Bernanke Gets Forcefully Vague

Our colleague John Curran over at the Curious Capitalist does some close reading of the Fed chairman’s speech in Jackson Hole following today’s tepid growth numbers:

With that less-bad-news-is good-news as a backdrop, Bernanke spoke of the Fed’s policy options in a sluggish world with low interest rates, miniscule inflation and a major headwind called Housing.

Evidently, he hit the right chords because the press and the market reacted positively. Here’s a key snippet of the speech where he speaks of possibly using “unconventional” methods to counter any sudden deterioration in the economy:

We will continue to monitor economic developments closely and to evaluate whether additional monetary easing would be beneficial. In particular, the Committee is prepared to provide additional monetary accommodation through unconventional measures if it proves necessary, especially if the outlook were to deteriorate significantly. The issue at this stage is not whether we have the tools to help support economic activity and guard against disinflation. We do. As I will discuss next, the issue is instead whether, at any given juncture, the benefits of each tool, in terms of additional stimulus, outweigh the associated costs or risks of using the tool.

[snip]

The essence of those comments is that the economy is facing no immediate crisis and is recovering, albeit slowly. However if economic conditions deteriorate significantly, Bernanke notes, the Fed will act. The “unconventional” course could entail buying securities in the open market, changing the language used in the Fed’s statements, or lowering the rate that the Fed pays banks to keep their excess reserves at the Fed.

With interest rates currently so low, and the Fed’s traditional ammo so depleted, it is perhaps best to stay forcefully vague at this point. Here’s part of Bernanke’s summary:

Should further action prove necessary, policy options are available to provide additional stimulus. Any deployment of these options requires a careful comparison of benefit and cost. However, the Committee will certainly use its tools as needed to maintain price stability–avoiding excessive inflation or further disinflation–and to promote the continuation of the economic recovery.

Bernanke is signaling he has the tools to take action, even if he won’t commit to anything yet. From a purely political standpoint, that might not be enough for a public that feels gnawing unrest over the stagnant recovery. The next few major economic reports — monthly unemployment numbers for August and September as well as the third revision of second quarter GDP due out Sept. 30 — could significantly affect the electorate’s psyche heading into the midterms.

UPDATE: Steve Gandel parses his use of “slow,” “extend” and the D-word.

Related Topics: Economy
  • Latest on Swampland

    Mitt Romney’s Sweet Spot: Just Conservative Enough

    Why is Mitt Romney having trouble winning over the conservative Republican base? One reason is his lack of political finesse, an air of dorky rich-guy aloofness that reminds some people of John Kerry. More important, however, is his ideological profile. In almost every important way, Romney’s policy platform is more moderate than those of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Gingrich  offers a much more conservative tax plan, along with crowd-pleasing ideas like his plan to sic federal marshals on “radical” liberal judges. Santorum carries a blazing social-conservative torch, championing ideas like a constitutional ban on abortion. Both Gingrich and Santorum talk quite openly about the virtues of bombing Iran. Romney’s temperature runs cooler in all these areas. Not to mention his past record of pro-choice, pro-gay rights positions. As Jon Chait notes today, the GOP establishment is defending Romney but also working hard to push him to the right.

    Romney: 'I Misspoke'HuffPost Politics

    Conflict Over Obama’s Contraception Rule Intensifies

    The Administration’s decision to require Catholic charities and universities to provide free birth control through employee health coverage is several weeks old, but the maelstrom of dissent it’s created is widening. Republicans, who charge that the measure violates such organizations’ religious freedoms, have allied with Catholic groups in opposition, and in recent days a handful of high-profile Democrats have joined their ranks in calling on the Administration to broaden exemptions from the rule.

  • shepherdwong

    From a purely political standpoint, that might not be enough for a public that feels gnawing unrest over the stagnant recovery.
    .
    From “a purely political standpoint.” You actually thought and wrote that. @sshole.

  • destor23

    “The essence of those comments is that the economy is facing no immediate crisis…”

    9.75% unemployment along with stagnant wages are a crisis.

  • allthingsinaname

    “Bernanke notes, the Fed will act. The “unconventional” course could entail buying securities in the open market, changing the language used in the Fed’s statements, or lowering the rate that the Fed pays banks to keep their excess reserves at the Fed.”
    .
    How about instead of lining the pockets of those that are sitting on the cash, why not just give it to me, so they can compete over what I spend? Too much inflation? I’ll bet it is better to prop up an already failed system.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    It is often said that the army is always fighting the last war. It it also apparent that we’re always fighting the last econimic crisis.

    The reason the right’s complaining about defecits is so effective is because everyone still remembers “stagflation” The problem now is completely different. Interest rates continue to hover around zero and inflation is hovering right there with it. The old rules do not apply and no one has yet figured out what the new one’s are.

