The Full Shirley Sherrod Speech – UPDATE

For those who have been following the Shirley Sherrod/Andrew Breitbart/NAACP/USDA story today – you might have whiplash! – here’s the full text of Sherrod’s speech before an NAACP audience in March. It’s worth watching in full.

(UPDATE: Around 2 a.m. this morning, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said he would review Sherrod’s firing. She said this morning she’s not if she wants to return to the USDA.)

If you haven’t been following the story, get up to speed over at CNN where you can see interviews with the parties involved and read through the events of the day.

The theme of Sherrod’s speech, which she repeats in various iterations throughout is, “It’s not about race. It’s about those who have and those who do not.” In other words, Sherrod tries to impart to her audience that those who believe America – and the South in particular – is divided because of race miss the point. It’s divided, she says, because of income.

There’s a strange lapse where the tape appears to be cut around 21:00, right as Sherrod is telling the story that was taken out of context today and resulted in her firing. It will be interesting to see if this is explained.

But the other parts I found notable in the video are the stories Sherrod recounts about her family and growing up in the South before and during the Civil Rights movement. Her father was murdered when she was 17 “by a white man,” she says, adding that in her county back then, “the murder of black people occurred periodically and in every case, the white men who murdered them were never punished.” No one was ever prosecuted for her father’s murder even though there were witnesses, says Sherrod. She also says after her father’s murder, a group of white men burned a cross on the front yard of her home while her mother, four sisters and baby brother were inside.

Shirley Sherrod is not, by this accounting, a person out of touch with the racial history of America. Listen to her speech and it’s clear this history is something she remembers vividly; her message to the NAACP audience seemed to be that if she can move past it, so can anyone else.

In her speech, Sherrod, who grew up on a farm in Georgia, said she desperately wanted to move to the North after high school, but that her father’s murder spurred her to stay and commit herself to helping black people. (He was killed in 1965.) Sherrod said over time – in part because of her experience with the white farmer she talked about in the edited Breitbart clip – she realized her goal was to help poor people, not black people.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, who fired Sherrod, said today that he stands by his decision. The White House says it supports him. The NAACP reversed its condemnation of Sherrod and urged Vilsack to reconsider his decision. We’ll find out in the coming days if he decides to.

Related Topics: andrew breitbart, CNN, naacp, Race, shirley sherrod, usda, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Obama to Submit His Budget to Congress on Monday

    President Barack Obama is pressing for investments in infrastructure while relying on familiar tax increases on the wealthy and corporations to claim progress on the federal deficit in his upcoming budget.

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Robert F. Bukaty / AP

    With Saturday Victories, Romney Retakes Control of the GOP Narrative

    Mitt Romney, the perpetually questioned front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, had a rough week. Three embarrassing losses to Rick Santorum in Tuesday’s non-binding contests led to questions about Romney’s conservative bona fides just in time for GOP activists, gathering at their annual Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, to collectively grumble about it. But in two narrow, largely symbolic victories on Saturday, Romney reclaimed the headlines. Never mind the details. He was winning again.

  • superset

    the tape wasn’t cut at 21 minutes, they had to put in a new tape per jake tapper’s twitter.

  • shepherdwong

    Gosh, so many great political stories here that have serious significance for the public.
    .
    1) Race-baiting, right-wing, political propaganda that is dividing the nation for Republican political gain.
    .
    2) The role of the major cable media conglomerate that claims to be a news organization, busted participating (again) in a right-wing smear campaign.
    .
    3) The foolish cowardice of the Obama Administration in the face of those obvious smear campaigns by the right-wing propaganda machine, featuring the above described FOX News.
    .
    4) The constant, unwarranted credibility given to known right-wing liars and propagandists by mainstream news media, living in constant fear of right-wing accusations of liberal bias.
    .
    But you can’t tell any of them, can you?
    .
    But thanks for the video of what we all already knew.

  • choska

    It took Obama’s White House and his appointees MONTHS to get off their a$$’s and do something about their own health care bill and stopping the banksters from robbing us blind again. They still haven’t done anything about the environment, DADT, or any of the other issues that got Obama elected.

    But it only took them hours to fire a highly qualified public servant when a sworn enemy of the administration accused her of being mean to white people. There was no due process, no ability to explain what happened. Fox News barked and the White House caved. And even now, when it is revealed that they were completely fooled, they stand by Tom Vilsack.

    This is nothing but cowardice on the part of Obama and Rahm, the latter of whom as been revealed once again as nothing but a classic bully. He’s ALL bark because he knows that when a fight starts he is helpless.

    But the real problem here rests with Obama. I remember candidate Obama who, when asked about how he would stand up to the Right, said, “I don’t do cowering.”

    Mr. Obama, you lie.

    And if Obama can’t defend himself from a clown like Andrew Breitbart, how can we expect him to defend us from bin Laden, BP, the crooks on Wall Street, or the rest of our enemies who want to kill, poison, and rob us.

