Why There Are No Notre Dame-Like Protests Over Obama’s Xavier Speech

Among the stops on Obama’s itinerary when he visits New Orleans to commemorate the fifth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina is a speech the president is scheduled to give at Xavier University, a Catholic school in New Orleans. You may remember that the last time Obama spoke at a Catholic university–giving the commencement address at Notre Dame in 2009–there was a bit of an uproar. This time around, however, despite the best efforts of Fox News and some pro-life activists, his appearance is prompting little more than a few isolated squawks. What gives?

  • Xavier is not Notre Dame. One of the aspects of the Notre Dame commencement that most galled Catholic critics of Obama was the idea that the nation’s flagship Catholic educational institution was honoring a pro-choice Democrat. While Xavier is also a Catholic university, and the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has called on all Catholic institutions to refrain from “honor[ing] those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles,” the school doesn’t carry the same symbolic mantle that Notre Dame does. And as the nation’s only historically black Catholic college, Xavier is a trickier target for criticism.
  • Obama’s just giving a speech, not being awarded an honor by the school. Again, the same USCCB statement said Catholic institutions should not give “awards, honors, or platforms” to politicians who dissent from church teachings, but the platform part of that has always been less of a concern, particularly when the politician in question is not himself Catholic.
  • The local archbishop doesn’t give a hoot. In the weeks leading up to Obama’s Notre Dame address, his appearance was protested by Catholic leaders including Cardinal Francis George and by the local Bishop John D’Arcy. Gregory Aymond, archbishop of New Orleans, has let it be known that he was not consulted about Xavier’s decision to host the president, but also that he’s not terribly concerned about it. Archbishop Aymond will not attend the speech, as he will be participating in an interfaith prayer service elsewhere in the city at the time. But his spokeswoman made clear the archbishop’s position “that this is not a political speech, but one that is a gesture of compassion for and solidarity with the people of New Orleans.”
  • It’s hard to make this a “Blame Obama” story. Not that Fox hasn’t tried–see the somewhat hilarious headline, “Is Obama Violating a Catholic Bishops’ Position With Katrina Speech Location?” Anticlimactic answer: No. The 2004 USCCB statement was directed to Catholic institutions. It wasn’t directed at politicians, especially not politicians who are not Catholic. And even if it was, it should go without saying that the statements of a religious body are not binding on a president. So, no, Obama is not “violating” a USCCB position, nor could he. Some Catholics may be upset with Xavier for hosting Obama, but that’s another matter and, again, their protests have been rather muted thus far.
Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    The right wing can get any phony controversy it wants covered as news. They just didn’t pick this one. Maybe it’s because they’re all perfectly happy to watch the folks in the MSM chase their tails over the completely fake mosque controversy.
    -
    As NY GOP Congressman Peter King put it, “in terms of social issues, the raging controversy over the Arizona border laws is providing more than enough ammunition for Republicans in key districts. ‘The Arizona immigration law is there, there’s no reason to be raising an issue of gay rights’ as a wedge, he said.” The right-wing paramedia, and therefore the MSM, are already hopped up about other petty, ephemeral, zero-substance; don’t really need this one. Plus you don’t roll out a new product in August.

  • grape_crush

    What gives?

    Amy, you forgot:

    - It was a mostly fake, over-hyped controversy in the first place.

  • newfreedomblog

    “Why There Are No Notre Dame-Like Protests Over Obama’s Xavier Speech”

    .
    Pretty easy. Most, that would be nearly 60% of all Americans could care less about Obama or what he says anymore. 99.9% of what he does say to Americans are lies anyway.
    .
    People would listen to Porky Pig give his rendition of the Gettysburg Address before listening to the quack, lame a$$ you all voted into the White House.

  • textee

    Who could possibly protest the appearance of someone like Obama who supports killing infants who have survived abortions? Obama said that prohibiting mothers and their abortionists from killing infants who have survived abortions would place a “burden” on those mothers. Does Time magazine know if Obama has any objections to those mothers eating the remains of said infants? If so, what is the basis for Obama’s objections? He’s a militant vegan? Such meals contribute to the “global warming” hoax? Please advise, Time magazine.

  • ilikechips

    Amy, nice cheap shot at FOX..very professional and classy. I don’t seem to remember you ever complaining about MSNBC carrying a story you disagreed with. Keep your liberal tinfoil hat on and go over to KOS where you belong.

  • newfreedomblog

    Amy Sullivan being a religious reporter is like putting Mao in charge of the reunification of the Christian Church in China.
    .
    Amy bows down weekly at the altar of Obama, the Grand Poobah of all atheists and Muslim-lovers.

  • apr2563
  • apr2563

    Is that the same Catholics that believe in social justice as did Martin Luther King? You know that social justice that Fox and Beck hate.

