The Latest Macaca: Ken Buck

Since George Allen’s infamous utterance of the word macaca, any statewide campaign or Party that can afford it has sent minions to tail their opposition in the hopes of replicating that scandal. Sometimes these moments have an impact, sometimes they don’t: Trey Grayson’s video trove of Rand Paul slip ups did little to slow Paul’s momentum.

In Colorado Lt. Gov. Jane Norton and Weld County District Attorney Ken Buck have been in a tight race for the GOP nomination to take on Senator Michael Bennet. Norton started out the race the establishment darling and heir apparent. But, her series of blunders – skipping the party convention after Buck won the caucuses and spending way too much money ahead of those caucuses — has helped Buck to a lead in the polls ahead of the August 10 primary. Perhaps a sign that Buck is the more feared candidate of the two? Democrats have kids following him around taping his every move.

Of course, candidates get to know the faces they see every day and Buck wouldn’t be the first politician to become friendly with their stalker: Paul’s folks often invited Greyson’s staffer to eat with them, though he never accepted. Still, Buck might not have wanted to have called this kid “buddy” before lamenting to him: “Will you tell those dumbasses at the Tea Party to stop asking questions about birth certificates while I’m on the camera?”

This comes on top of a gaffe last week where Buck was caught on tape telling folks to vote for him “because I do not wear high heels” in a dig at Norton.

Thus far, Norton’s run a pretty bad campaign and Buck has come from literally nowhere to lead her by 7 points in a Real Clear Politics average of Colorado polls. Buck has the energy of the Tea Party groups and has proven himself a savvy grassroots campaigner and fundraiser. But that could all change on the heels of these two caught-on-tape moments. Buck says his latest slip up came out of frustration that his message about deficit spending was getting lost with voters. “I’m not suggesting the language was appropriate,” Buck told The Denver Post and 9News. “But after 16 months of being on the campaign trail, I was tired and frustrated that I can’t get that message through that we are going to go off a cliff if we don’t start dealing with this debt.” Campaigning is like a marathon and Buck seems to be burning out on mile 23.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Colorado, Jane Norton, Ken Buck, Michael Bennet, primaries, Senate, 2012 Election, Congress, Democratic Party, Republican Party, Senate
  • Latest on Swampland

    Obama Stumbles? Why the President’s Right to Talk About Bain

    The meme of the day in journo-world is that President Obama has stumbled at the outset of the general election campaign. The evidence for this? Well, uh, there isn’t very much, really–except that a few Democrats have criticized his campaign’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital and that Obama’s fundraising is merely humongous, instead of obscenely humongous. The two phenomena are linked, of course: Obama isn’t getting the usual haul from Wall Street because he has outrageously–outrageously!–tried to regulate the bankers who did so much to crash the economy in 2008. The handful of Democrats squawking are people who either (a) get money from private equity firms or (b) have retired and joined Mondo Casino. But there is another side to this story:

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Morning Must Reads: Haunted

  • 53_3

    JNS:
    .
    What should anyone expect? Ignorance and intolerance are their stock-in-trade and they seem to be catching fire from all directions.
    .
    And I am truly all for it. After 35+ years, it is now time for the GOP to grow up…

  • destor23

    Is this really a gaffe? Seems more like the comment mainstreams an otherwise extremist candidate (and wouldn’t some distance from birtherism actually make the Tea Partiers seem less crazy?). More feature than bug, I’d say.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Where’s the intolerance or ignorance in either of those recorded statements? Seem pretty benign to me.

  • Paul-no not that one

    I wouldn’t equate this with a racial slur.

  • m0mentom0ri

    The high-heels comment seems more misogynist than intolerant, which I guess makes him a cad more than a bigot. Still, not exactly the high road.
    .
    The anti-birther comment seems like an obvious statement of fact, but with 59% of the Tea Partiers thinking Obama might not be an American citizen and Tea Partiers representing 21% of the population….well, I’m not sure how the math works out, but that sounds like it could hit his base negatively.

  • 53_3

    My reaction is that it wouldn’t be either, but then, I’m not a women and thus not as sharply focused on it (also a response to Exiled at 1.1)

  • Paul-no not that one

    I hear ya fitty.
    .
    I think the highheels comment was, as momentomori said, misogynistic.
    .
    The other line about the birthers was just plain smart.

  • http://flounder73.wordpress.com pafro

    George Allen uses an ethnic slur that is only used in the country where his mother grew up, so he can be a racist without anyone calling him on it.
    Ken Buck calls some dumb*sses what they are. He doesn’t have the morals or courage to do it in public.
    These are two totally different things.
    You need to stop the pointless equivocation. It is killing journalism.

