America’s Two Muslim Congressmen Cogitate on the New York Mosque and the State of Islam in the U.S.

For all that the hyperbole surrounding the proposed building of a mosque and Islamic center two blocks from Ground Zero would make it seem that religious tolerance – at least of Muslims – in America is dead, voters have, actually, elected to Muslims to Congress since the 9/11 attacks. Reps. Keith Ellison of Minnesota and Andre Carson of Indiana, both Democrats, agree on some things and disagree on others. Not surprising since America is, after all, a diverse place. Four questions on the state of Islam for America’s two Muslim congressmen:

1. Should the mosque be moved?

Ellison: No absolutely not. I fact I think that if it were to be moved that religious liberty would suffer. I think much, much more than this situation with American Muslims, what’s at stake here is the right to practice one’s faith. Because this could happen to any minority religion in which hysteria and fear crop up. In fact, they have already: the history of anti-Catholic sentiment in our country, anti-Jewish sentiment, the fear and suspicion of our Mormons. So, the mosque project needs to move right ahead, clearly, where it is. The mayor supports it, several members of Congress support it and I think a plurality of New Yorkers support it. It’s been through every community board. I think that it’s the constitutional right to build this facility of the owners and the organizers and nothing should be moved. They should do it where it’s being done. And for all the talk about insensitivity, how come their people aren’t upset by the strip joints or the off track betting. I mean that doesn’t honor anyone. And there’s been a mosque in the vicinity for years. That mosque itself has been there for a long time. And there’s another mosque within four blocks of the Ground Zero site. Nothing should be moved. The project should move forward and it should be a place where religious tolerance is celebrated.

Carson: That’s certainly a question that my friends in New York will have to hash out. I’m certainly carrying the banner for religious freedoms, be it for Muslims, Christian, Jewish brothers and sisters here, Hindus, atheists and others. You can go into any community across this the country and see several religious houses of the same denomination or differing denominations under the same religion. People certainly have a right to build as they please on private property. But that is kind of like saying that you have a quota for a certain group of people. It deals with tolerance and not necessarily acceptance: critical differences. I think that we’re at a time where we’re at a critical cross roads in this country where we’re really going to have to deal with the issues that are of importance. On the other side of the aisle, the Republicans, as much as they hail the constitution they seem to have a selective memory in terms of what the founding fathers intended. When it comes to gun rights they want to talk about the constitution and how the constitution and how the constitution is impeccable but when it comes to religious freedom they seem to have a selective memory.

2. Has Islamophobia worsened since 9.11?

Ellison: Yes. There was a pipe bombing recently in Florida. There are many mosque fights going on across the country. There’s one in Wisconsin, there’s one in Kentucky, there’s some in the Chicago area. There’s been signs of religious bigotry and intolerance in St. Cloud, Minn., which is not far from me.  There’ve been mosque defacements. Unfortunately it’s growing and unfortunately politicians and leading cultural figures are contributing to this negative sentiment and I think it’s getting worse. There are politicians out there making it worse like, Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, my own governor Tim Pawlenty. I think Rick Lazio has been very detrimental to the idea of healing and bringing people together between Muslims and others. These people are out there trying to exploit it for personal gain. And it’s very unfortunate and sad. Peter King has also played a very detrimental and negative role. Steve King has done the same. Michele Bachmann – I mean there’s sort of a chorus of these people doing this. Those are just the politicians. Franklin Graham has said some incredible painful things about Muslims, which are very unfortunate. So has Rev. Hagee – and these are leading cultural figures. Brian Fischer of the American Family Association has said no more mosques should be built because Islam is at war with America, which is absurd, ridiculous and untrue.

Caron: In dealing with extremism, we know that America cannot win in her war against terrorism without the help of the Muslims. But post 9/11 – as tragic as it was, I mean hundreds of Muslims died, hundreds of Jewish brothers and sisters, white, black, Latino and others passed away as a result of such a tragic event – but after that tragedy it opened the doors for different communities of interest, different religious groups, different ethnic groups to come together and talk about their different faiths and really allow people to gain a greater understanding of different religions, particularly Islam. I think we’re living in a time where our economic downturn hasn’t helped our fears and now you have a religion that a lot of Americans don’t know anything about, or don’t know much about.

3. Even as the threats have abated, have the fears increased?

Ellison: I do think that they have increased. I also think that with some of these anti-Islamic comments and actions — it feeds into the narrative of the transnational terrorists who claim Islam because it allows people like bin Laden and Anwar al-Awlaki to say, ‘See I told you those Westerners, those Americans hate all Muslims.’ Of course, this isn’t true but this is the narrative that they’d like to argue. And I don’t know why an American politician would write the shooting script for Anwar al-Awlaki but that is exactly what they’re doing with this anti-Islamic, anti-Mosque behavior. And I think it’s jeopardizing national security and making life harder for the people whose job it is to protect us, which is people in law enforcement.

Carson: At least during this time period. I mean, we’ve made some progress in different areas. In various professions, you can go into hospitals in major cities and there are Muslim physicians there. We have Muslim attorneys and professors at our colleges and universities. We have Muslim business owners who are not only employing Americans but are helping with our economy by employing Americans and with the imports and exports. So Muslims are certainly part of our fabric, part of our every day lives and I think the question becomes how do we encourage Muslims given that post 9/11 – you know, pre 9/11 a lot of Muslims, particularly immigrant Muslims, enjoyed certain anonymity and there were certain divisions within the Muslim community between African American Muslims and immigrant Muslims in large part — but I think post 9/11 really brought to bear the underbelly of this great country that we call America. I know personally as a Muslim from Indiana, a very conservative state, it’s really given our organization and myself a platform to reach out and say, ‘Hey, Muslims are concerned about the same things that most Americans are concerned about. We’re certainly concerned about the economy. We’re concerned about failing school systems, in major cities. We’re concerned about wars as taxpayers. We’re concerned about excessive government spending and in many cases a lack of transparency in our government.’ The more and more people who get to see that Muslims are deeply concerned about this country — Muslims most of them in America are patriotic and they love the country, have a lot to value, have a lot to say, they take great pride in this country and I think they can make positive contributions as we talk about our growing religious conversation, as we talk about our growing conversation about race and what it means in today’s society.

