Morning Must Reads: Dialogue

Reuters

REUTERS/Jeff Haynes

–Obama will sign financial regulatory reform into law today. Not pictured: Jamie Dimon or Lloyd Blankfein. Now begins the post-passage PR campaign to sell the bill to voters.

–Tom Vilsack will review the Shirley Sherrod firing.

–The irony of her unseemly ouster is that what she actually said is reminiscent of the Obama ethos; using a deeply personal narrative to highlight the tension — and eventual transcendence — of cultural disparity. Ben Smith rightly points out how far the dialogue has fallen.

Josh Green sees questions Andrew Breitbart’s motives. Erick Erickson questions Andrew Breitbart’s judgment. But the real story may be how and why the White House allowed itself to be manipulated.

–Harry Reid unveiled a scaled-back energy bill to his caucus yesterday. Afterward he sounded unsure whether Democrats would move forward.

–Blanche Lincoln’s re-election effort is in very bad shape. Nate Silver crunches the latest poll numbers and writes she is somewhere between a 20:1 and 500:1 longshot.

–Speaking of sober numbers for Dems: A new SurveyUSA poll out of marquee VA-05 suggests Rep. Tom Perriello is trailing Republican Robert Hurt by roughly 20 points. If there’s a way out of that hole, it’s money, effective advertising and hoping that third-party Tea Partier Jeff Clark makes some gains.

–Joe Manchin’s path to a West Virginia Senate seat looks pretty clear.

–Karen Handel and Nathan Deal head to a run-off in Georgia.

–As a young denizen of this particular glass house, I try to avoid casting amateur media observations willy-nilly. But I will say this post by Marc Ambinder, which is actually one piece of a larger dialogue with journalism professor Jay Rosen, is a thoughtful and worthwhile read for both producers and consumers of journalism.

–And trendlines that make Obama polls not look so bad: M. Night Shyamalan’s critical reception over time.

What did I miss?

E-mail Adam.

Related Topics: 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Harry Reid, Media, Miscellany, Senate, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • m0mentom0ri

    Alleged gunman says he wanted ‘a revolution’
    .
    Williams, an anti-government zealot on parole for bank robbery, had hoped to “start a revolution” with the bloodshed at the ACLU and the Tides Foundation
    .
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/07/21/MNMN1EHB37.DTL

  • m0mentom0ri

    Tide Foundation? Now where would he have got that idea from?
    .
    http://www.oliverwillis.com/2010/07/21/tea-party-terrorism-oakland-gunman-targeted-tides-foundation-aclu/
    .
    Cause and effect.

  • http://feifeis.wordpress.com Feifei Sun
  • nflfoghorn

    “M. Night Schlamma-lamma-ding-dong’s critical reception over time”
    .
    Critics pay those $10/$14 3D movie tix too, huh?

  • nflfoghorn

    Green: “…[I]t’s hard for me to see how the media can justify continuing to treat Breitbart as simply a roguish provocateur. He’s something much darker.”
    .
    Not referring to his complexion, obviously.

  • shepherdwong

    What did I miss?
    .
    Not much. Just the role of the nation’s largest cable TV news franchise in crafting and disseminating right-wing race-baiting and Republican political propaganda. But you’re not allowed to write about that are you?
    .
    http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201007210013

  • http://lookinfromoutside.wordpress.com lookinfromoutside

    A comment in the article you cited is worth transcribing:

    “This felon takes politics so seriously he wants to KILL those, with whom he doesn’t agree. It’s not the first time this has happened in world history….but what’s disturbing today, is that there are too many irresponsible people in the media, who will fan the embers, that then flare up in such minds.” — comment signed by ardvarc

  • http://lookinfromoutside.wordpress.com lookinfromoutside

    Sorry, I meant “… comment TO the article…”; need more coffee…

  • freeinpa

    The nations largest cable TV news franchise following the blue print the MSM has used for years.

    “News coverage of the NAACP has exploded since the “nation’s oldest and largest civil rights organization” passed a resolution last week attacking the Tea Party for including “racist” elements in its organization.