  • maverick2k9

    Has Shirley Sherrod disclosed who in the White House called her and forced her to resign?
    .
    Flox will do what they do best – take words out of context and slander. Nothing surprising about that.
    .
    What’s surprising is that some WH lackey fell for the cheap tricks from Flox News crowd.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Andrew Breitbart is just such an incredibly immoral person for this.

    If the Republican Party has any integrity, they will condemn him for race baiting and lying.

  • virginiagentleman

    Simple question: how is this any different than the Bush/National Guard story that cost Dan Rather his job with CBS? And why shouldn’t Fox News treat Breitbart the same way and end his career with them?

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “…how is this any different than the Bush/National Guard story that cost Dan Rather his job with CBS?”
    .
    1) Rather had a distinguished and very long career where that error was an extremely rare exception to his long career.
    .
    2) Rather himself did not invent the story, but, did a terrible job on verification which is an error, not a malicious act.
    .
    3) CBS believes in things called “facts” and “truth” where, despite his long record, due to his position, his error was unacceptable.
    .
    Fox will probably give Briebart his own show.

  • maurice2u

    “Fox will probably give Briebart his own show.”
    .
    It has such a high probability, it would be worth marking this discussion for future look back 1 year from now and collecting on bets we make now about it.

  • shepherdwong

    Not to mention, the Bush National Guard story happened to be true.

  • textee

    Kate Pickert: “For those who have been following the Shirley Sherrod/Andrew Breitbart/NAACP/USDA story today ….”

    Earth to Time magazine: Despite this story being old, old, old, anyone who relies on leftist political advocacy groups like Time magazine, ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, NPR, A-Mess-NBC, ESPN, ESPN2, Sports Illustrated, the Associated (with terrorists) Press, et al., for information would not know anything about this story because all of the above have ignored the story for the obvious reasons that they all live entirely in their own leftist bubbles and that bringing any attention to the unrepentant race baiting of the NAA[Leftist]CP doesn’t help promote the agenda of the above named political advocacy groups. Consequently, said political advocacy groups had a complete blackout on the story until a few hours ago. It also explains why clueless Bob Scheiffer announced on Sunday that he knew nothing about the Obama so-called “Justice” Department dismissing the default judgment won against the thugs of Obama’s New Black Panther Party. Schieffer said that it wasn’t in the news. Therefore, he knew nothing about it. Of course, that’s the same story Charlie Gibson gave for his complete ignorance of Obama’s criminal voter fraud outfit ACORN advising a “pimp” and a “ho” how to run a child prostitution ring. Gibson said that he knew nothing about the story because none of the above had informed him about it.

  • stuartzechman

    This is an amazing, inspirational story she told, actually.
    .
    Shirley Sherrod should be given an award for telling it, not walking papers.
    .
    Tom Vilsack should be defending this person, he should be standing up for honesty and redemption in matters of race and power. He should be doing everything in his power to make the truth –as evidenced by the full video of her remarks– known and understood, so that the credibility of his department can be borne upward by its association with someone of Shirley Sherrod’s integrity.
    .
    But if Vilsack is right, and this episode makes it literally impossible to do her job, then who is indicted by that reality?
    .
    In what circumstances is it possible for someone like Breitbart to falsely smear an honorable person caught in the crossfire of a political battle between factions, for the full context of her remarks to be perfectly accessible to the Administration and the press corps –everyone– within hours, and yet for there to be any controversy whatsoever that renders further credible service impossible?
    .
    People of the character and profession of Breitbart will always exist. They’ve been with us since the very beginning, since the first moment we began to realize that integrity was a precious bond between humans. There’s a biblical commandment devoted to condemning witnesses of the nature of Andrew Breitbart –it’s right there next to “Thou shalt not steal.” We’ve always known about falsehood and its profiteers, and they are still with us. Not that much has changed since we were given the commandment regarding false witness against our neighbors.
    .
    So, to me that means it isn’t really Breitbart who needs examining here.
    .
    It’s those who allow Breitbart to succeed who need to be held accountable. Tom Vilsack is one of them. The press corps who either cannot or will not view their role as being the opponents of false witness are another. The Obama Administration is probably yet another –the buck, as has been noted by prior Presidents, stops there.
    .
    These are the people who turn Andrew Breitbart from just another squeaking little rodent into a wealthy assassin with another notch on his belt. They make our democracy worse. They are, as someone said just a few short years ago, “hurting America.”
    .
    One gets the impression that, if the current political-media class in Washington were in power in the early 1950′s, the McCarthy era would still be going on today. The Shirley Sherrods of our nation would be sacked over and over again, as many times as they could be fired, just in order for everyone else to live a little longer putting off the fear that obviously comes with the task of defending integrity against falsehood. One gets the impression that the blackballing, the firings and the smears would never have ended, if these people were in the positions they hold now, back then.
    .
    They cannot be allowed to fail us this badly.
    .
    Those who make it impossible for Shirley Sherrod, once smeared, to do her job are making it impossible for our country to overcome what it needs to overcome in these increasingly dark hours. They need to be held to account –by us.
    .
    Will we do it? Will we hold them responsible for this, the latest in a series of irresponsible acts of political cowardice?
    .
    Or will we join them in their shame?
    .
    The greatest award we could give Shirley Sherrod –and those like her– for telling that true story of hate, murder, retaliation, redemption and, ultimately, knowledge, would be to let those who found integrity politically inconvenient know that our support is contingent upon whether or not they do the right thing.
    .
    Shirley Sherrod should be rehired tomorrow. The evidence proves it, our nation will be better for it, and we should demand it.
    .
    Let’s give her the award she has earned.

