In the Arena

Petraeus Wants More Time

Well, of course he does. It is the nature of David Petraeus to move mountains to achieve his mission–and the immediate mountain sitting in front of him is the Obama Administration’s December policy review, which will determine how quickly we start to leave Afghanistan in July 2011.

Petraeus and Stanley McChrystal came away from the last policy review, in the fall of 2009, with the distinct impression that the 2011 date would not signal the beginnings of a precipitate bugout. I was told by Administration officials at the time that there might be NATO withdrawals in 7/11–the Germans from Mazar-e-Sharif in the north, for example–and some cosmetic American reductions, but the main fighting force in the Taliban-infested south and east would continue its work until the mission was accomplished. (There has been been a fair amount of withdrawal-hyping by supporters and opponents of the war in the months since, but no basic changes in the plan laid out last December.)

The biggest problem Petraeus faces is the prospect of no significant progress–and perhaps even some regress–between now and December. The growing notion that Afghanistan is a helpless sinkhole would lead more than a few Obama aides to conclude that a new strategy is needed. The most plausible alternative is Joe Biden’s rejection of labor-intensive counterinsurgency in favor of targeted special ops and drone attacks, designed to inflict pain on the Taliban leadership–and the Al Qaeda leadership in Pakistan, if we can find them. Indeed, the special ops piece of the war is about the only thing that’s working now.

Given the slow pace of COIN, the possibility that measurable progress can be demonstrated between now and December is a longshot. Petraeus is focusing on the right areas to address–Afghan corruption and the need for the Karzai government to perform credibly outside of Kabul. But it seems clear that the General is going to mount a media blitz to lobby for a steady-as-you-go policy until July 2011. It’s not impossible that he’ll get his wish, but his chance of getting the extra six months is going to depend very much on demonstrable progress between now and December.

(By the way, the argument that we can’t really judge the Obama strategy’s success yet because all the troops haven’t arrived is a bit of a phony. Almost all the troops have arrived–and, unlike Iraq, the increased presence of U.S. troops in the streets is a less important piece of the equation here. The most important part of the equation is the need for the Afghan government to step up with a competent Army, honest cops, a judiciary system that provides honest justice faster and firmer than the Taliban impose sharia law, education and development projects. We could send another 100,000 troops, but if the Afghans don’t start providing those services yesterday, this mission will surely fail.)

Related Topics: Afghanistan
  • Latest on Swampland

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Obama Stumbles? Why the President’s Right to Talk About Bain

    The meme of the day in journo-world is that President Obama has stumbled at the outset of the general election campaign. The evidence for this? Well, uh, there isn’t very much, really–except that a few Democrats have criticized his campaign’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital and that Obama’s fundraising is merely humongous, instead of obscenely humongous. The two phenomena are linked, of course: Obama isn’t getting the usual haul from Wall Street because he has outrageously–outrageously!–tried to regulate the bankers who did so much to crash the economy in 2008. The handful of Democrats squawking are people who either (a) get money from private equity firms or (b) have retired and joined Mondo Casino. But there is another side to this story:

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Yes, of course he wants more time, the more time permitted to wage war, the better. It is nothing more than a warmonger’s way.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “It is the nature of David Petraeus to move mountains to achieve his mission”
    .
    Hero worshipping journalism really doesn’t serve the public.

  • grape_crush

    But it seems clear that the General is going to mount a media blitz to lobby for…

    Going to mount’?

    Do you read the magazine you write for, Joe?

    …a steady-as-you-go policy until July 2011.

    If I recall correctly, ‘stay the course’ is good for at least 2-3 Friedman Units.

    It’s not impossible that he’ll get his wish, but his chance of getting the extra six months is going to depend very much on demonstrable progress between now and December.

    That, or how much public opinion can be swayed in favor of a continued US presence…my thought is that will be a tough row to hoe for Petraeus.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Do you trust Jonathon Alter?
    .
    OBAMA: “I want you to be honest with me. You can do this in 18 months?”
    .
    PETRAEUS: “Sir, I’m confident we can train and hand over to the ANA [Afghan National Army] in that time frame.”
    .
    OBAMA: “If you can’t do the things you say you can in 18 months, then no one is going to suggest we stay, right?”
    .
    PETRAEUS: “Yes, sir, in agreement.”
    .
    MULLEN: “Yes, sir.”