    Not only has the story spawned hundreds of news articles, but the network news stations have also taken notice. In just six days – from July 13 to July 18 – the NAACP’s feud with the Tea Party was discussed on eight network news shows on ABC, CBS and NBC”
    ==

    What really ticks off the left is that the game is exposed and they no longer write the rules.

  • porkdumpling

    “But the real story may be how and why the White House allowed itself to be manipulated.”
    Really? After the all the grief they’re getting over the ridiculous Black Panther story, promulgated by agenda-driven Fox News? They take every opportunity to turn white people as aggrieved victims of a racially-usurping WH.
    .
    The bigger story here is that Fox News grabbed hold of Breitbart’s manipulated clip despite his history for shoddy malicious editing. Despite that he was caught red-handed in the Acorn video case. Can the MSM now stop defending their colleagues at Fox News and pretending like they actually abide by any code of journalistic ethics? Will we see a single apology from O’Reilly, Beck, Kelly who drove drove this story and now have rotten egg on their faces?
    .
    Ms. Sherrod, please contact the most aggressive libel lawyer in the country and go after Rupert Murdoch’s billions, with Breitbart and Fox anchors as co-defendants. There isn’t a jury in this land that won’t be sympathetic to the professional lynching you just went through.

  • porkdumpling

    “Game”? People’s lives being toyed with is a game to you and the loser politicos you idolize.
    .
    You are sick.

  • m0mentom0ri

    “What really ticks off the left is that the game is exposed…”
    .
    Yup, Freepy, but its Briebert and the Tea Party’s game that’s getting exposed in this case. Manufacturing a NAACP video to make them appear racist in order to counteract The Tea Party’s Mark William’s actual racist comments are going to blow back in the face of the rabid right. Appropriately so.
    .
    But look at this way, you’ve further alienated African-Americans from the Tea Party, neo-conservatism, and the GOP: Mission Accomplished!

  • tstar3

    You know, you guys in the peanut gallery amaze me.
    .
    You, the media, dredged up this non-controversy. You allow yourself to be used by the right wingers because they throw spitballs at you and accuse you of liberal bias. When nothing, can be further from the truth.

    .
    For example, after the highly reputable Breitbart posts a shortened video of Ms. Sherrod’s video, and the uber-reputable Drudge links it…it heads straight to the Fox News panel..who give it due diligence by blaring a chyron reading “USDA worker accused of racism” (Albeit she was working for non-profit agency, not the USDA, all 30+ years ago that mainly worked with African American farmers, but I digress). And rather, than waiting till the FULL video comes out, the media jumps on it because they didn’t want to be called liberal. Credit should be given to CNN who actually interviewed Ms. Sherrod and the farmer’s wife.

    .
    So when the video pops up showing Ms. Sherrod explaining how she overcame whatever ills she had against the farmer due to things that happened during her childhood….what does the media do? Blame the administration of course. While Vilsack was a bit too quick to fire Ms. Sherrod, what choice did he have? If he didn’t, he would be called racist by proxy by the liberal media.

    .
    So congratulations media, you created a controversy, got someone fired, and made the administration respond to your super important national story…………..Your parents must be proud.

  • shepherdwong

    “Can the MSM now stop defending their colleagues at Fox News and pretending like they actually abide by any code of journalistic ethics?”
    .
    FOX has already driven half the country to functional insanity (see Obama is a socialist and the stimulus hurt the economy) and driven the credibility of mainstream news into the toilet and they’ve uttered barely a peep about it. The most amazing thing, it’s probably the biggest political news story of early 21st Century and will be featured in every history book of the future (if we have any – books and future, I mean). They’ve completely muzzled themselves on a cultural phenomenon that affects literally everything we do as a nation. Incredible.

  • grape_crush

    But the real story may be how and why the White House allowed itself to be manipulated.
    .
    No, the lesson is for you and the rest of the media, Adam: Most of what floats up out of the right-wing blogosphere is sh*t.

  • nflfoghorn

    Did I hear right or did Lauer sound righteously indignant at the right-wingers who did this?