4. Do stories of Nidal Hassan, Omar Abu Mutallab, Faisal Shahzad and Najibullah Zazi and recent homegrown attacks deepened the problem?

Ellison: Certainly they have deepened the problem; they provide an example for the anti-Islamic types to point to. They try to impose collective guilt on American Muslims because of the behavior of individuals like Nidal Hassan, Omar Abu Mutallab, Faisal Shahzad and individuals like this. But you’ve got to understand, Anwar al-Awlaki is connected to trying to recruit all of these people. And if you listen to Anwar al-Awlaki his principle argument is that America is hostile to Muslims and I believe that to be a false statement. But it is true when people like Peter King and Steve King, Sarah Palin do what they do. Basically they’re writing a recruiting script so that Americans who are disaffected, naïve or criminal are subject to being recruited by terrorist recruiters. I think that it’s incredibly detrimental and we need to dial back our rhetoric and really reassert our fundamental and historic belief in religious tolerance. Because then we undermine these recruiters and we make sure that the disaffected to not get steered in a direction to be violent, dangerous and a threat to the rest of us.

Carson: It’s certainly a concern that we have to look at. I mean I worked in counter terrorism and intelligence and there are extremist elements in all groups from Islamic groups to Christian and so on and so forth. The deeper conversation goes when we talk about racial supremacist groups and other homegrown groups, you know Islam doesn’t have a monopoly on extremism or psychopathic behavior. But we can’t win the war on terrorism without cooperating and coordinating with different groups by they Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Atheist and so on and so forth.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: andre carson, congressmen, islam, keith ellison, muslim, new york mosque, 2012 Election, Congress, Democratic Party, Republican Party, Sarah Palin
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • Paul-no not that one

    I do like my straight talking Congressman.
    .
    And it helps that Ellison is right.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Combatting ignorance with actual reporting.
    Not bad……..

  • Paul-no not that one

    And thanks for doing this JNS, an absent and needed perspective.

  • gadsbys

    I would very much like to see the churches and clergy of America weigh in on this.

    Where are the voices of the Catholic, Baptist, Mormon, Lutherin and Jewish leaders?

    Too smart or too afraid to jump in?

  • newfreedomblog

    Let’s see, two converts to Islam who are now in Washington wrestling with the rest of the corrupt nitwits we have elected.
    .
    Or this man, the Son of the Leader of Hamas.
    .
    Yes indeed, just keeping it all in perspective.
    .

  • http://leisureguy.wordpress.com/ LeisureGuy

    It’s not a mosque, you know. But I suppose if you’re dealing in propaganda (as you are) “mosque” is better than “community center with a prayer room.”

    Until you can report accurately, I suggest you not discuss the matter.

  • nflfoghorn

    Say hi to Gerri Willis for us, Rusty.

  • nflfoghorn

    Since you like to talk about how Flox has more viewers than CNN, Ms.NBC and Cartoon Network combined, any explanation as to why FloxBiz has to have a “channel finder” to find it on the dial???

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    “Has islamaphobia worsen(ed) since 9/11?
    .
    I certainly hope so.

  • danbeaches

    The straight talking congressmen still need to add one more point…this is America founded on the principles of religious freedom period, lets move on!

  • nflfoghorn

    Country-hater.

  • dankaduna

    Two Muslim politicians support building the mosque. What an insightfulnews article. Next week Time interviews two bears who support eating fish.

  • americanwithabrain

    I’ve had all I can stand of this Mosque debate!! I’m going to end it all. Let’s see… bullet to the head, alcohol and sleeping pills, hang myself…. NO!!! I have it!!! I’m going to doodle a cartoon of Mohammad in a bear suit with a bomb in his turban! That should get me killed quickly!

  • nibblybits

    Everyone else has added their 2 cents (many without even being asked), so why not these two voices?

  • apr2563

    Let’s stir the bigotry and xenophobia.
    Courtesty of Crooks and Liars
    Tweet by jasonmustian:
    .
    “In fairness, we’ve been building ‘ground zeros’ near Iraqi mosques since March 2003.”
    .
    Our friends on the right can now start frothing at the mouth.

  • nibblybits

    Or you can go to medical school specializing in women’s health. Soon enough some pro-lifer will come by your house with a sniper rifle and aim for you through the window.

  • http://morninglight.wordpress.com/ mL

    Look, as an American Muslim, I think the developers need to compromise. There’s really no point in starting a place of tolerance in such a controversial way that is only increasing resentment toward the Muslim community, including those who are not involved with these developers and their enormous PR missteps.

    They do have a right to religious freedom like anyone else, and I certainly would agree that the basic sense of discomfort is misguided because American Muslims find AlQaeda to be an enemy to Islam as well as America, but the ideal isn’t reality, and perception can often become reality. A lot of people feel uncomfortable with this project and the developers shouldn’t be obstinate, and ought to take that seriously. We can’t expect people to commiserate with us and not extend that same courtesy to others.

    Paterson’s offer should be looked into. I can understand from the perspective of the Muslim supporters in NYC, who may often feel victimized and lambasted and made to carry collective guilt, that such a compromise may be termed as giving into bigotry, but I actually think it will be a sign of compassion and cooperative participation, and the better short-term and long-term choice.