    .

  • formerlyjames

    The public opinion sway is my hope. There seems to be more and more focus on the futility of it all. December isn’t far off, but maybe there will be a swell of opposition that will ring at the policy review.

  • pintortwo

    The most important part of the equation is the need for the Afghan government to step up with a competent Army, honest cops, a judiciary system that provides honest justice faster and firmer than the Taliban impose sharia law, education and development projects.
    .
    Never happen. The current government is in power because it stole the last election (link); how can it provide competent or honest anything when the citizens of Afghanistan know it to be dishonest and illegitimate?
    .
    Mr Klein, why are you not questioning the mission at its very core?

  • grape_crush

    The public opinion sway is my hope.
    .
    Sway which way? Toward continued presence (what apparently Petraeus is seeking) or disengagement?

  • pintortwo

    The most plausible alternative is Joe Biden’s rejection of labor-intensive counterinsurgency in favor of targeted special ops and drone attacks, designed to inflict pain on the Taliban leadership–and the Al Qaeda leadership in Pakistan, if we can find them. Indeed, the special ops piece of the war is about the only thing that’s working now.
    .
    versus (link)
    .
    LAHORE: The chief justice of the Lahore High Court on Wednesday remarked that drone attacks are against the integrity and sovereignty of Pakistan, and if these are not being carried out with the government consent, it should take measures to stop them.
    .
    The CJ said, “Through the media, it is known to everyone that people of Fata are being killed by America in drone attacks. I, being chief justice of Punjab and a citizen of Pakistan, am of considered view that due to drone attacks, terrorist activities are being increased in the whole of Pakistan, and the citizens are killed in suicide attacks.”

  • formerlyjames

    grape, the key phrase is “futility of it all” and yet I see now that futility of what isn’t implicit. I mean futility of any further military effort and I hope for sway of public opinion from the complacency that allowed the diversions from the initially stated purpose, to break al queda and take bin laden. Time to close shop.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I’ve always maintained that the point of the deadline was to remind Karzai that we are NOT his personal bodyguards. With no prospect for a US withdrawal there is zero motivation whatsoever to strengthen the Afghani security forces. Nothing in your reporting has dispelled the notion.
    .
    All the debate swilrling around US based politics ignores this simple point.

  • grape_crush

    Thanks for the clarification…it’s just that I’m seeing fewer and fewer people trying to justify maintaining the current level of presence in Afghanistan, and was wondering – if you were one of those who were – what were the reasons.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    I do believe hearing Obama saying something quite similar at some point.

  • gadsbys

    ” But it seems clear that the General is going to mount a media blitz to lobby for a steady-as-you-go policy until July 2011. ”

    If he does he will find himself outside, sitting on the sdidewalk next to MCChrystal, polishing his stars with that same dazed look MacArthur had when politicking against Truman.

  • michaelfury

    “the General is going to mount a media blitz”

    ————————————–

    “In its strategic context, MindWar must reach out to friends, enemies, and neutrals alike across the globe – neither through primitive ‘battlefield’ leaflets and loudspeakers of PSYOP nor through the weak, imprecise, and narrow effort of psychotronics – but through the media possessed by the United States which have the capabilities to reach virtually all people on the face of the Earth.”

    “A MindWar message does not have to fit conditions of abstract credibility as do PSYOP themes; its source makes it credible. As Livy once said: ‘The terror of the Roman name will be such that the world shall know that, once a Roman army had laid siege to a city, nothing will move it — not the rigors or winter nor the weariness of months and years — that it knows no end but victory and is ready, if a swift and sudden stroke will not serve, to preserve until that victory is achieved.’”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/target-audience/

  • Cliff

    Interesting that Klein’s post shows up right around the same time as Crowley’s screed on how awful it’ll be for everyone if we don’t stay forever in Afghanistan.
    .
    Probably paranoid on my part, but considering the propaganda blitz Petraeus is starting, I have to wonder how far its tendrils reach.

  • jaylemeux

    It would seem, then, that there’s not much US journalism that serves the public.

blog comments powered by Disqus