Afternoon Miscellany

–By a 13-6 margin, the Senate Judiciary Committee backed Elena Kagan’s nomination for a spot on the Supreme Court, sending her candidacy to the full Senate for final confirmation. The vote split nearly along party lines, with South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham the only Republican to cross the aisle in support of Kagan. The New York Times has a handy GOP vote tracker.

–ABC News illustrates how the oil spill is reshaping races around the country, as candidates scramble to “seize the opportunity created by this crisis.” In light of the pounding President Obama has absorbed over his handling of the disaster, Slate examines how a Republican chief executive might have handled the issue differently.

–Real Clear Politics surveys the fall’s statehouse races, and says the Democrats could be in for a drubbing.

William Finnegan explains why “the battle to pass immigration reform may end up making the struggle over health care look mild.”

–Nowhere is the art of manufacturing controversy more prized than on Capitol Hill, but Politico raises the bar in this piece, which wonders whether reporter William Arkin’s past stints with groups like Greenpeace and Human Rights Watch compromise the Washington Post’s trenchant look into the post-Sept. 11 national security system. I’m not sure whether it’s more staggering that the story mentions only a sole complaint from an avowedly conservative website, or the fact that the (excellent) series it objects to is devoted to exposing redundancy and the growth of government–phenomena to which conservatives are traditionally opposed.

–And the Economist takes a look at the hubbub surrounding Proposition 19, a November ballot initiative that would revolutionize California’s marijuana industry.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • newfreedomblog

    Hi Alex:
    .
    Any news on when we might see a TIME.com post on either the rampant race baiting from the Democrat Party, other nefarious left-wing groups like the NAACP or how the liberal media was in cahoots to keep Obama’s pristine record intact during the 2008 elections?
    .
    Here is a link, check it out.
    .

    “It was the moment of greatest peril for then-Sen. Barack Obama’s political career. In the heat of the presidential campaign, videos surfaced of Obama’s pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U.S. government and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright. Now the black nationalist preacher’s rhetoric was threatening to torpedo Obama’s campaign.

    The crisis reached a howling pitch in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them. Stephanopoulos asked, “Do you think Reverend Wright loves America as much as you do?”

    Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged. “George [Stephanopoulos],” fumed Richard Kim of the Nation, is “being a disgusting little rat snake.”

    Others went further. According to records obtained by The Daily Caller, at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.

    In one instance, Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”

    Michael Tomasky, a writer for the Guardian, also tried to rally his fellow members of Journolist: “Listen folks–in my opinion, we all have to do what we can to kill ABC and this idiocy in whatever venues we have. This isn’t about defending Obama. This is about how the [mainstream media] kills any chance of discourse that actually serves the people.”

    “Richard Kim got this right above: ‘a horrible glimpse of general election press strategy.’ He’s dead on,” Tomasky continued. “We need to throw chairs now, try as hard as we can to get the call next time. Otherwise the questions in October will be exactly like this. This is just a disease.”

    (In an interview Monday, Tomasky defended his position, calling the ABC debate an example of shoddy journalism.)

    Thomas Schaller, a columnist for the Baltimore Sun as well as a political science professor, upped the ante from there. In a post with the subject header, “why don’t we use the power of this list to do something about the debate?” Schaller proposed coordinating a “smart statement expressing disgust” at the questions Gibson and Stephanopoulos had posed to Obama.

    “It would create quite a stir, I bet, and be a warning against future behavior of the sort,” Schaller wrote.

    Tomasky approved. “YES. A thousand times yes,” he exclaimed.

    The members began collaborating on their open letter. Jonathan Stein of Mother Jones rejected an early draft, saying, “I’d say too short. In my opinion, it doesn’t go far enough in highlighting the inanity of some of [Gibson's] and [Stephanopoulos's] questions. And it doesn’t point out their factual inaccuracies …Our friends at Media Matters probably have tons of experience with this sort of thing, if we want their input.”

    .
    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/20/documents-show-media-plotting-to-kill-stories-about-rev-jeremiah-wright/print/#ixzz0uFRd9bB6
    .
    I think there is a reference in there someplace about TIME’s Journalist being part of the “Journo-list”. Might be an interesting article.