  • virginiagentleman

    Always amusing to see someone criticize the media for not covering a story, at the very moment they’re covering it.
    .
    BTW, textee, care to take my challenge? How is this incident different than the one that cost Dan Rather his job with CBS? Didn’t Breitbart willingly distribute distorted and false information without verifying it? Shouldn’t he face the same punishment as Rather?

  • maverick2k9

    textee, the worst possible insult that I can probably hand out to you is that your retarded ramblings about ESPN and “Micky Mouse is a communist spy in Disney World” style conspiracy theories, make freeper, NewRustyblog, 3x, Dr Earl et al sound very articulate, rational and logical.
    .
    So thanks for making your fellow whingnuts look good in comparision.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    If there is a petition drive for her to get her job back and full apologies from everybody involved – including POTUS – you have my signature and, for what I can, bring a few others along.
    .
    This is so low.
    .
    And our media is biased towards… liberals?

  • apollyon07

    This stunt Brietbart pulled is deplorable. I felt nothing but sadness when I first heard the speech in context (well, just the part after the infamous clip), where she talks about the lesson from that story in retrospect was that it isn’t about white vs. black. Did he really not think anyone would notice?
    .
    When I saw just the initial clip, my interpretation was that she chose not to help him as much because he was acting uppity and superior to her, so she sent him to a white lawyer, which she assumed he would have preferred. Snooze. I would’ve done the same thing, I thought.
    .
    Sadly, I doubt there will be any serious repercussions to him for this, as professional race baiters seem to have no problem continuing their careers after doing on ridiculous thing after another (e.g. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson)

  • apollyon07

    Another revelation from this: the White House is apparently even more thinn-skinned than I thought.

  • apollyon07

    thin*

  • 3xfire3

    Stuart,
    .
    “It’s those who allow Breitbart to succeed who need to be held accountable. Tom Vilsack is one of them. The press corps who either cannot or will not view their role as being the opponents of false witness are another. The Obama Administration is probably yet another –the buck, as has been noted by prior Presidents, stops there.
    .
    Let’s give her the award she has earned.”
    .
    I totally agree with your comments. To fire this lady without even checking out the story completely is a cowardly act. You don’t throw people under the bus without proof they did something wrong. This administration feels so strongly that their cause is right that honor, honesty and doing the right thing comes in second or third on the priority list.
    .
    She was told to resign because the film clip would be on the Beck 5:00 show. It was not. Beck did show it this evening a day later and said there is no way she should have been fired because of the film clip. He showed more of her speech that showed her intent to show how she had overcome those feelings from 24 years ago.
    .
    Whether you like Beck or not probably depends on your politics. He is standing up for Sherrod and believes she should be rehired. Her firing was totally wrong.
    .
    Liberals on this site and jealous Joe like to call Beck crazy and say he lies. They are wrong. He states what he truly believes is accurate from his perceptions and opinions. He has facts to back up his views.
    .
    Liberals state what they believe to be true based on their perceptions and opinions. They usually have facts to back up their views.
    .
    Facts like Beauty are often in the eyes of the beholder.

  • nflfoghorn

    He’s been Jeremiahed to death, it seems.

  • nflfoghorn

    FOUR SCORE AND THREE OR FOUR POSTS AGO I said:
    .

    “Why won’t BrightBoy release the full speech? Is he afraid that the full context of the speech will reveal the intent of her point [i.e., you can't judge a book by its cover] versus taking snippets and using them as prima facie ‘evidence’ of racism?
    .
    “The National Association for the Advancement of Certain People did indeed get duped and owes this lady an apology.
    .
    “Vil-No-sak overreacted.
    .
    “And BO needs to have another race speech at the ready.”

  • afraidofheights

    The moral outrage on both sides of the NAACP/Tea Party debate is pretty laughable. Mark Williams claims that the Tea Party has no racists? Come on. Get 20 people together at a neighborhood block party and you will have a racist in your presence. And the NAACP, while they have accomplished many good things for African Americans, they are hardly the last bastion of unadulterated racial tolerance.

    Fox News is deservedly taking one on the chin for this splice job. How is it that they ever thought that they could get away with this in the first place. Jon Stewart and his crack crew of interns would have broken this story if he was not on a summer break. Stupid mistake by all parties involved in misleading the public.

