?”

Peter added that there was a recent European study that showed that people who worked were healthier than people who were unemployed. “It just isn’t good for you, lying around the house. I’d be in favor of taking the money we’re paying for unemployment and redirecting it into a big, Roosevelt-style public works program…Of course, you can’t do that these days. The construction unions would block it.”

The unions have a point: if you did that sort of jobs program, not very many people would be making $75,000 a year in construction anymore. The gap between the middle class and the upper middle class would grow even more. But, if jobs are actually available in the $12-14 per hour range, those who oppose further extending unemployment benefits have a point, too.

Politicians talk and talk about jobs. They do not talk about these sorts of details, these sorts of nuances, these difficult choices. They talk bumper stickers. I will give notoriety and a dozen donuts to the first politician who says something interesting to me about the country’s employment dilemma.

This post is part of my Election Road Trip 2010 project. To track my location across the country, and read all my road trip posts, click here.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Mitt Romney’s Sweet Spot: Just Conservative Enough

    Why is Mitt Romney having trouble winning over the conservative Republican base? One reason is his lack of political finesse, an air of dorky rich-guy aloofness that reminds some people of John Kerry. More important, however, is his ideological profile. In almost every important way, Romney’s policy platform is more moderate than those of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Gingrich  offers a much more conservative tax plan, along with crowd-pleasing ideas like his plan to sic federal marshals on “radical” liberal judges. Santorum carries a blazing social-conservative torch, championing ideas like a constitutional ban on abortion. Both Gingrich and Santorum talk quite openly about the virtues of bombing Iran. Romney’s temperature runs cooler in all these areas. Not to mention his past record of pro-choice, pro-gay rights positions. As Jon Chait notes today, the GOP establishment is defending Romney but also working hard to push him to the right.

    Romney: 'I Misspoke'HuffPost Politics

    Conflict Over Obama’s Contraception Rule Intensifies

    The Administration’s decision to require Catholic charities and universities to provide free birth control through employee health coverage is several weeks old, but the maelstrom of dissent it’s created is widening. Republicans, who charge that the measure violates such organizations’ religious freedoms, have allied with Catholic groups in opposition, and in recent days a handful of high-profile Democrats have joined their ranks in calling on the Administration to broaden exemptions from the rule.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    “I can’t believe teachers are getting raises and raising our taxes, while people are losing jobs and struggling>

    Because after all, everybody knows that education and employment opportunity have no connection to each other whatsoever.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Neat stuff, thanks for the story.
    -
    It sounds like a lot of these discussions are carried out with little knowledge or data.
    -
    “But, if jobs are actually available in the $12-14 per hour range, those who oppose further extending unemployment benefits have a point, too.”
    -
    But that isn’t true, is it? I thought I’d read that there are 5 applicants for every opening right now…

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Also note that the actual end-point for the Construction worker settling for 13-15/hr is that he ends up getting that for the same construction work he used to do. The jobless aren’t the only ones ‘holding out’ for a better deal. Employers are doing precisely the same thing.

  • kbanginmotown

    Joe: Thanks for the post. Sounds like you’re off to a good start.
    .
    re: Jobs and “…you can’t do that these days. The construction unions would block it.” If the UAW can be brought around to instituting multi-tier wage levels, why not the construction workers?
    .
    re: Frustration with Government. I keep hearing this a lot from people who sat on their hands between Nov2000 and Jan2009, and suddenly got frustrated the week of Jan20th, 2009. I hope that you can separate real from imagined frustrations.
    .
    Also: How many of the folks you speak to believe President Obama is a Mulsim? 30% 40%?

  • mycophile

    Interesting post, Joe
    .
    I think that comments 1,2,&3, as well as the comments regarding construction unions in #4, bear keeping in mind.
    .
    I, too, feel like you are off to a good start.

  • mycophile

    the stuff in #4 about separating real from imagined frustrations is also worthy, but, in practice, will probably be hard to accomplish in short discussions.

  • square1

    I’d be in favor of taking the money we’re paying for unemployment and redirecting it into a big, Roosevelt-style public works program…Of course, you can’t do that these days. The construction unions would block it.”

    LOL! Thanks for the belly laughs, Joe Klein! This is the first time that I have heard anyone suggest that the reason the Obama administration hasn’t called for more New Deal-style programs is because of union opposition.

    Well, America Works is a for-profit company and the Obama Administration has limited job placement programs to not-for-profit groups.

    My sense is that America Works does a great job of getting people who largely would be unemployable to function in private-sector employment. But the reason that unemployment is near 10% isn’t because millions of Americans suddenly forgot how to function in the workplace. It is that their services are suddenly no longer needed. They don’t need job training. They don’t need job placement agencies. They don’t need case workers. They need jobs.

    Here’s a solution. Instead of asking construction workers to take massive pay cuts and to become security guards, we could simply invest a couple trillion (like the Chinese are) in new infrastructure projects, pay skilled American workers the prevailing wage rates, put money into the pockets of middle class employees, rejuvenate state and local tax revenues, get people off of unemployment, and stimulate the economy.

    Of course, that would deprive Joe Klein of the opportunity to scapegoat unions and public-sector employees for hampering our recovery from the Great Recession….

  • edismeiamhe

    Have any of the heavies in the Union Management slots ever figured out that a $75,000 a year construction worker, shovel and all, is a drag on the economy.

    The same goes for the $45.00 an hour, with all the benies, ($93,600 a year) production line worker at an Auto Assembly plant putting five nuts on a wheel is one of the causes that the American Auto Industry fails to compete world wide and it the real cause of jobs going overseas?

    Should this greasy fingered wrench bender, with no skill, and little education, receive, Union coerced, pay that enables him to have a nice three bedroom home, two cars, a cottage at the lake, a cadillac health plan, and on an on?