    Most who oppose this project are not bigots. Yeah, there are some who are calling it a landmark of Muslim triumphalism. (Cordoba in Muslim self-understanding holds connotations not of conquest, but rather interfaith productivity, even if that may seem a historical stretch.) Still, this project is different from other areas in the US where mosques are being actively opposed. The vast majority of those who oppose this particular project find it uncomfortable because of its proximity to Ground Zero, and that shouldn’t be discounted.

    Islam is still a controversial topic for most in America. Most Muslim Americans shy away from controversy and just want to live their lives productively. It would be awful if they had to experience added resentment if this project continues forth. American Muslim leadership also needs to improve. The developers of this project are certainly PR-clueless. Their lack of organization and foresight has only made things worse.

    The smarter course of action, the one that best serves Americans and American Muslims, is to urge the developers to compromise and to relocate.

  • nflfoghorn

    lol
    And the people can’t settle on a government to tolerate its outrage.

  • sue_n

    From the blog of Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York:
    .
    “Yes, it is acceptable to ask questions about security, safety, the background and history of the groups hoping to build and buy.

    “What is not acceptable is to prejudge any group, or to let fear and bias trump the towering American (and for us Catholics, the religious) virtues of hospitality, welcome, and religious freedom.”
    .
    http://blog.archny.org/
    .
    From the blog of Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston:
    .
    “it is a sign of the value we have for freedom in this country, and for religious freedom in particular. We certainly do not want to support groups that promote terrorism, but there are many American citizens who are Muslim, and they have a right to practice their faith. Having a mosque near the site of the attack can be a very important symbol of how much we value religious freedom in this country.”
    .
    http://www.cardinalseansblog.org/
    .

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Ever had a thought that was your own aper?

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    This isn’t a Muslim issue, it is a religious freedom and democracy issue. That is why so many atheists and other members of the hated professional left are engaged.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    profound

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Thank you mL.

  • gysgt213

    Thank you Derek. This is not a “specific religion” issue. The question is do we as Americans believe in religious freedom or are we all bull crap and tough talk.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Wow floggy, like, that’s some heavy sh!t dude! Stay on the case and keep us posted!

  • apr2563

    Thanks sue for sharing those statements. I wish the MSM would spread the word.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Thanks gysgt213, this is an attack on the heart of the nation. Democracy is not possible without religious freedom because that is the thing that keeps faith out of the business of the state. Consequently, it is good for believers and non-believers alike. One can support the building of the temple even if one finds the Muslim religion, or any religion disgusting.

  • gysgt213

    On August 17, 1790, Moses Seixas, the warden of Congregation Kahal Kadosh Yeshuat Israel, better known as the Hebrew Congregation of Newport, Rhode Island, penned an epistle to George Washington, welcoming the newly elected first president of the United States on his visit to that city. Newport had suffered greatly during the Revolutionary War. Invaded and occupied by the British and blockaded by the American navy, hundreds of residents fled, and many of those who remained were Tories. After the British defeat, the Tories fled in turn. Newport’s nineteenth-century economy never recovered from these interruptions and dislocations.
    ,
    Washington’s visit to Newport was largely ceremonial—part of a goodwill tour Washington was making on behalf of the new national government created by the adoption of the Constitution in 1787. Newport had historically been a good home to its Jewish residents, who numbered approximately 300 at the time of Washington’s visit. The Newport Christian community’s acceptance of Jewish worship was exemplary, although individual Jews such as Aaron Lopez and Isaac Elizer were unable to obtain full political equality as citizens of Rhode Island. The Jews of Newport looked to the new national government, and particularly to the enlightened president of the United States, to remove the last of the barriers to religious liberty and civil equality confronting American Jewry.
    ,
    Moses Seixas’s letter on behalf of the congregation – he described them as “the children of the Stock of Abraham” – expressed the Jewish community’s esteem for President Washington and joined “with our fellow citizens in welcoming [him] to New Port.” The congregation expressed its pleasure that the God of Israel, who had protected King David, had also protected General Washington, and that the same spirit which resided in the bosom of Daniel and allowed him to govern over the “Babylonish Empire” now rested upon Washington. While the rest of world Jewry lived under the rule of monarchs, potentates and despots, as American citizens the members of the congregation were part of a great experiment: a government “erected by the Majesty of the People,” to which they could look to ensure their “invaluable rights as free citizens.”
    .
    Seixas expressed his vision of an American government in words that have become a part of the national lexicon. He beheld in the United States “a Government which to bigotry gives no sanction, to persecution no assistance—but generously affording to All liberty of conscience, and immunities of citizenship: – deeming every one, of whatever nation, tongue or language equal parts of the great Governmental Machine: – This so ample and extensive federal union whose basis is Philanthropy, mutual confidence, and public virtue, we cannot but acknowledge to be the work of the Great God, who ruleth the Armies of Heaven, and among the Inhabitants of the Earth, doing whatsoever seemeth [to Him] good.”
    .
    Seixas closed his letter to the president by asking God to send the “Angel who conducted our forefathers through the wilderness into the promised land [to] conduct [Washington] through all the difficulties and dangers of this mortal life.” He told Washington of his hope that “when like Joshua full of days, and full of honour, you are gathered to your Fathers, may you be admitted into the Heavenly Paradise to partake of the water of life, and the tree of immortality.”
    .
    Not surprisingly, it is Washington’s response, rather than Seixas’s epistle, which is best remembered and most frequently reprinted. Washington began by thanking the congregation for its good wishes and rejoicing that the days of hardship caused by the war were replaced by days of prosperity. Washington then borrowed ideas – and actual words – directly from Seixas’s letter:
    .
    “The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for giving to Mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection, should demean themselves as good citizens.”
    .
    Washington’s concluding paragraph perfectly expresses the ideal relationship among the government, its individual citizens and religious groups:
    .
    “May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.”
    .
    Washington closed with an invocation: “May the father of all mercies scatter light and not darkness in our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in his own due time and way everlastingly happy.”
    .
    The letter, a foundation stone of American religious liberty and the principle of separation between church and state, is signed, simply, “G. Washington.” Each year, Newport’s Congregation Kahal Kadosh Yeshuat Israel, now known as the Touro Synagogue, re-reads Washington’s letter in a public ceremony. The words deserve repetition.
    .
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/bigotry.html