    That said, check out this article: Token White Member of NAACP Calls Tea Party “Racist”; Lone Black Tea Partier “Outraged”.

    Very FUNNY!

    http://www.dailygoat.com/?p=1798

  • http://superbena2002.wordpress.com superbena2002

    I am a white male from Maryland and I think that Mrs. Sherrod should get her job back. The White House should NEVER believe a Faux Noise/Andrew Brietbart story without doing their own fact checking. She should sue Faux Noise and Andrew Brietbart for slander and defamation of character as well. Faux Noise has had a long history of racism as well.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “Facts like Beauty are often in the eyes of the beholder.”
    .
    Forgetting the thesis, most of which I agree with, your final sentence negates absolutely the rest of your entry.
    .
    Fact: Shirley Sherrod has every reason one could expect from her biography for her to be an anti-white racist.
    .
    Fact: Despite the first fact, she battled her demons and fought her urge to be vindictive and involve herself with reverse racism and, instead, did something very fair and just in her capacity.
    .
    Fact: By removing parts of her speech, Briebart had created a lie.
    .
    Fact: Democrats and the media are so eager to treat right wing evil people (no, not all conservatives nor even all who are right wing – just Briebart and those who do truly evil things) with respect which they do no deserve from long records of distortion and bias that they did not fact check the story until after her termination.
    .
    No just person can see her statement very clearly stating that she nor anybody else could excuse themselves for either ordinary racism (majority group against minority group) nor reverse racism (minority group against majority group) and call her anything other than very anti-racist when it is shown in full.
    .
    We’ve done to one another “I’ll correct that statement”, but in jest at one another’s opinions (without pretending it was what you said) and you know how the movement of words can make the exact opposite point.
    .
    Yes, the administration and the State of Georgia did make some terrible errors. However, those errors were in trusting a far right dishonest propagandist (not all far right are even propagandist much less dishonest – but Briebart is, clearly is both of the above).
    .
    There is nothing any reasonable person can say when seeing or reading the statement to come to any other conclusion. There is nothing in this case about the beholder. It is a clear cut case of the truth that Sherrod is both very opposed to ordinary racism and equally opposed to reverse racism and the lie being that she is supporting reverse racism.
    .
    Once again, Obama’s hands are not clean. However, Sherrod’s proverbial blood was first spilled by an extremely dishonest far right wing propagandist.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Although it is impossible to tell online, a very large majority of the people posting here are white and male.
    .
    I think it is fair to say that this is not about white or black, male or female or, even, conservative or liberal, but, simply about fair and unfair.
    .
    I can not imagine saying that her termination was anything other than completely unfair and unjust.

  • stuartzechman

    If you have the time, you can demand that the Obama Administration do the right thing, and give this honest lady her job back:
    .
    Comments: 202-456-1111
    .
    Switchboard: 202-456-1414
    .
    If you don’t have the time to call them up, you can email them here, using this form at http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

  • kathy

    Ag dept is “reconsidering” the firing today.

    What a sorry spectacle. The only person who looks good in this whole story is Shirley Sherrod.

    According to her, she was told she had to be fired because she was “going to be on Glenn Beck tonight.” Oh good, now we’re puffing up Glenn Beck by letting fear of him call the tunes.

    One of the people who should be fired is the stooge who told Sherrod this. When you’re firing someone because you’re afraid of adverse publicity, you don’t give them a soundbite that will give you adverse publicity. Said person also told Sherrod “the White House” wants your resignation. So either the stooge was lying, or Vilsack was, or the White House was. Great.

    Get that woman back on the job in a hurry, or face the reality she could and should sue for wrongful termination of employment. It’s outrageous she wasn’t so much as asked to explain herself.

    I’d like to see Vilsac sacked, if he’s responsible for this.

  • newfreedomblog

    Ms Sherrod should get her job back, but not as a reward for realizing what she did initially was wrong for basing her decision to help or not help on the color of someone’s skin. What she admitted to was wrong, and like a child, she should be commended for her change in behavior and encouraged to not make the same mistake in the future.
    .
    You place her on some pedestal as a victim, when in fact she was the perpetrator of the crime. Unbelievable. It is like an adulterer, who finally admits to having the affair, and is asking for our forgiveness. We should forgive, but not forget the act. Shirley should be forgiven, but strongly urged not to repeat the same offense in the future. Her record at the USDA should have been looked at, and if there are any instances of the repeated behavior she has admitted to, then she should have been fired. It would be quite simple to look at all the cases she had any part of to see who exactly she helped and who she admittedly “only did what I had to do”.
    .
    With that said, where is the same outrage as expressed on this very site for the false allegations accusing the TEA Party of racism. Those on the left simply took the “word” of some leftist jouno who claimed he heard racial epithets shouted out against a member of the Black Caucus, at a TEA Party protest held this past March. But, our dear friends on the left are still silent, why is that? No proof has been rendered by anyone despite the rewards offered. But, those on the left continue to vilify the members of the TEA Party as “racists”. The same tactic that those on the Journo-list said they would use against anyone who challenged this President or his character.
    .
    The double standards set by those on the left are as objectionable as anything Andrew Breitbart has played in a 20 something second video clip.
    .
    Again my little liberal friends, take a long deep look within first, and then shout out your outrage. It is indeed very comical.