  • porkdumpling

    What did you miss?
    .
    Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post story of John Boehner telling his caucus to stop getting drunk with female lobbyists.
    .
    http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/pols_warned_on_lady_lobbyists_UB8osujWi4TjdAbi5lmZ3K
    .
    Though let’s be honest: drunken stupidity afflicts both parties. And yet these morons get re-elected

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Shep,
    You should try to stratify your hatred a little more. It’s not healthy to have such pent up rage singularly focused on one intangible entity. It’s like banging your head against a brick wall over and over and over. It’s not only unproductive -if not regressive- it’s also a tad disturbing to watch. There must be something out that grinds your gears that you can rant about besides vile, right-wing, Republican, propaganda conspiracists. Maybe something you can actually affect…

  • grape_crush

    What did I miss?

    Life is much too short to be / a drag

    “We are therefore removing from our estimates an assumption of further fiscal stimulus beyond the policies in law (including this week’s unemployment extension), though we continue to expect extension of most of the expiring 2001/2003 tax cuts. This adds almost a full percentage point to the drag on growth from Q4 2010 to Q4 2011 to what we had already estimated.”

  • grape_crush

    More mismanagement at the RNC.

    “The Republican National Committee failed to report more than $7 million in debt to the Federal Election Commission in recent months — a move that made its bottom line appear healthier than it is heading into the midterm elections and that also raises the prospect of a hefty fine.”

  • grape_crush

    Holy alternate reality, BatKing!

    “The gentleman from Florida, if he knows anything, knows very well the Republicans don’t have the votes to block an unemployment extension. Don’t have the votes to block a declaration of war. We don’t have the votes to block anything in this Congress… “

  • sevenoaks07

    Agree. I watched MSNBC last night and this morning. Everyone went with the sensational stuff. USDA, NAACP and the WH come off as pawns. Fox is ****news: so what’s new.

    CNN seems to have come out a winner for taking time and trouble to get the story right. Breit*art: this is one low human being!

    New pattern: Drudge: check! Politico: check! Run with it and then sit down as say” “What have I done”.

  • tstar3

    David Frum about the Sherrod debacle. This needs to be posted in full.

    .
    You want to see media bias in action? Okay — look at the conservative media reaction to the firing of Shirley Sherrod.

    .
    Sherrod is the former U.S. Department of Agriculture employee fired for supposed anti-white racism. On July 19, Andrew Breitbart’s BigGovernment.com website posted a short video clip from a speech Sherrod had delivered to an NAACP gathering at some unspecified point in the past.

    .
    In the clip, Sherrod confessed to having deliberately declined on racial grounds to help a white farmer faced with a foreclosure on his farm. She was immediately terminated by the USDA and condemned by the national NAACP.

    .
    But a second look at the tape made it obvious that the tape had been severely edited, abruptly cut short. Within hours it emerged that the story on the tape was exactly the opposite of the story Breitbart had wanted to tell.

    .
    Conservative pundits justify fraudulent journalism on the grounds that all is fair in war.
    .
    Sherrod was telling a story about overcoming her own racial antagonisms. She had repented, had helped the white farmer, had saved the farm, had formed a friendship with the farmer and his family that lasts to this day. Besides which: The video was old, taped before Sherrod ever went to work at the USDA.
    .
    By the morning of July 20 the Sherrod-as-racist narrative had collapsed.
    .
    What is most fascinating about that second day, however, was the conservative reaction to the collapse. At midday on the 20th, Rush Limbaugh was still praising Breitbart: “I know that Andrew Breitbart’s done great work getting this video of Ms. Sherrod at the U.S. Department of Agriculture and her supposed racism and so forth saying she’s not gonna help a white farmer.”
    .
    By the evening of the 20th, however, conservatives were backing away, acknowledging that an innocent women had been defamed.

    .
    Even the racially incendiary Eric Erickson tweeted his disquiet, and then posted this on his RedState website.

    .
    But you’ll never guess who emerged as the villains of the story in this second-day conservative react. Not Andrew Breitbart, the distributor of a falsified tape. No, the villains were President Obama and the NAACP for believing Breitbart’s falsehood.