  • m0mentom0ri

    Yes, Rusty, no one heard about Rev Wright all during the campaign. No one even know who he is until you mentioned him today.
    .
    Here’s some more background on Rev Wright:
    .
    In 1961 Wright left college and joined the United States Marine Corps and became part of the 2nd Marine Division attaining the rank of private first class. In 1963, after two years of service, Wright joined the United States Navy and entered the Corpsman School at the Great Lakes Naval Training Center.[8][13] Wright was then trained as a cardiopulmonary technician at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. Wright was assigned as part of the medical team charged with care of President Lyndon B. Johnson (see photo of Wright caring for Johnson after his 1966 surgery). Before leaving the position in 1967, the White House Physician, Vice Admiral Burkley, personally wrote Wright a letter of thanks on behalf of the United States President.
    .
    While I know you like dividing people by race. And I know how much you want to protect “welfare Blacks” from themselves. And I know how much you love this story because you feel like this perfectly demonstrates that its the ‘welfare Blacks’ who are the real racists…
    .
    But I’m willing to view Rev Wright as a man who served his country on the battlefield and in public service, who then went on to serve his community as a spiritual leader. Which is more than most people do for their country and community. Especially when you’re core philosophy can be summarized as “I got mine, screw you.”
    .
    Someone like yourself only sees the intemperate and ill-founded remarks he made late in his career. Because that is exactly what you want to see.

  • Alex Altman

    Accusing the “Democrat” Party of “rampant race baiting” in the same sentence as a jab at “nefarious left-wing groups like the NAACP” is priceless. Thanks. I’m not on Journolist, so it’s impossible for me to say whether the emails the Daily Caller highlighted are representative, but I think the story’s interpretation of the reaction to Stephanopoulos’s question is wrong. It seems like their objection was not to “tough” questions–my guess is most pols would tee off on a softball like that–but to bad ones.

  • ilikechips

    Alex, seriously though..try a little balance in your reporting.no doubt you are pandering to your fellow libs here..take a look at all the posts you have made and see if they seem balanced to you.

  • ilikechips

    Alex, instead of touting Kagan..perhaps a story or mention on how she has the lowest approval of any recent supreme court nominee. I know you have probably joined the liberal MSM boycott of the story on the NAACP banquet speaker admitting her racism.. Which is just delicious after the NAACP and liberal MSM kept touting how the tea party is racist..absolutely hilarious and is why Fox news blows everybody away. The bias is blatant these days people are just tuning out the MSM

  • newfreedomblog

    Thank you Alex for your kind reponse. I also find it “priceless”. But, do you think you could ask around TIME.com to see who all during this time period was also on “Journolist”? I am just a little curious is all.
    .
    I personally think most all of the questions put to Mr Obama at the time of the debates were nothing but “softballs” even a fledgling pol would ‘tee off on’.
    .
    I think my point which you may be missing is the fact those journalists involved while you may say have the right to express their ideology, and perhaps throw softball questions, but have we ever seen this level of protection before in our history by such a large group of journalists?
    .
    To be quite honest, and I never liked Hillary Clinton at all, but the liberal media’s treatment of her as opposed to Obama even made me feel sorry for her.

  • Alex Vallas

    It is pathetic and extremely immature for the Republican members of Congress to vote enmasse against virtually everything the President or Dems propose. They remind me of teenage girls who all ban together and not talk to a girl who showed them up by acing an exam. On a serious note, what is really scary is the fact that they do this indicating a lack of individual thoughts or opinions. They let Mumbling McConnell and Boozing Boehner dictate their votes.

  • Alex Altman

    Chips: Not sure why you say I’m “touting” Kagan. Where do you see judgment in that blurb? And I should have a story up later today about the Tea Party. Let me know what you think.

  • apr2563

    http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/07/white-houses-weak-back-hand.html
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    What Digby said via Atrios.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Tell me who was most craven in this situation:
    /
    Brietbart who again edited a video and will not release the complete video?
    /
    The reporters who latched on to the story knowing its source and promoting it?
    /
    The Ag Department for making the woman resign?
    /
    Or, the administration for not investigating the truth before caving to the right?
    /
    I know what I believe.

  • shepherdwong

    I just have to ask, does Rush Limbaugh’s @ss taste like oxycontin?

  • newfreedomblog

    April
    /
    Tell
    /
    Us
    /
    What
    /
    YOU
    /
    Believe!!

  • sy2d

    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

    White House duped by Breitbart and Fox again. CNN scoops MSM.
    http://cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2010/07/20/nr.bts.sherrod.farmer.cnn

  • shepherdwong

    “Tell me who was most craven in this situation…”
    .
    Tom Vilsak.