  • gysgt213

    “But if Vilsack is right, and this episode makes it literally impossible to do her job, then who is indicted by that reality?”
    .
    Actually Tom’s reasoning is as well thought out as this lady’s unjustified firing, by him.
    .
    If you follow his logic, than anyone with an ill agenda can slice and splice a video or recording to accuse anyone of anything from racisim, to murder, to child molestation and than the victim of the malicious intent of someone else, through no fault of their own loses the ability to do their job. And that person’s superior should make no effort to find out if what the person is accused of is actually true.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “Unbelievable. It is like an adulterer, who finally admits to having the affair, and is asking for our forgiveness.”
    .
    No, sir, it is like a woman who has a cheating husband and can find many reasons to cheat, smiles at a handsome man who might sleep with her and, then, decides that it is a terrible thing to cheat and, instead, goes straight home to her husband and never cheats.
    .
    Then she has some lunatic who saw her smile tell her husband that she did cheat and have him leave her anyway.
    .
    She did, at the very beginning, the minimum required of her job based upon race. Realized right after she had begun to do things in a mediocre way that she was wrong, corrected herself completely and won over the person she, for an extremely brief period of time, felt compelled to discriminate against.
    .
    Just admit that you were duped, Rusty.
    .
    Either that or just hate black people.
    .
    You have few other options, Rust.

  • gysgt213

    “What she admitted to was wrong, and like a child”
    .
    You are condescending a**. This is a grown woman and she is not like a child nor should she be treated like one.
    .
    “You place her on some pedestal as a victim, when in fact she was the perpetrator of the crime.”
    .
    If you knew anything about this story beyond wanting to so desparately that it was true you would know that this lady committed no crime and when this event happen she was not working for the United States Government.

  • hippooath

    “(…) but not as a reward for realizing what she did initially was wrong for basing her decision to help or not help on the color of someone’s skin. What she admitted to was wrong, and like a child, she should be commended for her change in behavior and encouraged to not make the same mistake in the future.”
    .
    It’s a interesting notion that a person that lost her father to a racial murder somehow changed her ‘behavior’. The speach in full context talks about a lesson; that eventhough she could have responded in kind to the white farmer she didn’t because she realized unlike the people that killer her father that the root cause isn’t black or white – it’s poverty.
    .
    I wonder what the person who killed her father did, what did he realize? In order for someone to change they have to do something first and it’s clear that she resisted the temptation to base her options on what happened to her and her family but to look at the problem at hands. Unlike much of your race baiting comments here.
    .
    While you say that she should get her job back you can’t resist the urge to assume there’s some kind of fault here, but in your entire rant you place absolutely no blame on the person who doctored the video to make her look like a reverse racist. Instead you continue the discussion about ‘what she did wrong’ when there’s nothing in what she said that indicate that she did something wrong.
    .
    If she resisted the urge to be just like you, she is indeed guilty as charged, but you’re grasping at straws if you claim that her strong show of integrity to do the right thing despite her history is anything like your complete lack of humanity.
    .
    “The double standards set by those on the left are as objectionable as anything Andrew Breitbart has played in a 20 something second video clip.
    .
    Again my little liberal friends, take a long deep look within first, and then shout out your outrage. It is indeed very comical.”
    .
    Comical indeed

  • porkdumpling

    There is absolutely no evidence that Obama knew about this whole Sherrod situation, that he was briefed on it, before it all went down. You can make an argument that *someone* in the WH screwed up, but you’ll have a hard time convincing me that Obama himself threw this lady under the bus, considering how certain clips of his own race speech (“typical white person” anyone?) were taken out of context to attack him.
    .
    So unless you can prove that he “lie”, do you want to admit that you too are “caving” ahead of evidence and laying blame before you know the story?

  • porkdumpling

    You make an excellent point, and in one way they should not be different: Ms. Sherrod should sue the pants off of Fox News and every single personality there who ran with the story instead of checking the facts. And she should insist upon punitive damages.
    .
    Breitbart should be neutered and publicly stoned. It would be a service to the human race.

  • porkdumpling

    “People of the character and profession of Breitbart will always exist. They’ve been with us since the very beginning…”
    .
    The answer is not to shrug and say there will always be cockroaches like Breitbart around. No, you stomp them out as such vermin deserve, and make it so toxic for them to exist, to shun them into penury and shame, because that’s what they deserve: the full force of societal condemnation.
    .
    You seem to give this cockroach a pass simply because he is one, but if you don’t crush him underfoot you’ll soon be overrun by a swarm.
    .
    It’s sad that you so easily take his bait by attacking his targets as he wants.