  • sue_n

    But why should Muslims have to compromise when almost certainly no other religious group would?
    .
    As a Catholic, I can guarantee you that, if a Catholic parish were involved in such a controversy, the attitude would be “man the shovels, full speed ahead.” Compromise would not be an option.
    .
    I dare say it would be the same with any other faith group. In fact, I know it would. Since the horrific sexual abuse scandals broke in 2001, Catholics all across the country, and now the world, have demanded that we not all be tarred with the pedophile brush.
    .
    When some fundie wacko kills an abortion provider or blows up a clinic or otherwise perverts Christianity, Christians of every stripe howl long and loudly that “you can’t judge us all by him!”
    .
    But you stick the word “Muslim” in a sentence, and suddenly we’re the ones wielding the tar brushes.
    .
    Either we believe in freedom of religion or we don’t. There’s no “but,” there is no midway point. And there is nothing in the Constitution or anywhere else that says you, as a Muslim, have to be ready to compromise just to make me, a Christian, more comfortable.
    .
    Because it’s not about my comfort. It’s about your freedom, and mine, and that of the next group that ends up on the wrong side of the “us and them” equation. And there will be a next group. There’s always a next group.
    .
    That’s why our founders had the remarkable good sense to put this stuff into writing!

  • nflfoghorn

    It’s a channel in search of an audience. If you don’t see it a year from now it’s probably gone.

  • nflfoghorn

    ‘doesn’t take much for you guys does it?

  • apr2563

    As I have asked before, should we move the Muslim prayer center located in the Pentagon, itself an edifice hit on 9/11?
    Should Muslims be prevented from working at the new 1 World Trade Center? 100s of retail stores and offices will be located there. Should all occupants be vetted for politically correctness and sensitivity?
    Should Muslims be prevented from joining our armed services and fighting and dying for their and our country? How about the sacred Arlington Cemetary. Should we continue to bury Muslims there?

  • nflfoghorn

    And whenever One WTC gets built it’ll have to have prayer rooms to accommodate worshippers of Islam who will work there.

  • maverick2k9

    NewRustyBlogWhore, Since you will be attending Glenn Beck’s rally on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, here is something for you to chew on
    -
    http://gretawire.blogs.foxnews.com/question-for-a-colleague/
    -

    On August 28th my colleague Glenn Beck is going to lead an event on the mall in Washington, DC. It is the anniversary of Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech. The event is causing much controversy …some support and some don’t support and some are even furious and upset. Yes he has a First Amendment right to do it…but what about the wisdom of it? Remember…the Muslims in NYC have a First Amendment right to build a mosque but most Americans don’t want it…and you have to ask the wisdom of the Muslims to push the issue. Just because you have the right to do something does not mean you should. My view? No mosque at ground zero and Glenn should move his event.

    It does not help heal the country on so many fronts if we poke a stick in eyes.

    Some Blacks find it offensive that a racist pig such as Glenn Beck is defiling the hallowed steps on which Martin Luther King’s delivered his “I Have A Dream” speech.
    -
    So, RustyDog, Do you support moving the venue?

  • nflfoghorn

    Next on Flox: More lyng, unapologetic, blowhard demagogues.

  • nflfoghorn

    “America is, after all, a diverse place”
    .
    As long as you don’t live in Wasilla, AK or aren’t Eye of Newt Gingrich.

  • apr2563

    sue: Thank you again. You have explained the dangers of guilt by association very well.
    Deo vobiscum.

  • kevin

    Someone on another blog noted that if the Park51 community center — with a swimming pool, gym, meeting rooms, and all the rest — can be called “a mosque” then the Bellagio Casino in Las Vegas must be “a cathedral” because it has a wedding chapel.

  • kevin

    I’m not sure if we’ve gotten any more hateful, but as 2thirds makes clear, we’ve certainly gotten dumber.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Two very good comments sue_n.
    .
    Thanks and post more, please.

  • gysgt213

    And as long as you are “real american and easily offended.”

  • kevin

    Beautifully said, mL.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Lame and pitiful to say the least. But you leave us no doubt as to who the real racist pig is.

  • kevin

    Dammit, I meant “Beautifully said, sue.”
    .
    I respect your opinion, mL, but this isn’t just about Muslims. And frankly, if you think caving in to the pressure is a good idea, you should realize it will only embolden the nuts on the far right. Next up — no Muslims in lower Manhattan.

  • kevin

    On that point, I’m reminded of something I saw a long time ago in the “Eyes on the Prize” documentary series about the civil rights movement.
    .
    During the mid-1950s, shortly after the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a TV reporter asked Adam Clayton Powell if he thought “Negroes everywhere” should rally to the cause of the civil rights movement.
    .
    Immediately, he responded with something like: “Oh, no. I think that Americans everywhere who care about freedom and democracy should rally to the cause of the civil rights movement.”
    .
    I’m a Catholic, and as the post notes, it wasn’t too long ago that people of my faith were regarded as agents of an evil foreign power (the Vatican) who were bent on taking over the United States. Some Protestants stood up for our rights to religious freedom, though, and now it’s my turn to stand up for yours. Period.

  • kevin

    Oh, that’s an easy one, 2thirds — it’s you, the guy who calls Muslims “ragheads” and expresses his hope that Islamophobia is on the rise.
    .
    Anyone can see that. Even without your white hood on.