  • destor23

    Exactly. In Joe Klein’s Social Security post yesterday he said that making deficit reducing changes would basically spawn a repeat of the 90s when the bond markets rewarded Clinton’s debt-mindedness with low long-term interest rates. It’s almost as if Joe didn’t realize that our short and long rates are both lower now than they were then. If we were having a borrowing crisis and 30 year Treasuries were paying out over 7% a year, Joe might have had a point. But now? Come on.

  • newfreedomblog

    “The old rules do not apply and no one has yet figured out what the new one’s are.”
    .
    The “rules” are very clear to anyone who is willing to look at them. Anyone who may have at least 2 working braincells functioning.
    .
    We are staring DEFLATION right in the face. Prices to drop to unseen levels since the Great Depression of the 1930′s. All patterns are exactly the same as then.
    .
    The major difference is once the deflation hits, we will see not just inflation, but HYPER-INFLATION. The price of things will skyrocket. It is estimated the price of a loaf of bread could cost you as much as your last new car.
    .
    Bernanke’s money printing presses will shut down from the overload it will cause trying to print more and more dollars just to keep up with the demand for dollar bills.

  • newfreedomblog

    Bernake or any of the so-called economists do not have any clue as to what to do or how to fight it. They only know to throw more money at it and hope it sticks
    .

    Should further action prove necessary, policy options are available to provide additional stimulus.

    .
    Wake up America, they are destroying your country right before your very eyes. We do not need more bailouts and buyouts. No more stimulus spending which is doing absolutely nothing to fix anything.
    .
    We MUST cut spending drastically. People will need to go back to work again. Put incentives into place which will create REAL jobs, not some road project job which does nothing. The Recovery Act has turned into a giant money pit, which is nothing more than a Union slush fund to supprt Union benefit programs.
    .
    If you have not planned ahead, you shall STARVE. Hope you enjoy eating MREs, that’s all Obambi will be able to give you.

  • pelhamite1

    rusty,

  • 3xfire3

    Trust on Issues
    .
    Voters Now Trust Republicans More On All 10 Key Issues
    .
    Voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on all 10 of the important issues regularly tracked by Rasmussen Reports.
    .
    The GOP has consistently been trusted on most issues for months now, but in July they held the lead on only nine of the key issues.
    .
    Republicans lead Democrats 47% to 39% on the economy, which remains the most important issue to voters. Those numbers are nearly identical to those found in June. Republicans have held the advantage on the economy since May of last year.
    .
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues

  • Adam Sorensen

    He’s talking about monetary stimulus, not fiscal stimulus.

  • CP in FL

    Rusty – what are you rambling on about? You said “…one the deflation hits, we will see … HYPER-INFLATION.” So which is it? Are we going to see deflation or inflation? They are opposite you know. This line is classis: “It is estimated the price of a loaf of bread could cost you as much as your last car.” Just who is doing the estimating? Sources please. Oh that’s right, you don’t have any sources, you are just speaking out of your behind as usual. Have a nice day dipsh!t.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    People beleive the darndest things:
    http://www.pipa.org/whatsnew/html/new_6_04_03.html

  • square1

    Interestingly, the press never bothers to ask why the Fed’s tools are so limited. Why, for the better part of the 2000′s, did the Fed maintain interest rates that were historically extremely low? Sure, during the 2001 recession, and post-9/11, rates should have dropped to spur growth.

    But why were rates kept so low, even after repeated signals of the creation a massive housing bubble?

    Bernanke has never been held accountable for contributing to the housing bubble. And, in late 2008, when the wheels were coming off of the economic bus, there was little that the Fed could do because interest rates were already near zero.

    It was like a fire occurred and we ran to the hydrant and discovered that there was no pressure because Bernanke had uncapped the hydrant years earlier.

    And the press has no interest in holding Bernanke accountable.

  • pelhamite1

    rusty,

    You are right in one sense in that the expenditures of a theoretical second stimulus should be different in nature from those of the first. Road building is attractive as a “first order” response, an initiative that can happen relatively quickly and put some spending money in peoples’ pockets. Depending on the state, road building can either help a lot or be relatively pointless. New Hampshire, for instance, took the majority of the stimulus money it was due and put it directly into roads – a bunch of guys (and a couple of women) got some jobs and the state’s employment picture lurched sort of back into gear – their unemployment rate is back down to around 6% and their (largely tourism based) economy is slowly recovering.

    Roadwork and some other immediate shovel ready stimulus jobs did their job of keeping a lot of Americans from falling through the floor. It may be a remedy that mostly keeps the patient alive until longer term medicine kicks in, but the many thousands who were sustained by the raodwork would, I think, beg to differ with the statement that the stimulus “did nothing.”

    On the other hand, more roadwork probably won’t help the likes of New York, Pennsylvania and Ohio. The stimulus there needs to be in the form of incentives that help new industries develop – because the old industries of the rustbelt – steel, autos, coal – are not coming back to what they were.