  • nibblybits

    How about Republican congressman Zach Wamp wanting to secede from the Union because of health care? And yes, he’s running for governor of Tennessee.
    .
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/07/health-care-law-leaves-talk-of.html

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    Wamp backpedaled on that statements.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Let em.
    .
    The WAPO stinks so much. Did you see the last part about Dems saying the same thing? Both sides Do-it-ism “journalism”.
    .
    The link was to the Moonie Paper which had a blind source, Laurence O’Donnell on the McLaughlin Report, and internet stuff.
    .
    Yep pretty much the same as elected republican officials.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Something in the water inTennessee.
    .
    “Tennessee Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey, currently running third in the state’s Republican gubernatorial primary race, says he’s not sure if Constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion apply to the followers of the world’s second-largest faith, Islam.

    At a recent event in Hamilton County, Ramsey was asked by a man in the audience about the “threat that’s invading our country from the Muslims.” Ramsey proclaimed his support for the Constitution and the whole “Congress shall make no law” thing when it comes to religion. But he also said that Islam, arguably, is less a faith than it is a “cult.” ”
    ..
    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/tennessee-lt-gov-religious-freedom-doesnt-count-if-youre-muslim-video.php?ref=fpa

  • http://24ahead.com/ kattest123

    This JNS post is like someone describing a Rube Goldbergian process, and then others accepting that as the best way.
    .
    If the Dems weren’t what they are, instead of trackers they’d hire people to “cross-examine” politicians on their positions. Instead of looking for gaffes, they could encourage real debate.
    .
    Obviously, the MSM – especially those like JNS – aren’t going to press politicians on anything. And, the Dems aren’t filling the gap. Perhaps that’s due to a variant of M.A.D., perhaps it’s because their minds think of smearing and other low-level activities first.
    .
    Instead of “trackers”, click here to read what the Democrats should be doing.

  • billiecat

    Paul – don’t you understand that the First Amendment only applies to *MY* religion, because every religion that doesn’t agree with me is not a religion, but a “cult?” See how easy it is to get around that pesky Constitution if we want to?

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    I don’t get it.

    I mean, this was a dumb thing to say but it was not racist, was only very vaguely sexist (women look good in high heels, this man would not).

    It was not a Dan Quayle moment where he garbled the Motto “A mind is a terrible thing to waste” of the United Negro College fund to the United Negro College Fund by saying “It is a terrible thing to loose your mind. Or not to have a mind. how true that is”.

    Now that was a gaff!

    This is gotcha journalism and, except maybe – maybe – to Republicans voting in that primary, you haven’t gotten much at all.

    NEXT!

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    What is it with these conservatives? First Perry, now Wamp? Secede already. The Union shouldn’t fight any secession plans this time, so long as those states that are seceding allow for Federal personel to leave the area peacefully, and make sure the we get everything off the military bases(and from NASA) and I mean every scrap of paper, every pen, EVERYTHING, before closing those places down.

    Within a year, those states will be crying for federal foreign assistence dollars, within 5 years, they’ll be crying to be let back into the Union.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    I wouldn’t even call it vaguely sexist. Not necessarily, at least. Sure, he could have been implying that her gender was a drawback. Or, he could have been speaking more to her persona, someone a little too lofty and unwilling to come down from her perch to associate with the voters.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Thanks Billie-the things I need explained is a long list.

  • anon76

    @Neo-

    I think then he would have referenced a high horse, rather than high heels, especially in Colorado.

    As others have said, I think the first statement was stupid but nothing near ‘Macaca’, and the birthers statement wasn’t even stupid.

  • Jim, Foolish Literalist

    The great un-discussed open secret of American politics: Right Wing pols hold their base in utter contempt. See “McCain, John -Palin pick”

  • Paul-no not that one

    While Democratic pols are celebrated for their contempt of their base.

  • acameronw

    How can the “because I don’t wear high heels” remark not be sexist? What he’s saying is vote for me because I’m not a woman (and conversely, of course, don’t vote for her because she is). How many female votes did he think he was going to win with that snarky little aside?

    (I’m assuming that he’s not projecting and wishing he could wear high heels…)

  • apr2563

    I don’t think any woman would throw up her hands and run away in tears about the high heels comment. However, it was stupid and sexist.

  • apr2563

    Speaking as a woman, thank you for getting it.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “(I’m assuming that he’s not projecting and wishing he could wear high heels…)”
    .
    If he does start wearing women’s clothes, that would be national news.

  • 53_3

    I think that I will have to walk back my comment at 1.

  • thomasrial

    Another YOU Tube misquote…

    He was referring to the misleading rumor that he cross-dresses. Why does everyone think its about THEM?

blog comments powered by Disqus