  • nflfoghorn

    And all this happened BEFORE she even joined USDA. Saw BrightBoy on the news this morning – what a jerk.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “If you have the time, you can demand that the Obama Administration do the right thing, and give this honest lady her job back:
    Switchboard: 202-456-1414″
    .
    The other number will get you a busy signal.
    .
    17 min 54 seconds for a two second remark, but, let’s see if we can help make it one million calls to the White House.
    .
    If you have phone and either do not work daytime or have flexibility at work, dial, put on speaker phone while on hold, support Shirley Sherrod.
    .
    If you have the flexibility to do this, it’s not exactly hard work.

  • mjwilstein

    Even Michele Bachmann is defending Shirley Sherrod:
    http://bit.ly/8ZzMrI

  • nflfoghorn

    “[Sherrod} said this morning she’s not if she wants to return to the USDA”
    .
    Unless she gets a presidential apology.

  • nflfoghorn

    Should read: “[Sherrod's]…not SURE if she wants to return to the USDA.”

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Not to diminish the woman’s personal history nor her enduring struggle to overcome, but seriously, she deserves an award? For telling her story? Sh*t, I have some pretty powerful stories about struggles and overcoming life’s embattling hardships. If I recount some personal narratives can we get a petition going around to get me an award? Forgive the sarcasm, but seriously…

  • stuartzechman

    neorationalist86:
    .
    Seriously, she deserves an award? For telling her story?
    .
    At this stage of the game, it seems as if whatever normal incentives there are for people in high places to tell the truth aren’t particularly effective, so, yes, maybe there should be some kind of award we, the public, can give them for honesty.
    .
    …like standing up for them when they’re smeared and fired.
    .
    That’s really what I meant, as I indicated at the end. It’s not handing out ribbons just for running the race, or gold stars just for showing up to class, it’s rewarding integrity in officials with democratic support.
    .
    Do you have any better ideas on how to change incentives, neorationalist86?

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    I prefer negative reinforcement. Punish those who do wrong, not reward those who are simply doing what they are supposed to. It’s not as if she rose above and beyond conceivable human reactions to her situation. So, she claims to not harbor racist inclinations. Bravo! Give her a cookie.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    By the way, I absolutely reject the idea that her firing was in any way warranted. She certainly deserves to be reinstated. That’s it.

  • stuartzechman

    simply doing what they are supposed to
    .
    Of course I agree in the abstract, but I think this may be a different case, because only in some ideal world is this person merely “doing what they are supposed to.” That’s what makes this episode exceptional.
    .
    I’ll let Greenwald explain it:

    Just as CNN fired Octavia Nasr for one of the few insightful and interesting observations she ever voiced about the Middle East, Sherrod’s speech — which caused her to be fired — is simply inspiring in its uncommon candor, courage and wisdom. Few people are willing so publicly to confess to tribal biases and detail how they struggle to overcome them, even though that’s a challenge which any person who evolves at some point must confront. That process — far more than the pretense of having always been bias-free — requires difficult self-examination, and its public discussion offers vitally needed lessons for everyone. Many people are unwilling ever to engage that process privately, let alone candidly describe it publicly. Those with the courage to do so, like Sherrod, should be heralded for that candor. Instead, she was slandered, falsely disparaged, and fired.

    Unfortunately for us all, the standard you describe doesn’t actually exist in practice, neorationalist86.
    .
    This fact is made painfully apparent by the incentives that greeted Sherrod upon the revelation of her public honesty: she was summarily sacked.
    .
    I’d say we’ll be able to reasonably assume an expectation of candor from public officials, private messaging shops, institutions of journalism, high-level participants in the legal system, Fortune 1000 executives, etc., when “what they are supposed to” becomes the baseline for their success, i.e. when we get done changing them. Until then, yes, punishment is necessary, but the reward of standing behind those with integrity may also required from us.

  • omaar

    Andrew Breibart should be [Sued]

    Because this is the 2nd Time Breitbart has Edited Out Videos involving [Afro Americans] to Stir Up Trouble for Political Gain.

    Remember the Heavily Edited [Acorn Video]

    Now Mrs. Sherrod.

    Fox News, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Brett Beir and Others at Fox News, should also be Sued & Fired.

    The Federal Government should also be [Sued] or Pay Compensation for being [Gullible-Shallow] regarding Not Demanding a Thorough Investigation of Mrs. Sherrod’s Clearly Edited Video Speech and the Hastily Firing of Mrs. Sherrod, without Due and Fair Process.

    For the 1st Time, I Must Say President Obama is Allowing Fox News To Dictate Action & Policy of His Administration Without Fighting them Back.

    President Obama, You’re letting Fox News Dictate To Your Administration Especially Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly & Brett Beir, that their Basically Telling You What to do and who you should Hire & Fire,

    This is [Sad] Indeed.

    Their Basically [Punking-Tricking You] and that makes You a Political Hostage and Prisoner of Fox News, which is Clearly Not a News Company.