    You say “people will need to get back to work” – but that fact is – no, they don’t. Doing nothing, as you suggest, will lead to nothing happening. huge swatches of our nation will simply deteriorate adn depopulate. We can sit and watch our cities slowly crumble as Detroit and Cleveland are doing or we can take action, with a combination of monetary tools as Bernanke will hopefully eventually apply and a second stimulus package (once we see the error of hiding under our collective mattress). I cannot think of any other developed nation that features a major poitical party so dedicated to imposing misery on its working class.

  • destor23

    newfreedomblog says: “It is estimated the price of a loaf of bread could cost you as much as your last new car.”

    Who estimates that? Just name one credible source, preferably one who isn’t directly or indirectly trying to sell gold.

  • Ivy_B

    Well they never had any interest in holding Greenspan accountable, why change now.

  • shepherdwong

    Republicans lead Democrats 47% to 39% on the economy, which remains the most important issue to voters.

    There are few more bitter ironies than watching the Republican Party — controlled at its core by the very business interests responsible for the country’s vast and growing inequality; responsible for massive transfers of wealth to the richest; and which presided over and enabled the economic collapse — now become the beneficiaries of middle-class and lower-middle-class economic insecurity. But the Democratic Party’s failure/refusal/inability to be anything other than the Party of Tim Geithner — continuing America’s endless, draining Wars while plotting to cut Social Security, one of the few remaining guarantors of a humane standard of living — renders them unable to offer answers to angry, anxious, resentful Americans. As has happened countless times in countless places, those answers are now being provided instead by a group of self-serving, hateful extremist leaders eager to exploit that anger for their own twisted financial and political ends. And it seems to be working.
    .
    –Glenn Greenwald

    http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/08/27/krauthammer/index.html

  • 3xfire3

    Paul,
    .
    Are you one of those Libeturds that believe the majority of your fellow citizens are dumb?
    .
    In nearly 250 years Americans have gotten it right about 80% of the time and I believe they will get it right in November, Confidence Factor 100%.
    .
    Bye Bye libs.

  • allthingsinaname

    “He’s talking about monetary stimulus, not fiscal stimulus.”
    .
    Oh! I thought Rusty was talking Fecal stimulus

  • newfreedomblog

    Oh right mr sorensen, please forgive me. I should have said take money from one pocket, and simply put it into the other pocket.
    .
    Now explain to me again where the money for the 1st ONE TRILLION dollar stimulus come from again?
    .
    Here is a rather SIMPLE explanation. Perhaps you may understand this explanation mr sorensen.
    .

    “It isn’t coming from the IRs – or any other government agency, for that matter.
    There is no money in our government for the stimlus money to come from. Some of it will be borrowed from other countries, and the rest will be simply slight of hand. The Federal Reserve will create credits which is essentially printing money from scratch, with nothing to back it up. So, we will go deeper in debt to other countries. And, remember, this is not “free money”. It is my understanding that whatever money you get this year will be subtracted from any tax refund you get back next year. If you owe money next year, the amount you get this year will be subtracted from your deductions.”

    .
    If you can refute it, please cite your source when you do my friend.
    .
    Here is another just for YOU!
    .

    While the Treasury deals with collecting taxes and borrowing money in order to pay for government services, the Federal Reserve acts as a central bank that can actually create money when it is needed.
    .
    This report features several economists who explain how the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department work and also discuss issues such as inflation and government bonds
    .
    Quotes
    .
    “The Federal Reserve insists, absolutely categorically, ‘We do not print money. That’s the U.S. Mint that prints money.’ But, of course, the Fed issues money. It’s a great deal, right? Instead of having to print it on a printing press, you just do it digitally. It doesn’t actually cost you anything, hardly anything to issue these new digits, these new bits of code on a computer somewhere” – Simon Johnson, MIT
    .
    “The Treasury, which collects taxes and, if they fall short of federal expenses, borrows to make up the difference by selling its Treasury bills, notes, and bonds to investors. Usually, the more it borrows, the higher the interest rate it has to pay to keep lenders lending. But investors have been so safety conscious of late, they’ve been willing to take almost no interest at all to stow their dough in Treasuries.” – Paul Solman
    .
    “The Fed is clearly pumping huge amounts of money into the financial system to prevent a panic, to provide liquidity for institutions who need it. And there is a danger that, if they pump too much in, the ultimate consequence will be inflation, which they don’t want.” – Robert Samuelson

    .
    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/video/blog/2009/03/where_does_all_the_money_come.html
    .
    So out of one imaginary pocket full of money, into the other imaginary pocket. Nothing short of bait and switch, Government and Fed Reserve style.