  • shepherdwong

    “Slate examines how a Republican chief executive might have handled the issue differently.”
    .
    He would have baked John McCain a birthday cake?
    .
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/24/mccain-and-katrina-ravage_n_98470.html

  • shepherdwong

    Whoops. Must be because there’s no sack in Tom Vilsak.

  • m0mentom0ri

    “Or, the administration for not investigating the truth before caving to the right?”
    .
    Ding, ding, ding!

  • m0mentom0ri

    Rusty’s list of questions (allegedly):
    .
    “Mr Obama, how much do you hate America and why?”
    .
    “Mr. Obama, why were you born in Kenya?”
    .
    “Mr. Obama, do you plan on declaring ‘marshall law’ in your first year or your second year?”
    .
    “Mr. Obama, when will you cut off all the ‘welfare Blacks’ who steal tax money from the hard-working, Real Americans™?”

  • m0mentom0ri

    “Fox news blows everybody…”
    .
    snicker

  • Paul-no not that one

    Hay-Zeus, this administration falls for bull easier than a comment section on a blog.
    .
    At least here people ask for links and evidence.
    .
    Such a bunch of wimps.

  • porkdumpling

    You people are ridiculous. Neither Vilsack nor the WH are the villains in this piece, just the easily swayed. (Though after all the grief they’re getting for New Panthers and the NAACP, maybe they just didn’t want to deal.)
    .
    By far the most craven is Andrew “blowhard’ Breitbart, who manipulated and falsified video with absolutely no care of how it would effect a good person’s life and livelihood. Breitbart shows again that he views the killing shot as a game and skews the media unfairly. It’s one thing to go after politicians, but to go after a lifetime civil servant just diligently doing their job is below the actions of a slug. He is truly lower than pond scum.

  • Paul-no not that one

    The administration can’t control what the Breitbart/Drudge/FNC puts out there but they dang sure can control their response.
    .
    This stuff isn’t going to stop anytime soon. And you can take away any chance at all of it not accelerating if the administration keeps falling for it.
    .
    It is their job “to deal”.

  • Ivy_B

    Well never mind. National Public Radio, that old leftist site just did a long story on this and the other ginned up story giving full credit and details about the rightwing faux statements, thus giving them credibility although they also gently point out that the assumptions are false.
    .
    This is so depressing. Facts, schmacts, who cares.

  • newfreedomblog

    mr momento:
    .
    If you really want to know my motive behind my posting of these various comments for the past week+, it is not about black folks, nor Jeremiah Wright, not Van Jones or Ms Sherrod’s discussion at the NAACP.
    .
    It does however have everything to do with our DO NOTHING media. The media our founding Fathers hoped would be that last bastion of hope against any potential tyrannical government.
    .
    It is a hope that our media will be non-partisan, non-biased and use this form of communication to tell us the truth. To inform us as citizens who work hard all day long and do not have the pleasure to be in Washington or other capitols in the States we live to keep us simply informed. Informed of what is going on with OUR government and those we have elected to be our representatives. It is a hope we can count on the media in general to be truthful and diligent to bring us that truth.
    .
    Unfortunately, the media has failed. Failed us miserably. Failed us to the point that most Americans do not trust the media, and believe what they say.
    .
    Time after time you see right here in the swamp both those on the right and the left who question the writers here. Where are your sources? How did you come to this conclusion? Why did you report this?
    .
    We need a media who is unbiased so we do not turn into a country like Venezuela, China or the old Soviet Union. Unfortunately, our media today is nothing more than a lapdog for the political elites in Washington. Nothing more.
    .
    But again, if it makes you feel real special to make fun of me, or call me a racist go right ahead. It only makes me even more determined to expose not only the biased lapdog media we have today, but to also expose them as the threat against this great country of ours they have turned into.

  • Paul-no not that one

    But how can they be false?
    .
    Someone DID have to lose their job so it must be true.
    .
    That’s what folding gets you.

  • shepherdwong

    NPR succumbed to “fair-and-balanced” center-right Village PC years ago.

  • 53_3

    I nite out with the family:
    .
    $200
    .
    Having a major barbecue fest with neighbors on the 4th of July:
    .
    $150
    .
    Watching Rusty the Racist get spanked for a second time by pundits at Swampland:
    .
    Absliartly fjarking PRICELESS!

  • 53_3

    Watching not only Rusty the Racist take two, then seeing Ilikechips toke one for the team:
    .
    Beyond fjarking absliartly teetotaling PRICELESS!