    .
    Breitbart went almost universally unmentioned. Erickson even justified Breitbart’s falsehood as a tragic but necessary and justifiable measure of conservative self-defense:

    .
    This is what we have become in politics because of the unrepentant race-baiting on the Left. It has become a tit for tat war of retribution. … That war has casualties on both sides. Ms. Sherrod is the latest. It is not fair. But that’s how the Left plays and the Right must fight on offense or not fight at all. It disgusts me to have to say it, but that is so very sadly where we are.”

    .
    Breitbart himself had this to say about those who would manipulate the public record for ideological purposes:

    .
    Journalists love whistle-blowers. Just not when the whistle is blown on them. Journalists love transparency. As long as they’re not the ones being exposed. No steadfast journalism rule is unbendable when it comes to justifying and protecting the racket that is modern journalism, specifically, political journalism in the United States today. The ends justify the means …. They lie when they claim to be objective. They lie when they claim to be unbiased, because these so called “truth seekers” are guilty of engaging in open political warfare. And when the whistle is blown, they simply double down.

    .
    But that of course was not a confession or apology. Breitbart continues to defend his own “ends justify the means” bending of the truth, as you can see here in this July 20 interview with CNN’s John King.

    .
    No, Breitbart’s indignant words on the 20th were aimed at another snippets-out-of-context scandal for the Right: the Daily Caller’s publication of quotations from the JournoList archive in which liberal activists and bloggers jeered George Stephanopoulos for asking Barack Obama about Jeremiah Wright.

    .
    Speaking on a liberal list serve, journalists had wondered how the Wright story could be stifled. One obnoxious young participant had even suggested that the story could be killed by hurling accusations of racism at conservative figures like Fred Barnes and Karl Rove. Conservatives exploded: The media were colluding to quash bad news about their beloved Obama! Only of course the Wright story was not quashed — unlike the story of Breitbart’s role in Sherrod’s firing, which has been, at least among conservatives.

    .
    On the phone on the evening of July 20, a friend asked me: “Can Breitbart possibly survive?” I could only laugh incredulously. I answered: “Of course he’ll survive, and undamaged. The incident won’t matter at all.”

    .
    There will be no apology or statement of regret for distributing a doctored tape to defame and destroy someone. There will be not even a flutter of interest among conservatives in discussing Breitbart’s role. By the morning of July 21, the Fox & Friends morning show could devote a segment to the Sherrod case without so much as a mention of Breitbart’s role. The central fact of the Sherrod story has been edited out of the conservative narrative, just as it was edited out of the tape itself.

    .
    When people talk of the “closing of the conservative mind” this is what they mean: not that conservatives are more narrow-minded than other people — everybody can be narrow minded — but that conservatives have a unique capacity to ignore unwelcome fact.

    .
    When Dan Rather succumbed to the forged Bush war record hoax in 2004, CBS forced him into retirement. Breitbart is the conservative Dan Rather, but there will be no discredit, no resignation for him.

    .
    Instead, conservatives are consumed with a new snippets-out-of-context uproar, the latest round of JournoList quotations. Here at last is proof of the cynical machinations of the hated liberal media! As to the cynical machinations of conservative media — well, as the saying goes, the fish never notices the water through which it swims.

  • pintortwo

    “I committed to having the ability by 2014….to reach a level of strength and ability and capacity in our forces to provide for our own security, for the population, for the country, for the world,” – Hamid Karzai -link
    .
    .
    Comfortable with providing Afghanistan’s security until 2014? (at least) And notice no mention of “basic services”. Are we to build this infrastructure- from scratch- maintain, staff and secure it until.. 2024 perhaps? At what price?
    .
    Is this effort equal to the threat posed by the Taliban? The jet/ship/missile/army- less Taliban. With no history of terrorism nor collaboration with terrorists (at least prior to recent drone attacks in Pakistan). With no means of getting here from there.
    .
    Or to the risk of al Qaeda re-claiming Afghani caves and rock-piles? (I’m sure they’d prefer to use their blackberries to plan any future attack, but that’s me — maybe they miss Afghanistan)
    .
    IMO, no explanation of our extravagance over there makes any sense– without focusing on money. Specifically, securing the untapped natural resources in the Middle East, and perpetuating the flow of funds from the Pentagon to big business. Someone, please, explain to me otherwise.

