Kagan Confirmed

After another summer of hyperbolic debate, the Senate voted 63-37 Thursday to confirm solicitor general and former Harvard Law School dean Elena Kagan as the next Associate Justice of the Supreme Court.

Despite the obligatory objections over her judicial record (or lack thereof), legal philosophy (real and imagined) and all-around Obama-appointedness, Kagan breezed through the confirmation process with nary a scratch.  Among the noteworthy yeas were five Republicans: Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Dick Lugar of Indiana, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, and Judd Gregg of New Hampshire. Notably voting no were moderate Republicans George Voinovich of Ohio — even though he supported her nomination for solicitor general — and Scott Brown of Massachusetts, who warmly introduced Kagan as a fellow Bay Stater at the outset of her Senate hearings. Also voting nay was Ben Nelson of Nebraska, the lone Democrat to oppose her confirmation.

Kagan, 50, will join Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg — both fellow New York natives — on the bench, marking the first time in history three women have served together on the High Court. She is the 112th Justice named to the Supreme Court, Obama’s second appointee, and will replace retiring John Paul Stevens when the court reconvenes in the fall.

Related Topics: Supreme Court
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • nflfoghorn

    “…the first time in history three women have served on the High Court”
    .
    At the same time, I’m sure you mean.

  • nflfoghorn

    Per the last post, it’s pretty apparent Repubs will fight his next nominee to the death, especially if they have a filibuster-ready minority. It’ll likely be for the same bogus reasons they rejected Kagan. Shame on Ben Nelson.

  • Ivy_B

    Imagine all the drama if he had appointed an actual liberal. We would be having filibusters; Orrin Hatch and Jeff Sessions throwing daily hissy fits. And on and on.

  • http://lookinfromoutside.wordpress.com lookinfromoutside

    If it wasn’t such a serious matter, it’d be fun to watch.

  • tharwatfawzi

    All in the world who value decency ,justice, integrity…and all other noble values protected by all faiths and beliefs pray for the continued success of President Obama and the Democratic Party in protecting these values and wish Justice Kagan success at the supreme court .
    Tharwat Fawzi

blog comments powered by Disqus