The New Health Care Strategy in Action

As Crowley writes today on Time.com, health care is not dominating either party’s message heading into the midterms. But that doesn’t mean no one is talking about it. As Kate reports, Democrats are experimenting with novel ways of selling a skeptical electorate on the merits of the new law. Almost assuredly doomed Arkansas Senator Blanche Lincoln released a new ad today directly defending her vote on PPACA and it seems to follow the new thinking from reform advocates pretty closely:

Before defending herself, Lincoln concedes that she’s “gotten an earful” from “angry” voters and highlights her opposition to a “government run program.” That sounds a lot like using a “transition message to meet [voters] where they are and relax their defenses.” And then there’s her ending line: ”I ‘ll never stop working to make [health care] better for Arkansas.” That hews pretty closely to this piece of advice:

In this context, voters what to move on and improve the law rather than repeal it. The language of “improve” works better than “fix,” “repair,” or “innovate” because it is positive and forward-looking.

And she doesn’t try anything on the list of don’ts:

-assume public knows the health reform law passed or if they know it passed understand how it will affect them;
-list benefits outside of any personal context;
-barrage voters with a long list of benefits;
-use complex language or insider jargon;
-use heated political rhetoric or congratulatory language;
-say the law will reduce costs and deficit

That’s not to say there’s necessarily a connection here. Lincoln is fighting for her political life in a deeply red state where she’s unlikely to make much headway by using what many Democrats have tried so far. But this ad is more or less what the new strategy that Kate explored would look like in action.

And for what it’s worth, the ads below (released today by Republican independent expenditure group American Crossroads) are the type of thing many Democrats are up against this cycle:

Related Topics: blanche lincoln, 2012 Election, Health Care
  • Latest on Swampland

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Obama Stumbles? Why the President’s Right to Talk About Bain

    The meme of the day in journo-world is that President Obama has stumbled at the outset of the general election campaign. The evidence for this? Well, uh, there isn’t very much, really–except that a few Democrats have criticized his campaign’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital and that Obama’s fundraising is merely humongous, instead of obscenely humongous. The two phenomena are linked, of course: Obama isn’t getting the usual haul from Wall Street because he has outrageously–outrageously!–tried to regulate the bankers who did so much to crash the economy in 2008. The handful of Democrats squawking are people who either (a) get money from private equity firms or (b) have retired and joined Mondo Casino. But there is another side to this story:

  • newfreedomblog

    Do you really think ads showing Democrats who voted for this abhoration called Healthcare Reform can actually sway any voters?
    .
    I mean seriously, saying “In this context, voters what to move on and improve the law rather than repeal it. The language of “improve” works better than “fix,” “repair,” or “innovate” because it is positive and forward-looking.”
    .
    People know what is and what isn’t a good thing. Improve, fix, repair or innovate all are the same thing. Why do Democrats always want to change the name of things?

  • gadsbys

    Why do Republicans want to call it a death panel?

  • allthingsinaname

    I know what you mean Rusty, like claiming someone who opposes you view as being Un-American, or Muslim, stuff like that.
    .
    Stupid isn’t it?

  • freeinpa

    “I ‘ll never stop working to make [health care] better for Arkansas
    ==

    MIssive form Democrat Central is that any Democrat talking about HC shall not mention “it reduce reduce the deficit” and “it will lower your premiums”. Those lies have served their purpose and now the Dems are running from that.

  • earljr1

    Because the physician and patient have been removed from the equation, gadsby. Decisions about continued treatment and methodology will now be decided by committee and you and your family are OUT of the loop, as is your physician. This HCR bill is a fraud perpetrated on the American people and as it unravels, it gets worse and worse. You can dress a pig up, but it is still a pig and this oinker is poised to create mayhem in our health care industry. Repeal this monstrosity and start all over again, for the sake of our seniors and ALL tax paying Americans.

  • http://lawbiggs.wordpress.com lawbiggs

    One would never want to “improve”, “fix”, “repair”, or “innovate” the Health Care system as it has worked in the United States for the past 40 years. Where costs have risen out of control, where insurance bureaucrats make decisions about what you can and cannot have done, where you are stuck in a job you don’t like because you are afraid to give-up your health-insurance, where you are excluded from coverage because of pre-existing conditions, where 40,000.000 Americans do not have access to any medical coverage except the emergency room. . .