  • freeinpa

    The righteous indignation would more believable instead of laughable if your outrage was targeted at the alleged offense (racism) and not the person/party.

    ==
    “Manufacturing a NAACP video to make them appear racist”

    First the conclusion that it is made up is coming striclt fro the left which is usually the first defense. But since honesty is not a strong suit of the left let’s remind you the hatchet job the left has down trying to paint the entire Tea Party as racist. Or the made up racial epithets supposedly hurled at Black Congressman which is yet unproven and forgotten.

    So spare us you indignation- hypocrites of the left!

    ==
    “you’ve further alienated African-Americans from the Tea Party”

    You mean like the black conservative who was beaten up by union members? The left works feverishly to beat the racial drums because without out it you have nothing – just a philosophy of failure.

    ==

    “Game”? People’s lives being toyed with is a game to you and the loser politicos you idolize”

    Yes lets forget that the MSM media as we have seen through email leaks has tried to silence any opposition and demonize those who speak out. You don’t seem to be very concerned about those folks. Again the indignation of the left is a punch line for the comedy that passes for a moral philosophy.

  • porkdumpling

    The Washington Times has the RNC treasurer pointing the finger at Michael Steele and his chief of staff Michael Leavitt.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/20/rnc-fails-to-report-to-fec-7-million-in-debt/

    Fraud by Steele or another effort to oust him?

  • grape_crush

    The GOP War on the Unemployed, Special ‘Why you are a loser’ edition.

    “…as I survey the ranks of those who are unemployed, I see people who have overbearing and unpleasant personalities and/or who do not know how to do a day’s work. They are people who create either little utility or negative utility on the job.[...]

    …high schools and colleges should have a course…includ[ing] showing up in clean clothes, smelling well, having had a good breakfast, dressed in a businesslike way, calling the other employees “sir” or “ma’am” and not talking back.”

  • porkdumpling

    And you see several ‘liberal’ commenters here play into that, blaming the WH instead of at Breitbart who deliberately initiated this mess. They did exactly what Breitbart wanted.

  • nflfoghorn

    That’s news to me: floating **** :) are we in space now?
    .
    Son of Sludge never answered a basic question this morning: Did you tell Ms. Sherrod you were going to publish excerpts from her speech?
    .
    It was brought up yesterday that the same lack of investigating (from the same “source,” no less!) shot Rather’s career to pieces. Kudos to CNN for finding out the truth from all sides and quickly.
    .
    ‘Brings up a big issue: It’s not the NAACP’s job to investigate news – it’s MSM’s job (with the exception of Flox, which does opinion). Why isn’t there more of it–and I don’t mean the “special investigative reporting” from Brian “Badluck Schleprock” Ross or whomever–is beyond me. Are they pressured into ripping and reading?
    .
    This whole sorry episode could’ve been figured out by a seventh-grader (aka someone like my daughter) who’s interested enough to really do some digging.

  • nflfoghorn

    Dag, Grapy – meant to put 8.1 under here ;)

  • nflfoghorn

    OK here’s tomorrow’s news!

  • m0mentom0ri
  • m0mentom0ri

    “First the conclusion that it is made up is coming striclt fro the left which is usually the first defense.”
    .
    If “the left” is everyone but Breitbert, then yeah.
    .
    Even Jonah Goldberg thinks she got railroaded at this point. Or is Goldberg on “the left”?
    .
    http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDNmYTk4ZmVjYzU0Zjk3OTU5ODNhODhjOTE4NmM1NmU=

  • kevin

    As Steve Benen notes, this is part of a larger disturbing pattern:

    These examples of politically-motivated attacks seem to keep piling up. Just this year, John Patrick Bedell opened fire at the Pentagon; Joe Stack flew an airplane into a building; Jerry Kane Jr. and his son killed two police officers in Arkansas; and the Hutaree Militia terrorist plot was uncovered. Last year, James von Brunn opened fire at the Holocaust memorial museum; Richard Poplawski gunned down three police officers in Pittsburgh, in part because he feared the non-existent “Obama gun ban”; and Dr. George Tiller was assassinated. In 2008, Jim David Adkisson opened fire in a Unitarian church in Tennessee, in part because of his “hatred of the liberal movement.”