    Let’s get real…if the U.S. is going to climb back to being the leading industrial power in the world, this nonsense has got to cease.

    The law of Supply and Demand must be free to operate. “A far days wages for a fair days work” is all that should be asked and demanded.

  • apr2563

    Joe, did you do any actual research to find out if the statistics and numbers you have thrown out has any validity. Or do they just reinforce your beliefs about teachers and unions?
    Are there actually a lot of $12 and over security guard jobs available? Most I have heard about pay minimum wage, you buy your own uniform and you work less than 40 hour weeks. You want to live on that Joe?
    Your traveling hasn’t seemed to increase your knowledge Joe.

  • redraven937

    [...] and the public employees who fear that if private companies can get people to work, they’ll be fewer jobs for public employees who deal with the poor.

    This has got to be the most ridiculous, asinine, and completely vapid thing committed to the internet by someone paid to do so I have ever encountered. Do you really, in your heart of hearts, actually believe there are meaningful amounts of public employees that think this way? As in, fear that lower unemployment would mean less poor people and less job security for themselves?

    Jesus Christ, Joe. Take your cruise through central Ohio and stop by Children Services and Jobs & Family Services, walk in, talk to the public employees you are vilifying, and ask them if they want the volume of utter misery they deal with every day to increase/stay the same, rather than decrease. I do not see any distinction between what you just typed and the scheduled Quran burning on 9/11: a cynical attempt to pander to an audience clamoring for anything to blame their present (and completely unrelated) frustrations on.

    Bottom line: you are talking way out of your ass. If the economy was better and more people were getting to work, there would be less public employees (especially those working with the poor) because public employees would be flying out the door to the private sector. I’m a public employee not out of choice, but because they were the only people hiring.

  • mycophile

    @ 7~
    .
    first of all, try getting your machines built and repaired by “sand-lot mechanics”, instead. You will find some good ones, but you will more than likely find yourself longing for the higher paid tradespeople and mechanics that you threw overboard. Sure, getting paid $75,000 per year to rune 5 nuts all day long is a ridiculously inefficient use of money, but is your example accurate, or a gross exaggeration to try to legitimize a black-and-white argument that is really much more difficult to nuance? Make no mistake, having been a union worker in my youth, and having found much of the operation of the union to be counterproductive and a waste of my dues, I do not defend unions as without flaw. But I advocate for accurate identification of problems before proposing fixes to them.
    .
    Next

    Have any of the heavies in the Union Management slots ever figured out that a $75,000 a year construction worker, shovel and all, is a drag on the economy.

    Byt the same logic:
    .
    the same goes for CEOs making millions and tens of millions
    .
    the same goes for insurance companies skimming 50% for administrative cost
    .
    the same goes for anyone making 6 figures for sitting at a desk working deals on the telephone
    .
    etc.

  • apr2563

    There has been a big drain in the journalism trade. I would like to see Joe take a cut in pay to help support those who are being laid off so they wont be a drain on the public.
    Redraven937, for some reason Joe throws out numbers and opinions and feels no requirement for proof or accuracy. After all, he is part of the pundocracy and they are experts on everything.
    It sounds like he took the Village with him when he left on his trip.

  • Paul-no not that one

    A slap at the teachers by proxy and then directly at Union Management.
    .
    I think at some point your concern about others-always others-making too much money is going to bring about a need for you to share what your income is.
    .
    You could use the out of teachers being public employees
    but as you have extended your disgust to private unions I really think it is appropriate.
    .
    As apr points out there has been a big drain in the journalism trade.

  • kbanginmotown

    mycop: I believe that the question, “When did first notice the government’s deficit spending / tax policies / socialist agenda?” can be asked innocuously, and can help the questioner gage the motivations of the responder.
    .
    My own observation has been that not all conservatives self-identify as “Tea Partiers”. “True” conservatives have questioned gov’t policies for years, while Tea Partiers “woke up” on 20Jan09.

  • mcal4402

    Joe…that was an unbelievably balanced piece ; thoughtful without all the hyperbole of either party. Kudos. You have it in you…..just grunt and let all that common sense come out. You will feel better.

    Notice though, when you publish something fair, people like me give you high fives, while your normal Zebra Mussels come out snarling.

  • nathan7777

    “Notice though, when you publish something I agree with, people like me give you high fives, while people who like to see actual statistics and data supporting reporters claims come out snarling.”
    .
    There. I fixed it for you.

  • swissArmyBrainBETA

    interesting start. i hope u follow through with the donuts.

  • mcal4402

    Ahhhhh the Zebra Mussels, so attached to your backside, that it’s confusing when they start to bite. Joe let me tell you, they are like “psychic vampiers” sucking all the vitality out of your written words.

  • nathan7777

    I notice you didn’t try to refute my comment. Are you saying it’s not true?
    .
    Would you ever consider an article you disagree with to be “balanced”? I disagree entirely with the premise of this article, but at least it was balanced! Not likely…
    .
    How are you defining “balanced” in this context anyway? An equal number of words devoted to contrasting ideas? And equal amount of quotes from people espousing opposing ideologies? Or perhaps more importantly, should journalists be striving for balance or truth and accuracy?
    .
    Think about it for a while. Then come back and admit you think his post his balanced simply because it reinforces your preconceptions.

  • http://tkkerrbythepool.wordpress.com tkkerrbythepool

    The unions have a point: if you did that sort of jobs program, not very many people would be making $75,000 a year in construction anymore

    Really? I make $14 an hour as a Fraud Analyst after working at the same company for 8 years, & I am not alone. If construction workers are making 75k then that is just a great indicator of how out of balance this country is.

blog comments powered by Disqus