  • newfreedomblog

    Ah welcome back IQ53. Glad to see you can’t hold up to your word. But, what else is surprising these days. You gave it a good 48 hours or so.
    .
    I guess when the truth is exposed, and you have nothing to combat the truth, then simply calling someone a racist is the next best option.
    .
    Just like your little buddies in the liberal lame stream media. You make me feel special. I am in the company of Karl Rove and Fred Barnes. I feel honored to say the least. Thank you.

  • newfreedomblog

    Yea chips, I think I will do a blog post on my own site.
    .

    “The Once Great News Organizations In America: How the infestation of progressivism has ruin TIME Magazine”

    .
    I’ll bet you’ll see Santa Claus posting something from the North Pole before Alex ever gets around to posting something positive about the TEA Party.
    .
    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

  • newfreedomblog

  • newfreedomblog

  • nflfoghorn

    “Fox news blows everybody away”
    .
    Ratings-wise, that’s like “American Idol” beating out “Meet the Press”…Top 40 out-rating news-talk (in most markets, not in North FL :) )…rasslin’ over Greco-Roman wrestling. And AA has some nerve to assume that neocons THINK.

  • ohiolibb

    Actually, Rusty, we call you racist because you say racist things and then blame it on other posters.

  • nflfoghorn

    “[...Republicans, if they were in power] would have mobilized more oil-collecting skimmers sooner. ‘It took the administration 70 days to order skimmers down to the Gulf,’ [Sen. Rhymes with Mitch] McConnell [R-Turtleland] said on Sunday. Sen. George Le[Purrrr] of Florida, the leader of the Skim, Baby, Skim caucus, has been equally frustrated. ‘We need every resource, domestic and foreign alike, in the Gulf, and we needed them yesterday,’ he said on the Senate floor June 30. ‘In fact, we needed them 50 days ago.’”
    .
    IIRC, weren’t the skimmers available around Day 20?

  • nflfoghorn

    Shep @ 1.4: Why don’t we ask Kobe Bryant? ;)

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.”
    .

    .
    The sound of wingnut laughter.

  • nflfoghorn

    Why won’t BrightBoy release the full speech? Is he afraid that the full context of the speech will reveal the intent of her point [i.e., you can't judge a book by its cover] versus taking snippets and using them as prima facie “evidence” of racism?
    .
    The National Association for the Advancement of Certain People did indeed get duped and owes this lady an apology.
    .
    Vil-No-sak overreacted.
    .
    And BO needs to have another race speech at the ready.

  • nflfoghorn

    …and fool me multiple times, I watch Flox.

  • 53_3

    I think he tried, ohiolib, he really tried.
    .
    He just has no idea of how not to be racist…

  • m0mentom0ri

    “It is a hope that our media will be non-partisan, non-biased and use this form of communication to tell us the truth.”
    .
    I actually agree with you on this, Rusty. But if you think Newsbusters, WorldNetDaily and FoxNews are the cure, you’re simply trading one bias for another. And that’s granting that the rest of media is a neo-socialist propaganda arm of ACORN and George Soros. Which it isn’t. Corporatist, maybe, but liberal? You must have slept through the Clinton years if you believe that.
    .
    You could also practice what you preach, and not be a knee-jerk caricature of a right-wing reactionary, but I’m skeptical. At least try to stick to the facts, when yo do.

  • apr2563

    We know what Breitbart is. Anyone who takes him as a serious journalist is a fool. You see the name Briebart and bells and whistles should follow. Yet the administration caved immidiately without investigating the truth. In my mind, they are the most craven. Breitbart is just an immoral creep.

  • firebatfox

    “In light of the pounding President Obama has absorbed over his handling of the disaster, Slate examines how a Republican chief executive might have handled the issue differently.”

    Duh. If in charge, the GOP would have handled the Gulf Oil Spill by cutting taxes.

  • http://tgace.wordpress.com/ tgace

  • http://tgace.wordpress.com/ tgace

  • porkdumpling

    Yes, we all know what Breitbart is: a racist sack of s**t. But your question was who on the list was most craven. Vilsack and the WH are guilty of being duped and of spinelessness, but Breitbart knowingly and maliciously manipulated video using this lady as a pawn for his political games.
    .
    And now who are the easily duped? You are, who jump to do Breitbart’s bidding by pointing at the WH just as he intended. Be proud of yourselves for falling so easily, just as Vilsack did.

  • ohiolibb

    The problem, momento, is that facts come from reality,. and reality has a well-known liberal bias.

blog comments powered by Disqus