  • 3xfire3

    Another liberal who doesn’t understand the greatness of our Country.
    .
    A dirt poor black man from Haiti or a Latino from Mexico can immigrate to American and work very hard, as all immigrants before them have, and within one generation his family can achieve a middle or upper class standard of living. No place on earth offers as great of an opportunity to achieve ones dreams as the USA.
    .
    My great, great grandparents did it when they immigrated in 1852. They also were dirt poor when that arrived. It took them 4 generations to achieve a middle class standard of living.
    .
    My experience has been that people who come here from a country that does not have a social welfare system, have such strong work ethics that they achieve a middle class standard of living within one generation.
    .
    it appears that many American citizens who have grown up participating in our social welfare systems find it satisfying enough that they don’t have the desire or work ethics to do the work to achieve a higher standard of living.
    .
    Before all you people start calling me a racist you must understand that there are more whites on welfare then there are blacks.
    .
    Race is not the issue. It is a learned work ethics that many on welfare don’t possess.
    .
    I have several relatives that fit into this category. My wife’s younger sister was in this category. We were always sending her money to help out thinking it would give her the opportunity to improve her life style. We finely realized her ambitions were not the same as ours. She died of lung cancer last year.
    .
    I have a 24 year old niece that is participating in 5 or 6 different welfare and government programs. Two out of wedlock children and a live in boy friend and she has never worked a day in her life. She’s on total disability because of something supposedly with her legs but she walks around just fine and certainly could work at a desk job.
    .
    land and grew enough to barter and feed his family. He and his wife have 5 girls. My wife and I have been sponsoring two of them to get an education. One just graduated from a 2 year technical college and the other is 8 and in the 3rd grade. They are wonderful people. The other 3 girls also have American sponsors for there education.

  • 3xfire3

    Missing paragraph from above post.
    .
    When I was in Africa 2 years ago the ambition and attitude of the poor was amazing. 60% unemployment but they found ways to survive. They were very creative in finding ways to earn enough money to take care of their families. I shared a meal with a family in a stick built hut. Joseph the father rented 1 acre of land and grew enough to barter and feed his family. He and his wife have 5 girls. My wife and I have been sponsoring two of them to get an education. One just graduated from a 2 year technical college and the other is 8 and in the 3rd grade. They are wonderful people. The other 3 girls also have American sponsors for there education.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    @3x:

    Here in PA, the largest demographic of welfare recipients IS NOT people unwilling to work for a living. It’s not even the working poor. The largest single group to get welfare (in any form) in PA, are people over the age of 85. The reason for that partly is because PA has a huge elderly population. At about 67-69, the elderly population drops, they move to sunnier states, but at around 80 they come back to PA to be near family, but also because PA takes care of its elderly. Through welfare, the elderly gets food stamps and medicaid to supplement their social security and medicare respectively. Medicaid pays their medicare premiums, deductibles and co-payments.
    .
    I served on my county’s board of health and human services just a year ago, so I know the stats. And I am sick and tired of people denigrating not only the elderly but the working poor, the disabled and anybody else living in poverty through no fault of their own. Yeah, there are “welfare moms” (young single women who keep having a bunch of kids they raise on welfare) but those are not the bulk of the welfare recipients in PA or any other state.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    BTW, 3x, sorry to hear about your niece, but “supposedly”? You sound like my sister when I was struggling to overcome a severe mental illness. I couldn’t work for years because my mind wasn’t stable enough.
    .
    Maybe your niece doesn’t have the skills to get the desk job you think she should have. Maybe her health has caused her to fall into a depression. If she’s never worked, she’s certainly not disability–she’d be on SSI and its extremely hard to get into the job market if you’ve been on SSI. It also takes so long to get SSI that many people are afraid if they go of it and discover they can’t work, they’d have no income whatsoever.
    .
    Maybe you could try to be just little bit understanding of your niece’s situation instead of saying “supposedly”. With a little of support rather than put downs, she might just discover that she’s capable of getting the education she needs for that desk job. But people who have desk jobs don’t really sit at a desk for 8 hours a day either, there can be a lot of walking and moving around on a “desk job”.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Another BTW @3X:
    .
    I think its terribly sad that you obviously care more about strangers than you do a member of your family.
    .
    Typical republican way, I guess.

  • 3xfire3

    erieangle,
    .
    “And I am sick and tired of people denigrating not only the elderly but the working poor, the disabled and anybody else living in poverty through no fault of their own.”
    .
    If you read my entire comment you would know that I was not denigrating the elderly, the working poor or the truly disabled.
    .
    Try reading it again with an open mind. My wife and I work and donate to help the truly poor.

  • tanboontee

    In this time of unusual uncertainty, who would want to be certain?
    Ambiguity is the new norm, and the economic guru knew it earlier than others.
    To be vague means to be smart. Everyone loves a smart person. Isn’t that so?

blog comments powered by Disqus