  • Paul-no not that one

    As I said about 1000 times during the HCR debate, and was demonstrated, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops does not speak for all Catholics.
    .
    I would link to a current piece in Commonweal discussing this very point “The Limits of Authority” but what’s the point?
    .
    Amy Sullivan simply isn’t very good at her specialty.
    .
    She misinforms her readers by omission.

  • lizziefromcanada

    apr2563

    Beside being French Canadian, I am also a Catholic who is pro-choice, for gay marriage, etc.

    Will I be arrested at the border? LOL

  • lizziefromcanada

    You are right for the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. Same thing here in Canada. Catholics do not form an homogenous group.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Catholics are catholic.
    .
    But that doesn’t serve the narrative.

  • lizziefromcanada

    If you say so, it must be true.

  • apr2563

    lizzie, only if you enter through the southern border, Texas or Arizona.

  • sacredh

    People would listen to Porky Pig give his rendition of the Gettysburg Address before listening to the quack, lame a$$ you all voted into the White House.
    .
    Glenn Beck is going to do a rendition of the Gettysburg Address in DC tomorrow? I’ll dvr it.

  • nflfoghorn

    So Dubya – aka Mushmouth from Fat Albert – delivering ANY address for eight years wasn’t enough torture?
    .
    Remember, YOU started the name-calling, bub.

  • sacredh

    It sends a very bad message for any sitting President to deliver an address at a college. Colleges are full of elitists and it’s a known fact that higher education provokes thinking. Do we really want our young people to think? There are many highly untrained people to do our thinking for us. Facts and evidence have poisoned our very thoughts. Many of our young people look up to the President because of the money to be earned from speaking fees after they leave office. Having a President speak at a college sends the wrong message.

  • apr2563

    The time I was most proud to be a member of the Catholic Church was during the time that many priests and nuns (not always approved by the Pope or Bishops) participated in MLKs marches for feedom and the poor and their joining the sit-ins and freedom rides down south. During the 60s and early 70s there was a real social justice movement within the church.
    Unfortunately, after Vatican II the conservative members of the church have to often abandoned what John 23 was trying to teach us.

  • vstillwell

    For once I would like to read through the comments section of swampland without seeing the vitriolic nonsense newfreedomdumbass posts on here.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Facts! They exist, though they will never appear in an Amy Sullivan column. To wit:

    The CARA study of 1,007 Catholic voters found 41 percent unaffiliated with either the Democratic Party or Republican Party, with 38 percent who are registered Democrats and 21 percent who are registered Republicans. In the CARA study:

    – Seventy-eight percent said the U.S. should guarantee basic health care for all citizens.

    – Fifty-eight percent said a woman should have the right to choose an abortion.

    – Forty-one percent said they believe all human life, from conception to natural death, is sacred.

    -
    There is an interesting story in there. But why bother to do reporting? Just regurgitate the prefab “culture war” story, yet again.
    -
    Usually I’d be more polite than this, but Amy Sullivan has made it clear that she will never, ever, ever read a thread, so whatever.

  • Friar Tuck

    Welcome to another Friday evening with Amy Sullivan and the NewFreeinTexteeSpobChips!
    .
    Where Clueless meets Tasteless to produce dumbness.

  • Cliff

    Honestly, Sullivan, who give a f@ck?

  • Alex Vallas

    newfreedomblog
    You are very seriously mentally handicapped. You need to see a psychiatrist ASAP. To point out your mental handicap would be pointless as you would not be capable of understanding.

  • sacredh

    Well, we’re all pretty testy tonight. I guess I wasn’t the only one that didn’t get lucky last night.

  • ilikechips

    Amen Cliff!

  • tonycjl

    Barrack Hussein Obama was an unknow quantity when he got elected as president of the United states of America. Most catholics, christians and americans got carried away by his demagogic abilities. Many being taken in by is demagougic abilities, voted for him, gave him honourary degrees and citations. He even won the peace prize. In my opinion i think every one was too much in a hurry, as they felt that george bush had faired badly. Yes, the job of the president of the united states of america is not an easy one. But by the same token, rushing in an inexperienced man to be president is not a wise decision. A president that bows before the king of saudi arabia, the biggest terrorists. A president that speaks of previous presidents and quotes them, to gain his own point of view. A president that supports the terrorists over his own people. A disgrace to black community and the ideals of Dr. Martin Luther King – his dream, is not ideally fit to be president of a nation of so may colors and creeds. Speech making is not the only attribute of a good president. Good Actions and loyality are also needed in great measures.So just be careful of what support you advance to such personalities. The path of evil is broad and lovely, narrow are the alleys of the righteous. Jesus and not mohammed/hussain will come back again to collect his faithful and take them into paradise. So be watchful america, lest you falter.

blog comments powered by Disqus