    Why would anyone ever want to Improve that?

    Democrats can feel proud for making the flawed attempt that was made less then desirable because of the fear mongering of Republicans, whose only desire was to make the bill flawed rather then participate honorably and make the bill the best it could be for all Americans.

  • carotexas1

    Blanche’s problem is that the Public Option polled high even through last summer into late fall, even with independents and surprising amount of Republicans. She would not have convinced me to vote for her, if I had wanted a Public Option.

  • mikew67

    These “reform unpopular” canards from Media Inc. are perfect to set up defeat of clueless GOP’ers in the fall. They are out of touch enough to swallow it.

    “You know, Wage Americans really don’t want a way to be able to afford health insurance. And those who have it on the job, don’t mind losing it and ending up one illness away from financial ruin when they get fired. And also, Americans by the tens of millions, don’t mind being locked out by insurers because they are sick…”

    The “polling” never gets at these issues. Run on it GOP, run! ;^)

    – Balkingpoints / www

  • freeinpa

    . Where costs have risen out of control,
    =
    Sounds like our educational system. So why isn’t the answer “spend more money”?
    =

    where insurance bureaucrats make decisions about what you can and cannot have done,

    Now you can leave it in the hands of clueless corrupt bureaucrats.
    =
    where you are stuck in a job you don’t like because you are afraid to give-up your health-insurance,

    Or become a public employee that has higher pay and benefits all at tax payer expense.

    =
    where you are excluded from coverage because of pre-existing conditions

    Hence the name insurance and not a right.

    =
    where 40,000.000 Americans do not have access to any medical coverage except the emergency room. .

    With the new HC insurance it will allow the illegal aliens faster service at taxpayer expense .

  • chohkmah

    earl…

    please, show me these “committees” that are going to be holding our lives in their hands, and can sentence us to death on a whim.

    Oh wait I found them… the claims committees of every single insurance company.

    Even in your nightmare scenario – the utterly fictional world of a “government takeover” – it would simply be the replacement of one committee (a private committee concerned entirely with profit-driven motives for not covering your daughter’s chemo, for instance, and whose positions were immune to anything, save loss of quarterly profits), with another (a government committee selected by people who would potentially lose their jobs if their electorate heard such horror stories).

    But again, the horse is dead, has been dead for months, and won’t be getting back up no matter how many times you kick it. HCR is regulation, not takeover. Last I looked, insurance companies weren’t shuttering their windows, or boarding up their doors.

    No, instead, they were looking for (and finding) loopholes to still be able to deny lifesaving treatment to children.

    Whew! Thank Jeebus for that!

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    It would be great to see Lincoln lose.

  • chohkmah

    ” Where costs have risen out of control,
    =
    Sounds like our educational system. So why isn’t the answer “spend more money”?”

    The education system is in dire need of additional funding, which voters continue to refuse to provide… often not enough enough to cover rising costs of replacement materials/personnel. Which means fewer, lower quality teachers, working more, for less, with less. Yes, additional money would help that.

    But that’s another issue entirely. If we could get back to the apples at hand, rather than veer wildly into orange territory…

    “where insurance bureaucrats make decisions about what you can and cannot have done,
    Now you can leave it in the hands of clueless corrupt bureaucrats.”

    Ethical purity of the corporate bureaucrats aside (coughcoughBPcough) … at least there’s some modicum of oversight and control to the process now. Something more than Q4 profit margin…

    “where you are stuck in a job you don’t like because you are afraid to give-up your health-insurance,
    Or become a public employee that has higher pay and benefits all at tax payer expense.”

    Yes, public employees sure are riding the gravy train. Those schoolteachers, police officers, and postmen sure a getting fat and sassy off of us Real Americans toiling away our lives in the spice mines of Kessel… I mean the private sector. /eyeroll

    “where you are excluded from coverage because of pre-existing conditions
    Hence the name insurance and not a right.”

    Life – being alive (i.e. not dying unnecessarily from denial of care)
    Liberty – being free (i.e. not needing to be a slave to your job to even have a shot at a basic human necessity)
    Pursuit of Happiness (i.e. … this one should be rather self-explanatory….right?! Kind of hard to pursue happiness when dying of mesothelioma.)