    I can’t wait to hear how all of this pales in comparison to the incredible threat of the New Black Panther Party. I mean, they must have killed dozens of people by now, right? Right?

  • shepherdwong

    “Did I hear right or did Lauer sound righteously indignant at the right-wingers who did this?”
    .
    That’s a stupid Joe Klein trick. Going after individual winger insanity is meaningless because they are each replaceable with what seems to be an endless supply of those on the right who are willing to lie and spin for fun and profit. It’s about “the vast right-wing conspiracy” of lies with FOX News at it’s disinformation center. Until our mainstream press can even acknowledge what FOX is they have no credibility in the discussion of partisan politics and public opinion.

  • grape_crush

    Warren gets nod from Labor.

    “‘In our view, there is only one candidate who is uniquely qualified and equipped to head this new agency,’ [AFL-CIO President Richard] Trumka said in a statement, adding that ‘Professor Warren’s appointment would make clear that under President Obama’s leadership, there truly will be accountability for Wall Street and fair treatment for the American public in the financial marketplace.’

    The SEIU said on its website that ‘Elizabeth Warren is the right person to be America’s new consumer protector in chief.’”

  • grape_crush

    Filling the fund.

    “The sale takes BP most of the way toward its goal of raising $10 billion over the next year by selling exploration and production assets. Those asset sales would cover half of the $20 billion BP has pledged to put in an escrow fund to cover claims resulting from the spill.

    The deal includes oil and gas reserves in Texas and southeastern New Mexico, natural gas reserves in western Canada, and the Western Desert business concessions and East Badr El-din exploration concession in Egypt.”

  • shepherdwong

    There must be something out that grinds your gears that you can rant about besides vile, right-wing, Republican, propaganda conspiracists.”
    .
    You name something, anything, that does as much harm to the nation and I’ll consider your suggestion. Perhaps you need to focus your anger a bit.

  • centfan

    Looks like they’re getting rid of landlocked assets. Well, underwater practice does make perfect.

  • newfreedomblog

    “You want to see media bias in action? Okay — look at the conservative media reaction to the firing of Shirley Sherrod.”

    .
    My God you people are such hypocrits to no end.
    .

    Conservatives BAD…..Liberals GOOD

    .
    Yes America, pick your monster, they are one and the same actually.
    .

  • shepherdwong

    Oh and you should figure out what really upsets you: my “pent up rage” or my “rant” about what what makes me mad.

  • nflfoghorn

    Shep @ 7.3: If you replace “right-winger” with “terrorist” you don’t change a whole lot of meaning (not sure how JK would feel about it, however).

  • centfan

    Didn’t I see that on an episode of Mad Men? Or was that Ozzie and Harriet?

  • nflfoghorn

    Rust-eze should’ve included the Munsters vs. the Addams Family since he doesn’t scare anybody.

  • billiecat

    Based on everything I’ve seen so far, Ms. Sherrod has a pretty good case for libel against Breitbart, even if the “public figure” standard (requiring knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard whether the charge is true or not) is applied to her claim. Although the First Amendment protects freedom of speech, it doesn’t allow you to defame someone with impunity. Here’s hoping Ms. Sherrod sues Breitbart out of business.

  • nflfoghorn

    Add another web site to his itenerary: Big Lawsuits.

  • grape_crush

    argh – youtube linky didn’t display…retry:

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38344940/ns/us_news-life/

  • m0mentom0ri

    From Time magazine, Mar 25, 2010.
    .
    Andrew Breitbart sits in an Aeron chair at an iMac computer gazing out the sliding glass door of his Los Angeles home office. On the patio, a hula hoop and a portable basketball rim await his children’s return from school. Breitbart, 41, dressed on this late-winter day in his standard work uniform of a dirty oxford-cloth shirt and grungy khaki shorts, looks more like a surf bum than one of the most divisive figures in America’s political and culture wars.
    .
    Maybe, instead of writing fawning pieces of praise for Mr Breitbart, you should’ve been a bit more critical of his work and his process. Breitbart is directly responsible for railroading Sherrod, but the media gave him the elevated platform for his slander.
    .
    Congrats, media.
    .
    http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1974949,00.html

  • grape_crush

    Wow. WordPress FAIL. Restate:

    Breitbart: It’s not my fault that someone got hurt by my lie, I was trying to smear the NAACP.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38344940/ns/us_news-life/

  • porkdumpling

    And you are pathetically predictable: Defend a-holes like Breitbart even when they commit corrupt acts like this.