  • maverick2k9

    Mr self-confessed “2/3rds Rock Head”, It is Greta Van Susteren, of Flox News, who is calling out Glenn Beck for inciting racism, not some loony liberal( To use the favourite expression of the wingnuts).

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    So boring and predictable kevie, Please, some originality!
    .
    I am the infidel. And so are you. With the exception of a very small handfull, they want us dead. But they’ll start with the sniveling cowards. That’d be you.
    .
    Damn I’m on a roll!

  • maverick2k9

    NewRustyBlogWhore, Is 2thirdsrocks (in addition to Rusty Returns) just another symptom of your multiple personality disorder?
    -
    Otherwise, I don’t see why 2thirdsrocks has to respond to a comment that is clearly addressed to NewRustyBlogWhore.

  • kevin

    I am the infidel. And so are you.
    .
    No, you’re the racist a$$hole. I’m a guy who actually has a number of Muslim friends and understands they’re not waging global jihad or whatever it is you morons in lily-white bumf*ck small towns seem to think they’re doing.

  • kevin

    Is 2thirdsrocks (in addition to Rusty Returns) just another symptom of your multiple personality disorder?
    .
    Probably.
    .
    You know, in all the times people have made comments about how some of the Rusty-like conservative clones are probably just more Rusty sock puppets, I don’t think any of them have ever bothered to deny it.
    .
    We should ask the Swampland bloggers to check the IP address of everyone here and root out the duplicates. It’d certainly make things a little more civil here.

  • sue_n

    apr2563 and Paul-nnto, thank you. I read Swampland religiously (sorry *g*), but usually find that other commenters are already saying what I think.
    .
    But this whole “how dare those people build there?” thing infuriates me, particularly when so-called Christians seem to be slinging the most spittle. We’re the ones who get our panties in a twist and scream “persecution!” at any and every slight, and we’re the first ones to wrap ourselves in the First Amendment when we’re feeling abused and unloved. So for us, of all people, to be denying another religious group the right we hold so dear is just unforgivable.
    .
    But beyond that, this issue goes to the heart of who we are as Americans. For more than 200 years, we have told the world that this is who we are and this is what we believe. We put it in writing. We have sent men and women to die for this, and, yes, the men and women in the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and that Pennsylvania field died for this, too. (“They hate us for our freedoms,” right? Well, this is one of those freedoms.)
    .
    So it’s time for us to put up or shut up. And grow up. It’s high time we started being the nation we keep telling the rest of the world we are.

  • kevin

    But they’ll start with the sniveling cowards. That’d be you.
    .
    I’m 6’3″ and 220 lbs. I can handle myself.
    .
    You’re a 50-something bass player in a Pat Benatar cover band. If anyone’s looking for someone to rough up, I’m sure they’d recognize you as the easy target.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Easy there young fella. You might blow a gasket.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    6’3 220 yeah we know already. A big’n. A dead givaway as you cruise the strip in your high-heels and daisy dukes.

  • kevin

    I’m not going to blow a gasket over you. You’re not worth it.

  • tharwatfawzi

    With the present hostility, unheard of before 9/11 , of some Americans and in the world towards Islam , all pray now that President Barack Obama will very soon publicly disclose to all Americans and to the world ,the names of the criminals who are ultimately responsible for , as well as the complete facts about , the evil crimes of 9/11 ,the two wars that followed in Iraq and Afghanistan – both citing these evil crimes as the reason, the following devastation that these wars have caused in these countries ,the hundreds or thousands of Americans, Canadians and other NATO heroes killed or wounded ,the thousands or millions of Muslims and others who were killed, wounded ,displaced……in the world ,the resulting prejudice towards the Islamic faith of some in USA and in the world, and the very serious economic problems that followed in the USA and in the world. Those criminals of 9/11 are very likely also responsible for the present rig explosion disaster and for the human, ecological , environmental and economic devastation it caused.
    Tharwat Fawzi

  • kbanginmotown

    sue_n: Excellent comments!
    .
    mL: I certainly respect your spirit of compromise. A word of caution, however: The question you do not address in your post (which, incidentally, no RWer has yet to answer), is how far, in feet, yards, or furlongs a new Muslim Community Center should be separated from Ground Zero. And, I’d get it in writing. My guess is Cleveland.

  • stuartzechman

    You realize you’re contradicting what Rustydog says about how conservatives feel about Muslims, right, 2thirdsrocks?

  • maverick2k9

    lily-white bumf*ck small towns

    You mean Sarah Palin’s Real America ™ ?
    - :)

  • stuartzechman

    Thanks so much for this post, Jay Newton-Small.

  • newfreedomblog

    You start by calling me names and then ask this question? Are you serious?
    .
    1. Go to hell a$$wipe.
    2. Kiss my A$$ on the way there
    3. Shove it where the sun doesn’t shine.
    .
    How’s that for an answer, freak!

  • formerlyjames

    As I’ve said before, I could not care less about Islam or any other religion. But I support the mosque because the Constitution says so.
    .
    Further, I support the mosque because I hold Islam with no less distain than I do all religions. People speak of “religious cults”, and I laugh, because to me, all religions are cults.
    .
    So long as there are religions, which will be until the end of the world, because of innate human superstitions and child-like belief in magic, I will support what the Constitution says about it. And I will watch with amusement the religionists who are guided by what their bible, torah, quran, tea leaves, or rw radio commentators (who are all religious freaks) tell them. Even though I know that the pleas for all religions to get along will fail, because all religions harbor extreme prejudices and hatreds, I support equal protection and accommodation of the law under the Constitution for all.
    .
    Stick that in your incense burner and smoke it.

  • http://morninglight.wordpress.com/ mL

    I respect all of you. And If I were not part of the religious community, I would hope that I would be by your side, defending the rights of whatever minority group’s rights were being infringed.