    ^them’s be rights.

    Regardless, in my Big Book of Antonyms, I don’t see “Insurance” and “Rights” appearing as opposites. Curious that you do…

    “where 40,000.000 Americans do not have access to any medical coverage except the emergency room. .
    With the new HC insurance it will allow the illegal aliens faster service at taxpayer expense .”

    Are you trying to keep crows away? Else, why roll out this hulking strawman? This isn’t about illegals. This is about – just like you said – the 40,000,000 !!>*Americans*<!! without access to medical coverage.

    But if we must venture wearily down this worn out trail once more… you are paying for illegals regardless. You taxes fund their emergency room visits… just like they pay for the Americans too poor to pay for those visits. The issue is… It Costs Less In The Long Haul To Perform Preventative Care, Than Emergency Lifesaving Care. That's the same whether you add illegals into the equation or not. It is cheaper to change the oil, than buy have to replace the engine. Period.

  • allthingsinaname

    You don’t vote so your opinion has no weight..
    Might as well piss in the wind as converse with you.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Don’t let me stop you. I’d advise you to shower afterward though.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    @earl:
    .
    For your information, we already have ‘death panels’. I know. My mom was recently diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer and her INSURANCE company tried to deny her chemo because pancreatic cancers are almost always terminal. This wasn’t medicare, in fact, as soon she applied for medicare, she got her chemo and even though she has only a year or less, according her doctors’ best estimates, she is going through chemo in an attempt to prolong her life and allow her comfort. Her previous PRIVATE insurance company wasn’t willing to do that for her.

  • earljr1

    erieangel, you are correct, the insurance companies have had WAY too much leeway in denying treatment, but as a physician, I have been able to justify over 95% of my prescribed procedures and gained ultimate approval for the patient. Under this new system, my input will be minimal. The biggest failure in our health care system has been the assumption of control by the insurance companies….THIS is what needed to be regulated and if our politicians were not so attached to the insurance and legal lobby, it COULD have happened. I sincerely wish you and your mother well. Terminal illness is a difficult road for everyone to travel and I hope she is kept comfortable and relatively pain free during this final phase of her life. May God’s blessings be with you both.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek
  • allisonisa39e

    When talking to any candidate ask them:” Will this reduce my costs”?
    “Will this reduce our countries deficit” ?
    If they voted for the Bill then ask them “Why”?
    They will try to double talk you, just make them answer the questions. It shouldn’t be hard; The first questions only require a “Yes” or “No”.
    If they will not answer your questions then are they someone you want to represent you in Congress????

  • allisonisa39e

    Do you really think any Washington politician is going to read what you write here.
    A new group of politicians in Washington would be more responsive to your wishes.

  • davidbt

    To Chohkma:

    Some of the points that you have made would be laughable if not so disturbingly shallow in thought. Having said that, of course, some of your other points were always accepted and supported by all Americans, Dems, Reps & Indeps. So, it seems peculiar that you would spend your time arguing the unarguable consensus. (In any case, you should be commended for the time that you took on your drafting post, sarcasm and all.) Which brings up my final point…I bet it really galls you that you are in the minority on this subject. The good news for America is that the mishandling of HCR by Congress and the Exec branch has galvanized the majority of the electorate to re-address this issue in a big way. It’s hard to tell if the failure of the HCR law is a result of political ineptness and/or arrogance by those in power. All the divisive rancor and well-founded legal challenges destined for the Supreme Court could have certainly been avoided. My guess is that we will ultimately end up with HCR that is closer to the Republican version, basically because it appears to be more accepted by the majority of Americans. Our representative form of government still has a chance to prevail.

  • apr2563

    I wont weep if she loses. If Ben Nelson was running this cycle, I would wish him defeat. I am so happy Bayh is retiring. He sure didn’t inherit his father’s guts.