  • grape_crush

    And here’s the youtube shorter version:

    (h/t LGF)

  • m0mentom0ri

    Rusty suspects Obama might be the anti-Christ, so I’d take his comments with a grain of salt.
    .
    “I am also not a religious zealot or fundamentalist, but this also REEKS in connections to writings I have read on how the Anti-Christ will take over the world. Just saying. Get out your copies of the Late Great Planet Earth and other various once widely believed science fiction books on the apocalypse. ”
    .
    http://www.teapartypatriots.org/Status.aspx?username=newfreedomblog

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    To all questions: you.

  • kevin

    Breitbart is a sociopath. No wonder Rusty likes him.

  • virginiagentleman

    Adam, I think you and your friends in the press corps are missing the boat (and, yes, I have to add: again). No, the “real story” won’t be how the White House was manipulated. Yes, that’s part of the story, but only if you and your colleagues are willing to report on how you were manipulated. No one did any independent reporting before reporting on this, they simply ran the video. No one appears to have spoken to Ms. Sherrod before she lost her job. They just set her up to lose her job.
    .
    But if you want to discuss why the White House was manipulated, do it fairly. The White House wasn’t worried about the reaction to the story from a tough-minded, serious group of journalists who would ask hard questions and demand full answers.
    .
    They were worried about the onslaught of rabid, barely informed reporters, anchors and pundits desperate to get their share of the hot story of the day/week/month, which might boost their ratings or online page views. Like a pack of puppies that weren’t housebroken yet, you guys would have made a colossal mess before the White House could get you under control. By the time somebody did the due diligence and found out the truth, the White House would have dealt with hour after hour of “a new debate on race in the post-Obama world,” and “will a black racist be treated the same as a white one with a black President” and “How Sherrod-gate is Obama’s (fill in the blank: Waterloo/Watergate/Katrina).” And of course, once the truth came out, the odds on anyone in the mainstream media admitting their culpability is, well, you’ve already shown how likely that is.
    .
    That’s what they were afraid of and that’s why they dumped her. Not because you’re watchdogs, but because you’re a clueless pack of hounds chasing their own tails.

  • shepherdwong

    Glad you were able to focus your anger but…little ol’ me? What a compliment! Thanks.

  • newfreedomblog

    More about Shirely Sherrod. Enjoy your reading!
    .
    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/Shirley-Sherrods-Disappearing-Act-Not-So-Fast-98846149.html
    .

    RDLN Graduate and Board Vice Chair Shirley Sherrod was appointed Georgia Director for Rural Development by Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack on July 25. Only days earlier, she learned that New Communities, a group she founded with her husband and other families (see below) has won a thirteen million dollar settlement in the minority farmers law suit Pigford vs Vilsack.
    .

    As part of a April 14, 1999 class action case settlement, commonly known as the Pigford case, U.S. taxpayers have already provided over $1 billion in cash, non-credit awards and debt relief to almost 16,000 black farmers who claimed that they were discriminated against by USDA officials as they “farmed or attempted to farm.” In addition, USDA’s Farm Service Agency spent over $166 million on salaries and expenses on this case from 1999-2009, according to agency records.
    .
    Members of Congress may approve another $1.15 billion this week to settle cases from what some estimate may be an additional 80,000 African-Americans who have also claimed to have been discriminated against by USDA staff.