    But I am part of it. And because of that, I have different concerns. I think you all represent the ideal, and while it would be lovely if everyone was as fervently supportive of the Constitutional rights that make for a strong and free society as you all are, my world view is dominated less by the ideal, and more by the real.

    As in, my considerations are for my little niece and nephew and other children who go to school or the most vulnerable immigrant and the difficulties they experience as Muslims in America. My interest is in making their lives easier, and it doesn’t make their lives easier to have 70% of the American people, more than just the far right, resent Muslims further, and see them as uncompromising, uncaring, disrespectful to the victims of 9/11, communicatively inept, and strategically naive or unwise.

    I do think that toleration is a two way street. I just don’t see how I can expect people whose introduction to anything associated with Muslims was in a violent manner, and for whom the Islamic community seems closed and difficult to understand, to be sensitive and understand better, when I don’t do the same, and understand that many of these people may have never met a Muslim person before, or that their discomfort could be understandable given the fact that Muslim leadership has not done a good enough job in explaining who we are. There is a give and take when it comes to understanding people, and a for a building that is seeking to promote that understanding, well, they’re not the most adept.

    Rami Nashashibi, a Muslim community activist in Chicago, wrote recently: “Whether it’s the Niqab in France, minarets in Switzerland or mosques across the US, the deeper pathologies underlying these obsessions in turn generate an unhealthy and disproportionate amount of reactive posturing on part of the Muslim community and those coming to its defense. The end result is a lot of public discourse about Muslim rituals and places of ritual as opposed to the general effort of Muslims in this country to be forces for good and transformation.”

    My interest is in showing Americans that we are cooperative parts of the American fabric, in establishing a positive image of American Muslims so that our kids grow up feeling comfortable and safe and so our fellow Americans develop trust in us and don’t feel 70/30 uncomfortable with us.

    So while I would be standing with you in favor of the rights of any other community, I think it would be short-sighted on my part as an American Muslim to not take the vast concerns and discomfort of a lot of Americans, perhaps not the anti-Islam fringe, seriously.

  • newfreedomblog

    First I want to say thank you mL.
    .
    However it is so sad to see the far left liberal extremists who cannot understand the basics of what is simply insensitivity and intolerance.
    .
    Again for those who are mentally challenged, Muslims have the right. No one is disputing that fact. What this issue is all about is the fact building of this mosque is a blatant disrespect of those who were killed on 9/11/01 by those who perpetrated the crime in the name of Islam.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    mL Americans don’t run and hide when the totalitarians come calling. The people who are opposed to this are not worth knowing so stand your ground and the cowards will go away.

  • kevin

    Thanks for the thoughtful comment, mL.
    .
    While I respect your concerns, I stand by my original position. Once you bargain away some of your rights to religious freedom, it’s not the end of it, but only the beginning.

  • maverick2k9

    Okk..Since you have burst your spleen at some minor (and alleged) name calling, I will now amend my earlier post.
    -
    Mr Rod Burket (since that is your real name), Do you support moving the venue for Glenn Beck’s rally, as it is very offensive move to many Black Americans?

  • http://morninglight.wordpress.com/ mL

    kbanginmotown: If they relocate, it should be in Manhattan, and they’re going to need Paterson’s help to find a place to build it. I agree with you that the question of where — two or three blocks?? — seems a little absurd, but short of changing the mission of the place entirely, making it an interfaith building that includes Jewish/Christian/Hindu areas or downscaling in size, it seems the only way to show a sense of compromise would be to relocate. Or renovate their PR.

    That said, I can see why the center is needed. It’s not simply a matter of a lack of space, but rather having a space. it can be a way for that congregation of Muslims in New York City to feel like they are contributing further to the city and are serving and building bridges with the broader community, and to perhaps lessen the sense of discrimination or alienation they may feel on a daily basis. So I think the center can be tremendously valuable, but now that it’s become such a lightening rod, they would be unwise not to take reality into consideration. At the very least, no matter the end result, their PR needs to be more sensitive, intelligent, and show a spirit of compromise.

  • kevin

    Actually, Governor Paterson’s offer is as bad as the critics’ complaints. The government can and should play no role in offering public property to religious groups.
    .
    And again, there are already two other mosques within a four block radius of the WTC site — and have been, for decades now — so it’s not clear just what sort of distance the perpetually outraged conservatives would demand here.

  • 53_3

    You know, maverick29, I think you hit the proverbial nail on the proverbial head.
    .
    There is absolutely no question that the Black community is intensly offended!
    .
    But, you know, for all the feces that I have handed back to those 1-2/3rds Klue Klux Klowns, I have never denied that they have the right to do so!
    .
    Hey, 2/3rds, as long as you are throwing your wight around, I might be 58, but, I can still pack a very stiff right.
    .
    Maybe when you go after Kevin you should come armed with something a little more potent than an electronic sausage…

  • 53_3

    Shhh. Rusty et al have a new Klub.
    .
    It’s the Klue Klux Klowns.
    .
    They’re like the Juggalos, only whiter…

  • doddeb

    Great post, Gunnery Sgt 213. I have been pretty depressed about the need to debate (endlessly) the “right” of this religious community to build a community center near ground zero. Your post, and sue_n’s, come closest to describing my feelings about this. “We hold these truths to be self-evident,” except when 60+ percent of my fellow citizens lose all perspective and forget our fundamental, shared beliefs. Your quote about Washington’s use of the word “toleration”, is priceless. No American should feel “tolerated”, as though they need another’s indulgence to exercise their rights. Semper Fi, Gunny, and thanks.

  • 53_3

    That’s when Rusty will start taking viagra by the handfuls…

  • 53_3

    You know?
    .
    I know some of my Black freinds and relatives, including my brother in law, who would actually respect 2/3rds for that sentiment, had they seen this.
    .
    But, I think what 2/3rds might not know is just exactly why…

  • http://morninglight.wordpress.com/ mL

    re: paterson; i stand corrected — i agree with you on that.