  • allthingsinaname

    You are both nuts if you think that a Democrat of your liking could be elected in those states. You are both as loony as the far right. You both are polarizing and, uncompromising.
    .
    She will be replaced by some unflinching Republican and, I will get to sit here and read all the complaining you will do about the stupid GOP , how nothing gets done, and all the if only.
    .
    If only Obama was a real Liberal, If only Lincoln was real Liberal, if only the only Liberals could vote, if only people were as smart as me, if only, if only,if only. Trouble is the if only rarely if ever happen.
    .
    Get your heads out of the sand. Sitting here whining about it, and I am not going to vote does nothing for your cause.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    allthingsinana…, and the stupid, predictable non-arguments his type continually make are helpful in driving an even bigger wedge between the Left and the craps. There ought to be a good core of progressive voters available whenever another candidate takes a stab at a new liberal party.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    The basic argument of the allthingsinana… wing is the Democrats will never win in the Red States unless they, the Democrats, are just as reactionary as the right. The entire party, especially liberals, must shut up and accept the fact that all policy must be reactionary or Blanche Lincoln may not get elected. It is imperative that the entire movement be reduced to her level.

  • naksuthin

    the old system we used to have was BROKEN, BROKEN, BROKEN.
    Freeloaders who wanted free medical care could just walk into a hospital, get treatment and walk out. Now they are going to be required to shoulder the cost of their own medical care by buying insurance.
    Self employed people who didn’t qualify for a group plan had to buy very expensive individual plans on their own. Now they can join an exchange.
    Kids in college, with no income, got dropped from their family’s plan at 21 and had to buy insurance on their own. Now they can stay with their family plan until they can graduate and get a job..or turn 26.
    People who have preexisting conditions will no longer be denied coverage by insurance companies just because they are sick or unhealthy.

    It’s too bad they couldn’t have made this more like Medicare…which has taken care of America’s old and sick for 50 years.

    Thank god we had medicare when my mother was in intensive care for her final days. Without it all her assets would have gone to pay the hospital bill…which averages 10,000 dollars a day now.

    Every developed country in the world has some form of national health insurance. America was the only holdout.

  • correction2010

    You have no real sense of reality, do you? Or do you mindlessly parrot what you have been told to think?

    The Republicans had drafted great reform that was fiscally sound and addressed many areas of true concern, but were completely shut out by the Dems and their President, the one who was elected on a platform of party unity.

    When they lost the majority in the Senate (thank heavens!) they took the flawed version previously passed and rammed it through the house instead of letting the Republicans have a chance to participate in the democratic process and craft something that would actually work.

    Instead we got the Dems version which is fiscally horrifying, unwelcome by the majority of America’s doctors not to mention the people, and will have set back TRUE reform at least 10 years unless we can somehow address all the many flaws to this program before it goes too far along.

    These are the FACTS – look them up yourself if you can manage to open your mind away from what you are told to think.

    Final comment: The Dems love to say that if you against THEIR plan you are against health care period – WRONG. All the commentary about how bad health care is today has NOTHING to do with the Republicans willingness to address these issues – but the RIGHT way, not this mess of ugliness.

    We all agree it needs attention and reform – but how we go about it needs to make sense, this does not.

  • allthingsinaname

    No Derek, You are wrong. My position is that Compromise is as old as the human race. My position is even if you don not get what you want you do not quit and withhold your vote. My position is even that even if you may or may not like what where a politician stands on certain issues, it foolish to wish for their loss to someone who will not Caucus with your party and, certainly will oppose anything and everything you may want.
    .
    Frankly I do not care about your hang ups, about war religion, and all the rest of the crap you guys carry, I do not have them, I am working to help people and, if that means that 26 million more Americans can get some assistance to purchase health care, that is something better than nothing.
    .
    If you do not get your head out of your ares, you will not only never get your health care, but lose your SS altogether, and see reductions in medicare, Chips, education, and see money flow from your pocket to the well off. If you think that those reductions will bring about the change you want, you are even more nuts than I thought.
    .
    You are being the one who is reactionary, you have no plan. You said your are not going to vote. I do not like them, they are not as liberal as me.
    .
    Do even realize what kind of a conservative bastion the Democratic party was during the 60′s? Whole blocks of them left when Civil rights was passed. Sorry Derek change doesn’t come overnight or because you wish it. You have to work at, you have to compromise, you have to bring in the voters, you have appeal to a wide range of people, you have to have even the low information voters, that will just pull the handle.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    This is hilarious. When was the last time the center ever compromised with the Left? The only group you are willing to compromise with is the Right, and they are doing everything in their power to obstruct what your president is trying to do. The public option was a compromise and the Left found out that even that was unacceptable to the current party. I’m all for compromise, but you are the one who refuses to do it, unless it is a right-wing radical you are compromising with. Compromise is nothing but another campaign slogan to back down on once in power, unless it is the likes of Blanche Lincoln who wants something.

