Financial Regulatory Committee Conference to Reconvene

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd stood an hour ago in the Senator’s Retiring Room off of the Senate floor in an intense conversation with Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown – one of surely many they will have today. Dodd is trying to get Brown, one of four Republicans who voted for the Senate version of financial regulatory reform, to pledge his support for final passage. House and Senate negotiators last week worked out a deal to combine the two measures only to find that Brown couldn’t support $18+ billion in new bank fees. To complicate matters, Democrats are now down a vote due to the untimely death of Senator Robert Byrd, a West Virginia Democrat.

Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, and House Financial Service Chairman Barney Frank are planning on taking the unusual step of reopening the conference committee this afternoon. Lucky for them it wasn’t formally closed or reopening it would’ve taken votes from both chambers of Congress. They have been negotiating with the four Republicans – Brown, Maine Senators Olympia Snowe Susan Collins and Iowa’s Chuck Grassley — on new offsets for the $18+ billion. Dodd says that 90% of the $18+ billion would now be paid for by the immediate end of TARP, the unpopular bank bailout fund due to expire October 3. The additional offset would come from raising fees the banks pay to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, exempting all small banks under $10 billion capitalization (Dodd says he’s spoke to Sheila Bair on this and she’s fine with it). Some Republicans still have reservations that such a move, though, wouldn’t prompt the banks to pass the cost on to consumers. “Repealing TARP definitely appeals to me,” says Snowe, who met with Dodd in her office last night and again this morning.  “At this point other issues are not related to the TARP part, we’re still looking at how you replace those fees. So things are still in motion here, there are a lot of conservations developing.”

Brown, emerging from his meeting with Dodd, says he’s waiting to see the final product and hasn’t made any decisions yet. Brown sent Dodd and Frank a letter this morning announcing his opposition to the $18+ billion in fees, prompting today’s dramatics. Collins told reporters she was pleased with her meetings with Dodd but that she also had made no final decision. Grassley was nowhere to be found. “I gather there were a number of people who were uneasy with the earlier pay-for who like this alternative and so the present plan is to probably reconvene the conference this afternoon,” Dodd said, heading into a meeting in Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s offices. If all four Republicans sign on, Dems should have enough votes to pass the Senate as they race to finish the legislation by the end of the week.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: chris dodd, financial regulatory reform, scott brown, tarp, Congress, Democratic Party, Economy, Republican Party, Senate
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • 53_3

    I think that it can be a done deal.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Jay. Are you there live or elsewhere / watching on cspan? If live, can you grab Feingold for an interview (literally) to make him tell you directly his opposition? How soon can Gov. Manchin appt. Byrd’s successor and fly his ass up to DC / swear him in? Thanks for your tweets / work here on this issue Jay. Too bad you didn’t get to cover Russian spy ring, but MS did a good job there and you’ll be kept up to date on that in posts, emails, and tweets, no doubt.

  • stuartzechman

    Really appreciate this reporting, Jay Newton-Small, thank you.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Thanks for this report, Jay. Sounds like a lot of effort went into getting the info for these three paragraphs.

  • shepherdwong

    I’d love to see the phrase, “to overcome the Republicans’ blanket filibuster,” in every one of these vote-counting stories but, other than that, good reporting, JNS. Thank you.

  • formerlyjames

    I hope the FBI had Special Agent Hanssen/Smart on the scene searching out Russian spies seeking access to the policy makers.

  • nflfoghorn

    Filibuster: Everybody threatens it, nobody actually does it.

  • gysgt213

    Hmm, guess the hand job from Obama’s people didn’t do the trick on Brown.

  • artraveler

    Get out the cots and dust them off. Make them filibuster. And no more breaks for week-ends or vacation until they get through this and the budget bills. If they don’t have a chance to run for re-election, too bad. Make them do their jobs first.

  • carotexas1

    I thought tarp was taxpayer money, so Brown, Collins and Snowe want to use this money instead of taxing banks, and the Dem’s are going to cave in to pass this bill.
    Did they suggest using these funds for helping the unemployed when they would not vote for the unemployment bill to have a vote?

blog comments powered by Disqus