  • 53_3

    Extremely interesting commentary, mL, and thanks for the commentary.
    .
    I think the political football being kicked here is not just about the Constitution, which you appear very knowledgeable of, but about the GOP’s penchant for xenophobia.
    .
    I think most here understand the propriety issue too, but some are riding that particular horse for different reasons than just the appropriateness of building it.
    .
    For clues, look upthread at the comments of some of those that have thanked you…

  • stuartzechman

    Very, very interesting commentary, thanks to all for your contributions –so far.

  • shepherdwong

    I’m not normally much of a fan of it but this is a good example of total he-said-she-said reporting that is actually informative and worthwhile. Perhaps it’s the great story concept.

  • sue_n

    mL, the sad and maddening truth is that, no matter where you build, Muslims are going to be distrusted, disrespected and despised in this country, not because of anything you have done, but because of our fear and ignorance. In communities across the country, nowhere near Ground Zero, attempts by Muslims to build mosques have been met with hostility. And that shames and infuriates me as a person of faith but, even more, as an American. That is not who and what we’re supposed to be!
    .
    I respect and admire your sensitivity, and I understand your concern for how all this will affect those you care about. And it bothers me more than I can say that you even have to worry about that.
    .
    But exactly how much should Muslims have to sacrifice and compromise to “earn” the respect and rights that should be yours by, well, by right? Why should you, as a Muslim, have to “prove” yourself any more than I as a Catholic do? And what right do I have to expect that from you?
    .
    Right now, we as a nation seem to be stuck at stupid. We keep saying we’re not at war with Islam, and yet the mere thought of Muslims in our midst has us wetting our beds. As if Muslims have not been in our midst for much, if not all, of this country’s history. We keep saying we want to hear from moderate, peace-loving, reasonable, rational Muslims, but when you step forward, we start frothing at the collective mouth. (And, by the way, I’m sorry for and shamed by that, too.) Our ignorance is appalling.
    .
    But at some point, someone is going to have to step forward, challenge our cowardice and ignorance, and insist upon the rights that are yours.
    .
    If ever there were a place and a time in such need of a place of peace, prayer, dialogue and outreach, that place is Manhattan, within walking distance of Ground Zero, and that time is now.
    .
    Teach us. Stand up to us, live and walk and worship among us, force us to live up to our ideals and point us to the better angels of our nature. Some of us will have to be dragged kicking and screaming, but, in the end, your nieces and nephews and their children and my children and this country will be better for it.
    .
    As a nation, we have too many stains on our conscience as it is. Please don’t let us accept another.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    I worry, mL, how much of a compromise would be necessary. Newt Gingrich and some other loud mouths on the right would like to see no new mosques built in the US–none. If the developers of Park51/Cordoba House were to comprise and say agree to build at a site 12 blocks away, those loud mouths would scream that was even too close. It would also embolden them to step up their hatred and rhetoric.
    .
    I’m not Muslim, but I know something of being a member of a minority group that is often looked upon with disgust, misgivings and outright fear and or hatred. See, I’m mentally ill and how many times in the recent past have we all seen the news reports of some mass shooting in which a major component of the story was the shooter’s mental health history and diagnosis? These kinds of reports give the false impression that those with mental illnesses can be dangerous when in reality most of us are extremely passive. We are law abiding and want only to be included in society.
    .
    There are nut jobs in every group of people. But for those who don’t follow the nuts to roll over and compromise with the hate mongers of the world, those who would paint everybody in that group with the same broad brush, is totally wrong. We all must do what we believe is right, even if it is unpopular. The developers of the so-called ground zero mosque (its not at ground zero and its not mosque) are doing what they think is right in their choice of building site. And just because 70% of those polled (no poll org. asked my opinion) don’t think it should happen, doesn’t mean that 70% is correct.

  • michaelfury

    “I don’t know why an American politician would write the shooting script for Anwar al-Awlaki”

    So who writes the script for this guy?

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/the-talented-mr-pearlman/

  • redraven937

    However it is so sad to see the far left liberal extremists who cannot understand the basics of what is simply insensitivity and intolerance.
    .
    [...]What this issue is all about is the fact building of this mosque is a blatant disrespect of those who were killed on 9/11/01 by those who perpetrated the crime in the name of Islam.

    How is it disrespectful? No, seriously.
    .
    What the terrorists “did it in the name of” is completely irrelevant. This is not an al Qaeda memorial. However, the intolerance you are showing to the Islamic community that lives and works in New York City is the best al Qaeda memorial you could construct.
    .
    By the way, I am completely baffled as to how people can get so sanctimonious over 9/11 out one side of their face and then vote down better health coverage for 9/11 first responders out the other (link).

  • kbanginmotown

    @maverick2k9: Good catch!
    .
    decon discovered the Rusty == NewFreedom equivalence a few months back; it sounds like you’ve hit upon the NewFreedom == 2/3srocks connection.
    .
    With proper goading, we should be able to tie in freeinpa and spob as well.
    .
    However, it’s 12:04AM on Thursday, so let’s give it a day’s rest….

  • Ike Jakson

    I never in my dreams even once thought that so much hatred could be engendered as witnessed above by a discussion on a church building. Had this happened in England … well …? But I always thought America should be different?

  • sue_n

    erieangel said, just because 70% of those polled (no poll org. asked my opinion) don’t think it should happen, doesn’t mean that 70% is correct.