  • ohcalcutagirl

    What I find unfair is available for those who work for a company large enough to offer it and others are forced to subsidize these people’s health care while they are denied health care if they have any pre existing condition. And under insurance rules;; guess what? if you ever had acne you have pre existing condition.
    Universal health care for all with the same rules for all citizens should be the goal.

  • allthingsinaname

    You are a frigging fool! I fought for, as hard as I could for the single payer plan; I didn’t get it. Too bad. I am not going to sit around and pout and, scream like my two year old grandson, or my 6 year old grandson who says I am the worst grandpa ever when they do not get their way.
    .
    Now I will argue to keep what gains we have made, and in the future try to move it forward. You? Electing Democratic Senator in AR who will vote for a Single Payer plan in the near future is futile. Period.
    .
    You are just setting yourself up for defeat.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    I really don’t understand why a few liberals leaving the party has you so upset? Aren’t all the moves you are making in this “post-partisan” world able to more than replace them? There must be millions of right-wingers lining up to caste their vote for the Craps now that Obama has brought them more war, zero investigation into the Iraq war crimes, and an administration filled with nothing but former Bush and Clinton officials, continuing on with the same Bush policies. One would think centrists would be happy as hell to get rid of the Left, which they only use as a convenient punching bag whenever they need another Sister Souljah moment to pump up their credentials with reactionaries. But, maybe that is the key to why they are so upset. They may not have the professional Left around any longer to prove how tough they are getting with their base?

  • allthingsinaname

    You are not the base Derek. No matter what you say or think.
    .
    Fact is Derek Democrats need every vote they can get. I agree with 90% of what you want, that is why I want your to vote.
    .
    It is all about numbers Derek. You have to have them to win.

  • freeinpa

    Another wonderful long-winded, fact-free defense of an overpriced under productive education system in our country.
    =
    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/08/graph_of_the_day_for_august_15.html

    This graph shows how public workers outstrip private not only in salary but benefits. Teachers pension for which they contribute little is bankrupting nearly every state.

    Out-earning then crying its not enough all at taxpayer expense.
    ==
    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/06/graph_of_the_day_for_june_27_2.html

    Here is the graph comparing the money spent and results. Cost line is straight upward while results can be generously described as flat.
    =

    Let’s not forget those poor overworked teachers in Wisconsin who with nearly 10% unemployment and 40 million people without health care, threatening a strike because Viagra was not covedred in their HC plan.

    Or the teachers union in LA threatening to boycott the LATimes because they had the temerity to report the union fighting the schools to get rid of lousy teachers. Costing the school districts $500,000 per teacher to get dismissed. Yes children come first with our teachers
    ==

    Life – being alive (i.e. not dying unnecessarily from denial of care)

    No one is denied care they may be denied insurance a minor aspect the left clearly chooses to ignore
    =
    Liberty – being free (i.e. not needing to be a slave to your job to even have a shot at a basic human necessity)

    A job like HC is not a right not matter how you twist and torture the Constitution. I am sure the teacher union considers Viagra a necessity.
    =
    Pursuit of Happiness (i.e. … this one should be rather self-explanatory….right?! Kind of hard to pursue happiness when dying of mesothelioma.

    Every one dies that is a fact no amount of liberal angst can change nor health care. You seem to have an opinion that utopia actually exists. Click your heels Dorothy, it doesn’t.
    =
    It seems we had a country that thrived and grew without our ancestors whining in over 200 years as much as you did in one post. Grow up!

  • apr2563

    allthings: Do you think the Conservatives spent their time in the wilderness worrying about compromise? They dug in their heels, built organizations like the Heritage Foundation, usurped talk radio, recruited far right candidates, supported them, controlled their message, worked from the local to national platform. Unfortunately, they succeeded.
    I like having a majority in the House and Senate. However, too many of are members are not concerned about ideoloy or constiuents. They are pleasing their corporate, lobbyist, masters.
    We need to build a real Progressive/Liberal majority.