  • apr2563

    Pork: My concern with the administration does not exonerate Breitbart. As I said earlier, Breitbart is an immoral creep. Everyone with any brains knows this and would avoid him as a source. I am ashamed that the administration did not take the time to speak to Sherrod to hear her rebuttal and just reacted to something promlugated by the right wing sleaze machine. I understand their sensitivity but not their lack of judgement.
    Obviously Breitbart initiated the charge and surely coordinated with Fox. I expect nothing better of them but do of the people I support.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    You’re quite welcome. I don’t generally become affected by the world around me or what people say and think -with the exception of those close to me-, but in your case, Shep, you make me want to go dive off a bridge. No small accomplishment.

  • m0mentom0ri

    Is she part of “The Plan”, Rusty?
    .
    “I did research on Obama before he was elected. He is clearly on a pathological plan to destroy this country as we know it.”
    .
    http://www.teapartypatriots.org/Status.aspx?username=newfreedomblog

  • shepherdwong

    “…Shep, you make me want to go dive off a bridge.”
    .
    This probably won’t surprise you much but you’re not the first person to express that sentiment.

  • nflfoghorn

    This is supposed to slander Sherrod how exactly?
    .
    Deep breath, Rust, and say it slooooowly…
    ..
    Breitfart was W….WR….WROOOOONNNNNGGGG.

  • porkdumpling

    apr: In a list of who was the most craven in this situation, you chose the WH over Breitbart. That was your list. And you weren’t the only one. How easily many just fell into Breitbart’s trap and blame the WH first and most.
    .
    As of now, we still don’t know to what degree the WH intervened in the firing. We only know that Obama was not briefed until the whole thing was done, yet another commenter felt free to say, “Obama, you lie.”
    .
    This is a case where there is no question who is the bad guy. Vilsack and the WH can be accused of spinelessness or being easily duped, but they didn’t exhibit the disgusting malice Breitbart did. And yet you still picked the WH as the most craven. Own your choice.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    There’s hope yet for the world. ;)

  • rose83

    There is enough blame for everyone involved in Sherrod’s firing.
    .
    Here is the link to Frum’s post: http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/205190/shirley-sherrod-and-the-shame-of-conservative-media
    .
    I want the editors to know that people are reading it.

  • newfreedomblog

    Yup the “Plan” was thought out a long time ago, momento.
    .
    Here you go, you very own copy.
    .
    http://www.archive.org/details/YouDontNeedAWeathermanToKnowWhichWayTheWindBlows_925

  • newfreedomblog

    Oh foggie, there was no slander. Just very questionable as to how Shirley has access to well over 1.5 BILLION US Taxpayer Dollars.
    .
    Did you get your cut too?

  • nflfoghorn

    Um, no.
    .
    But I’d be willing to *give* $ if you ever admitted to what I said in 26.0.

  • shepherdwong

    “In a list of who was the most craven in this situation, you chose the WH over Breitbart.”
    .
    “Craven” means cowardly and, yes, when you look up the word cowardly in the dictionary there’s a picture of the White House political shop. I have plenty of adjectives and blame for Breitbart but he didn’t fire an innocent public servant based upon the edited video of a known right-wing race-baiter and propagandist, picked up and broadcast by the known propaganda outlet of the Republican Party.
    .
    http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/07/messina-stupid-and-cruel-or-merely.html

  • apr2563

    Shepherd thank you for explaining my position better than I have. When I consider the most cowardly, I stand by my position. Who was the most despicable and immoral: Brietbart and Fox.

  • apr2563

    Pork: There is room for nuance.

  • newfreedomblog

    Ok, there is a paypal link on my blogsite.
    .
    Brietbart was wrong.
    .
    Thank you for the donation.

  • apr2563

    Thanks nflfoghorn: I refuse to acknowledge newrusty directly. I’m trying to figure out what his new paronoia implies. She is involved in a scandal so to keep her quiet they fire her? Huh?

  • newfreedomblog

    One wouldn’t want or expect you april2563 to fully understand, it is just not in your genetic makeup i’m sure.

  • shepherdwong

    Hope you’re right. If there weren’t, then there would be no point in pissing-off people by telling them what they don’t want to hear. Unfortunately, the social science doesn’t leave much room for hope.
    .
    http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/07/11/how_facts_backfire/?page=full

blog comments powered by Disqus