    Exactly! What percentage of the population thought slavery was acceptable? What percentage thought Japanese internment camps were a good idea? What percentage thought allowing women to vote was ludicrous and finally giving civil rights to African Americans was an outrage? And what percentage thought the war in Iraq was right?
    .
    Numbers do not make right. And rights are not a popularity contest. As one of the commenters here has noted several times (Paul Dirks? Paul-nnto?), the rights guaranteed by the Constitution are in there not because they are popular, not because they are easy or comfortable or natural, but precisely because they are difficult and counter-intuitive and demand more from us than we are often willing to give.
    .
    If all this were easy, we wouldn’t still be struggling with it 200+ years down the road.

  • kbanginmotown

    ::stands::
    ::salutes::
    ::two!::

  • kbanginmotown

    sue, sue, sue….
    .
    Been votin’ for all of 90 years (today) and it’s gettin’ to your head…
    .
    /snark ;)

  • abdullah69

    You people just don’t seem to get it. America was born out of religious intolerance – in Europe. Great societies flourish with religious tolerance – see Cordoba pre inquisition or the UK in the empire – building years,while societies which practice intolerance tend to fail – Hitler’s Germany, or Pol Pot’s Cambodia (but hey, two thirds, they were good years while they lasted, eh?).

    If you want the US to become another Bosnia, or Darfur, or Rwanda, then go ahead, ban the mosque. But since this will take time beyond most of your lifetimes, then just go ahead anyway. Who cares about principles when self – interest is at stake?

  • rcmartel

    The First Amendment indicates that everyone has something called ‘free speech’ and ‘freedom of religion’; but everyone knows that’s only for instances where we all agree that the speech in question agrees with our opinions, and the religion in question is the one in which we choose to believe.

    See, the founders of this country had a fetish for saying whatever they thought and for practicing (or not practicing) unacceptable forms of religion. They had some ridiculous notion that if we could all speak and worship without discrimination or persecution from one another, we could have a peaceful and strong society. Obviously that’s false, or we wouldn’t all be ready to ‘reload’ and fight about this mosque or any other mosque anywhere in this country which can’t be tolerated. We can’t take any of the founder’s amusing flights of fantasy seriously in this day and age – even though we might permit the First Amendment to remain in our Constitution, because to change something that old could send a message that we aren’t sufficiently conservative.

    When someone foolishly states that the First Amendment gives people we don’t like the right to build some monument to their religion, though, we just laugh at them and inform them that real patriots understand that true freedom is exemplified by the raging mob, without which the revolution never would have occurred, and by which we can intimidate and control those who aren’t intelligent enough to agree with us. Those who have the power, rule – unless they’re liberals. Those who don’t, serve – unless they’re very rich. That’s what the founders REALLY meant to instill in American society until they got off track.

    The Constitution is just a g-dd-mn piece of paper, after all. Good conservatives are determined to prove that every single day of their lives, because words on paper restrict freedom and the enforcement of those words is tyranny.

    In fact, true conservatives understand that the founders made a mistake with the Constitution and that it should have been used to create a loose confederation of local governments instead of a federal style of government. The southern states tried to save us all by creating the Confederacy; but that traitor, Lincoln, waged war against them to preserve his authoritarian dictatorship. Someday the South will rise again and take this whole country forward to 1859, when the world was so much better and nicer. In fact, we’re almost there now. All we have to do is vote Republican in November.

    /snark

  • eycomm

    Another point I must mention – it was the Imam of a DC area mosque who gave intel about some of the individuals; this is indeed a favorable argument for the mosque, which in my view will create very positive social and economic impact there. I have seen a strong Mosque adminstrator can easily deal with some of the unwanted issues people talk about.

    Community board, mayor, president as well as many NYers think so; funding will not be an issue as Muslims have done well despite the hostility in the US; in rest of the world progress has been even more – look at country like UAE, Qatar, Turkey, Algeria, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Bangladesh to name few – all had strong GDP growth and gender equality last few years.

    Most of NY mosques media mentioned are actually small basements, not official places. On a slight large gathering, people have to pray on the streets – very common in the US.

    Opposition of this kind was there since the inception I should add – Islam is particularly well equipped to deal with it as it defeats the bigotry with well founded reasoning and benevolence. “Hallowed Groud” according to the dictionary is – “worthy of religious veneration; “the sacred name of Jesus”; “Jerusalem’s hallowed soil” is a religious term specificly used by some of the people without understanding what it brings to the argument. Have we said “no place is more hallowed than the house of worship, the place of almighty God”?

    Mass of humanity, standing shoulder to shoulder, regardless of their origin, race, and color – is indeed a breathtaking scene. We are enriched because of Americans, Africans, Europeans, Asians and others enriching our experience of this extravagantly deep religion. Let us pray, you will be a believer, God willing.

  • eycomm

    Just saw the ad. put out by Rick Lazio, I think his arguments can be torn to pieces fast, he will need far sticker issues to build on his political hopes.

    Lazio’s issue is Mr. Rauf, moderate Shia, did not denounce Hamas etc. Well he did that in some of the interfaith meetings attended by cross section of people, he can denounce it in public, end of story. About the source of fund – well anyone can raise that in the US from private capital markets directly from investors and institutions, let alone the donation part. I guess Republicans would want those investors to be Muslims? SEC clearly prohibits this sort of discrimination in their laws. How about the foreign sources? Those can all be transparent and put together by U.S. accountants and attorneys – anyone with basic business sense will do that, end of story. I would want the due diligence to be done by people objecting it though. It seems his objections can be met easily, but I have a feeling he is not forthcoming.

    I openly challenge Rick Lazio for a debate at a place of his choosing and a time of his choosing and suggest he reads much more than the polls to put forward his ideologies. In a clean debate counter arguments will come down on him like a ton of bricks. Rick Lazio – spend campaign capital in building bridges; you must be kidding about your politics and building hopes on stuff that you need to be putting in blogs not mainstream media; if those journalists knew much about the counter arguments and depth of the issue they could tear your arguments to pieces in the interviews.

blog comments powered by Disqus