  • okieoneshinobi

    Keep your Republican hands off my Obamacare!

  • allthingsinaname

    I hear you aprl, but again you can not do that by throwing out the bums if they are going to be replaced by the right wing.
    .
    You can not elect even someone close to ideal in AR. It is a wasted effort, and you certainly are not going to accomplish it by not voting.
    .
    If the people are not with you, then…………….? What???? Make them be with you?
    .
    You have to have a better argument then I didn’t get what I want, most people do not care what you want, they care about what they want.
    .
    Some how you have to convince them that they want what you want.
    ,
    Hate sells, I am not willing to go there.

  • earljr1

    How can you be so naive, allthingsinaname? Reading your diatribe lends credence to the fact “one is born every minute”. You are prepared to vote ANYONE into office, just so they are democrats. I suppose this means the likes of good ole Charlie and marvelous Maxine, too? If politicians serve themselves instead of their constituency and I don’t care what side of the aisle they call home…..Vote them out! Professional politicians, lining their pockets at the taxpayers expense are responsible for the mayhem and chaos we see in Washington today. This insanity must stop if we are to survive as a nation and the sooner we mandate term limits, the better. We need a cross representation of our citizenry, willing to serve for the good of their country and a willingness to separate themselves from the cozy confines of lobby favors.

  • allthingsinaname

    See? If earl is against me, I am correct! Earl of course means TEA PARTY Wackos.

  • newfreedomblog

    Great comment correction2010. It is amazing how Republicans are vilified for their actions to use prudent and rational changes to our healthcare system. Democrats shot down every single idea from conservatives with their majorities in both Houses of Congress.
    .
    I always go to the one which made no sense to me what-so-ever, the Dorgan Amendment. In this amendment the price of drugs alone would have fallen by estimations nearly 50% across the board. We would have seen the economic rule #1 of a free market economy unleshed as never before. It is called competition. But what did our Democrat Senators do? The VOTED IT DOWN.
    .
    You only need to ask yourself why they did this? If they truly wanted to see reforms in place, why not go after the number one cause of the problem, the cost of healthcare? In their quest to socialize medicine, they wanted to forgo any measures which would have acheived this end.
    .
    Anytime competition was brought up as an answer to our healthcare problems it was shot down by our Democrat friends. Even the people here in the swamp applauded the Democrats for doing it.
    .
    But, the American people know which party wants to pass sensible legislation. Pass a healthcare reform law which does address the problem of rising costs. They know that socialized medicine has been tried in all of the big OECD countries of the world, and that test in socialized medicine like all socialized programs fail in the end.
    .
    Britain one of the very first Democracies with a free market based economy tried socialized medicine. Their system is failing them as we speak. They have begun an aggressive rationing program which I predict will only get worse, no better. They will have but one choice to slow it down, begin cutting other social programs in order to feed the healthcare monster.
    .
    Competition is the only means to stop this money hungry monster. With competition and free market interventions, you see innovation with new drugs and treatments. This is why we have the best healthcare program in the world in our country. That is why you see people like the Premiere of Newfoundland who recently left this Canadian Province to come to the United States for treatment of his cardiac problems. He did it because the same procedure is not offered in his area. Wonder why?

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    “It is all about numbers Derek. You have to have them to win.”
    .
    If you want votes you need to earn them. If you want votes from the Left try including them and their ideas in your administration, and then you might get them. You don’t get them by insult, threats or fear.

  • earljr1

    Your stupidity reigns supreme, allthingsinaname. Blindly following and casting votes and yet you complain if someone questions the wisdom of doing so. Weeding out and replacing incompetent and in many cases, corrupt, politicians,( from both sides of the aisle) is the right thing to do, but NOT to allthingsinaname. Entitlement, because of party affiliation, is his answer to our escalating problems. No wonder, as a nation, we are in such dire trouble.

  • allthingsinaname

    I am not sure what you are saying earl, I am weeding out every Republican I can. Isn’t that good enough?

  • dnha14

    Bernie Madoff will sell me a used car before Blanche Lincoln or any of the others will convince me that the healthcare bill is good for anything other than enriching paper and ink manufacturers.

blog comments powered by Disqus