    ______________

    Andrew Breitbart: Please Present The Full [Acorn] Video, Oppose to the Heavily Spliced,Edited & Doctored Tape You Made, You Won’t, just like Mrs.Sherrod’s Tape, You Edited-Shortened it Out [Badly] but Good Enough to do Major Damage to those You Seek to Destroy.

    The Federal Government Allowed Breibart’s Crooks & Cronies, Off Easy, Opposed to Giving all Three Men Federal Time, just because President Obama is Scared of some kind of Backlash from Fox News and AM-Hate Radio, Sad indeed.

    Oppose to Enforcing Federal Law, when Breibart’s Crooks-Cronies Broke into a Federal Building, A Senators Office of all Places, in Louisiana, with the Intentions of Wire Tapping her Phones, Yet All Three Men Walked, with Federal Misdemeanors, Because, Yet Again…

    The Administration and The Federal Authorities [Obama Administration] were Scared Of Fox News and AM-Hate Radio, Hate Meisters, Using this on a Daily Basis.
    _________________

    Mr.President: Stand Up,

    Stand Up, Mr. President and Defend Yourself and Your Appointees, Don’t Discard them because of Political Heat from AM-Hate Radio & Fox News .

    No More Passive, Kow-Towing to Fox News & AM-Hate Radio.

    Enough is Enough,

    You Must Meet This Head On,

    Not With Your Head Down

    Or Your [Eyes Closed]

    Not This Time.

    No Sir, Not This Time.

    Read more: http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&bID=537370955#ixzz0uL0JM3m9

  • omaar

    http://mediamatters.org/columns/201003020001

    Breitbart Confirms He was Duped By O’Keefe and the ACORN Pimp Hoax

    If Andrew Breibart is the Holy Grail Of Journalism, God Have Mercy On America and This [Republic]
    __________________

    It turns out that Andrew Breitbart didn’t actually know what was on the ACORN tapes when he helped launch them on his website last year, and used the videos to fuel his oddly personal crusade against the low-income advocacy organization.

    That’s right — Breitbart didn’t know what was on the tapes. Take a few seconds to let the implications of that confession sink in, and what it means to Breitbart’s already dented credibility.

    Recall that for months Breitbart personally vouched for the ACORN videos, braying loudly that they could not be ignored and that they represented the unvarnished truth. Breitbart claimed he had told “the truth” every step of the way about the controversial ACORN clips and bragged that “[t]hroughout the ACORN story I applied my conscience to the material.”

    But now it turns out that Breitbart was fooled by the ACORN pimp hoax and mistakenly assumed, after watching deceptively edited clips from his protégé James O’Keefe, that O’Keefe strolled into ACORN offices wearing the outlandish pimp outfit.

    Now Breitbart, the chief promoter of the ACORN sting, claims he “didn’t know” the truth about the tapes. Although he’s quick to insist it doesn’t really matter anyway.

    And yes, that sound you hear is Breitbart throwing O’Keefe under the bus. Because it’s O’Keefe who Breitbart now blames for the “discrepancy” regarding the pimp hoax. It’s O’Keefe, who Breitbart once touted as a should-be Pulitzer Prize winner, who created the false impression that he walked into ACORN offices last summer dressed as a garish pimp.

    In a video interview posted Monday at Crooks and Liars, Stark Reports, as well as The Brad Blog, Breitbart, filmed by blogger Mike Stark at the recent CPAC convention, claims he did not know the facts about O’Keefe’s pimp outfit. (See video below.)

    Essentially, Breitbart claims he was duped like everyone else who saw the ACORN clips created by O’Keefe. He was duped because at the outset, the misleading clips contain cut-away shots filmed outdoors, which feature O’Keefe decked out in the cane-fur-sunglasses pimp costume. (Breitbart deceptively refers to the dressed-as-pimp section as the “title sequence” of the videos, but it’s really much more than that.)

    It appears that many viewers just assumed O’Keefe wore the get-up while he surreptitiously filmed the ACORN workers who ignited a scandal when they gave O’Keefe and his pretend prostitute girlfriend, Hannah Giles, tax advice on how to run a brothel.

  • 3xfire3

    OH You Hypocrites on the Left
    .
    “Andrew Breibart should be [Sued]

    Because this is the 2nd Time Breitbart has Edited Out Videos involving [Afro Americans] to Stir Up Trouble for Political Gain.

    Remember the Heavily Edited [Acorn Video]

    Now Mrs. Sherrod.

    Fox News, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Brett Beir and Others at Fox News, should also be Sued & Fired.”
    .
    Blame and Demonize Andrew Breitbart. He’s an Evil Rightist.
    .
    Give me a break. The art of taking comments and video clips out of context is practiced daily by most Politicians and Partisans of both Parties, and both Left and Right Wing Medias and Blogs. It is also practiced by the Commentators / Reporters from Time every day on this site. Joe Klein is a Master and PhD in this art form of distorting the facts.
    .
    All of you people on the Left posting to this article are major Hypocrites.
    .
    The NAACP and White House are major Hypocrite and practices this form of distortion on a daily basis.
    .
    Not much Honesty or Honor on this website.
    .
    We all agree Mrs. Sherrod should get her job back. She did not deserve to be fired and it was a stupid act by the White House to throw her under the bus.

  • rose83

    When you’re firing someone because you’re afraid of adverse publicity, you don’t give them a soundbite that will give you adverse publicity.
    .
    It sounds simple, doesn’t it?
    .
    I understand the cowardice in the face of growing right-wing extremism and I understand the willingness to sacrifice this woman for political gain. I deplore it and I find the whole incident incredibly depressing, but I do understand it. The incompetence is what I can’t understand.
    .
    Political operatives, whether in the WH or Vilsack’s office or both, were clearly involved in the decision to fire her. But how is it possible that any professional political operative could be so incompetent?

  • omaar

    Breibart Now Says He’s Sorry to Shirley Sherrod, After The Entire Un-Edited Video is Released and The Public Backlash …
    _________________

    That’s just like a Rapist Telling his Interrogating Detectives after Raping a Woman….
    ___________________

    “I’m Sorry, I Did It, I Didn’t Know, I was Raping A Good Woman”

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Unfortunately, Stuart, it is, in fact, impossible to create higher standards by which to judge officials. The standards are either inherently there as per socialization, or they are not. It’s a reflection of culture, society, trends, etc. These cannot simply be adjusted. I do think, by and large, the social perspective is that people should do the right thing. That is not enough to influence people’s behavior though, because who cares what people think you should do. Hence, the requirement of punishment. I simply don’t see how an award in this case could be explained or justified, no matter that Sherrod look the path less traveled.

  • stuartzechman

    That’s a very interesting thought, neorationalist86, I will consider it.

  • markr1957

    Apparently textee missed the follow-up story on the fraudulent ACORN “Pimps and Ho’s” video, which has been proven beyond doubt to have been edited to create a false story where none existed.
    What is really of concern is that something purporting to be a news organization gladly presents made-up stories without any attempt to verify the source, and then refuses to discipline the culpable parties.
    As for Charlie Gibson’s ignorance of “Obama’s criminal voter fraud outfit ACORN advising a “pimp” and a “ho” how to run a child prostitution ring” – the fact that the story was complete fiction is justification for ‘ignorance’.

  • 3xfire3

    omaar,
    .
    Did you read my post 18.1?
    .
    Are you going to put as much work into demonizing all those people , blogs, medias, Politicians, White House personnel and others on the Left that take comments and videos out of context on a daily bases? If not why not? Are you just another Left Wing Hypocrite who is blinded by their ideology?
    .
    How can anyone in this country have a rational discussion of important issues if people on both sides only see evil when it’s the other side performing the act? They are blind to the fact that their side is doing the same thing. That doesn’t make it right. Both sides are wrong.

  • inc123

    Yes, she is out of touch with racial history. did you not hear the stuff she made up about how 400 years ago whitey elites wanted to stop all the interracial marriages and so devised a plan to keep races apart by discriminating against blacks? What world is she from? Does she know nothign about American and World history? What an idiot. Since likes an reasonable education, she should nto hold any job of any consequence. She is an embarassment, and a racist.

  • maverick2k9

    Is this for real?? Or is my sarcasm detection meter isn’t working today?

  • maverick2k9

    3x – Some examples of how Joe got his PhD in distortion would be nice.
    .
    Otherwise, your fact free rant will only lower you to the level of textee and his “mickey mouse” conspiracy theories.

  • herby002

    Maverick,
    I think he/she is serious. Inci123 is taking part of the speech at around minute 42.xx of the video, then twisting Sherrod’s remarks to say she was saying something she didn’t say. Breitbart is lying the same way today. After it was shown that he cut/pasted/edited this video to create a lie, he still says that the NAACP audience laughed and applauded her “racist” comments. I saw his clip, and I saw the real video. He is lying.

  • marianelizabeth

    way to go Fox (aledged) news. Mrs. Sherrod was telling an important story that all of us have experienced in some way. She found herself not being helpful, and then finding the true way to be an American and a government employee. She humbly admitted in a public setting her shortfall. How courageous. Your station, as usual, cut out the Important Facts of her recovery, slandered her character at every chance, and now blame everyone else. When I was a child I was assaulted by an Hispanic man. It took me about 30 years to stop being afraid of Hispanics, and I actually made an effort to have men of all races in my circle. We all have this kind of crap in our lives. Admitting our mistakes, as Mrs. Sherrod did, takes a lot of courage. M

  • ajbruno14

    One point.
    One constant, critics of the Tea Party do not want to discuss the issues. All their rhetoric is personal attacks, name calling, etc.

    Important issues need to be discussed, but this will not occur as long as the media indulge inflammatory criticism not provide a venue for serious and intelligent
    conversations.

    ajbruno14@gmail.com

blog comments powered by Disqus